>YFW a 4 year old has contributed more to the kernel that you ever will
>You will never have a daughter who contributes to the kernel
>You will never have any kind of daughter
Don't give up, anon! Wait a few years and you'll be able to find some desperate woman in her early 40s who's never found love and just wants to have a baby, and willing accept any man who'll give her one. Even you!
>You think she'd lower the standards just for him?
Have you not any single women heading towards the menopause and wanting a child? They'd marry a three-legged goat if it could impregnate them.
>cute kid thing, they love to project humanity onto stuff
Find a slut who looks like your waifu, and pump your baby batter into her.
Stay away from the +30 year old women, they're most likely dried up and infertile.
14-24 is the proper breeding age for our species.
>14-18 is the proper breeding age for our species.
I agree, teens are generally more fertile and therefor best for breeding, and there's a steady linear decline from age 17 to age 34.
But when he's 27, he can't be too picky.
It's objectively good to prefer girls in their perfect breeding age.
In real life, it'll get you arrested though.
>Go study STEM they said
>There is no way you won't get laid in college they said, parties are everywhere! (as opposed to a quick job training, allowing you to pick up bitches from clubs in your BMW after you are finished)
>Girls dig a stable career and an intelligence over quick money they said
This is a picture of a department in my uni. Notice something about the M:F ratio?
But it's true Anon.
Infertility is categorised as Widespread Disease in the developed world.
I have to call bullshit on that. We're not talking about early teens, but the 14~17 range as optimal.
In Germany it is common to finish high school at 19-20, not 17 like in the US; and do something else before starting college. so many finish college in their mid to late 20s instead of early 20s like in the US
Don't do that. The older the woman, the more genetically imperfect her eggs become.
Stay far away from the +30 year olds, it's a trap and you risk fathering some handicapped child.
There are such things as abortions.
That's why you agree on things beforehand, of course. Also you should only ever marry a woman richer than you, otherwise there's no point.
can someone explain what she did?
she made the letter s happy???
Ex law school student here. Prenums don't get dismissed only if they are fair. They are only fair if the woman still gets a lot (like 30% instead of 50%) and PRENUMS ON CHILD-SUPPORT ARE NOT ALLOWED AT ALL. CHILD-SUPPORT IS SOMETHING YOU PROVIDE INSTEAD OF THE STATE, WHICH DOESNT HAVE TO RAISE THE CHILD FOR YOU. IT IS NOT SOMETHING YOU DO FOR THE MOTHER AND CAN OPT OUT FROM.
>/g/ plans to become fathers
>they want cute teens who look ilke their anime girls
>they can't find any
Where I live it's not always the man that pays for child support, it has to be the person who earned the most at the time of the marriage. This is why I said
>you should only ever marry a woman richer than you
That's subjective, but I meant "good" as "functional".
The functional genes in their egg cells are degrading fast over time.
It's why 20 year olds female get treated in IVF clinics.
aaaaa i see it so it was sad because it was lonely?
well it sucks to be single some people never find a partner
his father should have tell his daughter that not everything is like the disney movies
pretending something interesting happened to get upvotes like that one comic of the girl arranging her cat and drink to take a photo and post it to show everyone how cool she was
What about shy, insecure girls like muh Mio?
What makes you think having getting a daughter is so hard?
Women on average desire children more than men desire sex. Though most guys don't want to have kids "yet."
Literally all you need to do is make it clear to the next women you date that you want to "settle down and start a family" and you'll have a daughter before you know it.
Alternatively if you don't want a wife/girlfriend to help you raise your daughter AND you're not willing to risk getting a son, you could always try adoption. There are literally millions of girls around the that are going to have hellish poverty stricken lives. You could save one of these girls and give her a loving father and supportive household.
>but adoption agencies don't give single guys kids
They do. You just have to be able to prove that you have a stable income. Neets need not apply.
>tl;dr getting a daughter is easy shit
Well, Dr. Stallman is only part right.
The act of reproduction requires no talent, that is true. But you have to have certain features to actually even get to having sex with someone that is willing to reproduce in the first place.
Citing this Stallman classic only shows how butthurt you are as a virgin.
Oh, so you do deserve to get an education while women don't? Tell me more, friend. While you're at it (and since you deserve it) maybe you could get an education on this individual freedom thingy? Maybe you've heard of it.
>tfw your mom was 39 and your dad 67 when you were conceived
>tfw you're gay and emotionally unstable with severe depression and a host of other psychological maladies
thanks mom and dad :^)
Women want to have kids with alpha males, friendo.
And adoption agencies require you to not only have the money, but also the TIME for kids. Meaning if you are employed and single, you wont get horseshit
>projecting this much because I call cancerous parents cancerous
Ohh vey... remember that child prodigy that "invented" a compression method to compress petabytes into a few kilobytes? Yeah, these retards are the product of overly proud parents.
>Oh, so you do deserve to get an education while women don't?
That's not the point. Our kids just goes through our education system completely uninformed about their fertility issues. They are making uninformed decisions when they leave high school.
The end result is what you see:
- People from developed countries get less and less children.
- People from developing countries will inherit the planet.
Females typically go into a wild panic and have their eggs extracted frozen when they find out (too late) that they regret not trying earlier.
>Oh, so you do deserve to get an education while women don't? Tell me more, friend.
Ok, I'll tell you more "friend."
While both men and women have the liberty of being able to work in our society. Women also have the privilege of being able to choose NOT to work.
A woman can easily make her life goal "find myself a man to look after me and my kids" and easily find such a man. Pretty much every needy "beta" would take on the role a the tip of a fedora.
Men on the other hand, while technically are capable of saying "my life goal is to find a strong career woman to take care of me and my family" are almost NEVER going to make this a reality.
Because of this, education/work is OPTIONAL for women but NECESSARY for men. Men NEED work and EDUCATION in order to survive in this world.
When there is an abundance of jobs and places in educational institutions sure, let women study if they want to. But we live in a world where there is unemployment and limited places in academia.
As I said before men NEED these positions. women don't. Every time a women gets an education or a job she is displacing a man and stripping him of the ability to provide for himself, his wife and his family.
This is why women should only be afforded education/work if there are no suitable male candidates available.
Huh, no. Women bodies are ABLE to make bodies. Well, for the most part anyway. That's a huge difference, unless you actually believe in intelligent design.
I'm sorry to make you whine that hard :(
>Because of this, education/work is OPTIONAL for women but NECESSARY for men. Men NEED work and EDUCATION in order to survive in this world.
Feminism made people ignore this issue altogether and pretend it isn't real.
And when people inevitable find out, they get all kinds of surprised.
You're basically supporting ignorance at this point.
All they are saying is that girls in their teens need to be better informed about the risks they take, if they choose to pursue higher education and set aside family making.
>A woman can easily make her life goal "find myself a man to look after me and my kids" and easily find such a man
So can a man. Just date a rich woman.
>Men on the other hand, while technically are capable of saying "my life goal is to find a strong career woman to take care of me and my family" are almost NEVER going to make this a reality.
It's not hard, actually. Some of my friends just did. What now? Yes this is anecdotal evidence and all that, but have you ever considered that perhaps you're just bad at finding such women? Or maybe you live in a shit country with a shit mentality, I don't know. Stop having a life that sucks I guess.
>Because of this, education/work is OPTIONAL for women but NECESSARY for men. Men NEED work and EDUCATION in order to survive in this world.
That's bad, but how does that imply education for women is bad?
>When there is an abundance of jobs and places in educational institutions sure, let women study if they want to. But we live in a world where there is unemployment and limited places in academia.
Or you could try not being bad at whatever it is you do.
>As I said before men NEED these positions. women don't. Every time a women gets an education or a job she is displacing a man and stripping him of the ability to provide for himself, his wife and his family.
Why should a women that's better at what you do be removed in favour of your sorry ass? Then she'd take care of your family.
>This is why women should only be afforded education/work if there are no suitable male candidates available.
Don't worry, men are still privileged when it comes to strength related job like the army ;^)
>Women want to have kids with alpha males, friendo.
There is no such thing as "alphas" you fucking retarded teenager. I bet you probably think there are "leagues" and all that retarded shit too?
Women crave children. It's not a want it's a need. Most women will have children with the first non-deformed fuck that offers to support her.
>thinking a man alone can still provide for himself and a familly
lol, maybe you should work once and see the misery you're paid. If anything women working is not going anywhere, and it has few to do with "displacing man's work", it's more of a necessity nowadays since wages are shit and life is expensive. Except if you're a doctor or other type of white collar, don't even expect to be able to provide for your family without your wife working.
>women not being allowed to get educated
Please backtrack the conversation, nobody said this. It's your defense mechanism that hit a false positive.
They are pointing out our current education system is flawed and brainwash our children into uninformed decisions.
Just so the big universities can make a larger profit...
>Women crave children. It's not a want it's a need. Most women will have children with the first non-deformed fuck that offers to support her.
Bitch, I dare you, if you think it is so easy to be a man, register on OKCupid with a profile of a nerdy looking guy and try to score even one single pussy in a month.
get them to keep doing the stupid shit they have been and make people actually pay attention and realize they're stupid. this could however cause the entire populous to go along with the stupid thing
Well, I do and I'm grateful I didn't get caught in marriage in my 20's.
>dodged a bullet in my teens
>dodged another one in my 20s
>little girl ads a hyphen to the Linux source code
>/g/ rages about it, then forgets all about it and starts discussing procreating with highschoolers
Never change, /g/. Never change.
>if you think it is so easy to be a man, register on OKCupid
Move the goalposts more you fucking retard. OKCupid is a essentially just a hookup site where people select good looking strangers for casual relationships/flings.
Just ask ANY of your female friends/sisters/cousins if she can introduce you to her friends and I guarantee at least half of them if not more will be willing to settle down and start a family with you after dating for a short while - that is supposing you have a job and aren't a disgusting slob of course.
Maybe this is why the internet is so fucking retarded when it comes to women? They think ridiculous "dating sites" like OkCupid are somehow representative of the real world.
As a human you have a responsibility to your kind. If everybody thought 'let them take care of it', America wouldn't have fought for independence and you wouldn't have the right to bitch in public.
>As a human you have a responsibility to your kind.
Nope. I have a responsibility for myself and the people I care about.
> If everybody thought 'let them take care of it', America wouldn't have fought for independence and you wouldn't have the right to bitch in public.
I don't give a shit, I'm not American.
Going to college was the worst decision of my life. I haven't been around girls for 6 years. My only fiends are other nerds from college who never go to parties involving women.
Now I will die alone and for what? 20% better wage
It isn't necessarily bad. You can get brainwashed into doing positive things too. But you need to look at who benefits and who is victim in this case.
The thing is you'll find far too many women, in their 30s, who regret not pursuing family life sooner, because they where simply uninformed about their fertility degradation.
Meanwhile our state funded universities are rolling in state funded cash thanks to these women. This comes at those women's cost.
Why's everyone worried about dying alone?
Who the fuck would want anyone nearby to interrupt or distract your journey into the unknown?
I either want to die alone or upside-down and on fire in a a tumbling race car. Fuck you pussies.
you are autistic if you don't desire to experience that peaceful moment when you cum inside a girl and she happily accepts your seed and hugs and kisses you until you both fall asleep
Oh, I forgot education wasn't free in American universities. Too bad.
>The thing is you'll find far too many women, in their 30s, who regret not pursuing family life sooner, because they where simply uninformed about their fertility degradation.
Come on, procreation can be assisted in many ways. This is 2014.
No cool friend/s to party with? Gosh let's see if we can solve that programmatically!friend = befriendSomeone();
friend = befriendSomeone();
party = getParty();
if (party == null)
party = new party; // Throw a party if non available
It doesn't matter what country. It's actually the free universities who get the most money thanks to uninformed kids.
You pointed out something very irrelevant.
>procreation can be assisted in many ways
It's a desperation that shouldn't have to be needed. In Denmark, every 11th birth is assisted by fertility clinics. That's an alarming development.
We're fucking up our society little by little, and you are helping the fuck up.
you are not bisexual. you are just another teenager in puberty with too much testosterone, thinking he has a thing for traps just because the internet told him it is such a cool fetish
> In Denmark, every 11th birth is assisted by fertility clinics. That's an alarming development.
Who cares? The important thing is that they get the kids they want.
>We're fucking up our society little by little, and you are helping the fuck up.
And who the fuck are you to think your opinions on society matter enough that you can somehow dictate other people? Go have eleven kids with an Amish woman if that's what you dream of, in the meantime fuck off and stop rambling about "muh womyn".
And why should feminists dictate men to suffer alone in their 20, women to suffer alone in their 30s and the resulting demographic problems to be filled with shitskinned immigrants, which said men have to pay taxes for?
>The important thing is that they get the kids they want.
Some of them birth by moms from India. So called rent-wombs.
It's come to that point where women get so desperate, they resort to having babies that are not of their own DNA.
>And who the fuck are you
An Anon who advised another Anon to stay away from no-good +30 year olds. Then you had to come along an turn it into an feminism issue.
And you're losing even that arguing.
Except feminists don't dictate anything except in your dream-bubble where everyone that isn't a 50's American conservatard is a SJW feminist.
Ah, you're a /pol/tard. Still mad that your beloved board got buttraped?
>And you're losing even that arguing.
why do Anglos think everything is a debate to be won or lost? do you guys all take debating classes and prance about with silly words like "ad hominem" or "fallacy fallacy" and get applauded by the class when you've scored enough fallacy points or something?
ugly woman are just like men. they have to work. and being some dude's fuck toy isn't as glamorous as it sounds
the woman obsessed with they children aren't necessarily sexual creatures
>literally did nothing but vidya for 8 years after leaving high school
>as if i needed to repel more pussy, I also wasted thousands of dollars on japanese toys that I'm still trying to get rid of
>overhear coworkers younger than me talking about taking care of their children and having to find babysitters just so they can earn a wage
>one of them isn't even old enough to use the heavy equipment in the back (<18)
>mfw one of them openly hits on me later
the third dimension is one of suffering
This thread just proves the good old high school darlings are the best types of girls to marry.
As if "freedom" is a good thing. Sure it gave people sexual freedom. But in a libertarian, darwinistic way.
While in the old days you have had one man and one woman sharing their fate together, now you have 60 males competeing for 1 female and only 10 or so of those males actually succeeding. The others live with the consequences of a rejection, kill themselves, shoot up schools, rape women or simply wait until women their age become undesirable for those 10 alpha males.
I personally do not care at all about it outside of research papers and stuffs but maybe
>>I simply happen not to be bad and blame "feminists" for my failures.
>I simply happen to not be bad and blaming "feminists" for my failures
>Living on a non-shit continent helps too.
not a complete sentence so either include it with say ", and living on ...", or include a subject to semantically satisfy living
>While in the old days you have had one man and one woman sharing their fate together
Do people actually think that?
>now you have 60 males competeing for 1 female and only 10 or so of those males actually succeeding
Uh yeah because there are like 60 males for 1 female on Earth
Holy shit stop projecting your nerd insecurities and thinking the apply to the whole world
Also stop misusing the word "darwinistic"
>now you have 60 males competeing for 1 female
This is what sociopaths actually believe.
>Uh yeah because there are like 60 males for 1 female on Earth
there is a small percentage of men fucking a vast majority of women, while all the other men have to compete for the leftovers. just google the statistics, I'm not gonna do that for you.
meanwhile the women fucked and dumped by alpha males don't even want the beta-losers and think one day an alpha prince will fuck and keep them, while their aging pussies start to rot and the alphas have long switched to fresh meat.
There is literally no reason not to be having a ton of casual sex in college other than mental illness. (probably autism)
Guys want to fuck. Girls want to fuck. They all go to parties, bars and clubs to meet and to fuck. They take drugs (such as alcohol) that lower their standards to make it easier for them to fuck.
Yet somehow, someway there are people on /g/ that make seem like the most complex thing in the world.
Right now: poor people; ugly people; and stupid people are having sex and making a fuckload of kids. Many of these people can't even read or write and yet right now, you're sharing a website with people that fail at one of the most basic human interactions.
It's not even an insult anymore. These fuckers are genuinely retarded and should be called on it.
>thinking celebrating the holidays is all about partying and spending
I got no family to go back to for this holidays and the past few holidays. I missed the days when I was a kid waking up in the morning seeing siblings, parents decorating trees, opening gifts and the dinner afterwards
I think you haven't seen a 14 a year old in quite a while.
They are well grown and well endowned nowadays.
Leaving that aside, dating a 14 year old, she wouldn't be giving birth until 15 anyway.
>there is a small percentage of men fucking a vast majority of women, while all the other men have to compete for the leftovers
you're aware that sex is something that can be given freely? it's not like a women that someone fucked is "taken" or something
>meanwhile the women fucked and dumped by alpha males don't even want the beta-losers and think one day an alpha prince will fuck and keep them, while their aging pussies start to rot and the alphas have long switched to fresh meat.
Yet another delusional day in Anon's fantasy
people on /g/ have simply been told by their boomer parents and feminist teachers that girls want "nice guys" who can provide for them. so they study hard to get a good job.
meanwhile alpha males are passing around the girls anons lust for like a bag of chips
You're aware that there are no actual alphas and betas, right? It's a concept that came from wolves and it's been invalidated in the 90's or something when they found they only ever behaved like that in captivity.
You sound like these armchair anthropologists and "geneticists" on /pol/ who use 19th century speculation about races to divide humanity.
>you're aware that sex is something that can be given freely? it's not like a women that someone fucked is "taken" or something
Not that guy but most women are hypergamous. See cads vs dads in human sociobiology.
>Yet another delusional day in Anon's fantasy
Ad hominem fallacy.
There are cads vs dads. That dichotomy is true. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~kruger/dads-cads.html
I'm the "feminist" here, and I use GNU/Linux.
Anon I think it's time to stop applying the Mendelian genetics you learned in high school to everything. You're not making any sense now.
And somehow those alpha males always miss the Mio.
>Not that guy but most women are hypergamous. See cads vs dads in human sociobiology.
Everyone is hypegramous, it's called "promiscuity". Humans have been promiscuous ever since they branched out from fucking bonobos.
Why don't you have a qt gf, /g/?
Reminder that even people with an IQ of 80 or less fuck like rabbits.
everyone has psychopathic tendencies these days. especially if you live in a big city and have a stressful job. it is either you or them and you have to fight to survive. there is no room for generosity and kindness, unless you want to feel better about yourself.
Why are you implying it's always the men that go for women?
Huh? The whole dominant/recessive paradigm came from Mendel as far as I know. Beans and flowers and all that.
sane != intelligent
you are just having a mainstream opinion that you can throw around in a debate with girls around you without getting anyone offended and ruining the vibes. good for you, and I hope being a drone pays off and you fuck more of stupid pussy, but that opinion of yours is still bullshit, regardless.
>What do you gain from sexual intercourse, spiritually or intellectually?
Rewarding experience. Various hormones and neurotransmitters are released during sexual intercourse that promote neuronal development.
Sexually active people often have lower levels of the hormone cortisol and consequently a stronger immune system and quicker muscle growth.
The actual orgasm itself is a highly rewarding subjective experience and when experienced with a partner significantly raises the levels of another hormone (called Oxycontin) which has been linked with the euphoric feelings created by the drug MDMA and the love a mother has for her child.
(i.e. it's good for your brain, makes you smarter and feels great)
Sexuality is of spiritual importance to many cultures. While typical university students usually don't explore it in such a way, sexuality can be used as an aid to meditation and seeking mindful states of consciousness.
See: tantric yoga.
There is also the "spiritual bonding" that occurs. Sexuality usually causes a relationship between people to become significantly stronger and this can have significant spiritual implications. Love is considered by many to be somewhat spiritual.
And of course the act of making and raising children is viewed by many as spiritual.
Admittedly not much, though as I mentioned before. Certain neurotransmitters released during sexual intercourse promote neuronal development which could theoretically contribute to intelligence.
It's also important to note that overworking your brain can be detrimental and it's good to have a break from your computer every once in a while to fuck and cuddle. Recuperate and then jump back into the action.
>Everyone is hypegramous, it's called "promiscuity"
That's not what hypergamous means. Hypergamous means "marrying up". It's due to sexual selection. Women are bigger standards than men simply because they need more energy to give birth to offpsrings. They also get pregnant for 9 months which limits their fitness during that time. A man can have more offpsrings than a female. So females are more picky. This isn't a bad thing but it does come with consequences in big societies.
>Humans have been promiscuous ever since they branched out from fucking bonobos.
Are you basing your knowledge of Sex at Dawn? It's pseudoscience. And humans didn't branch out from bonobos nor chimps. They share a common ancestor. Bonobos branched out later from a common ancestor of their closest cousin the chimp.
Humans haven't really been promiscuous. It's hard to have any evidence of that but if you look at hunter gatherers of today, you can see that they are largely monogamous. The rate of cuckoldry isn't high.
>So as you can see, theres one hunk-ass chad thundercock hogging all the bitches; leaving the rest of us fighting over this female specimen on the right....
>However! If I flip this chart upside-down, we see that this last remaining pure virgin woman actually becomes the biggest whore in the whole room, leaving the remaining women to claw and tear at each other over Mr. Chad.
Say... why is Chad a "Stud", and the girl on the right a "Whore?"
Mysteries, mysteries. We'll never know.
Y'all niggas is dumb. What we /g/entleman seek is something that does not exist in the real world. Anime girls do not exist and having kids is something you do not want if you failed to mature into a capable father. We are not meant to have kids, we are too intertwined with the trinkets of this world to deal with raising other human beings. Just go lives your lives happily with computers and video games.
I think what we need is to create virtual worlds where we can do absolutely anything we please - no restrictions. Such an environment would satisfy our need to have kids and would prevent us from having to pay child support to a slut that we paid a few grand to sleep with.
>That's not what hypergamous means. Hypergamous means "marrying up". It's due to sexual selection. Women are bigger standards than men simply because they need more energy to give birth to offpsrings. They also get pregnant for 9 months which limits their fitness during that time. A man can have more offpsrings than a female. So females are more picky. This isn't a bad thing but it does come with consequences in big societies.
Why are you implying sex = marriage?
> And humans didn't branch out from bonobos nor chimps. They share a common ancestor.
Yeah yeah I know humans are a kind of chimps spare me the lecture on my own field, it was worded like that to be meant to be easier to understand.
> It's hard to have any evidence of that but if you look at hunter gatherers of today, you can see that they are largely monogamous. The rate of cuckoldry isn't high.
Again, sex != pairing up. If you're implying humans haven't been screwing each other all the time you are seriously deluded.
Why are we arguing?
Just find a girl and date her, have sex with her. It's so fucking simple.
And every psychopath has normal person's tendencies. What's your point with using a very vague term as "psychopathic tendencies" which would be defined as having anything related to psychopaths.
>there is no room for generosity and kindness
False. Kindness and generosity do help at building relationships. Sure you could make the argument that people in urban areas are less empathetic than people in rural areas but that doesn't mean they are psychopaths. They still have empathy.
>dominate, to have power and influence over.
>from recess, recede, to go or move back or further away from a previous position.
Maybe Mendel was first to use them together, but the meaning is fairly self explanatory without needing a heritability component.
I have at least once cite-able source, http://marnor.home.xs4all.nl/published/rolemodel.pdf and google scholar isn't exactly refuting me: http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=dominant+social+behaviour&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1
1. that blue girl is not fucking losers. even the most disgusting, fat females these days still aim for Chads.
2. key/lock principle, in a biological and psychological way (nobody wants to be a cuck and whores are guaranteed to divorce and steal money from you)
3. You are not talking to a "stud", you are talking to a loser, who hates "Studs". IT IS WOMEN WHO HAVE A HERD MENTALITY OF THINKING MEN WHO ARE ALREADY IN RELATIONSHIPS AND FUCK LOTS OF WOMEN ARE THE MOST DESIRABLE. see evaluations of photographs where women were told the same man is single or not or had a wedding ring or not.
other guy was right - dominant/recessive traits are just that - traits first observed by mendel
in psychology they teach you that for example the way you fold your hands together is one such trait and if you put your right thumb over the left thumb thats a dominant trait
but having it does not mean YOU are dominant you fucking waste of oxygen
That is what we call Alphas though. Who is the Alpha Wolf? He's the biggest, strongest wolf, the leader of the social structure. He's at the top. He has the highest social standing.
We have these in human society too.
>Various hormones and neurotransmitters are released during sexual intercourse that promote neuronal development.
Murdering people also promotes neural development. Neural development doesn't necessarily mean "getting more intelligent".
>Sexually active people often have lower levels of the hormone cortisol
That's true. Sex is a reliever of stress but doing exercise is far more effective at relieving stress on the long run and it's more healthy. Now you could say that one can have sex and be physically active. However, the studies that saw a correlation between sex and lower stress probably saw that factor play a strong role because people who have more sex are usually more physically active. In other words, telling people to have sex because it'll reduce stress may not be a good advice.
>It's also important to note that overworking your brain can be detrimental and it's good to have a break from your computer every once in a while to fuck and cuddle. Recuperate and then jump back into the action.
Bad advice. The break should be a 20 minute run.
>key/lock principle, in a biological and psychological way (nobody wants to be a cuck and whores are guaranteed to divorce and steal money from you)
you're aware that the key/lock principle was meant as a joke when it was first stated?
>in a biological and psychological way
oh please shut up about biology you have no idea what you're talking about
Because /r9k/ is a shit tier board with shit-tier users.
There is no such thing as chad. If those fucking basement dwelling lard asses dedicated half as much time to developing their social skills as they did posting their degenerate "feels" on the internet they'd find it no more difficult to get laid than "chad" does.
get a load of this fucking faggot.
He'd rather go for a 20 minute run than have sex with the girl he loves
First, alpha wolves only exist in captivity, so that makes your analogy a tad less credible. Second, social standings are dynamic and have little to do with one's ability with women. There are stupid people who get women, there are ugly people who get women, there are poor people who get women. It's not because they have this magical charisma or vibe or whatever mysterious voodoo you people think MUST exist so as to justify your own inability to get some, it's simply because sex is what humans do. It has nothing to do with pairing up, I'm talking about the basic act of mashing one's genitals together. Humans have always been fucking each other in history, that's a fact. If you walk up to enough women and ask them to have sex with you, eventually one of them will accept. Hell, even PUAs like Roosh acknowledge their number of lays mainly relies on their number of approaches. Now stop trying to find excuses, even you can get laid if you really want to.
Look, we spend most of our lives on computers and watching chinese cartoons. We fantasize about fucking anime characters. We are not prepared to have kids - we need to leave all this shit behind us and start being social before we even think about having kids.
Most of us are not really lemons, we just got too deep into fantasizing and we never really came out of it. We can change but most of us will be too content with what we have. Maybe we were simply never meant to have kids and just live happy lives with a few friends. I actually think this is a good thing because we are overpopulated and a 5-10% reduction in our population numbers is not a bad thing.
By /r9k/'s standard I already am "chad." I have no trouble with socializing or getting laid.
That's why I want to you leave my /g/ and go back your cesspit of self pit you sickening degenerate.
I put "marrying up" in quotes before. It's not literally marrying. It's mate selection. My point still stands.
>know humans are a kind of chimps spare me the lecture on my own field
No offense. But you don't know shit about your own field. Humans are not a kind of chimps. Chimps and humans are both Great Apes. Get the terminology right you fucking retard.
It's okay to be ignorant but don't play it like you're an expert when you clearly aren't.
>Again, sex != pairing up. If you're implying humans haven't been screwing each other all the time you are seriously deluded.
Like I said: "The rate of cuckoldry isn't high".
If women were screwing all the men all the time, there'd be a lot of cuckold men. People in hunter gathering societies do pair up.
You have no evidence to back your silly assertion. You're basing your delusion solely on your love for promiscuity.
>implying you can just "develop" your social skills out of nowhere by yourself when you have been ostracized from your college and workplace community for being that weirdo who never talks to people.
when the beta uprising comes "just bee urselves" like you will be the first to go.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. But if you had the choice and your goal was an improvement in health and intelligence, a 20 minute run is far better than sex, especially after sitting for a long time in front of a computer.
Older women having the child of a younger man, will have enough the genetically strongest children. Although you need the parents to have good genes in the first place. Genetically superior autists are still autists.
Mios have already been impregnated and started their family life.
You should find a Nadeko instead.
> People in hunter gathering societies do pair up.
Wrong, they have children multiple partners. If a man dies on the hunt the women will still be provided for because paternity isn't known
Dude English is not my first language, spare me the pedantry. What I'm saying is that their last common ancestor was looking closest to a modern-day chimp.
>If women were screwing all the men all the time, there'd be a lot of cuckold men. People in hunter gathering societies do pair up.
Huh you may be aware that having sex doesn't mean having children all the time? Or maybe the biology class that taught you to be pedant about homoninae forgot to tell you about menstruation cycles? Mate selection is not father selection and it has ceased to be the case ever since we became civilized.
>Older women having the child of a younger man, will have enough the genetically strongest children
This is blatant bullshit.
Older women risk children with more birth defect. Sorry to burst your bubble, old hag. But you're inferior to younger women.
You don't need English to be your first language to know terminology.
>What I'm saying is that their last common ancestor was looking closest to a modern-day chimp.
That's not what you said.
>Huh you may be aware that having sex doesn't mean having children all the time?
It's precisely because human females can be pregnant throughout the year, that they can be pregnant more likely than other mammals. Sure they aren't getting pregnant with every instance of intercourse. The ratio of intercourse and pregnancy is around hundreds of intercourse to usually a maximum of dozen of children. But one would expect those children to be from different men. And that hasn't been observed.
You're claiming that human females in hunter gathering society are fucking men all the time. Going by that statement, you should see a higher rate of cuckoldry. But that hasn't been observed.
>Mate selection is not father selection
For the most part it is.
>t has ceased to be the case ever since we became civilized.
That's just false. If anything it, father selection became more apparent with the advent of agriculture.
How does your statement refute the assertion that hunter gatherers pair up?
You can have a society where people pair up and yet women will be provided for if the man dies.
And if you have doubt that hunter gathering societies don't pair up, see Marlowe 2003 study.
>That's not what you said.
Because you interpreted chimps as "modern-day chimps" which obviously isn't the case. You were pedant, that's fine.
>all that speculation
Are you referring to this?
Because we're talking about societies waaay older than that, paleolithic if not older. How the fuck could you just assert that in all of prehistory and everywhere in the world people have been selecting one mate once and for all? That's a hell of an assumption to make. And even then, the advent of civilization and sedentarization changed everything.
>Because you interpreted chimps as "modern-day chimps"
That's what chimps mean you dummy.
>which obviously isn't the case.
Of course. It took you a google search break to figure that out.
>are you talking about modern hunter gathereers
No shit. You don't know what if far older hunter gatherers were promiscuous or not. The best empirical guess is to look at the behavior of modern hunter gatherers.
>you just assert that in all of prehistory and everywhere in the world people have been selecting one mate once and for all?
For the most part they haven't. But I'm basing that on behavior of current hunter gathers across the world. You're basing your assertion on what? Nothing.
Science is ultimately about empirical observations.
>And even then, the advent of civilization and sedentarization changed everything
There are hunter gathers that aren't as much affected by sedentarization.
Either way, your argument is weak. You either believe that there is no evidence, which results in neither of us knowing what the fuck we're talking about. Hence the issue of promiscuity in our oldest HSS ancestors will be unknown.
Or you believe that we act promiscuous today because our ancestors did, which is what half the thread has been about. In that regard, you have to believe that knowing how the previous foragers were would be most closely observable by how modern foragers behave. That's if you believe this discussion has any meaning when it comes to modern humans.