IT'S HAPPENING

If you didn't post this I would have.
I have waited for desktop OLED for so long. I am ready.

Thank you based Dell.

What the actual fuck. It's about time they gave us "consumer" OLED monitors. Will definitely wait for a 1440p OLED monitor with freesync/gsync.

>>52275937
>0.1 ms response time

wat

>5000 DOLLARS
MEANING PROBS LIKE

UMM

7500 EUROS

TO PLEL

>OLED

Oh boy can't wait to spend $5k on a monitor that has burn-in after one month of use

I hate not being rich SO much!

>>52275937
OLED is fucking awful, it's literally a meme. Enjoy your intense bleeds.

>>52276304
Fuck me too senpai.

I need to get a good job to get shit like this.

College here I come

>>52276292
I wish this burn-in meme would die.

Enjoy your blues' luminosity dropping by 30% in 6 months

>>52276304
The solution is to spend more time on the 4chans :^)

File: 1435766852033.jpg (18KB, 248x248px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 248x248px

>>52276336

>meme

Yeah fucking right I wish. I spent $1000 on an OLED monitor for filming interviews for my job, now it has burn-in from the all the interface buttons on screen from my camera. And my Galaxy S6 has burn in from using GPS too long. Anything OLED is terrible because of this. It's all part of the new wave of planned obsolescence designed to get gullible goys to shell out money for a new monitor every two years.

>>52275937
>only 30 inches

No thanks.

>>52276355
Just buy a new one then.
$5000 is like a week's pay

>>52276336
Why? Isn't it pretty much a fact that OLED has burn-in? Or has the technology evolved enough for it to be usable in monitors? I had a Moto X 2014 and it had pretty noticeable burn in on the on screen buttons.

File: 1449787673266.jpg (240KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1280x960px

Square 4k x 4k OLED when?

>>52276440
Retard alert

File: p3.jpg (94KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x800px

>>52276472
poorfag detected

>>52276414
enjoying your white male privilege much?

File: 1426653839073.jpg (34KB, 474x304px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 474x304px

>>52276396
Jesus dude, you shelled out a grand for that thing and it burnt?
Why haven't you RMA'd it?

>>52276526
It's not a bug it's a feature (tm) of oled!

>4K 120hz OLED
Holy shit. Usually when I see high-end devices posted on /g/ I'm like, "well that's pretty neat but honestly the one I have is fine". But this... I want it. I really fucking want it and I can't wait for the price to come down.

>>52276477
>you must be poor if you don't spend your money on stupid things

Okay there pretend richfag

>>52276279
As a Canadian, I should probably pick one up now, the prices are probably going to fall slower than the value of my money.

2016 already confirmed to BTFO 2015 with just a few things
>OLED monitors
>14nm-16nm GPU monstrosities
>xPoint SSDs

>>52275937
>falling for the >60hz meme

>>52276440
Xavier Dolan pls go

>>52276682
>falling for memes is always bad

>>52276682
It's not a meme if you play vidya. It's not about the raw rate of frames but about the incidence of frames with external events.

>>52276697
... yes?
What do you think something being a meme implies?

>>52275937
>5000 dollars

Ayy

>>52275937
Enjoy your burn-in :^)

>>52276292
>>52276396
>>52276744
>Dell has “incorporated a pixel shifting algorithm to prevent image burn-in.”

>>52275937
>>$4,999
>Are you ready
Fuck that shit.

>>52275937
>$5000
>lasts 6 months before severe burn in

I'll stick to my shitty $250 4k LED Acer.

>>52276721
>meme
>A meme (/ˈmiːm/ meem) is "an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture".
>all culture is bad

>>52275937
Actually apart from the 4k meme, I really want to get an OLED display.
I am not a gaymur but OLED makes reading very comfy

>>52276771
That doesn't prevent uneven pixel wear that will come from your total blacks, and that requires you to buy some shitty dell monitor or laptop.


OLED is a shitty tech and we deserved better. It's a shame SED was patent trolled once other companies realize it would destroy all other brands.

>>52276682
if you play fps games >60hz is so nice. Even just dragging a window around is noticeable, but not worth the price upgrade. I really wish they made high fps movies. I have tried using svp and it looks great, but the tearing is disgusting

>>52276882
>>52276054
>on a tech board
>doesn't even realize OLED monitors already exist and have been there for years for professionals that actually need it

>>52276912
>It's a shame SED was patent trolled once other companies realize it would destroy all other brands.
Care to fill me in with this? What happened? How was it so good?

>>52276336
You're an idiot. All modern oled panels still burn in.

Any chance of more affordable 1080p versions?

>>52276943
Toshiba + Canon 2006.

Once toshiba showed off their early prototype models that had 100000:1 contrast at CES they were the major hype for their final TVs that were to come in by 2008.

Then Canon got patent trolled by some no name company with patents in the SED tech and that forced the partnership with Toshiba to die and the death of SED.

>>52276912
SED is the real meme technology, makes OLES look durable and long lasting in comparison.
It wasn't happening.

>>52275937
>4k
>30"
Enjoy that shit scaling.

File: angry merchant.jpg (68KB, 600x737px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 600x737px

>>52275937
>Oh shit, LCD prices will never be high again even if we keep forcing the resolution up and up for no reason!
>Hurry up and get the OLED shit out! Get the shills on it, fast!

>>52276912
OLED ins't bad at all, its just not that far developed yet. btw, it's a pretty bad idea to buy now a 5000$ screen, in about a year you'get them for 700

>>52276977

the pixel shifting that prevents burn-in requires really high resolution to not look weird.

>>52275937
>$4999
>16:9
no

>>52276771
How does pixel shifting work? Does it just shift them all back and forth really quick?

What if all the pixels nearby are the same color? Won't it still burn in or is dell going to change the color completely and make the "shifting" noticable?

>>52277060
nice picture friend, mind if i save it? :^)

>>52277107
It probably moves across the rgb scale slightly not across pixel positions.

>>52277087
this meme needs to end

>>52277125
Wouldn't that be noticable then if ithe scales to a slightly different shade?

https://youtu.be/-5Epb5Fisio lmao

>>52277148
It obviously wouldn't be.

6T78TYU8TGITJHUGHJ;JKAHSDF;KGVHJA;LSD FU

>>52275937
> and an image sensor that can tell whether or not you're viewing the monitor and turns it off when it's not in use.

$5000 to be spied on

>>52277173
are you ok there friend? :^)

>>52277087
21:9 master race

>>52277112
It's all yours my friend :D

Also I'm not bashing Jews, just the tech industry shills and the constant unnecessary moves to new technologies that sound good at first.

>>52277087

>I want to be different and have an objectively worse aspect ratio

There's a reason the computer industry uses 16:9. It's much better for entertainment like movies and games.

>>52276929
dude what? Tearing is not a general problem of motion interpolation, it's just a misconfiguration on your end. Try turning on vsync or double buffering if you can find that somewhere.

>OLED
>4k UHD
>0.1ms response time
>400,000:1 contrast
>120Hz
Amazing
>$4,999
Now you fucked up. Call me when it gets under a thousand and I'll consider it.

>>52277342
First 4k 120hz I have seen. I imagine they'll get cheaper as they become more available

I'm not buying that

>>52277069
That has to look weird at 4K as well under the right circumstances. I hope it can be disabled when desired.

>>52276477
Finally! The globe fits on my computer mama!

>>52275937
How many bits is it? With a 400,000 to 1 contrast ratio you better enjoy saturation or poor gamma if its anything less than 12 bit being high gamut and all.

>>52275937
for 5k you could get a high end gaming computer with high end peripherals

>>52275937
>no ultrawide
>no gsync
>VR right around the corner

no thanks

>>52277465
>ultrameme

disgusting. Vertical resolution > stupidly wide bullshit.

>>52275937
>30"
>monitor

no

anything bigger than 24" is too big

>$4,999

FUCKING DROPPED

>>52277494
once you go wide you dont go back. Imagine going back to a 4:3 ratio. You can't

>>52277494
>Vertical resolution > stupidly wide bullshit
this, desu.
My ideal setup would be three thin bezel monitors in in vertical mode.

>>52277521
Piss off. What's the point of having a 24 inch 4k monitor? You'd have to scale everything up.

I am really excited for this. In about 4-6 months we should see more companies launching 4k, 120Hz monitors.

>>52277543
I can't only because of them no longer being made or the ones that still are are very expensive for being a rarity.

There are more things to a computer than watch movies and game.

>>52277570
enjoy your eye bleeding pixels while I enjoy my perfect resolution that's like AA on crack due to the high pixel density.

> OLEDs typically suffer from more burn-in and shorter lifecycles than their LCD rivals. Dell says it has remedied the shortcomings of OLED panels by introducing a pixel-shifting algorithm that prevents burn-in, and an image sensor that can tell whether or not you're viewing the monitor and turns it off when it's not in use.

Dropped, fucking NSA trying to watch me when I'm fapping.

>>52277570
>You'd have to scale everything up.

Well yeah, that's one of the selling points of high PPI screens.

>>52277622
So you pay a shit ton... just to play in 1080p?

>>52277622
The other point of a high resolution screen is more screen real estate.

File: 1436641056588.jpg (14KB, 249x228px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 249x228px

>>52277708
Why don't you just buy more 20" 1920x1080 screens then if you want more real estate?

>>52276526
It's what happens to all amoled and oled displays.

>>52276267
>OLED
>Freesync/Gsync

>OLED
>video games
hahahaha

look at him

look at him and laugh

>>52277733
Because I want one 3840×2160, 30 inch screen.

>>52277667
You play at 4k if your PC can handle it.
Anyway, that has nothing to do with scaling, don't know why you replied to me.

>>52277708
I agree, but huge screens are uncomfortable, unless you're sitting far away.

File: Laughing Dragon Crowns.png (598KB, 673x680px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 673x680px

>>52277750
>freesync/gsync
>only limited to video games

>>52277766
If you're scaling your 4k down you're basically paying a shit load for a sharper 1080p display.

File: mp3_cube_mobiblu_DAH-1500i_Silver.jpg (40KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x400px

OH FUCK YES

I've been waiting for so long for this, since I got this fucker in 2007.

>>52277781
>OLED
>freesync/gsync

go back to /v/ idiot.

>>52277801
Yes. Sharper is nice.

It's about time computer screens get pixel density that is at least close to that of phones from years ago.

>>52277357

>First 4k 120hz I have seen. I imagine they'll get cheaper as they become more available

That's now how economics works though.

>>52277874
The sharpness is barely noticeable unless you're magnifying your images.

People who buy 4k screens that are under 30", especially the laptop idiots are just wasting money. Most of the benefit from upgrading is coming from better contrasts, etc, not ppi to begin with.

File: 889540a40debce92b4c8015c4d7767a2_400x400.jpg (32KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x400px

>>52275937
>that fucking gif.

I need to know where it came from, who that man is, and what was said.

>>52277887
More supply, demand stays the same = lower prices.

Econ 101

>>52277937
Ainsley Harriott

>>52276480
Woah there Sally-sjw, we live in a connected world which can now allow a person of any stature to achieve a financial situation of great affluence.

Your hateful meme that only White men can achieve such affluence is extremely harmful to the social image of non-White, non-male human beings. It degrades all other peoples that you would so quickly assume that they can't achieve a similar position and it is beyond oppressive that you would voice your ignorance with such certainty.

Your problematic memes are harming the peaceful world we are trying to build for future generations.


>>52275937
Also, don't buy this shit screen; literaly all those seemingly great specs are memes to convince you to spend your cash in a way akin to wiping the asses of everyone at Dell and Silver Lake. An unbiased review can be much more telling than the shit the company shovels at you, wait until we have a handful of those before diving in. The Golden rule is that most of this tech will drop in price after very little time. If you don't mind being the first kid on the block with (Read: beta tester for) this new tech, you can save an assload of cash by being a year or so behind.

>>52278086
*don't mind not

>>52277969

But there's not any demand for that now so prices will stay high to keep them exclusive and drive up demand.

>>52278029
He disturbs me deeply.

>>52277937
>>52278029
>Spicy

File: 1448901346739.jpg (47KB, 268x265px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 268x265px

>>52278131
Ahhh now I see.

His tongue flicking was too distracting.

>dell
Speaking of, anyone know how their pixel policy for ultrasharps work? I keep seeing conflicting information whether or not it applies to monitors bought from resellers.

Their monitors costs like 200 bucks more if buy them from their site instead.

>>52278280
buy from Amazon

>>52278280

I'm fairly certain that it does apply through authorized resellers. B&H Photo explicitly states that the pixel policy is valid on the Dell monitors that they sell.

>>52278339
>Ever notice a bright spot on a monitor that won't go away? Dell has — and we know it's annoying. That's why Dell is now offering a Premium Panel Guarantee that ensures zero "bright pixel" defects on your UltraSharp, Professional and Alienware monitors purchased from Dell.

There is also shit about no service tag or order numbers will set the warranty date to the time where the reseller bought the monitor to dell, and from what I can find on dell site resellers very rarely have that.

Except none of this is on the translated version of the warranty pages so I have no idea what applies in my country, and resellers don't seem to say much more than "3 year warranty" and a link on another page for manufacturer warranties

>>52278574
>>Except none of this is on the translated version of the warranty pages so I have no idea what applies in my country
The translated version is legally applicable too.

>>52278574
Contact Dell/the reseller/a local consumer advocacy bureau if you want to be sure. Since you seem to want to be extra sure, that might be a good idea.

Fucking Dell wont contact me anymore after I **acquired* 2 laptops and 2 ultrasharps for the price of 1 ultrasharp and 1 laptop from them

fucks

>>52276931
Yeah and they cost 15 grand minimum and don't even operate at 120Hz. Jesus fucking hell, fuck off.

>>52278946
>whaa i'm poor
>whaa muh gaymen

kill yourself, as I said OLED is for professionals.

Human eye can't see past 3 fps anyway

No thanks. If I want to get fucked in the ass, Ill buy apple

>>52278982
there are professional gaymens tho. As if a neet like you knows what a professional means

>>52275937
> 4K UHD

does this mean DP 1.3?
when will the first compatible GPU hit the streets?

>>52275937
/g, someone has to pay for the cost of research and development. Wait two years or so and you will be able to own a monitor that might just cost a third of this with better technology.

>>52275937
I'd rather SED have a resurgence

>>52279198
I'd rather this SED meme actually stay dead.

>>52279228
we would be in a better place with tvs and computer monitors had SED not been killed.

>>52279252
SED wasn't economically viable then, nor is it resistant to burn out. It wasn't happening then, Applied Nanotech or not.

File: 1386809298962.gif (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

>>52276679
>xpoint ssd
>dafuq?
6GB/s bandwidth.

>>52279252
>>52279228
>>52279198

SED/FED failed because nobody could figure out how to make them not self-destruct.

Any gas in the gap that got hit by the electron beams created ions that eroded the emitter tips (whether 1 or many per subpixel), any normal use created free floating phosphor molecules anyway.

at some point the positive feedback loop made all the screens become perceptibly darker, at an ever-increasing rate.

their durability made early plasma and even OLED look great by comparison.

>>52280085
research shows SED failed due to funding backing out for not being able to get production costs down. i'm sure good funding would have allowed it to get past the hurdles just like plasma and oled have

>>52280113
that was always the official industry line, but it's only half the picture.

it turns out that nobody knows of a material that is both easy/cheap to make huge arrays of emitter tips from yet durable enough that the tips didn't get completely fucked by incidental plasma ions.

>>52280236
Ah, ok then.

>>52275937
Wonder how long you can use them before they burn in and become useless like current oled tvs

>>52276292
lmao, burn in are literally impossible

>>52280251
>>52280113
If you work in tech long enough, especially outside of software, you'll see this pattern soon enough.

Every fledgling company with an untested tech always tries to spin problems as being things about just needing more time/money, even if the truth is that nobody knows the general way to solve an issue, whether they are actually capable of solving it, or whether the issue is potentially theoretically intractable.

they are all scared shitless of spooking customers and investors, and a lot of emerging tech is closer to being snake oil than not.

>>52275937
>tfw by the time this comes down in price computers will be powerful enough to put out 4k@120Hz
hopefully 8k won't be a thing by then

So this display is apparently USB-type C/Thunderbolt 3 only?

>>52280113
Plasma was killed in the end because of their own technological hurdles, in addition to LCDs scaling larger.
OLED was already a market product before any SED/FED anything. SED wasn't a durable product, as has already been said.

OLED durability, durability, maximum brightness are not quite a match for the LED backlit displays of today in these aspects, at least it isn't vaporware.

>>52280384
>we'll turn out a useful result soon
>please don't take away our grant money
That's how it always is.

>>52280461
8k should be a thing a little before 2020, but gaming won't be anywhere near ready to move to it for a while.

GPUs will probably be stuck on 14/16nm GPUs for the next 3-4 years, which means that it will still take dual high-end GPUs for UHD@120fps and four-way sli/cf for 8k at even 60fps.

The only thing that will change that is if 10nm lithography comes a lot sooner than anybody really expects.
> even intel is dropping the fucking ball with cannonlake slipping to 2H'17

File: LCD-OLED compare.jpg (135KB, 1270x428px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1270x428px

>>52276276
OLED panels are significantly faster than more traditional LCD panels.

>>52280666
nice try, satan, but everyone knows that pixel transition time isn't the limiting factor for displays at this time.

> any response time under 8 ms is enough to get 120 Hz/fps content displayed with zero visible transition artifacts by using strobing and a compressed row writeout

realistically, 120 fps strobed LCDs will have much better motion clarity than OLEDs, which can't be strobed without murdering their lifespan.

OLEDs would be great for displaying something like 500 fps content, but we are a long way off from having sufficient rendering and communications throughput for that at reasonable resolutions.

>>52280593
>>52280666
>>52281172

> fuuuuging EEs
> EEs in my /g/

th... thanks for the good posts, EEfriends...

>>52275937
>oled
Anything but the good old LED is trash.