What does /his/ think about this book? I read it and it was k.

a fag who sells his shittier researched books, seperating alt-right wingers from their shekels.

>>621267
>taking advice on how to be a man from a guy who sucks dicks

shiggy

It's a bit faggy. The equivalent of I am woman hear me roar shit.

>>621267
>Men's rights
What a cuck.

>>621300
This desu. All these neo-manliness things tend to be a bit silly.

If you really want manly books, don't read books that try to be manly. Read these:

Storm of Steel - Ernst Junger
The Saga of the Volsungs
The Iliad & The Odyssey - Homer
The Gallic War - Julius Caesar

>>621267
I was seriously considering buying it until I found out the author was a homosexual, which automatically discredits more than half of the thigns he says in that book

>>621334
This is the correct answer ITT. If you seriously read these type of "how to be a man" books then youre definitively not a man. Its tryhard and pathetic tbqhf.

>>621323
It's about gays, idiot.

>book about being manly
>written by an actual faggot
yeah no

How is him being a fag relevant?

He criticized effeminate males a great deal.

>>621770
Contrary to the popular belief, you can't be manly if you're gay.

>>622175
/sarcasm?

I mean how is fucking men (as dominant obviously) less masculine than fucking women?

See that one comedian about how gays are more masculine because they wanna fuck a bloke, mate.

It's a fun little book, doesn't delve too deep, but contains a lot of reasonable stuff. Would recommend reading it to those who haven't already

File: Sam Hyde.jpg (501KB, 955x804px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 955x804px

>>622209
It's just obvious to most people that guys who like getting their dicks all shitty up another guy's hairy butthole aren't the best role models for how to be a man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjPQ_jVlEnQ

>>621267
I always found it pretty Ironic how many "Macho" men call guys who aren't as insecure as them gay when gays historicly have been Macho Bears

File: 1439669599349.jpg (14KB, 500x321px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 500x321px

>>622282
>It's just obvious
It's not though, sticking your dick up a male butthole (filthy or clean, hairy or shaved) doesn't look like it has anything to do with traditional masculinity.

File: SHHHHHH.jpg (35KB, 360x345px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 360x345px

>>622344
Yeah but poop is still gross and people who want it near their genitals shouldn't be surprised if they don't get taken seriously.

>>622209
>gays are more masculine because they wanna fuck a bloke

desu that makes sense to me. i don't get why wanting to fuck someone soft and pretty and feminine makes you manlier.

File: 1382943142319.png (719KB, 446x1000px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 446x1000px

>>622344
>sticking your dick up a male butthole doesn't look like it has anything to do with traditional masculinity
Are you serious?

>>622352
>poop is still gross
gays also think poop is gross. what makes you think men have poopy butts naturally but female porn stars for example do not

>>622404
Let me show you the truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euXQbZDwV0w

>>622344
It assumes your dominance over him.

File: 1445491954635.jpg (587KB, 1024x993px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1024x993px

>>622404
Anal sex is disgusting no matter who does it.

It's the equivalent of playing in a sewage facility and it mistakes an exit for an entrance.

>>622427
Don't you have mass to go attend or something

File: YgSuZYA[1].jpg (42KB, 450x345px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 450x345px

>>622352
WOAH BIG DAWGS

>/pol/tards eating themselves alive in the war of masculine gays

So this is how the NEET Empire dies?

A fag with deep insecurities about his masculinity so he has to write a 200 page mental gymnasium to show how much of a man he really is.

File: putin56.jpg (94KB, 2140x1605px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 2140x1605px

>>622431
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
- Leviticus 18:22

>>622421
that it does.
But that's positive innit?

>>622442
I'd say so. There's a reason the Greeks and Romans didn't consider it shameful if you were the penetrator.

>>622437
Not at all, actually, he only talks about what it meant to be a man in traditional societies and sees a very insightful distinction between being a good man vs. Being good AT being a man, but I wouldn't expect a machiatto swilling noodle-armed faggot like you to get it. Keep talking shit bruh no one ITT would last a fucking day in a survival scenario. Neither would I but at least I'm not some memer with a lisp and an autographed copy of some gay hipster shit like neutral meme hotel talking shit about ways of life I have absolutely no experience with

File: 1424558244788.png (216KB, 506x538px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 506x538px

>>622431
>implying that's bad
>in any way

But going back to OP's topic. I'm quite comfortable/satisfied with my masculinity so I personally don't see much gain in owning such books.

However if the author actually bashes on effeminate guys as other post said, then I guess it could help fruity faggots into becoming more normal

>>622513
Whenever someone has sexual hang ups they're usually religious. just sayin family

>>622517
source?

File: nailed it.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>622437
nailed it

>>622521
General observation, I'm not writing a fucking paper here.

>>622404
>poopy butts
/his/ - History and Humanities

File: PLEB PATROL.jpg (75KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 500x500px

>>622434

I have this awesome dream of a guy like this author getting hunted down by the amazons of dahomey.

>>622982
He'd probably die.

But a squad of Dahomey amazons wouldn't last against an Impi. (Another subsaharan African kind of soldier)

>>622209
>Getting fucked in the ass
>Masculine
>Sucking dick
>Masculine

>>623097
If you are the one doing the fucking, that's masculine(dominant). If you are the receiver, that's feminine. It ain't rocket science.

File: way it is.webm (2MB, 346x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 346x225px

>>623105
And if you are a man who fucks men, you are a faggot.

>>623105
Yes, but being in a sustained relationship with another man requires some reciprocation.

Otherwise yes, it's totally no homo and not even gay.

File: 1446611850651.jpg (50KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x600px

>>623126
>Getting fucked in the ass
>Sucking dick

>it's totally no homo and not even gay.

>>623120
Depends. If you reciprocate and get fucked, you are definitely gay.
Take prison rape for instance. The bulls who do the fucking ain't necessarily fags, they'd probably get tons of pussy outside prison.

File: 1444234090233.jpg (11KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 200x200px

>>623132
>have buttsex with men
>not a faggot

ok anon ok

>>623131
Those are gay.

But getting your dick wet is unconditionally not gay under any circumstances.

File: yoba.jpg (55KB, 551x551px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 551x551px

>>623143
>>623139

File: steinbeck.jpg (297KB, 1175x1458px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1175x1458px

Let me tell you why homosexuality is not masculine.

Point 1: masculinity is proven by having women, notice the plural.

Point 2: homosexuality is not part of the natural order of things, which necessarily leads to procreation.

Point 3: homosexuality eventually places the individual in a passive stance, whether in the relationship or in any other social group, position that is, of course, not masculine.

>>623164
Applying an image to the things you have sex with is the unmasculine part.

The most masculine way possible is to view them all as holes to fuck, everything else aside. Because the most important aspect here is maximizing your personal satisfaction and power.

>>623169
Applying an image to the... What the fuck are you talking about?

>>623169
I bet you're that guy that got his dick stuck in a toaster

>>622436
As it lived.

>>623175
To put it in simpler terms.

You shouldn't care about men or women at all, you should care about yourself and getting what you want regardless of anyone else. In the case of sex everything should be a non-factor except putting your cock in someone else.

>>623169
>Applying an image to the things you have sex with is the unmasculine part.
Are you a fucking Muslim, in addition to being a fag?

>The most masculine way possible is to view them all as holes to fuck, everything else aside. Because the most important aspect here is maximizing your personal satisfaction and power.
So the manliest possible behavior is being a chronic masturbator?

>>623188
No pham, because an egoistic manchild is not at all masculine.

I haven't read it but just reading his site for 15 minutes gives me the impression that he's trying to sell a product rather than reveal important truths or espouse conservative values

Masculinity (and femininity) are of no importance either way.

>>623261
4u

>>622282
sam was satirizing you sorry f am

Go back to your containment board, /pol/tards.

>>623261
effeminate weakling detected

File: 1453952790496.jpg (45KB, 599x655px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 599x655px

>>623532
It's time to go back, reddit

Is what he said about the founding of Rome true? That they were a bunch of ISIS-tier ragtags that just carved a land out for themselves?

>>623639
Well no one knows how Rome was founded, but the myth is that Romus killed Remulus over the argument on what to name their village.

The rape of the Sabine Women is generally treated as proper myth, too. But I dunno about the rest.

Shit book, and I am a traditionalist.

>>623209
Being an egoistic manchild with power to back it up is ubermenschculine.

Fantastic book, very very solid understanding of masculinity. Who gives a shit if he was a faggot? Alexander was a faggot. Achilles was a faggot. Caesar was a faggot.

Being a faggot is a definite negative in terms of masculinity itself, but it doesn't disqualify someone completely from the title of Man.

Ad-hominem: The Thread.

>>623195
No, he's saying it's being a chronic fucker

I'm not saying I agree, but if you haven't heard, it feels better when you use something other than your hand

>>622175

protip:

Most warrior cultures encouraged homosexuality because it created stronger bonds amongst men. Therefore you are wrong.

Wasn't he the guy that said one of the primary problems with gay culture is that it acts as a distinct subculture that treats homosexual men as something different (and lesser) from heterosexual men? I'm inclined to agree, save the fact that homosexual subculture is basically a byproduct of being attacked by culture at large and not likely to vanish over night.

>>627295
I have no idea if he did.
But he's obviously anti-flamboyancy so maybe.

>virgin neets arguing about what masculinity is on 4chan

kek

>>628064
>projecting