on a scale from 1-10, how good is this painting?

just a side note, this is an picture that has been turned into painting using a computer algorithm

>>2357134

I don't know if it's the algorithm but the compression looks really bad, Do you have another example with better quality?

Bob Ross/10

>rate this painting
>not a painting

ok

>>2357134
Making edges more rough isn't what makes a painting a painting.

File: ex01.png (542KB, 521x665px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 521x665px

>>2357134
3-4/10 for me

technical aspect apart, there isn't much going on. I find the golden spot garish in contrast to the rest of the painting and while being the center of attraction of the piece, there nothing going on in it.

I propose this crop. I put the river at the center of attention, it's still not very interesting, but I find it more pleasing

>>2357135
as a side note?

it just looks like a badly compressed photo. what is there to talk about?

Dougle psych!

It was actually painted by a human.

Sick realistic ;) looks like photo. My rate is 10, really amazing, love that lighting effects

The composition is shit.