Post your internet speed!

>>60285211
>>60285218
Just a slight difference between the two.

File: Screen Shot.png (20KB, 485x99px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 485x99px

>>60285211
How'd I do?

File: copeltelecom.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

>>60285211
Oh sorry. Upled the wrong pic. Here's the right one:

File: dat download.webm (2MB, 1060x631px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1060x631px

>>60285218
Feels good to be end game internet for at least the next few years.

File: real world 1gbps.jpg (93KB, 1162x468px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1162x468px

>>60285366
>>60285218
>b-b-but you'll never see that in a real world scenario!

File: Screenshot_1.png (8KB, 476x97px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 476x97px

>>60285211

It's okay

>>60285807
Quite asymmetric…

>>60285904
That's most of the world sadly.

Unless you're on fiber anyway.

File: 6282102573.png (20KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x200px

it's alright

>>60285922
How much do you pay for that?

>>60285946
a very close second place
>>60285218

>>60285954
I know; there's not a good server near me to actually prove that my university campus has two 40 gbit uplinks

>>60285964
Not to mention I doubt you'd have a NIC capable of even 10gbps.

>>60286002
I don't, no. Unfortunately, single connections are capped at 1Gbs. What I actually wanted to say is that, in theory, I could hit 1000/1000 on Speedtest, but there are too many bottlenecks, including my NIC. At this point it's pure chance whether they or I have the fastest internet, as you can't really measure it anymore.

File: 2017-04-28 16_59_55-Speedtest by Ookla - The Global Broadband Speed Test.png (8KB, 506x99px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 506x99px

>>60286047
I know the feeling.

Also, since it's going through TCP/IP protocol, it's got ~5.5% overhead anyway using normal frame sizes.

Unless your ISP supports Jumbo Frames, the maximum you'll see on a 1gbps NIC is ~950mbps.

I'm provisioned for 1024/1024mbps, but I cap at around 950mbps because of overhead.

>>60285946
Why pay $100/mo to browse 4chan?

File: speedtest.jpg (17KB, 615x106px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 615x106px

>>60285530
No one needs such speeds. I would be glad about 6 Mbits. Triple speed!
>Needings 4 days to download GTAV

>>60286101
I actually pay €12 a month for this. Welcome to The Netherlands :^]

>>60286113
I had 150mbps, and with 4 heavy internet users on that connection, I noticed times where I would have to throttle my downloads so i didn't disrupt anyone else.

I was also paying $139.99 a month for 150/150mbps + TV + phone.

Now i'm paying $100 a month for 940/880 mbps + TV + phone. With the same ISP, and no data caps.


Now everyone can be streaming or downloading pretty much unrestricted, because 99% of things cap at ~300-500mbps anyway, so that leaves easily half my bandwidth unused for everyone else on the network.


tldr; not everyone needs it, but it sure is nice to have.

>>60286144
I pay 30 € for mine, I couldn't imagine to share it with someone else. Of course no data caps in Germany.

I had a 50 Mbit connection in the past, this was incredibly fast. Hopefully I can get Magenta @Home by January 2018. LTE + DSL for around 40 €, my only solution for better internet. It will be around 20 MBit then. I really wish I could cancel my contract...

currently on 320/30 connection..... theres gig fiber literally a block from my place...yeah

>>60286144
I only pay for the internet and use key sharing to decrypt the satellite channels.

File: 1463012326327.png (9KB, 542x142px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 542x142px

A bit slower than it should be, but it's fine.

>>60286540
anything past 300-400mbps is going to be unnoticable for normal use anyway.

Only thing it's good for is downloading and if you've got 5-10+ heavy users at once.

>>60286562
>only thing it's good for is uploading

File: speed.png (18KB, 803x454px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 803x454px

ATT Fiber

cox gigablast in phoenix

File: 253666_7098287045343020421_o.jpg (29KB, 1045x160px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1045x160px

>>60286744

>>60286664
What the fuck is this font rendering

>>60286744
Data caps?

>>60286784
I have font smoothing off.

Best available in my area. Advertised at 300 but I consistently get numbers around this. 100/month. Cox

File: Untitled35.png (9KB, 489x129px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 489x129px

>>60287378
And I forgot the fucking picture

>>60287391
Also data caps out at 1024 GB

>>60287404
>1024 GB
what a rip off.

In a house of 5 heavy internet users I alone regularly see ~800GB a month in traffic.

>>60287452
Well it's just me and my mom so all the data gets used by me alone. Highest I've gotten is 600

>>60287472
You'd think with almost 400mbps they'd cut you some slack...

>>60287486
You just hitted the asymmetric record.

File: Screenshot_2017-04-25-09-44-47.png (901KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

901KB, 1080x1920px

>>60285211
Man I wish I had better internet. Shame google fiber is ded

>>60287520
rogers hates upload speed

>>60287520
>hitted
Not sure if memeing or just not from english speaking country.

It's still "hit" however, not "hitted"

>You just hit the asymmetric record.

File: dat upload.webm (2MB, 1261x631px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1261x631px

>>60287545
really the only good thing about having fiber is the upload speeds, doing any sort of uploading (online backups, dropbox, seeding, youtube, twitch, etc) is painless and super fast.

>>60287565
>any sort of uploading (online backups, dropbox, seeding, youtube, twitch, etc)
Posting on 4chan… I mean… /hr/

>>60287404
I couldn't get used to that. Don't like to have to stop downloading my porn.

>>60286793
no datacaps for gigablast plans

>>60288273
Makes sense, comcast does the same with their 2gbps plan.

File: Capture+_2017-05-08-23-31-14.png (241KB, 644x605px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 644x605px

What sucks is that this is considered really good for Comcast.

File: P_20170423_122746.jpg (3MB, 4096x2304px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4096x2304px

>>60285951
Not that Anon but 74.99 with hbo so I think 59.99?

File: 2017-05-09 00_36_12-XFINITY® TV, Internet, Phone & Home Security Services by Comcast.png (14KB, 1248x115px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 1248x115px

>>60288357
>this is considered really good for Comcast.
...is it?

Comcast offers this in my area.

>>60288415
...Do you understand what a screenshot is?

>>60286132

:O

File: 1457144699023.jpg (184KB, 850x782px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 850x782px

>>60288424
>$150 for 2gbps
>the most i can get is 30mbps

>>60288429
I've heard of it yes

>>60288455
Don't worry, what they don't tell you is they can charge "up to" $500 for installation and "up to" $500 for activation. (which if you decide you want a refund in the first 30 days, you only get the install fee back, not the activation).

On top of that "up to" $1000 upfront cost, you'll be limited to 1gbps unless you buy 10GbE network equipment. Which conservatively for a single desktop setup would be ~$300-500.

So overall, a very expensive proposition, and even if you don't plan on upgrading to a 10GbE NIC and just using a 1GbE NIC, you're still paying "up to" $1000 install/activation fees.


But I guess it's nice they lock in the $149.99 price for two years.

File: Screenshot_20170508-233953.png (760KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 1080x1920px

I fucking hate comcast

>>60288502
That ping is just rude

File: 6282410841.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

Oh baby. Lets download some torrents.

>>60288559
>satellite internet

surely there are other options...

>>60288559
LOL

File: 1492558484131.gif (3MB, 200x170px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 200x170px

>>60288601

File: 1491694737181.png (407KB, 374x539px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 374x539px

>>60288645

File: 1467163671661.png (30KB, 952x227px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 952x227px

>>60288424
>$149.99
fuck dude i wish i could get that
>tfw comcast is the only provider in my area unless i want 1mbps DSL

>>60288755
Well it's because I can get 1gbps from Verizon for $70 a month, or 1gbps from RCN for also $70 a month.

Comcast had to lower their 2gbps price, even if it is faster, 99% of people will be using it at 1gbps speeds anyway.

And even at $150, i doubt very many people are getting it considering the other gigabit offerings around here.

>>60288775
jews

File: chrome_2017-05-08_22-27-34.png (79KB, 817x893px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 817x893px

fuck off ookla shills

> Getting an upload speed to match your download speed

What sorcery is this?! Fuckin yanks, my people have suffere through 0.9 Mbps up speed for too long.

File: 6282480227.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

>>60285211

File: speed.png (15KB, 1017x142px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 1017x142px

>>60285211

Cheating from inside the data center

>>60288273
Not for Mediacom, though

File: speed.png (28KB, 842x484px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 842x484px

It's going to be like 5 more years before we get gigabit Ethernet in Canada for residential.

>Feelsbadman

File: 6254425373.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

>>60285211

File: Screenshot_2017-05-09-01-34-29.jpg (881KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

881KB, 1080x1920px

>>60289543
I got the opposite through wifi