>>560218 It's pretty much all mythology. There might most certainly be some historical basis for the stories, like the wars and perhaps some king's name, but the specific events? Total bullshit. Even the late republic romans were aware of that.
Of the legendary "Seven" kings of Rome, they ruled for a combined like 300 years, which averages to a reign of about 40 per king, which is simply not plausible, and therefore it is highly probable that some of them were composites of several rulers.
All completely factual. I have the corroborating accounts here in other Roman mythological accounts. If you deny my claims you're a materialist positivist fedora shitlord who is probably a moral relativist too. The Romulus and Remus account is just a metaphor even though this was never considered the case until it was utterly refuted, but still it's 2deep4u even though all the other unfalifiable stuff is totally true.
>>560218 How about the part with the Etruscan kings, what does that mean? Was Rome developed into a bigger power by Etruscan elements? Was it simply an etruscan city with a strong latin and sabinian presence? Where they physically conquered?
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.