>2016 >not having 32gb of ram

>>52460482
>DDR3

>>52460963
I aint a leet gamer who needs 500 fps

File: ram.png (44KB, 750x321px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 750x321px

>>52460482
Half into the decade of the Linux desktop; actually filling up more than 2GiB or RAM.

File: dogwut.jpg (16KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 250x250px

>>52460482
>having 32gb of ram, for gaming and social jews

>>52460482
> 32GB DDR3 803MHz
> DDR3 803MHz
>803MHz

In what realistic scenario would you be worse off with, say, 8GB DDR4 2166MHz?

>>52462824
8GB<32GB

seriously anon?

>>52462824
Do you realize that 800Mhz "DDR" means it is 1600 Mhz?

>>52462848
Im sorry, you didnt mention you edited videos + 35 tabs in botnet + memory intense stuff in parallel. If you only use ~4GB there is little performance gains with higher frequency in that scenario though.

>>52462860
No I dont, elaborate

>>52462939
*"[...]there is little performance gains, but there is performance gains with higher frequency[...]"

>>52462939
>No I dont, elaborate
DDR is an abbreviation of double data rate. Speccy reporting 800 mhz is actually 1600 mhz if you check in the bios.

2166 mhz ram is actually clocked at 1083mhz and than doubled.

>>52462975
So OP's RAM would be labeled as 1600MHz if sold at store?

File: wotthefok.png (283KB, 450x436px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 450x436px

>32gb of ddr3

>>52463081
Yea.

File: current.png (30KB, 931x613px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 931x613px

<current_year>, having 32GB of memory
>laptop

>>52463100
Ah ok, not as trashy as I though then. Sorry.

File: Capture.png (2KB, 390x48px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 390x48px

>>52460482
>not having it since 2014

>ddr3
lol

>>52460482
>ddr3
>803mhz

go back to 2005

Yeah, I guess I'd need 32GB of RAM if I used Windows.

~ > free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        193834     192837        997        116          1     151921
-/+ buffers/cache:      40914     152920
Swap:         3811          3       3808

>>52460482

>2016
>downloading a proprietary spec viewer
>for your proprietary OS
>running on your proprietary hardware
>so you can use proprietary software

wew

>>52462824


1600mhz ddr3 is probably faster than ddr4 at 2133

>not having ddr4

>>52460482
Enjoy your placebo, faggot.

>>52467595
Just because you can't do it, doesn't mean it's placebo.

I have a dev box with 12 cores and 288gb ram that I hammer the hell out of.

>>52467386
what? really? sounds like bs

>>52460482
>2016
>not using ECC ram

Enjoy your slow but guaranteed corruption from cosmic rays and reptilian particle beams!