>The Start Of February Edition
This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that are required to make a fine watch.
>Required Viewing For Newbies:
https://youtu.be/508-rmdY4jQ
>Strap Guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous Thread:
>>58722550
Gently reminder Citizen Satellite Wave Air has better technology than Casio's G-Shock Radio Controled watches.
>>58749410
>$500 for a Casio
Oy vey
2nd for Seagull 1963
>>58749461
I would hope so. They're 10x the price
Snowflake covered in snowflakes.
>>58749487
there are cheaper models now desu
>>58749494
>gay covered gay
>>58749494
grand seikos look so good
>>58749501
I looked. $700-800 is still a bit of a different price bracket than $90
They look really good though
>>58749415
Embrace the future.
SKX007 or Orient Blue Ray?
>>58749763
Ray
>>58749461
>That abomination
>Better than a simple, clean ocANUS
Get the fuck outta here nigga
>>58749763
I love my orient ray
>>58749745
embrace the penis of a dead negro and caress it gently with your lips
>>58749745
looks like shit sempai
I know you are cheap or poor but why not go and get something with the same function that doesn't look that cheap
Can I make a watch fade faster? I think this will look really good once it's beat up after years of use. But I don't want to wait years.
>>58749494
Back to pleddit you soeacisl
>>58749461
Reminder citizen and casio GPS watches are still the size of a sedan.
The new Astrons are only the size of a subcompact.
>>58750270
The oceanus doesnt have gps time though
are Steinharts really that bad?
i want a titanium watch and i don't think i can find something else for this price
>>58750682
Casio Oceanus.
New astrons are still to big for a wristlet like me. So I wear radio controlled Brightz and synchronize them with pc/smartphone using signal emulator software.
>>58750687
>Casio Oceanus.
lolwut?
i just did a brief search and it looks like the Oceanus does come in titanium, but:
i don't want a solar watch and i don't want a bunch of little watches on my watch.
it's also appears to be 2 - 3 time the cost of the Steinhart
thanks, but no thanks
>>58750411
That is the worst photograph ever taken
>>58750682
>riding that sub rep homage bucks to the farm
buy it if this doesn't bother you. if this doesn't bother you you're also a pleb.
>>58750476
Put it in a jar with sand and shake it.
Or tie it to a chain behind your car, and go on a drive.
>>58750807
words hurt anon.
>>58750476
I heard dipping it in vinegar overnight gets some nice patina
I don't get why people would want their watch to look old and busted
>>58750682
Spend a little more and get a tempest commodore or seiko shogun. The steinhart's finish looks like shit.
>>58750868
Might look into the vinegar.
I just think that a faded af pepsi bezel looks really good. I thought about leaving it outside in the sun for a week and see if that fades it faster.
>>58750729
Model number?
>>58750682
They're great value for money. Nice accurate movements, decent quality cases. Their original designs are starting to develop nicely, as shown in the Titanium 500.
If you like it, grab it.
Moonwatch,
What would you pay? 2500 USD for good condition, from 2009
Should I pull the trigger?
Comes with original bracelet and strap
>>58750795
oceanus is a line. there's a nice time-only for $500.
and there's a reason you don't usually see titanium watches for the price of that steinhart: it's finished like total shit.
>>58751207
I paid $2200 for mine from 2014. Fantastic condition from eLady. Don't worry about the description saying "polished". It's not actually polished like what watch people mean when they say polished. 10/10 will buy from eLady again.
What does /g/ think of analog Casio watches, excluding G-Shock?
>>58750998
SAGZ081
>>58750986
They get that way by people wearing them for years, a week in the sun isn't going to do shit.
>>58751241
You bought it in 2014 or its from 2014? Makes this deal feel a little less sweet now.
Looking at eLady now.. you pay import taxes on top?
>>58751409
I bought it in November of last year. It was from 2014. One of the last 3570.50s. Came with bracelet but no box or papers. I was prepared to pay import taxes, I had to pay $60 import taxes for my seamaster I bought early last year. But it's been three months and I haven't received any billing like I did with my 2220.80. So idk.
>>58751409
Buy the seller not the watch. The price is the secondary concern.
t. Guy who took three tries to get his Explorer II.
>>58751243
they aight if you're looking for cheap quartz
>>58751531
What does "t." mean?
My thoughts after a few days:
The finishing is spectacular, I don't get tired of looking at it. The blue hands are sublime but I wish the subdials had the same color instead of black. The watch is quite thick at 15mm but the shape of the case does a lot to hide it from all but a direct side view and it's less than 5% thicker than a MOTFM. The movement is running about 6 seconds a day fast, unfortunately the chronograph portion is under the dial and invisible through the caseback. No microadjusts on the bracelet but two half links were included. Not bad for less than $1100.
>>58751684
Forgot photo.
I just bought my first "real" watch, a Seiko Premier analogue quartz watch with a date calendar and two hands. I really like it but I'm a bit worried, because in my autistic attempts at getting the long hand to match my computer's time, I've accidentally done a couple of things that perhaps aren't good practice:
>turned the second hand backwards ½ turn
>once failed to pull the crown all the way out before turning it, resulting in both the date calendar and second hand advancing at the same time
Any reason to worry about this or am I just being silly? The manual doesn't mention these situations being an issue, but, still.
>>58751772
nah you're fine
>>58751772
Your parents failed you
>>58751645
>What does "t." mean?
It's shorthand Finnish for "terveisin" which means "regards".
>>58751531
The guy has 100% feedback including a watch for a similar price in the past... Fuck I'm tempted what I do
>>58751901
Someone please give me the true meaning
>>58752028
He did you moron
>>58752028
>t. Reddit
>>58750892
>seiko shogun
SBDC007 ?
i already have two Seiko divers, but that IS pretty nice. it's quite a bit more than i really want to spend, but it does look tempting.
the Tempest looks kinda ugly
>>58751019
o-ok anon, thanks, but everybody else is telling me it's shit
>>58751208
hrmph, ok thanks. i'll do some further research
>>58752028
t. "it's my first day here" guy :DDD
>>58751834
Alright thanks
>>58752399
Ive been on 4chan since 2008.
This meme is récent afaik and I still dont get it
>>58752581
Are you literally retarded? Can you not pick up on context clues? It's the same as saying "source". Just with a dash of autism.
>>58752604
Even with context clues I can't.
At a moment I thought it was à shortening of tfw but its def not
>>58740781
>im suprised there isnt more digital watch appreciation here.
There is some but digital is a mixed bag really.
Aesthetics should be easier than mechanical in theory since the movements tend to be smaller so you get more freedom in layouts. Unfortunately many of the designs are downright hideous. Also few digital offer complications.
Smart watches has made it possible for third parties to make designs, many of which are nice, tidy and can have complications. The downside is that you need a daily recharge.
>>58752604
Aaaah it means source!!
Everything makes sense now.
Why à "t" thought?
>>58749415
where is the place to go for a Sea-Gull Rodina? I'm in love with that watch is the most affordable from the bauhauses i liked. I find their website, and also read a lot about some website good-stufss.com, but they don't have it anymore, just some version without logo.
ALso, I can't find the R005GB/st1731 (date) version in black, does it even exist ? I'd preferably want it in black.
>>58752695
The first guy told you
SKX013 vs Orient Ray
which one is a better waste of money?
>>58753142
I'd get the SKX: better lume, subjectively better-looking.
>>58749763
SKX, it's more iconic.
>>58753413
>seiko
>iconic
kek
>>58753428
Wew lad
>>58753428
>iconic
relating to or of the nature of an icon
>icon
2. a person or thing regarded as a representative symbol of something
yep, pretty much
>>58753207
In terms of actual finish the Orient is a lot nicer looking though
>>58753487
So what icon does seiko make?
Diver? No that's Rolex.
Chronograph? No that's Omega.
Entry level? Timex
Rugged af? Casio
Seiko? Meme for watch nerds
>microbrands
>"homages" with insignificant differences
How innovative.
http://www.borealiswatch.com/store/diver-watches/
>>58753636
why post about it then
Outsider here, what was that really cheap brand that made good looking watches?
>>58753540
How to prove you don't know shit
By Anonymous
>>58753636
Borealis has a few hits, but this really looks like shit without Blancpains build quality.
>>58753932
Nope.
>>58754074
Well there's the seiko 5 line a myriad of casios and orients
Be a lil more specific
Size
Style
Price
Quartz or Auto
>>58753729
MVMT
>>58753142
Ray looks far better. Much more modern
>>58753540
>Diver - SKX, MM300, Sea Urchin, Monster
>Chronograph - 6139, Bullhead Speed-Timer
>Entry level - Seiko 5
>Rugged af - You got me there
>>58753540
>>58755094
There's also this little beauty that brought about the decimation of many mountain jews.
>>58750493
> soeacisl
what did he mean by this...
>>58755179
What? Are u new or retarded?
t. The dude not knowing what "t." meant
Any digital watches similar to the Casio AE1200WHD-1A with a metal case that also have support for at least three timezones but without Bluetooth or any "smart" capabilities? Love this watch but the silver painted resin is peeving me. Budget is <$700 USD.
So, TGV just posted his current collection on jewtube. Opinions?
He is now talking about adding a Moonphase Speedmaster.
>>58752361
>o-ok anon, thanks, but everybody else is telling me it's shit
And everyone says SSDs are a meme.
I understand the disdain towards Steinhart as a brand as 80% of their watches are just straight up uninspired Sub Homages. I get that some people don't like to see that.
But at the same time, those people have to stop and look at everything else about the watch.
They're adequately finished considering the price, far from exceptional, but nor are they poor.
They have considerably more accurate movements than you might find in Seikos of a comparable price. By a considerable margin too.
Their original designs are hit and miss. I personally love the look of the Titanium 500, and the Military 42 (Though the branding in the middle of the dial is a turn off).
Frankly dude, if you like the look of the Titanium 500, go for it. Don't be memed out of it. It's a solid watch, I know one anon here had a bad time with a Steinhart Fliegar, never knew what became of it or what was wrong with it in the first place - beyond the obvious that is atleast.
If Titanium 500 bro crops up, be sure to ask him. He'd feed in how it is in person. I can only speak on part of the OVM.
>>58755318
The Pulsar PW3001 has a world time function.
>>58755503
>Frankly dude, if you like the look of the Titanium 500, go for it.
thanks man, that was basically my opinion anyway.
however, i wasn't aware of the Seiko SBDC007.
i think it's within my price range
do i need another Seiko? do i need another diver? do i need another watch??
>>58755318
Ellesse p1500an
best dive watch under 100?
>>58755459
>mfw pure classy dogshit
>excepto for Accutron and Rolex
>tfw scratched the screen of my terrorist watch today
;_;
>>58756282
You only have two choices in that price range, the Casio MDV 106 and the Vostock Amphibia.
>sell watches on forums
>listings literally edited to say "SOLD" in bold red letters once sold
>people still contact me two years later "hey bro you still got that watch?"
>literally more responses to old listings than my currently available ones
Wait, what's all this about MEMS crashing the watch market?
wtf is a MEMS and why is it crashing the market?
Did I miss a memo?
>>58756970
>why is it crashing the market?
Behold the chaos of a market crash.
>>58756574
Relax. Nothing valuable was lost.
>>58756970
>MEMS crashing the watch market
KEK Obviously not.
>>58757207
Apologize my terrorist watch right now or I'll allah snackbar you!
>>58755654
>>58756097
Thank you friends.
>>58757444
>>58757228
>>58757133
In the previous thread those two jerk faces were writing dissertations about MEMS. MEMS this, MEMS that.
I've literally never heard of it until now.
What's the cheapest smart watch that supports Android Pay?
I wanna blow some people's minds.
The chinesium on my fake Breitling started leaking blue (probably nickel) on to my skin, so I went out and bought a F-91W. No regrets.
>>58757744
For reference, Grand Seiko has been using MEMS for like 8+ years. Those escape wheels I posted are MEMS parts used in GS.
Which watch screams "I'm a virgin"?
>>58758054
Then wtf were they talking about. The market hasn't crashed.
>>58758090
casio databank
>>58757839
>replacing dogshit with another flavor of the same shit.
K m8
>>58749763
SKX007 All the way, the icon, the best the tried and tested 7s26 movement. Don't fuck this one up.
>>58749461
>NO OK
>>58758250
>>58749763
>007
Get the 009 if you're not getting the ray. 007 looks extremely boring.
>>58750682
Yes. Steinharts are great quality for the price. The best Swiss Made watch in the $500 range, hands down.
>>58749471
I like these Seagulls. Ed put together a nice watch.
Is the ST19 movement pretty good (like the watch still functions 1 year later)?
I'm looking to get an snk007, but I can't seem to find them for sale directly from Amazon. Could someone here recommend a reputable online watch seller where I'll get a genuine one complete with warranty?
I have a SARB035. Should I change the bracelet to either a nice brown leather strap, be it a normal strap or a nato strap? The metal bracelet sizing is a bit fiddly and I can never quite get it right.
Caveat is that live in the tropics so I sweat a lot.
looking to buy my first luxury dive watch
omega or breitling?
does anyone wear these watches as a republican?
>>58759039
>omega
>breitling
>luxury dive watch
You can get used orient rays for that price
>>58759154
then recommend a dive watch sub 3k-ish
don't know much about brands
new to the watch game
>>58758459
yeah ive actually had my skx007 for 5 years now and was thinking of replacing it with 009 hm...
>>58751772
>all good buddy boy, cool watch btw
I've done the reverse crown thing a number of times on my automatics when Im lazy. I tend not to do it as much and rather go forward.
I haven't bought it, but need help deciding.
This one
>>58759294
This one?
>>58759294
go spring drive or go home.
>>58759308
This one?
>>58759324
Or this one?
>>58759315
I already have to service 3 high end swiss pieces. Tired of the insane servicing costs and want some quartz.
>>58759324
This one
>>58759352
Why does it appeal to you the most?
>>58759377
5 part link bracelet, more interesting case design, best looking finishing
>>58759402
The one with the domed sapphire looks impressive as well.
Are expansion bands a meme?
>>58758785
I made a croc embossed cow strap for my sarb in black with black stitching and it works well.
>>58759194
Seamaster
anyone got a Junghans?
Look clean as fuck
>>58760523
Nice render dumbass
The consensus seems to be that the quality isn't great. Don't look at it too closely if you buy one.
A bit overpriced for what you're getting too.
>>58759698
They're kinda meh. If you are ever looking to get a watch for an older person, an expansion band may be one of the easiest for them to use though.
>>58760565
>it doesn't look as good as the renders!
What does /wt/ think about the new Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80?
>Cheaper than either a Le Locle OR a Powermatic
>great dial design
>non-pleb bracelet
>cool Le Locle back case engravings
>80 hours power reserve
Honestly, I don't think it gets any better than this for a sub $400 casual/dress watch
>>58760915
I remember reading that part of how they achieved that power reserve was thinning out parts of the movement. Can't be assed to find the article, but enjoy a corner cutting movement.
>>58760915
>Le Locl
>Le L
LEL
E
L
>>58759308
get this one
>>58751019
>steinshit marketing is here
>>58751698
Why can't seiko make a decent chorno around $300? I like that alot but over $1000 I might as well get a speedy.
Looks great though senpai.
>>58761331
Find yourself a 6138. Read up on the vertical clutch though, if that breaks then you're at various levels of fucked.
>>58761324
>eceleb shitposter is here
>>58761371
I've seen them before but you cant get one under $500 unless you want one thats completely mangled.
>>58761409
Try yahoo jp auctions? Can usually get watches cheaper there than on ebay or other places.
>>58761419
thats pretty based, thanks for the tip
>>58751772
It's recommended not to do that everyday, but a dozen times in 10 years should be fine. It won't suddenly kill the movement, it just "may" slightly damage it in the long run. Don't worry too much.
>>58761504
>>58761504
Were you trying to say something?
>>58761519
graphic designer is here moron.
>>58761597
>>58749415
Hey, I have the exact same watch (only sand colour)!
>>58760989
Can't find any source on that but this article sums it up quite well
http://www.watchtime.com/wristwatch-industry-news/industry/watch-insider-tissot-automatic-affordable/
Also, worth mentioning that it's some COSC level tier, so that's not to be taken with a pinch of salt
>>58761640
I got one for my dad as a daily for christmas, I used to have the blue dialed one. Loved that watch
>>58760592
looks cheap and tinny
>>58761604
what i am saying is you dont have any aesthetic tastes.
>>58761843
>diesel dogshit
>aesthetically pleasing
>>58761843
>apprehands of aesthetic
>apprehands
A P P R E H A N D S
P P R E H A N D S
P R E H A N D S
R E H A N D S
E H A N D S
H A N D S
A N D S
N D S
D S
S
>>58761942
>understand or perceive.
great art invites us to apprehend beauty
synonyms: appreciate, recognize, discern, perceive, make out, take in, realize, grasp, understand,
>>58761859
who is in here has some art degree?
>>58761983
>>58761992
Stop it anon, my sides can't take this.
>>58762013
is not even an answer. thats mean you are a moron.
Steinhart said their watchmaker will take care of my case and crystal for me. I don't know what that means, but they no longer sell cases so if you fuck yours up there's not really much you can do.
>>58762177
Why what happened to it? My guess is they'll polish the hell out of it.
>>58761504
>>58762072
>>58761992
>>58761983
>>58761843
God damn.
There are the criminally stupid and then there's you.
If you think that piece of shit Fossil is aesthetic in someway, or valuable, you are undoubtedly the biggest retard that ever came to these threads.
kys
And in the process, learn what good, tasteful design, really is. (pic related)
>>58762243
>fageron constantinople on a sheared e-peen
what shit taste but that's expected
>>58762259
Are you being deliberately a moron?
1/10
>tfw I've just managed to sell all my 8 watches on eBay except for my SKX and will finance premium hookers once a week for a few months with the money
anyone else undergoing a crippling post-break up depression?
>>58762177
will they heal your finger
>>58762226
They just sent me another email. They don't do any replacement at all, only fixing the watch. The only way to fix it is to replace the case and the crystal.
>>58762324
My finger is all healed up, friend.
all people of here is a jacobin
Where can I buy a replacement crown for my grandfathers vintage Technos?
>>58759194
Seiko SKX007.
>>58762684
Find another technos for parts and take its crown?
>>58762684
If it's 100m you should get a proper one from Cousins, or just give it to a qualified watchmaker.
If you don't care about WR then get a box of assorted chink crowns from Ebay, one is bound to be good enough.
>you have $300 do you spend it on
>japanese automatic
>swiss quartz
?
>>58762769
The answer is hookers.
>>58762769
>$300 swiss quartz
Enjoy your heavily marketed Swatch.
>$300 japanese automatic
Enjoy your well-finished Seiko.
Your pick.
How much would you pay for a NOS seiko 6246?
>>58762979
300 bucks
>>58762997
>>58760915
1853
8
5
3
>>58762271
yeah no just calling out the faggot that calls morons
>>58762997
This
>>58758054
what particular movements? are there MEMS in spring drive movements?
and how do you feel about the st19 (for an 'affordable' chronograph)?
What watch screams "I am very masculine and no one would ever suspect that I find young feminine transgenders to be VERY appealing"
Just preordered pic related. Excited for this fucker.
>>58763777
Anything with Steinhart on it
>>58763802
Nice. What movement and size are those?
I'm not a fan of the hands, but that case is just great.
>>58763827
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/seiko-prospex-blue-lagoon-samurai-turtle-srpb09-and-srpb11
>>58763777
Daniel Wellington. People will think you like hyper-masculine nigger dicks up your boihole instead.
>>58763777
INVICTA
>Orient Ray
>Seiko SKX013
>Seiko SNZF17
which watch will make me feel happy and complete until the end of my days? or maybe something else under $200?
>>58763939
>which watch will make me feel happy
How the fuck will anyone else know the answer to that
>>58759344
>swiss
Found your problem.
>>58763939
If you have your doubts, I don't think any of them meet that criterion anon.
>>58763939
How the fuck are we meant to know what will make you happy? The SNZF would be my choice. If you get bored of it you can look into modding it, modded SNZFs look better than modded SKXs imo.
>>58750682
>>58752361
Tempest Commodore is really nice watch, very comfortable, but its also pretty big.
The lume is pretty nice too
>>58765562
lume
>>58761371
>>58761409
I was just looking last night, there are a couple decent 6138s on fleabay between 300-500
>>58750682
>>58765562
>throwing away money on mushroom brands that will not exist in 2-5 years
lmao nice joke
>>58765593
That's sexy
Where to cop?
>>58765562
>>58765593
well thanks, i appreciate the pics & comments, but i really just don't like the way it looks
>>58763802
Eh, pretty ugly compared to the original.
>>58765638
tempest watch website or might be a few on ebay.
Still haven't gotten around to fixing this black bay mod 007. Dagaz dial didn't last very long
>>58761506
>>58759273
Alright, thanks.
I think it looks even better in real life than in that image. Have a meme
>>58763939
any more opinions?
>>58766582
Ray
Fantastic article
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/seiko-credor-eichi-2-in-depth
all i want is a fitness band type thing that does time and stopwatch. why does this not exist in 2017
>>58766896
Casio F91
uncle archie has a video on my camera lmao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giSRczBv-wQ
>>58757744
>I've literally never heard of it until now.
MEMS is not new by any means. In horology there is also several Ulysse Nardin designs that also use MEMS. They are also working on glass bridges and if I understood/remember the article correctly someone is making integrated bridges, that is bridges manufactured with jewel equivalent fabricated from the start.
>>58756970
I am not sure there *is* a crash but I guess it will come sooner or later. With MEMS you take a lot of manual labour out of the production and the main value add is design and functionality.
>>58763838
>4r instead of 6r movement
>>58766626
I love my SNZF, but the hands are starting to bug me. Modding might be in my future.
>>58766760
Damn
>>58766760
yep, i'd love to see one of those
>>58749415
Got a new watch today /g/. Using Apple Pay is cool, using it with a watch is even more convenient that with my iPhone.
I can also now control all the lighting in my house right from my wrist.
It's pretty great.
Does pic related make any good watches? What are some models worth picking up that don't have that gaudy engraving on the side?
>>58770138
>Does pic related make any good watches?
No.
>>58766760
The eichi II in person struck me as meh to be honest. Unless you're looking at it with a ten power loupe, it just looks really sterile and empty. The movement finishing is of course superb, but again, unless you're really really up close, not immediately distinguishable from lower-end credors or high-end GS.
>>58770131
I like the idea of it. I just wish I liked the design. Apple Pay on the wrist must be pretty fantastic though.
I wanted a cheap but durable watch for the gym should i get an f91w or the w800-1av
Just sold my smartwatch to buy a real watch. I'm kind of on the fence between this
>https://www.amazon.com/Timex-TW4B048009J-Expedition-Scout-Slip-Thru/dp/B0194LWAGW/
and some sort of casio because I heard those were super durable. I want something to wear when I sleep and shower, preferably not having to take it off for weeks at a time. Which one should i get? If Casio, which specific one?
>the normal human pulse is between 70 and 80 beats per minute
Time for Couch to 5 km you slob
>>58772770
ok so all the casios look bad
Im really thinking im gonna go for that timex unless theres an alternative at the same price I should go for for any reason
>>58772566
gold terroristwatch friend, set timing kino
Hi /g/ents
>>58773053
sorry I can't read your post your watch is so big it's covering the text.
>>58773053
Jesus fuck me 8big5you
its that a fucking wall clock or fuckin Westminster
>>58773008
I doubt you looked at every single Casio in 20 minutes
>>58773053
Christ, that is awful
>>58773130
Well no but I'd want a g shock and the ones that are in my budget aren't super appealing.
>>58773053
>>58773214
ok guys
for 24/7 wearing
>https://www.amazon.com/Timex-TW4B048009J-Expedition-Scout-Slip-Thru/dp/B0194LWAGW/
or
>https://www.amazon.com/Casio-G-Shock-Classic-Digital-Watch/dp/B01A7IL94K/
>>58773261
timex
This just came today, first Grand Seiko in my collection and it really really is everything people say online about it. Extremely nicely done with awesome packaging. The case and dial and bracelet sheesh.. And the beautiful movement at the behind
>>58773985
Nice. Lo-beat, right? 9S65?
>>58774047
yeh more like normal beat lol
>>58773261
I'd get the G-Shock. Should last longer.
>>58773996
How d'you like it compared to the explorer?
>>58774653
Both cool, Rolex explorer is great as it is reserved rolex and a true icon.
Grand Seiko not as much an icon but for me an extremely respectable and great maker.
Quality wise when handling, the bracelet on both are extremely nice.
Case/Dial - I will give it to the Grand Seiko for the higher finish with more intricate case details and the better polish. Dial really reflects light nicely on the GS. Can't complain about the iconic explorer dial of course.
Movement on both are great of course. Two of the greats in the industry I'm sure.
They for me are different watches of course and can't say I prefer one over the other.
One crap thing about it is that its 13.2mm thick or so. Explorer is 12mm
That is one thing I can say that I prefer the rolex over the GS.
On the wrist it doesnt seem too thick so it is OK. But could be improved.
>>58773053
>>58773985
>>58773996
Nice bro, quite the collection you've got. Did you sell your seamaster to put towards the GS?
r8 my watch familia
>>58775958
Judging by the time does this watch belong to some Russian Oligarch or some jet setter on a Hawaiian vacation?
>>58775054
Yeah got rid of the seamaster up above. I think I will get a 2255.80 or 2254.50 next to replace
>>58758759
longislandwatch.com probs
>>58773985
N I C E
I
C
E
Movement pic?
>>58776347
One thing I have discovered is the super legibility of this watch. The super sharp hands make it extremely clear what the time is. Although not the most popular GS, i like it a lot with the red accents making it a little sportier than the dressier GS watches.
It is the most beautiful movement watch I've owned for sure.
>>58776603
the katana polished sword hands really make GS
>>58776603
The hands are my favourite feature of Grand Seikos. And yeah the minute track makes it an easy watch to wear every day.
I'm still on the fence about the choice of my first "nice" watch, Nomos or GS.
I'll need to actually try different models on - it will be quite a ways before I can buy one anyway.
>>58776663
The polishing is amazing all around the case and the hands. Works well with the creamy dial as well. I'll have to take better pics tomorrow, in the middle of a move atm
>>58776680
I consider all my watches nice anyways, whats your current collection if you have one?
Watch repair anon here. Guy comes in today saying that he has a 45-50 year old Soviet watch that needs repair, and by the way he said it I think it's a bumper watch. Any idea what make it could be? The guy didn't know, he said the logo was like a red V.
>>58758722
>Is the ST19 movement pretty good (like the watch still functions 1 year later)?
So far so good (it's been 4 monthes).
Bought it from Poljot24, which sent an additional leather strap and a chocolate Santa Klaus :)
>>58777312
Actually more like 2 monthes
>>58776680
I own both. GS shits over Nomos in terms of quality.
Nomos is still nice, sure. But different leagues in every way.
>>58777000
Seiko SNK803, Orient Ray (first version), Luch one-handed watch
So pretty much shitters, although I really like the Seiko and Orient. The Luch is just for fun since I got it for a good price.
I don't consider any of them actually good watches though, the finishing, and even the design, aren't up to par with the better watches out there.
>>58777603
Grand Seikos are a bit more expensive anyway. But even then, I really like Nomos' designs. GS are amazing but way more conservative.
My growing collection
Let's not forget the terrorist
>>58778612
Why would you store a watch backwards you animal
>>58778881
I didn't even notice...
>>58778633
>He doesn't have a NATO strap on it
>>58778568
Should I buy this as my first auto for someone with babby wrists
>>58779458
Definitely.
It's cheap, well made and small (38mm I believe)
>>58779314
I'll put a NATO on it when the resin band dies (I've heard they last a year)
>>58779477
Cheers mate
>>58779458
Yes
>>58779314
NATOs are the worst meme
Where is the new thread?
>>58780588
Why would there be a new thread, there's plenty of posts left in this one.
>>58750682
I'm here for you bro. If you like it go for it. There ain't anything else like it out there.
>But but you can get something so much better for a bit more $$$
Nope. It's always different.
H I B E A T
I
B
E
A
T
Why the FUCK are meistersingers so expensive I want one so bad
>>58750729
cool!
>>58780897
hey thanks.
still undecided about this right now.
i like Steinhart, but i might just go for the Seiko SBDC007
pls post some more pics if you have the time to do so
>>58781479
I don't have too many, just these few
>>58781503
And I actually posted the wrong one (yes crown is open), well what ever.
>>58773053
clean your keyboard, you swine
kek
>>58781764
Well well well what do we have here?
>>58758090
Any watch that isn't D. Wellington.
>>58781783
Random old watch I found while cleaning.
>>58781109
because muh exclusivity
get a luch
>>58763802
Fucking love that watch. Angled lugs, rocket hands, the blues. I really am impressed by those. But I can't justify $800 or whatever for one.
>>58782332
$560.
Ay
>>58784493
Nice post retard.
>>58784706
Calm down.
>>58760523
Beautiful design, I think it's a phantastic watch
>>58775958
Eyesore/10
Less is more
>>58784706
Thanks you piece of fucking turd.
what diver is this guys?
>>58786246
I would guess some Yachtmaster variant.
this watch is worth $500k. what is it?
>>58786426
Dogshit
>>58786262
jotaru kujo is rich.
>>58786434
>t. jealusy
>>58786462
Money can't buy taste.
>>58786480
can't buy you some brain cells either
>>58786426
Looks like the MB&F HM no.3. If it is, it's not worth $500k. Maybe $200k tops.
Best <$150 beater to travel around southeast Asia with? Don't want to lose my arm.
Any diving won't be that far down and it'll be two or three trips at most.
>>58786447
I recall that in one episode they mention him wearing a TAG Heuer. Based on the timeline it would have been 1-2 years after TAG bought Heuer, so it is possible it was a mistranslation of just Heuer, I wasn't listening well enough until I read the subtitle. Additionally, if he had had the watch for more than two years it would have definitely been Heuer.
>>58786536
G-shock, Mdv-106, maybe an orient ray, generic Seiko 5, Casio edifice, 3 Vostoks just in case, the list could go on...
>>58786649
coo. i thought it was a yachtmaster knowing how rich his gramps is and since he's got the whole marine getup.
>>58786536
SKX, there's a lot of those in SEA.