>god-tier software >cringy UX and UI WHYYYYYYYY

>he fell for the irfanview is god-tier software meme

>>52398183

I used the following

>ACDSee
>JPEGview
>IrfanView
>FastStone Image Viewer

and IrfanView is literally the best one both in speed of loading files and the previews it also has infinite possibilities comparing files running it 1000 times and shit like that literally a god-tier software but cringy UI and Icon. god damn it.

>>52398222
Yup, Irfanview is king but dat UI tho

>>52398112
windows babby's first useful software

Deprecated
http://www.imageglass.org/

>>52398865

>19 image formats supported, including JPG, JPE, JFIF, JPEG, PNG, GIF, ICO, BMP, DIB, TIF, TIFF, EXIF, WMF, EMF, TGA, PSD, HDR, EXR, SGV.

>no EPS

"no"

Don't know why XnView is never mentioned on /g/. All the features of IrfanView but a much better UI and is highly customizable.

>>52400080
This

>>52398112
>normal UI similar to what everyone was fine with for 30 years

No, "MUH MODERN!" is the cringe. You're literally whining about a program's aesthetics

Stop being a fucking poser and use what works best

make your own then

>>52400042
What software is this?

>>52398112
Why do you fags insist on every interface looking like some fisher price toy bullshit? Metro, material, whatever the fuck apple is calling their shit now .. they all look like they were designed for literal retards.

File: lol.jpg (1KB, 32x32px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 32x32px

>>52400175
irfanview alternative icon, removed the bikini

File: thread.png (110KB, 987x960px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 987x960px

Just disable the toolbar OP

>caring about the UI
"remembering basic shortcut combos" masterrace

File: startbild_engl-small.gif (29KB, 379x266px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 379x266px

Holy fuck the site looks like its from the 90s, just look at this shit it looks like they made it in powerpoint.

>>52400242
>menubar and statusbar still present
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>52400287
>oh no! the UI is still presenting important, relevant information about the displayed file!

>>52400242
This is the correct answer.

JPEGView is the best image viewer.

>>52400279
That's because it's not being developed by a company which has to sell its products to idiots like you, but is developed by a university which focuses on functionality.

>Not using Impression:Eyes
>2016

>>52401472
>meme software

>>52400760
> guy from bosnia
> university
pick uno

>>52398222
you forgot to mention the god tier thumbnail viewer, which is perfect for organizing large collections of images

>>52398112
but, anon
>god-tier software
stop being a faggot

File: Kebab.png (999KB, 817x773px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 817x773px

Who said it was god-tier?
It's just an image viewer. A good one at that

>cringy UX and UI
how so?

XnView is better tbqhfam

>>52400080
XNview has no function for getting randomized next picture. (Ctrl+m)

Irfanview is indeed the king, but :
>still shitting itself when opening an image amongst 25000 in a folder, can't close it until it has loaded all of the infos on the other ones.
>thumbnails mode limited to 32000 or something, can't remember
But still, nothing comes remotely close. I just wish they fixed those 2 bugs.

>>52398222
>what is feh

>>52398112
I use HoneyView and it fulfills my requirements.
Is XnView better?

>>52398222
I've always liked faststone the most. I've been wanting to program my own though.

>>52404966

At such levels of pedopornography, you shoould use CLI and a DB to scan folders and 'search' your "images"

ifranview is definitely the best when it comes to fuctionality

>>52402522
Image viewer
No bullshit
Mass image resizer
Mass image converter
Support for fucktons of formats

I wish there was a native linux version.

Irfanview supports photoshop plugins.

>2016
>not using Nomacs
Do you hate freedom?

if only every software developer in the world had Irfan Skiljans modus operandi... when you simply devote to performance-feature efficiency-perfection. remind me what does style do?

he is currently working on perfecting 64bit version.
shame there is no linux port.

btw how long is it, since 96.

File: img.png (233KB, 700x648px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 700x648px

>not making your own software that looks the way you want it to

>>52407690
I wonder how much work it would take for a Linux port

>>52400042
Kek. Was this seriously deleted because of a 64x64 drawn nipple?

>>52407756
Upload it for us anon, we'd like to admire your software.

>>52407758
who knows, IV is so feature rich... in other words it so deep into the windows pit. He could probably do it but is mostly focused on features, bugs that are really minor.
cbr/cbz reading is in plans for a long time. it would kill a lot of comic software. :)

you have the similar situation with foobar, but linux already has quite solid music players.

>>52404976
>command line oriented image viewer
>can't even use all options unless starting from command line
>can't view gifs
>doesn't update file list if file is renamed/moved/deleted in directory
shit but it is the best thing on linux

>>52400279

What did you want, you fag? Some shitty bootstrapped crap with javascript paralax and recomendations from social media? It works, it tells you the information you need.

Go die in a fire and record it in .wmv

>>52398112
>autistic coding neckbeard programs something
>works well but has aesthetics only an autistic neckbeard would like
>feign surprise