Hi /g/. So since I've heard TC is not secure anymore I tried

>>52492299
>So since I've heard TC is not secure anymore
You heard wrong.

/thread

>>52492321
Yeah, well can you elaborate on that ? I do want to trust you since I'm used to TC, but who am I supposed to follow when I read here and there that the tool has been audited to reveal some flaws. Also, the dev said :

"WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is not secure as it may contain unfixed security issues"

I'm not really fond of cryptography so my knowledge is very limited thus why I'm seeking informed advices here.

>>52492445
https://opencryptoaudit.org/

>>52492445
The last time truecrypt was audited for security issues they found nothing. The program has not been altered since then so as far as anyone knows it is still fine.

They were just covering their asses with that message since it could at some point in the future be insecure since it won't be updated.

>>52492488
Ok so I guess I've started freaking out for nothing.

Why do you encrypt?
I don't think anyone on this board can decrypt it.
It's compromised in terms of nsa, eavesdropping, etc. It's safe for grandma.

>>52492523
I want to encrypt my corporate documents mostly.

>>52492299
>he fell for the FUD

File: pls.png (28KB, 484x458px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 484x458px

>>52492584
Come on mane, I'm no specialist, I've freaked out seeing this on the setup.

>>52492635
use the 7.1a version found at >>52492481

>>52492696
>>52492481
Thanks senpai.

>>52492635
It's insurance, not gospel.