INTEL BLOWN THE FUCK OUT

>>52464479

the video is from last week, fuck off.

>>52464479
>bad teeth

holy shit, even AMD businessmen are unoptimized

Should anyone really care that a single benchmark is flawed?

>>52464502
Lol.

>>52464660
>mine is fast
>mine is way faster look at this
>but its fake
>ITS ONE BENCHMARK JEEZ.

Intelfags don't need to go on suicide watch. We can afford quality mental health and the prescriptions that come with it.

>>52464479

how do I advertise AMD on my website? Can i just mail them and ask for permission to use their logo in a banner with a link to their website? I don't want money for that, just do it for free

the reason for this is because Intel's built-in hardware backdoor into their processors (intel anti theft technology)

>>52464986
You just plug the banner right next to your kickstarter campaign that you need to fund your shitty AMD server because you are too poor to buy Intel

>>52464986
amd has that too

http://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/security

File: 309.png (44KB, 200x197px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 200x197px

>>52465142

omg

is there no processor maker that doesn't have hardware backdoors?

>>52464479
this guy is shilling for amd
they literally just said
>but it doesn't take into account graphics processing from the processor!
why would I want that when I have a GPU

>>52465185
ARM,
Enjoy your android fuckshit

>>52465227
>ARM

http://www.arm.com/products/processors/technologies/trustzone/

File: 1422838399880.jpg (431KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 3840x2160px

>>52464502

File: Screen-Shot-2015-08-12-at-7.26.16-AM[1].png (668KB, 1115x621px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 1115x621px

>>52465258

Crying about A benchmark not being fair doesn't change the fact that their cpus are shit, even at 5Ghz.

>>52465584
>Retard: The Post

>>52465595
By all means, expend your thought and explain to my why I should by an AMD toaster.

>>52465626
You shouldn't I want you to waste more of your money goy

>>52465676
Don't get me wrong, I was buying amd from my first Duron 800 to the A64. But they just haven't been able to put a fight since the core2 architecture.

File: Capture.png (642KB, 839x533px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 839x533px

>>52464479
WAIT A SECOND, THAT HAND

>>52464479
amd has to make a 5 minute movie to combat cpu shills

>>52466041
>>52465894

oh, i didn't realize you could zoom in.,

So it was broadwell vs what AMD processor?

>>52464479
>we are here in our amd labs to collect facts and data to determine whether or not this is truth or myth
>sysmark is excessively benchmarking the cpu
>pcmark benchmarks the gpu/video components as well
>a set of custom scripts developed within amd
Basically what they're saying is that in most "real world applications" it isn't the CPU that is the bottleneck, but more likely the hard drive.
Running tasks in Office isn't likely to fully load the CPU, it'll just use it in bursts and it won't even make full use of all of its cores in all of the tasks.

So what it comes down to is that they proved that in "real world" light computing examples there is negligible difference between the two platforms, but what they didn't prove was that the AMD CPU was not 50% less powerful than the Intel.

>>52464479
tl;dr: AMD has better integrated GPU but intel has better CPU performance

>>52464479

>Creating a strawman 101

Why didn't AMDfags get into professions of teaching people how to argue horribly?

>>52466887
That's probably largely it really.

They basically took a more favorable benchmark and then concocted a test that would reflect the results of the benchmark in order to "prove" that it is more accurate.

>>52466261
obligatory

>>52466059
i5 5200u + HD5500
FX 8800P + R7

>>52467760
>HD5500 vs R7
>HD5500 still wins
LOL my sides are in orbit

>>52467760
Doesn't the FX 8800p get fucked by its tdp? Seems like a lot of people online are having problems with it throttling because of the 15w tdp companies like HP use

OUR CPUS AREN'T COMPLETELY SHIT

THEY'RE ONLY LITTLE BIT SHIT

GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. OK?

jesus fucking christ did they do this in one take? the guy is clearly reading off of a Teleprompter

>>52468309
These are people who clearly don't make videos often.

Everyone is like this to begin with. It takes practice to get used to talking to a camera.

>>52465185
Try OpenPOWER. Be prepared to pay a few thousand minimum though, because servers.

I buy Intel because I support Israel.

>>52468413
>Everyone is like this to begin with. It takes practice to get used to talking to a camera.

so have him practice for fuck sake they are a large company not some ma and pa they should have more self respect

>>52468647
You expect them to put more effort into training their presenters for this video than they put into "debunking" sysmark?

>>52465894
WE FOUND THE HAND

>>52464479
did anyone notice that the guy in the video is blinking in morse code?
what does he say?

>>52464479
Intel will never get my money. white hating racist pieces of shit.

>>52468677
lol

>>52464479
Reminder: Lisa Su fired the head of marketing, and is personally behind all of their latest advertising and marketing initiatives. The lady is absolutely brutal and doesn't fuck around. AMD is going to put out more and more videos like this.

>>52464479
>>52466887
I was about to complain about them whining about a benchmark that gave more weight to single-threaded performance putting the Intel CPU higher. In this case though, they picked a really low-end mobile i5, that is apparently weaker across the board than the AMD one. They then still managed to find the Intel one beat them out in all three benchmarks.

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
FX-8800P: 1482
i5-5200U: 1442
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php multithreaded
FX-8800P: 4210
i5-5200U: 3533

>>52470141
Z E N will save us
E
N

>>52470166
I'm using a 2600K still, and I want Zen to be good so that it'll push Intel to release something that's not 5% IPC or 5% TDP.

>>52470141
>passmark

Just stop it

>>52470229
Whats wrong with it?
Also what alternative is out there?

>>52470229
The multithreaded benchmark has shortcomings when comparing Intel and AMD (it tends to overrepresent HT), but the single-threaded benchmark is completely fine.

>>52470141
>literally the point

>>52470282
Whats wrong with it? Everything. You might as well ask whats wrong with Geekbench composite scores. This shouldn't need to be explained on this board after this long.

Use Handbrake, Fritz, DIEP, POV-Ray, 7zip, x264 encoding benches, c-ray, AIDA64, and SiSoft Sandra

>>52470307
No. Stop it.

Intel CPU's are worth the money not just for that extra performance but also power saving.

AMD's run hot and with high power consumption for what you're getting. The last AMD chip I bought was FX6350 when it came out and it is the biggest mistake I made in past years.

passmark almost equailt irl absolutly shitty
so i had c2d ee7200 (1658) and shitty MOBILE i3-4005U 2461)

i3 running mint (older_ debian
On c2d i could easily open os x, mini linux and WINDOS, without cpu shitting itself
On i3, it craps with linux and os x / windows and is incapable of procesing 3 vms.

>>52470440
Kabini > Everything Intel
in terms of power efficiency

>>52470498
Thats not how you spell Beema, and you're still wrong.

>>52470498
>Kabini
That's another thing Intel do better, not using shitty poo in loo type names.
Kabini is quite literally a river in India that the "people" there shit in.

http://vrworld.com/2011/06/24/amd-insiders-speak-out-bapco-exit-is-an-excuse-for-poor-bulldozer-performance/

AMD can't compete, tries to discredit benchmarks they don't like

Zen is Bulldozer 2.0 all over again

>>52470467
>wondering why a mobile CPU that has worse singlethreaded performance than a c2d is worse at running multiple VMs

Also I literally said that passmark overrepresents hyperthreading (i7, i3, mobile cpus) in their multithreaded scores, so thanks for proving my point.

>>52470592
this i am proving your point and bumbping the thread.
We need some good of all opensource db of all cpus with diffrent benchmarks

>AMD makes their own scripts to test because that bench is corrupt
>they still manage to lose by 7%

You can't make this stuff up

File: 1248377851467.png (397KB, 602x449px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 602x449px

>>52464479
>Le suicide thread

>>52471162
They're being completely honest, its what companies do when they have real scruples.

File: 1300044776986.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>52464479
>2016
>AMD PUTS INTEL ON SUICIDE WATCH
>AMD loses by 50%
>AMD loses by 7%
>people still buy AMD
>ISHYGDDT

Reminder that Intel supports sjws, don't buy their products

File: 7328.jpg (11KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x242px

> YO SUPP POORFAGS
> U WORRIED OUR SHIT SUCKS?
> DEM BENCHMARK JEWS TOTALLY BIASED
> WE WROTE OUR OWN NON BIASED BENCHMARK SO YOU CAN SEE HOW AWESOME WE REALLY ARE!

>...
> loses by 50% on the test
> loses by 7% on the second

Why the fuck did AMD put this out? They should have kept quiet or rigged the tests this is an absolute embarrassment.

>>52471616
I have a hard time believing you're actually so retarded that you totally misunderstood a 4:34 long video.

>>52471674
AMD sucks and you know it, Bharu. Time to give up and try for a marketing job at Intel or Microsoft, they pay better per-post.

>>52464487
>3 days ago
ok f4m

>>52467966

well that is true you know

in terms of price/performance ratio amd is pretty good

>>52471847
it's sunday dingus

Learn in2 economy and fuck intel

>>52464479
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSq0eJ7JQeE

Even AMD don't use their own CPUs.

>>52465185
>AMD Secure Processor is currently only available on select AMD A-Series and AMD E-Series APUs.
FX-* is "safe", (for now).

>>52470376
>Whats wrong with it? Everything. You might as well ask whats wrong with Geekbench composite scores. This shouldn't need to be explained on this board after this long.
newfag here, what exactly is wrong with passmark?

>>52474035
>>52465142
>>52465185
You're shit eating retards. An ARM TrustZone processor is not a hardware backdoor.
The lot of your should be taken outside and put out of your misery for being this ungodly fucking stupid.

>>52474320

>just trust us, goyim
>you don't have anything to hide, right?

>>52474412
>tech illiterate retard can do nothing but shitpost

Competent mods woudl permaban every one of you underage fucktards on sight. Spreading FUD like a luddite child has no place outside of /b/.