Why is Intel so slow, expensive and shitty?

>>59265988
Intel: Never Again

File: 1488786278103.png (45KB, 630x424px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 630x424px

>>59265988
Intel is also horrible for games.

AW YEAH IF ONE SIDE DUN SHITPOST THE OTHER SHOULDA!

File: 16-game-average.png (61KB, 1306x1646px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1306x1646px

>>59265988
>kernel compilation

And then in the real world

>>59266242
Ah, yes.
Children's entertainment, I have a hard time believing some mom will buy their 13 year old son $300 CPUs

>>59266242
>implying games are the only use for the CPU
That you only use your computer to play video games isn't our problem. Some people here have other needs

>>59266242
>Real world
>Video games

>>59266261
Adults play games too.

File: yot.jpg (557KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 2048x1152px

Hit and a miss.
Another
Massive
Disappointment

>>59266066
>"muh games"

>>59266242
>Both the 7700k and 6700k beats the 6900k
Wow, what a good and relevant chart for discussing the technological merits of a CPU

And also, in the real world people don't buy $500 8 core 16 threads CPUs just to play video games on unless they're mentally ill autists that browse /v/

I only use my pc for games and Photoshop.

I buy what i know is good. I know that the i7 is the best for games so I get that.

It's your choice what processor you want. But the i7 are the best and after seeing all these benchmarks from Ryzen, I think I'll stick with the i7.

>>59266242
>gaming is real world
tell your mommy to buy you a 7700K then.

>>59266299
You mean children.

>>59266637
the 7700K is currently the best CPU for games and the poorly multithreaded photoshop.