Why don't we use GDDR5 memory for our systems? Kinda

Because of the poor timings. You'd need an extreme amount of bandwidth to make up for it.

>>51929577
True. In theory it could be pretty good right? Seems like the PS4 takes good of advantage of it.

>>51929598
Because every ps4 shares the same CPU, GPU, etc. It's the utilization within their walled garden hardware environment.
Unless PCs can all share the exact same specs, such utilization of gddr5 would be near impossible. Atleast for consumer PCs.

>>51929568
Why don't I gold plate my toilet?

>>51929624
I guess. Let's say if Intel or AMD made a powerful APU chip. Then it should work?
I'm guessing it could be possible even if you do have a discrete graphics unit, because your CPU could access it very fast. I think it would just need to be engineered to work like that.

>>51929650
You could faggot. Mike Tyson got a gold plated bath tub for his wife.

GDDR5 is designed for graphics and can't really be compared to normal DDR3/4.

PC systems do use GDDR5 in the sense that most dedicated graphics cards have GDDR5 onboard, with the most bleeding edge cards using the superior HBM.

So we do use GDDR5 in our systems when you think of the graphics card as a sub-system (which it technically is).

>>51929568
It's a subsystem of a subsystem. No need to put it on the mainboard.

because HBM > GDDR5

>>51930759
In theory it can be used though

>>51930046
It is designed for graphics cards but is still random access memory, It should be able to be used. If the PS4 can do it, others can do it as well.

>>51932512
Yea or that