any one know went the GeForce GTX 10xx is coming out? form what i have seen 1q to 2q
http://www.gputechconf.com/
APRIL 4-7, 2016
SILICON VALLEY
not before q3
>>52229687
what does this have to do with OPs question?
>>52229687
are you fucking retarded?
thats /g/ in a nutshell, dear god I hate this place.
>>52229942
This is what autism looks like.
>>52229672
There's absolutely zero chance of a launch there. At best a reveal.
>>52229687
If you want to have a basically functional machine you would use integrated graphics. Even if you're not gaymen a gpu is useful for gpgpu processing
>>52230032
No one cares about what boards you regularly visits.
https://www.zauba.com/import-graphics-processor-integrated-circuits-hs-code.html
>GRAPHICS PROCESSOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS BGLW5
>GRAPHICS PROCESSOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS NT0EH
>GRAPHICS PROCESSOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS 433X3
>GRAPHICS PROCESSOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS 2E73U
>GRAPHICS PROCESSOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS 3R08A
>GRAPHICS PROCESSOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, JM601
Nvidia has been sending a ton of Pascal based GPUs to their India testing facility
>>52230072
>I'm poor so I can't get a dedicated gpu
I'm not a gaymer but a gpu makes things so much easier for me.
i have a 770 2gb think it wold be worth it to get a 970 4gb for 330 for a hold over then sell it later
i have a 4k samsung lcd as well and want to game at 4k. im gaming at 1440 now
>>52230099
How?
>>52230846
i have bean real happy with it
i hade some probs at the start i was mixing it with a 24 at 1920x1600 so i and wen i move stuff over form the 32 4k tot he 24 i was tossing it a round so i lowered the 32's rex to 2560x1600 and turn the scaling off and was happy
>>52230846
+ i got it for 300 for it
>>52229668
I hope it launches soon. I'm selling half of my computer just to buy it.
>>52229668
HBM2 is out only Q2 at the earliest, unless Nvidia chooses to push out some lower-end cards that still run GDDR5, we won't see a proper Pascal card until summer. Even if Nvidia is ready and has chips to go, they can't do anything without the memory, and it's something they're not in control of.
the real question is
WHAT'S THE NAMING SCHEME FOR THE NEXT GEFORCE???
can't possibly be 1000, they're already done that
>>52231499
6,000,000 Holocaust edition
>>52231499
X080
>>52231499
geforce 3.5 1.7 woodscrew you in the ass gapeworks sli titan
>>52233104
SHUT IT DOWN