Can you point me to any wars in which no non-combatants were

>>548692
Naval warfare harms trade in general, so it does hurt non-combatants.

>>548742
Directly harmed then.

>>549079
>>548692
World War when Americans put civilians on ships to keep the Germans from sinking them and they went and sunk them anyways?

Sinking of the RMS Lusitania

>>549167
I asked for examples in which no non-combatants were harmed, not examples in which non-combatants were harmed.

The 1967 and 1973 Arab vs. Israel shitfests both took place in the desert, so the vast, vast majority of deaths were civilians.

>>549648
How many civilians were killed on each side during the Yom Kippur War? I can't seem to find any information on the subject.

>>549167
why was germany so edgy at the start of the 20th century?

>>548692
Not recent, but in ancient Hindu kingdoms warfare was carried out exclusively by the Warrior castes, and battles would occur a few hundred metres from a field where farmers were tending their crops, because the Vaishya class farmers knew that they were not a part of this, as did the warriors: the Kshatria.

At some times in Japan during their earlier history warfare may have been exclusively carried out by Samurai as a highly ritualised event exclusively participated in by warriors.

>>549728
This was the US's fault. Literally taking your own people hostage

>>548692
>Russo-Japanese War print
>Clearly depicts Japs and Chinese