>English teacher makes us art
>Trace hand and draw random abstract thing
>Asks me specifically to make something that looks meaningful
>inb4 only gave us crayons
How'd I do for a 2-3 minute project?
You traced a hand and had the revolutionary idea of putting a flower on it. To make it 'look meaningful'. And you post it here in 2 threads, asking for critique.
What do you want to hear, exactly?
Comments on how the hand looks? On the design of the flower? On the colouring? On the idea?
Because there's not much to be said on what you've done. It's hard to care about something that was done in 2-3 minutes for an English project, the anatomy was traced, so it's slightly off in places, the idea isn't particularly interesting or new, and the choice of colours isn't particularly pretty.
Sorry if you were expecting a pat on a shoulder or a "you sure did a good job on that project there, anon!".
Move on with your life from this goddamn English project. Make something actually cool and worth showing. Nobody's saying you can't.
you are literally 13 years old
you want critique on your fucking traced crayon drawing? go ask your parents what they think and watch the disappointment wash over their face while they force out a compliment