>>1287818 i didn't want to join in this argument, but i really dislike that picture. oh well.
>labels are for soup cans and what exactly are they used for on soup cans? because we like to read? we use labels to classify different types of soup to easily explain what's in them and what they taste like, so everybody else can tell which are relevant to them without having to try them all. it works exactly the same way for sexuality; the most convenient (and relevant) example is porn. if you want porn relevant to you, you use a label. the label might not fit what you're searching for perfectly - maybe you typed 'gay porn' and you were looking for twinks specifically - but it narrows down the selection to something manageable, so you don't have to sift through all the bullshit everybody else is into. next example: online dating/hookups. imagine trying to search through every person on a website without using a label - after typing "men who like men" a few times, that will become a label on its own. the world would get nowhere without labels; it's a natural human habit to classify things, and we do it with everything. just look at biology. we classify all plants as 'plants', but no rational person expects a tree (lets use an oak for example) to be the exact same as a vegetable (eg Hawking). in the same way, we can't expect every straight person to be the exact same in terms of their sexuality. some straight people (>>1286933, >>1287186, >>1287191, >>1287240, >>1287810) might be into this kind of shit, and some plants might have remarkably animal-like traits (venus fly catcher is a well known example). that doesn't mean they aren't plants, or that the above anons are gay, or most importantly, that labels are somehow useless. we gain a lot by classifying a venus fly catcher as a plant; we might be surprised that it can sense and move like an animal, but from that label we know a ton about the rest of its behavior. /rant
>>1287982 >ost of the man-on-man action that happens, boyo, are 'straight' dudes hooking up with other 'straight' dudes I am a gay man who has almost only straight male friends. We're all extremely open about shit, but none of them have ever done anything gay with another guy. Admittedly 20 or so is a small sample size, but if 0/20 have experimented, it seems extremely unlikely the actual population of straight men have over half experimenting as you claim.
You're either a "straight" guy trying to maintain your internal heterosexuality or you're a gay guy who gets off on straight guys experimenting. And that's fine, but your'e just saying patently false things. The vast majority of straight men will never touch another man's penis. It's as simple as that.
>>1286933 1. Tell her how you like her erotic ass. 2. Touch her asshole every now and then during foreplay. 3. Imply you'd like to explore that way. 4. Do sweet tender enjoyable anal experience for her. 5. Ask her how it feels (good?) 6. Coerce her to express something in style of "you would like it" 7. Shyly accept. 8. Enjoy.
>>1288898 yeah, exactly. i feel like an idiot from how easily you summed that up when it took me a whole post to explain what i meant haha >>1288633 sorry anon (no sarcasm), but if you bring people together there's always gonna be discussions/debates. you're only joining in by adding another opinion like that
>>1288086 >labels are good because they can help you find porn Idiotic. Doesn't give any argument as to why labels are even remotely good to apply to people. Or maybe we should start labelling people as "fisters" and "sodomites" because "that's what turns them on, so that's what they are.
>>1290947 you're missing my point entirely, anon. let's say we somehow get rid of labels entirely: what would you call gay people? how would you refer to them/us without a label? labels are good to apply to people for the same reason they're good for everything else: they categorize things. labeling people as "fisters" is perfectly valid if you're trying to refer to people who like fisting, and people trying to define other people by their sexual interests is a whole other issue. >Doesn't give any argument as to why labels are even remotely good to apply to people. yeah, i figured it'd be obvious enough from analogies, but whatever i'll use a direct example this time ex: gay people are more likely to get HIV. this is valuable information that needs to be known, and how would you phrase it without using labels? you could replace 'gay people' with 'people who have anal sex', but isn't that just another label in it's own right? i still don't feel like i'm phrasing it perfectly, but hopefully you get what i mean this time.
>>1286933 You wont try it just once,oh no not just once.There is no feeling like the moment a nice cock goes full depth,that first plunge.Your girlfriend can understand that .Try to get her interested in pegging you.I came out as bi to my wife before we were married.when she first wore the strapon she was shy and hesitant.Now she gets rough and cums with her clit butterfly vibe as she fucksme.
After pegging me for a while and really liking it,she suprised me by inviting an old lover of mine over for dinner.after a nice dinner we smoked a joint in the living room .She suddenly switched to her "mistress voice" ,ordering me to strip and suck.I had hot sex with my friend while she watched and filmed us.She masturbated furiously and later told me it was her best orgasm ever from bating .This kind of thing changes the dynamic of the relationship however.She has little interest in me fucking her anymore.She is lately getting into rougher ass play and some ball torture.the other night she had me tied up and got into a cruel place and lightly played a lighter flame over my asshole,then dildoed me without lube while pulling hard on my balls.....However I am having the time of my life lately.She has since invited my old boyfriend over 4 more times and filmed our increasingly rough sessions,now she joins in and has dildoed me while I eat his cum.Now she is talking about carefully arranging to have me gang banged,paying for STD testing for the guys first and filming and posting the gangbang on the internet...And this from a girl who was shy and hesitant about pegging me 6 months ago.Its been a fast ride down a slippery slope to probable cucktitude,but Im having the time of my life.
>>1286933 Well, although I primarily top, I've bottomed a few times before, and it can be very enjoyable, if done right.
So long as you clean yourself often and loosen your hole up by fingering/using a dildo, it should be a pleasant experience, when you finally take a cock up there.
Just keep in mind that if your ass isn't stretched enough to take the size of the cock that's entering you, you may experience one of the deepest, sharpest pains I've ever encountered. So make sure the top isn't a total asshole and shove it in fast, or ignores you when you tell him to stop or slow down. You need some trust.
But, all that aside, it's one of the most enjoyable sexual experiences I've ever had. The feeling is very unique, quite unlike topping, and orgasms are far more intense, last longer, and can be felt in almost your entire pelvic region, instead of just your dick.
With the right guy, I'd highly recommend trying it out. And if you're bi, or lean more towards straight, I guess pegging would work. I've never been pegged before though, because I don't date women, being a total fag myself, so I can't say whether it's good or not.
Regardless, if your girlfriend loves you, then she'd at least try to understand your preferences. If she can't handle you being bi, or at least bi-curious, then I'd probably seek another girlfriend, or even better, a boyfriend.
>>1297145 >But, all that aside, it's one of the most enjoyable sexual experiences I've ever had. The feeling is very unique, quite unlike topping, and orgasms are far more intense, last longer, and can be felt in almost your entire pelvic region, instead of just your dick. Just based on the number of postings of bottoms looking for tops, this has to be true (don't know personally... yet?).
When i was young and in denial i thought butt sex was the dirty and gross kind of penetration. Nowadays I find anal more pleasureable to watch tan vaginal penetration. When the ass is clean and shaved it actually is more aesthetically pleasing than a slimy and foldy cunt.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.