>cutaway collar Why the fuck is this now standard in formal

File: blog_ln_1013.jpg (109KB, 650x433px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 650x433px

This is the kind of man who thinks cutaways are good.

File: 1000x500px-LL-b3747df8_Three-Piece.jpg (68KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x426px

>handsome dude
>nice three-piece
>strong silhouette
>acceptable tie
>complementary pocketsquare
>oh wait, you really fucked it up

File: bba87538787cd632d2d576593d2b9345.jpg (29KB, 360x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 360x480px

Nobody else triggered yet?

>>10928646
How this would look good on anyone but Peter Crouch is beyond me.

Beats leaving that little faggoty gap between the shirts collar and lapels like a massive fruitcake.

>>10928751
found the autist

>>10928761
WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU JUST CALL ME?!

I'll find you, and I'll FUCKING END YOU!!

looks bad imo

>>10928683
>>10928680
These only look bad because of the contrasting collar. If they were all-white shirts, they'd look fine.

File: anders_peter_900x397_ny.jpg (318KB, 900x397px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 900x397px

Stenströms does it right

>>10928646
>standard
Where the fuck is this the standard? Cutaway collars look more special-needs than diapers.
#maximumtriggered

>>10928668
This guy wins the special award for doing everything wrong, from being born on up.

>>10928751
That is bad too, but you've got more problems with the jacket if there's a collar-lapel gap.

>>10928942
The contrasting collar certainly emphasizes the shittiness, but even with a plain white shirt the shape looks stupid.

>>10929012
Based Stenströms