Intel's 100 MHz faster i7-7740K is on it's way

File: wow.gif (1MB, 300x174px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x174px

>>60059592
>100 MHz faster

File: Intel designed final solution.png (297KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 550x550px

>>60059697
>21w higher TDP
That single socket holocaust ain't gonna start itself.

File: 4243269-hell.jpg (159KB, 1600x1280px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1600x1280px

Holy shit, I was honestly expecting to see april 1 as the date on that.

It might be shit but normies will still buy them rather than AMDs offering. It's the same as with netburst vs A64.

>>60060038
>conviniently forgetting the 220W amd housefire

File: ipuh.jpg (11KB, 239x211px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 239x211px

Does this mean Intel has literally no answer to AMD this year?

File: not cute.jpg (98KB, 377x377px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 377x377px

>>60060138
Nobody will ever remember Faildozer or the memetastic 9590. But this shit?

https://ark.intel.com/products/93791/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E7-8893-v4-60M-Cache-3_20-GHz

>4c8t
>140w TDP (probably a shitton higher under load, just like every other broadmeme and delidlake)
>$6800
Intel is trying to kill you and rob you blind at the same time. Even AMD isn't that brazen.

>>60060169
Shit I meant forget.

>there are retards that will buy the 7640k

>>60060169
>https://ark.intel.com/products/93791/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E7-8893-v4-60M-Cache-3_20-GHz
What a strange thing. Why would you even care about dat IPC-raising 60 MB of L3 cache when you get 3.2 GHz speeds instead?

Is it just for those workloads that benefit from the increased bandwidth when their dataset fits entirely in the L3? I can hardly imagine there being two of those in the entire world.

>>60059592
netburst 2.0 here we come!

>>60060169
because the only thing worth remembering about that 9590 was the price, but I can never get a solid lead on what msrp for it was, amd either scrubbed all mentions of msrp for it everywhere, or it was always 270$ but was oem only at first, and one oem decided to go third party seller and ask 1000$, as it was only that price for what 3-6 weeks and then a consumer packaged version came around that was 300~$

>>60060294
the xeon alone can deal with 3tb of memory, the cache size on die is a side benefit, this is more you need the ram you pay the price, not so much you want an ipc uplift.

>>60060150
no answer for the next 3-6 years really
They were bringing out more cores eventually but they had to expedite that, and likely by the time it comes along, amds low hanging fruit processor will come and reshit on intel.

>Ryzen's floor is the Core arch's ceiling

It's going to be a next few years watching Intel squirm until they finally release a new architecture

>>60060494
I can't wait for Zen 2 to close the gap in single core performance and really make them sweat. Single core is pretty much all they have left. Even Intel is moving away from it with their 6 core consumer Coffee Lake CPUs.

>>60060038
BETTER GET THE LIQUID HELIUM TO COOL THAT BABY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g

>>60060418
Right, I get it. But then in that case, why would you go with a 4-core instead of the 10-core 8891v4 for exactly the same price, especially when both can turbo just as high when only using few cores?

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>60059592
>>60059697
>>60060038
>>60060066
>>60060150
>>60060345
PLEASE STOP

>>60060614
good point, my only guess would be its application specific, the 4 core likely keeps its boost longer and has a higher base clock, while the 10 core does neither,

Going with X99 wasn't a mistake after all.

>>60059592
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

psst, they have no validation staff left(hehe) they fired them and rushed the product(hahaha)

File: 1424128401512.jpg (33KB, 248x252px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 248x252px

>>60059592
>0.1 GHz faster

I hope it requires a new socket and chipset just to fuck over customers extra hard.

so glad i stuck with my 4690 for a while longer

3.9ghz is fine and ddr4 is shitting the bed price wise.

ddr5 when?

>>60061831
it does. kabylake-x on 2066 socket for NO reason at all except for 8 more PCIe lanes.

If this 7740k is way faster than a 7700k, that's means Intel was bullshitting us with Kaby lake.

Anyways, I'm not buying anything less Than 6 cores when my 2600k dies.

>>60061845
2020

I expect it to overclock to 5.7Ghz on air

>>60059592

i care about it

>>60061981
Using only 400 watts idle?

>>60061981
Are you trying to kill your family?

>>60059592
>http://wccftech.com/intel-kaby-lake-x-core-i7-7740k-gigabyte-x299-gaming-3/
inb4 it costs $300 more, and retards will still buy it because
>muh gaming muthafucka

>>60062237
Also, new socket.

>>60061981
5.5-5.6 maybe

liquid metal on heatsink + 2 or 3 San Ace fans
+1 San Ace fan behind the motherboard

http://stanislavs.org/lga-2011-cpu-socket-backplate-cooling-modification/

>>60059592
Intlel was a mistake.

AMD is finished and bankrupt

>>60059592
delid dis

File: s.aolcdn.com.jpg (194KB, 600x392px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 600x392px

>>60059592

>140 W TDP
>4 CORES
>4 FUCKING CORES
>need to buy new expensive motherboard because Z270 is incompatible

>>60059592
Panic release? Panic release.

>waging a war against the laws of physics

Intel is fucking finished

>Sorry, we couldn't find the exact page you requested. You may have followed a bad link of the content many have been deleted.

>>60059592
>0.1 Ghz higher clock
>new socket
>20w higher TDP
>4 cores
Oy vey

>>60062806
Noctua and Corsair are going to be very happy thanks to the retards buying this garbage though

>>60060150
Why would they need an answer to a worse performing architecture lol

7740k supports quad channel memory so extra 21W because of that?

>>60062922
Yeah, right, that's exactly the reason why Intel is rushing duct taped housefires and products that don't even make sense into their market segmentation out of nowhere. Back to /v/ with you.

>>60062955
And 6ghz water cooled overclocks

>>60063000
Not sure if you can watercool with boiling water

File: IMG_2649.jpg (124KB, 784x580px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 784x580px

>>60062959
At least amd's $600 flagship beats an i3.. oh wait

>>60063014
Poo in the loo autistic shitskin nobody is buying your cheap poozen poo in loo made cpoo rajeet 580 0 fps gain 50watts gain kys poojet

>>60063023
>oc 5GHz
>30% less 1% LOW
>launch benchmark missing every single bios & windows performance update
nice

>>60063032
You okay, Ramesh?

>>60063036
Dude, a TWO core cpu beats an EIGHT core cpu, there's no way you can defend this unless you're an actual street shitter

>>60063036
So why don't you overclock amd's cpu?

>>60063032
[autistic screeching]

>>60063049
What are programs that put all the workload on 1/2 cores? What are single or close to single threaded applications?

meh, who cares. currently running an i5 7600k at 4.6 without even upping the voltage

>>60063072
Games

>>60063049
and a $325 4 core 7700k beats a $1100 8 core 6900k, i guess intel is done for

File: ridiculous-heatsink.jpg (92KB, 640x753px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 640x753px

>tfw pic related is actually going to be a thing with babby lake x

>>60062959
Nice memes

Nothing you say is substantiated in the least

Now back to reality: Ryzen is trash for gaming

>>60063098
That is what you need to get Ryzen cpu's past 4.2 ghz

>>60063098
a large passive cooler?
it's not ridiculous it's silent and free of moving parts.

>>60063102
>trash
>Difference in gaming isnt even noticeable
>If you have 60hz screen like most do it doesnt matter in the least

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybF7r4rogHc

The better multicore performance is something you really notice though.

>>60063049
>>60063102
Truly it is, I do all my gaymen at 144p with all background apps closed and need can feel my body phisically convulse when my average framerate is lower than 600, such as 550 with Ryzen. Strangely this affection doesn't seem to occur with stuttering and frame drops.

t. intel owner who is switching in 2 weeks

I feel like all those guys with 5820k's have made pretty good purchases. Everything since with 6 and more cores coming from intel was pretty bad, obviously especially in price/perf. And we all know about the 200w 4core inferno.
>>60063075
probably runs on 1.3v or so regardless.
@60063049
boring stuff, faggot

File: 5.jpg (230KB, 1277x683px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1277x683px

>>60063119
>difference isn't even noticable

lol

>>60063137
OH NO 5 FPS LESS WOW

>>60063169
>amdrones in charge of math

>>60063178
>posting synthetic (bots) benchmark and its probably outdated as well
yeah totally fair

>>60063183
>t-this benchmark d-doesn't count!
Every single time

How long until amd and Intel stop sucking dicks

Can buy X99 mobo for $150 and i7 3930k for $150, it's tempting to take that upgrade path from my i5 3570k, since even AMD is being faggots and the 6c12t ryzen is $300.

>>60063137
That's still more than 100 frames over a gaming screens refresh rate. Completely synthetic benchmark that makes no difference in reality.

>>60063218
>synthetic
You do not understand what that word means

>>60063117
it isnt, it has a radial blower in it and it is just Zalman tier retarded design with no benefits to it,

File: 1481842183278.png (14KB, 622x336px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 622x336px

>>60063227
you neither.

>No matter how many times I write this paragraph, a lot of folks do not seem to "get it." These are very much "benchmarks." These are good in helping us understand how well CPUs are at performing calculations in 3D gaming engines. These benchmarks in no way represent real-world gameplay. These are all run at very low resolutions to try our best to remove the video card as a bottleneck. I will not hesitate to say that anyone spouting these types of framerate measurements as a true gameplay measuring tool in today’s climate is not servicing your needs or telling you the real truth.

https://www.hardocp.com/article/2017/04/11/amd_ryzen_5_1600_1400_cpu_review/4

>>60063276
http://www.nofancomputer.com/eng/products/CR-100A.php
you can stop posting now.

>>60063102
>ii-i-i-i-i-i-ntel i-i-i-s t-t-t-t-tt-he b-b--b-bb-b-est

>>60063342
do those even work?

File: 1485581601882.jpg (11KB, 480x301px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 480x301px

>NO REALLY GOYS, I MEAN GUYS, INTEL HAS NOTHING UNTIL 2028 BUY A RYZEN 1600 RIGHT NOW
hmmm

File: 1489160516428.png (245KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x612px

>>60063453

>>60059592
you don't understand, that new refresh is a NEW start.
The 7740k will probably have more IPC than it's brother 7700k AND more clock speed ! It will probably have the famous 25% performance improvement, it would make sense because of the TDP.


What a fucking joke, they're selling a new 7700k on a new platform to outjew their fanboys. When AMD make a rebrand of their RX 400 series it's a disaster but when Intel do basically the same it's ok ?

>>60063421
>do those even work?
If the airflow in your case is decent, yes.

>>60063098
>hanging a tonne of metal onto your motherboard sideways
Wow fuck the strain properties of PCB, let's wreck this shit. It's supposed to used laid-down.

>>60063216
>since even AMD is being faggots and the 6c12t ryzen is $300.
Where do you live? Even in Europe its only $247.

>>60063342

Seems like an ideal cooler if silence is your goal. I doubt that cooler is going to be effective if your intention is to do some gaming and overclocking.

>>60063544
the thing is no more than 800g

>>60063563
if you put high cfm fans on case, but that would defeat the purpose

>>60059592
>404
What did he mean by this?

>>60063203
If it was made on release day then the info is surely invalid.

>>60063478
Because amshit rebranded something with shit performance and the resulted rebrand still has shit performance. Intel 7700k already has top performance, much higher than amd, and their refresh will be even better

File: jew_alert.jpg (17KB, 187x204px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 187x204px

>all the damage control
>all the muh gaymes are what counts
>all the haha Intel wins because...
>all the panic

File: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9KL0EvNjMzMTQyL29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDE5Yi5wbmc_.jpg (47KB, 755x566px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 755x566px

>>60060138
>>60060169
At least that thing had eight cores at fucking 5ghz stock on an ancient process, the lower clocked ones were at only 125w TDP.

4 cores, 4.5ghz, 14nm, 121w TDP, no fuckin justification for this bullshit. It doesn't even have an IGP the thermal specs are all CPU.

File: IMG_2801.png (514KB, 500x498px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 500x498px

>>60064185
I'd take 5 more watts over shit performance any day

>>60064203
cute old benchmark

>>60064203
>stone old cherry picked benchmark
0.1 Rupee have been deposited to your Intel© Pro® account, Mr. Rasheesh.

File: IMG_2740.jpg (443KB, 2133x1242px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 2133x1242px

>>60064224
>every case where my poo loses is biased
One week old DigitalFoundry benchmark

File: 1488953016326.jpg (273KB, 1032x774px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1032x774px

>>60060138
At least the 9590 could be properly cooled
A fucking dual core pentium runs hotter at the same clockspeed

>>60064242
Ironically funny because amd cpus are made by actual indian shitskins after they wiped their poo with their hands

>>60064267
Better than being made by the kikes

File: JUST krzanich.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>>60059592

>>60064261
Better than 250watt rx 580 with sub 1060 performance

What will be the difference between a Basin Falls X299 hexacore and a X370 Coffee Lake hexacore?

>>60060090
>buying a Ryzen which ALREADY bottlenecks today's best GPUs

Absolutely retarded, stay classy AMD fags.

>>60064287
The difference is that they are both better than piece of shit ryzen

File: rx580.jpg (85KB, 773x771px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 773x771px

>>60064281
>sub 1060 performance
>implying that the 1060 doesnt draw just as much power because of much higher CPU overhead

>>60064307
>580 better than fury x

AYYMD FINISHED & BANKRUPT

>>60064267
>no arguments
>muh poo in loo
Your Intel™ CPU is made by H1B visa poo in loos, too, retard.

File: IMG_3339.jpg (14KB, 198x197px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 198x197px

>>60064320
>you

File: no.png (67KB, 719x453px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 719x453px

Stuttering housefire edition

File: goyim_nooo.jpg (68KB, 600x737px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 600x737px

>>60064327
Back to your oven, shill.

>>60060614
Some applications you pay per core.

>>60063341
Again, you do not understand what synthetic benchmarks are, and you demonstrate it again

File: Nvidia-Cuckold.png (168KB, 1010x802px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1010x802px

>>60064245
filename

>>60064290
How can it bottleneck the GPU when the CPU usage is <50%? Most likely terriblly coder games is where it's at

>>60064453
It doesn't work like that you dumb indian. Gpu needs a really fast core that can feed it information fast enough rather than more slow cores (ryzen)

File: lol-27.jpg (92KB, 400x801px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 400x801px

>>60064367
>oracle charges obscene prices per core
>intel then charges slightly less obscene prices to remove cores
Shit is too good to make up.

I think I'm done building computers. It's all a scam these days.

>>60064203
>old benchmark
Intel shills are really desperate and pathetic.

>>60064349
POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

>>60064621
See>>60064245

File: 1310483412100.jpg (36KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 413x395px

>>60064245
Lol Ryzen really is dogshit for gaming
>b-but that benchmark doesn't count!
Sure kid

>>60064677
see
>>60064430
Nvidia is the one that's dogshit

>>60064685
Only with an AMD poo-in-the-loo gpu.

I wonder who could be behind this...

File: 1492260318665.jpg (94KB, 900x960px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 900x960px

>>60064659
Feels good knowing Ryzen is infinitely better and smoother even in gaymen than Intel's shitty housefire abortions.

>>60064693
>I wonder who could be behind this...
Nvidia, when they decided to go full power-meme and remove the hardware scheduler.

File: 1492587863785.jpg (395KB, 2400x2000px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 2400x2000px

>>60064696
>7700k
No thanks, that housefire is for stuttering poorfags

>>60064696
You btfo yourself. I knew indians were stupid but not this stupid

>>60064696
>infinitely better
>7700k on top in all charts

Do you mongs even read the shit you post yourself?

>>60064704
I don't run Poolaris budget cards though so I don't care

File: qmv3fjDc7O3IDMeJMOnibpiu3g7Z4oA5LRWXy5Myq70.png (76KB, 650x674px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 650x674px

>>60064710

File: IMG_2802.png (538KB, 1279x720px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 1279x720px

>>60064707
Poo

File: 1491062981332.png (130KB, 1597x634px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1597x634px

>>60064677

>>60064721
This isn't even relevant to anything that has been said. Polaris is the one withOUT issues, retard.

File: ryzen7.png (2MB, 769x8779px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 769x8779px

>>60064733

>>60064731
>$180 intel i5 destroys $600 poozen
Color me surprised

>>60064741
>480 crossfire
Really grasping at straws there aren't we?

>>60064430
Oh wait now I see this retard is comparing CF 480's to a 1070

AHAHAHHAHAHA

File: 1492842903517.jpg (2MB, 3840x1032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x1032px

>>60064733
Stay mad poorfag stuttering corelet

>>60064741
>crossfire a 250watt card

CALL THE FIREFIGHTERS

File: 1310429820535.jpg (13KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x300px

>>60064733
>1800x below an i3

You can't make this shit up

File: 0bbfddc9c03fc4bd3a3e23af32ea82fc7add863410095522d433d8c3fe46b60e.gif (365KB, 2000x1153px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 2000x1153px

>the damage control by Intel™ shills in this thread
OY VEY ITS ANUDA SHOAH RERERERELEASE SKYLAKE WITH MOAR COARZ AND HIGHER TDP !!!!!

>>60064760
>corelet
How are those 2008 4.1 ghz corespeeds treating you corelet?

>>60064778
Ask Intel when they release a consumer 6-core, you disgusting shekelchaser.

>>60064760
One core of yours is as slow as a mid 2007 i5 lmao

>>60064778
Intel shills are so retarded they don't even know what corelet means.

File: 1402065566623.jpg (43KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 450x450px

>>60064776
>"I-Intel is s-shit for gaming, m-muh cores, r-right guys?!"
>gets BTFO by actual benchmarks
>"Le h-happy merchant boogyman xD"
The standard fallback for AMDrones that can't come up with an actual argument

>>60064786
Intel's IPC is to Ryzen what Bulldozer's IPC is to Intel LOL

File: 4.jpg (35KB, 1276x161px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1276x161px

>>60064785
Okay

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2mB42jFIfs

File: 1443859768881.jpg (156KB, 474x595px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 474x595px

>>60064696
>Feels good knowing Ryzen is infinitely better and smoother even in gaymen
>posts a benchmark with Intel on top with a wide margin

KEK

>>60062922
*chases shekel down the street*

>>60064760
Why is Intel such a stuttering piece of shit in gayming? Serious question.

>>60064827
first provide some evidence for your claim, then we will discuss it.

Why is ryzen such a slow piece of shit?

Evidence: it can't clock higher than 4.2 ghz

>>60064795
Actual benchmarks BTFO you, you blind autist.
>inb4 old benchnark from january
The standars fallback for Intel cucks. Stay cucked and burn to death with your Delid™ Kelvin Lake™ CPU that gets completely destroyed in producrivity.
Oh wait, you don't work? The this is where you underage vermin belong.
>>>/v/

>>60064758
You're missing the point, fucking mongoloid. The i7 and Ryzen are equal if the GPU isn't fucking the CPU in the ass. Nvidia can't into DX12 because shit hardware.

>>60064837
4.1*. 4.2 is 1% sillicon lotery

>>60064825
>>60064795

>>60064837
The evidence is in the image, Intel is complete garbage trash at literally everything

>>60064843
Check this benchmark from april, pozen is still poo>>60064245

>>60064846
I'm not missing any point since you don't have any.

>Nvidia can't into DX12 because shit hardware.

I thought we were discussing Intel vs AMD here, but leave it to an AMDrone to move the goalpost when it suits him

File: 1448210908987.png (167KB, 318x308px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 318x308px

>>60064707
>even the 7700k is shit

POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

>>60064837
Why are you posting so excessively about "muh gigahurts"

>>60064858
In what image?

>>60064811
>Chip from 2011 with way lower IPC but MUH GIGAHURTZ
Shekelchaser desperation is real

>>60064885
Because it matters obviously, do you claim it doesn't?

File: slide-out.png (583KB, 845x796px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 845x796px

>>60064837
>MUH GIGAHURTZ
Get in, shekelchaser.

>>60064885
>no response
>>Y R U RACIST PLS BUY MY INDIAN SHIT
why do you shit in the street?

>>60064877
So it's okay to test CPUs matched with GPUs that don't perform as expected? Nice.

>>60064888
kek you're retarded

>>60064901
>>60064893
>lower ipc
Only slightly, IPC gains from Sandy bridge to broadwell have been marginal.

at 4.8 ghz it trashes a 1600x at 4.1 ghz.

If you think otherwise you are delusional

>>60064893
>>60064901
See>>60064795

>>60064910
>ask for evidence to back up a claim
>'N-no you're stupid!"
Typical fanboy

>>60064896
Of course it matters, but it doesn't seem to stop the 7700k from stuttering.
>>60064902
>>Y R U RACIST PLS BUY MY INDIAN SHIT
please cite where this was said

>>60064905
Post Ryzen + dGPU versus Intel + iGPU gayming benchmarks because this is the logic if your average Intelfag

>>60064930
The 7700k stutters 30% less than amd flagship 8 core

>>60064915
Prove it.

>>60064930
>stuttering
Nice meme
>>60064905
Maybe AMD should design a cpu that is compatible with all gpu's and not just their own brand

>>60064866
>pozen is still poo
except it isn't
>>60064430
test with hardware that actually works

>>60064929
Not my fault you're too retarded to follow the reply chain.
Thanks for reinforcing the fact that you're retarded though.

>>60064929
>Expecting serious replies when you are obviously that one Intel shitposter who has been shitting up Ryzen threads since release
Gas yourself, kike.

>>60064949
>>60064951
Still waiting for your evidence you disgusting shills

>>60064944
>Meme
Literally experimentally corroborated by blind testing, shekelchaser.

https://youtu.be/ybF7r4rogHc

File: IMG_2801.jpg (89KB, 500x485px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 500x485px

>>60064943
Here you go. 10 year old intel cpu trashing double core amd flagship

>>60064959
You're too retarded to know how to read graphs. How is it my fault?

>>60064947
>CF
No

>>60064941
Perhaps 30% more than AMD? >>60064760
>>60064944
>nice meme
nice rebuttal

>>60064963
>b-but m-muh Dx12
LOL

>>60064944
>Maybe AMD should design a cpu that is compatible with all gpu's and not just their own brand
So it's AMDs fault that Nvidia can't into DX12? Lmao

>>60064973
It's about the differences between CPUs and DX, it's actually impressive CF worked as nice as it did.

>>60064963
Where are the i7-3930k and R5-1600x on that chart that was made on R7-1800 launch day using DX12 on an Nvidia card to deliberately gimp the AMD CPUs?

Oh, you mean they aren't on the chart? Ok fuck off then shill.

>>60064866
>this one specific cherry picked benchmark of a shit optimized game known to have issues is my ultimate proof
Pure desperation. Enjoy your Stutter™ Delid™ Kelvin™ Rebrand™ Lake, cuck.

>>60064965
Show them and I will read them
>>60064962
I've seen that video, they are literally the only ones reporting it, so far nobody else has replicated it. Sounds like bullshit to me.

>>60064430
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tfTZjugDeg

File: IMG_3333.png (312KB, 595x654px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 595x654px

>>60064991
>>60064992
DESIGNATED

>>60065005
Read the reply chain

>>60065008
Yikes, falling back on memes.

>>60064991
Theres a 2600k on there which is weaker than a 3930k, and it beats it.

What do you expect a 3930k would do to your poozen with 2 cores and 4 threads extra?

File: 1484857165b9Q0qmS6fl_1_6.png (13KB, 620x336px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 620x336px

>>60065008

>>60065026
I don't know, why don't you show me some evidence?

>>60065022
It's not a meme, indians do shit on the street

File: 1491958654249.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>60064962
IT'S A CONSPIRACY

>>60065013
So you have no evidence, cool>>60064988
>So it's AMDs fault that Nvidia can't into DX12? Lmao

It's AMD's fault that Rypoo cpu's don't work properly with Nvidia cards yes.

>>60065033
Ofcourse you don't know since you're an idiot

>>60065036
>So you have no evidence
Literally read the graphs posted in this thread.

Oh I forgot you can't read.

>>60061851
God boys at Intel never change.

>>60065022
>cries about memes
>shitposts memes>>60064992

Why are indians such hypocrites?

was going to buy a ryzen 1700 but this 100mhz increased kaby lake has changed my mind

>>60065061
No evidence
Opinion discarded

>>60065030
>not mentioning what cooled has been used

Indian posters everyone

>>60065054
Oh, so you don't have ANY evidence of how that archaic i7 6-core performs then? Ok. Feel free to shut your shill mouth then.

>>60065070
Considering it comes ontop of a gap of 1300 mhz it should change your mind

>>60065090
Better than a poozen 8 core

>>60065067
Wrong person

>>60065090
Considering a 2700k which is inferior beats it, that is enough evidence.

It´s called deductive reasoning, but that´s probably beyond your capabilities as an AMD peasant

>>60065036
just watch the video, maybe your simple mind can actually understand it!
>>60065006

>>60065087
Glad you admitted you're retarded.

>>60065089
>i-it doesn't count
>i-i-intel i-i-s b-best
Nice delusion, retard. Kelvin Lake reached 100°C even on AIO.
Enjoy your death by fire.

>>60065099
>>60065112
SHOW ME THE GRAPHS, SHEKELCHASER.

>>60065036
>I don't know how gpu drivers work: the post

>>60065122
>>60064963

>>60065119
S-S-SS-SS-SS-S-SSHUT UUU-UU-U--UU-U-U-UU-U-U-P

File: IMG_2828.jpg (193KB, 650x889px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 650x889px

>>60065119
Enjoy your smell of poo and low fps

>>60065114
Glad you admitted you have no evidence for your memes

File: 1487659908328s.jpg (2KB, 124x125px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 124x125px

>ITT: Intelfags literally spamming cherrypicked benchmarks against Ryzen to cover everything up

I haven't seen this level of damage control since the Bulldozer launch

>>60065132
>the 1800x all the way on the bottom

AHAHAHHAHAA

>>60065139
kek you're the most retarded person in the universe if you can't read the graphs posted in this thread

>gaymen benchmarks
>>>/v/

File: 1489122339460.png (495KB, 1070x601px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1070x601px

>>60065143
SHUT UP

>>60065148
I've seen plenty of graphs in this thread, and aside for the cherrypicked ones rypoo gets BTFO everytime

>>60065152
>s-s-shut it down
>i-it doesn't matter
Poo

>>60065132
>DX12
Gee, I wonder if they used DX12 on an Nvidia card to aritficially gimp Ryzen? It's truly a mystery.

>>60065026
3930k is a fucking legend, 5 years going and still strong. You even get 16x16 pci-e 3.0 with an update. Only thing holding it back is DDR3 and lack of NVMe/usb 3.1.

It wasn't worth upgrading to Ryzen from my 3930k.. Release Date: February 2012

Gonna finally replace it with x299 skylake.

Fuck You AMD.

>>60065159
Prove it

>>60065159
>cherrypicked
This cemented the fact that you're retarded.

>>60065147
Nobody wins in that image, all the numbers are low as shit.

File: IMG_2742.png (1MB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1228x1502px

>>60065162
IT'S A CONSPIRACY

>>60065162
*tips tinfoilhat

>>60065171
Now try and get beyond calling names, and try and form an actual argument.

Go ahead try it

>>60065176
lol retard >>60064731

>>60065176
Except that at least two.independent corporations of Nvidia DX12 drivers gimping Ryzen were already posted I'm this thread, shekelchaser.
>>60064731
>>60064741

File: other.png (129KB, 354x504px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 354x504px

Stutterlake is real
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stutter_Lake

>>60065186
Arguments are useless against retarded people.

>>60065168
>No charts
>No graphs
>No tables
>No links
>No evidence at all
Well on that basis the i7-3930k is actually the slowest chip ever made in the history of CPUs.

>>60065187
>amd cpu performs like shit
>that's somehow nvidia's fault
Ok poojet

>>60065207
Aha, you are incapable to go beyond namecalling.

Go play with your lego little man

>>60065216
How is it namecalling if the person is actually retarded?

File: IMG_2994.jpg (62KB, 610x288px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 610x288px

>>60065210
Slower than even a ryzen?

>>60065225
Please continue to prove my point

>>60065233
You confirmed the fact that you're retarded a long time ago. If facts are upsetting you that's not my problem. Facts are facts. The only thing you can do is keep replying to me to further reinforce this fact.

>>60065244
Please continue little man

File: IMG_1090.jpg (19KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 250x241px

>>60065244
>my words are facts
>DID YOU HEAR ME FACTS

Don't get a heart attack

>>60065211
Using game as benchmark, somehow nvidia driver only optimise for intel. yup it nvidia fault

>>60065245
Yes keep replying.

>>60065259
CONSPIRACY

>>60065258
If you can't read graphs you're retarded, simple.

>>60065272
I agree, so therefore we can conlude you are retarded

>>60065293
>no u

>>60065210
Google them.

You want me to link 50 pages of benchmarks from 2012? It's a 6c/12t processor thats scaled very well with time. Way before AMDtards were calling intel corelets.

Everyone says the 2500k/2600k, but it's the 3930k that really was value king of sandybridge.

File: IMG_3348.jpg (799KB, 1080x1359px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 1080x1359px

>>60065272
>>60065293
MY SIDES

>>60065295
NO YOU

>>60064464
>Nvidia drivers need a really fast single core that can feed it information fast enough rather than more cores (ryzen)

Fixed that for you.

>>60065132
>polski
Good to know who is shilling here. Better clean the loo.
>ass old benchmarks again
Here we go again. Desperation at its finest.
>lose in efficiency
>lose in temperatures
>lose in productivity
>lose in price/performance
>have stutter in games
>have socket change every two years at least
>all this to gain 5-10% in max FPS only
The definition of being cucked.

>>60065160
>mention productivity
>s-s-shut it down
>i-it doesn't matter
>HURR POO DURR
Nice scat fetish you delusional autist.

>>60065229
>Still no evidence at all
(You)

File: 1489103005792.png (162KB, 633x900px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 633x900px

>>60065392
Please delete this.

>>60065296
No. You made the argument using an archaic low-IPC processor, YOU defend the assertion.

>>60065392
Nice memes

>>60065434
>archaic
And here is an example of an even more archaic cpu beating AMD's finest
>>60064963
KEK

>>60065437
>I don't have any capacity to respond to the arguments or evidence so if I just respond "Nice memes" I won't have to acknowledge how much I got BTFO'd

>>60065452
No matter how many times you link to that chart the i7-3930k will not magically appear on it, nor will the R5-1600.

SHOW ME THE i7-3930k BEATING AN R5-1600 RAJEESH. SHOW IT TO ME.

>>60065454
>arguments and evidence
You just spouted some random conjecture, please look up the words argument and evidence in the dictionary you simpleton

>>60064962
>Nvidia stutters on Ryzen the same as Intel due to shitty drivers.
>B-but it's a v-valid test

>>60065471
>I'll just continue diverting since I can't actually respond to any of the points raised.

>>60065469
Well I guess we can conclude you simply lack the IQ to understand this matter.

>>60060587
Intel has ascended the point in the market where they can just stop caring
They can release whatever the want and get no issues due to 60%+ market share. They are nowhere near sweating considering even their stick is 4-5 times that of AMD.

>>60063169
OH YES I WILL BUY WORSE PRODUCT FOR SAME MONEY YES MOMMY BUY ME THAT ((( AMD PAJEET JEW ))) AMAZING RYJZEN PLS MOM I HATE INTEL SO MUCH

>>60061091
You realize this is a new socket right?

>>60065477
You've yet to provide any shred of evidence of anything you've said.

>>60064963
>Day one review http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/luke-hill/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-cpu-review/10/
>Already been patched

Discarded.

>>60065495
Not him, but those things have been established since Ryzen launch overtime.

>>60065132
>Day one review. http://www.purepc.pl/procesory/premiera_i_test_procesora_amd_ryzen_r7_1800x_dobra_zmiana?page=0,16

Discarded.

File: SUCC.jpg (71KB, 680x757px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 680x757px

>another new socket

WHATS WRONG WITH LGA 1151, FUCK

>>60065543
Intel was a mistake.

>>60063023
>Day one benchmark
>Gaymans Next Ass
Discarded.

>>60065555
quads of truth

>>60065543
>WHATS WRONG WITH LGA 1151, FUCK
Everybody already has a motherboard with it.

File: cherry.png (905KB, 1600x1614px) Image search: [Google]

905KB, 1600x1614px

>>60065132
damn, I know how to cherry pick too

>>60065630
This
Intel is a company the same as AMD, they want money. The difference is intel can get away with it as they have a stupidly high market share. Once AMD gets there we can expect the same treatment.

>>60065437
Reality isn't a meme, though. Not my problem you can't accept it.

File: Futuremark.png (323KB, 1237x2322px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1237x2322px

>>60065480
Well I guess we can conclude that you simply lack any evidence at all and simply asspulled all your claims about the i7-3930k.

Hmm...seems that i7-3930k has a few problems keeping up with the R5-1600 after all.

>>60065429
>delid dis
FTFY

>>60065690
oh my..

File: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9KLzUvMzE4MjA5L29yaWdpbmFsL3dvcmxkLW9mLXdhcmNyYWZ0LTE2ODAucG5n.png (23KB, 450x855px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 450x855px

>>60065715
Even at the time of release a 4.5GHz overclocked i7-3930k was barely faster in CPU bound games than a 2600k AT STOCK CLOCKS.

>>60065541
>purepc.polack

Literally who site nobody has ever heard of with bullshit benchmarks. Hmm yes, it's perfect for shilling on this mongolian basketweaving forum.

File: 1380697092809.jpg (42KB, 479x720px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 479x720px

>AMD is better than Intel

>>60065760
This is what you've been reduced to? Jesus Christ how pathetic.

>>60065768
$0.10 have been deposited into your AMD Rewards account, Rajesh.

File: 5ghz4133cl17 1t.jpg (401KB, 1991x862px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1991x862px

12-15% faster than 5ghz 3200 CL14

>>60065768
they have to rewrite their shilling manuals

this tactics didn't work when those benchmarks were semi true, it sure doesn't work when it's outright lie

>>60059592

I want a true 6 core 7700k @5 Ghz
Don't care about burning my house down or 300w power draw.

>>60065842
A quad Titan X system uses about 1400-1600w

(3930k) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90TFRVd4bk

(1800x) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANnhInFaIhc

both done with gtx 1070 @ 1080p ultra settings. different level of the stage but similar environment, this was the closest 1:1 comparison I could find.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce80Fe_N5VQ (3930k/gtx970 vs 1700x/gtx1060)

>>60059592
>>60059697
>>60061810

I would be totally impressed if this was the 1990's and I was rocking the Pentium 100mhz! 100mhz more would be totally doubling my CPU power.

>>60062678
Not yet, but I'm curious what their Q1 numbers will look like. If Ryzen does have a positive effect then it probably won't show up until Q2 2017. You may or may not be aware that their profit margin Q4 2016 was -4.8%. You're actually that far off base with your statement.

>>60063098
I don't think you quite get what you're looking at there, that one's passive. I actually have something similar on my 65W TDP CPU and I can tell you that I will probably never buy a CPU with a higher TDP than that and I won't be buying any AM4 CPU until I can get a cooler like this or like the one I have which can be mounted on AM4. No, I don't want no Intel for various reasons.

Feel free to laugh at my massive heatsink. I'll take that and silence the rest of the time over a loud fan any day.

>>60065917
Look at >>60061571 thread and reconsider your options

>>60065485
at least i wont have to change socket every fucking 3 years because intel cant make their fucking mind up

>>60065947
There is a massive difference between getting 70c running passive on a heatsink not designed to run passive and whatever you'd get on a heatsink designed to be passive.

File: intel jews.jpg (56KB, 720x740px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 720x740px

>>60059592

File: intel cpu ripoff.png (79KB, 500x483px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 500x483px

>>60059592

Jeez 309 replies for shilling and shitposting le Ayymd vs Shilltel again?

>>60066265
yup

File: 1468711424253.png (543KB, 900x720px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 900x720px

>>60066265
This is what keeps /g/ alive, gentlewoman.

>>60066265
Jewtel shills are in damage control mode

>>60066265
>leave /g/ for a few months
>come back
>meme shill wars about the new amd cpus still raging

>>60063137
>2600k shitting on 7600k

holy lol, anyone owning a 6600/7600k must be pissed now

>>60065543
A socket change a year keeps the goyim in fear