>outdated phone >dick replacement apparatus >2 Pakistani steel shit knives >flashlight with same lumens as phone light >paper money >boomer tier money clip wallet >1 quarter probably for flipping Jamal to see who is closing at the mall >copied Walmart key to apartment >plastic watch >base model acura key
>>10880665 Kill yourself. Americans are fucking retarded. The south and the Midwest don't deserve to share the same rights as the rest of the country. I bunch of science denying uneducated fucks that think swinging around a murder device somehow makes you more of a man. Fuck you and your shitty blood line. I hope whatever shitty flyover state that you live in sinks into the goddamn earth.
>>10880809 Why would you include the Midwest in there we have no fucking crime. You're retarded for believing that straight white gun owners are the ones who are remotely at fault here. You're right, we don't deserve the same rights as you because you've all been cucked into giving up all your gun rights in California and the east coast. Cry harder man.
Oh and also the heartland has better academic achievement than anywhere else in the country :^) Can't speak for the south though... I don't like them.
>>10882563 right now the market is being flooded with police trade in 229s in 40 cal in great condition as alot of departments are switching back to 9. you can get a good kitted one (often with night sights and 3 magazines) for 450$ ish.
>>10882642 here let me make a less often made case for the .40, first off the 229 was designed to handle it from the ground up compared to the older sig models. It's over engineered to handle even the hottest 40 loads. Second 40 isn't much more than a 9mm now in cost. And third... in non shtf panic modes like when Obama was elected each time and panic buys drained all the ammunition supply... 40 was one of the few calibers you could reliably get ammunition for. It's fairly scare proof. Also the 229 handles it's 'snappy' nature very well. No matter how you feel on stopping power or any silly thoughts of that there's plenty of reasons why the 40 should be considered. Plus when you can get a deal like 450 for a good gun it might be worth considering regardless of your bias expecially if budget is a concern.
>>10883008 some of us actually wear tailored suits everyday. In fact a properly tailored suit with allowances for a holster are quite nice. The best of both worlds but then again many on /fa/ think fashion equates to thin ankles pants over a pair of 'distressed' sneakers and a outer garments so thin they couldn't break the wind of the fat guy in the mirror.
>>10883396 >a tweet haha no wonder you're into propagandist bullshit
here's a less sensationalist thing a *bit* longer than a tweet, I had to scroll past shitty Breitbart on Google to get to it, I know effort to be skeptical is such a pain especially if Tweets reconfirming something you already believe informs your shitty political awareness
>>10883468 Talk about propagandist you chose a bias site. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE94Q0E620130527 >Some 43,900 asylum seekers arrived in 2012, a nearly 50 percent jump from 2011 and the second highest on record. Nearly half were from Syria, Afghanistan and Somalia and will get at least temporary residency. There was a total of 103,000 new immigrants.
>>10883468 you're the one that brought up Sweden's rapes, I could have told you it was bullshit if you wanted that being said the graph in his chart does show a slow increase in rapes look Abdul you're going to have to leave eventually, no point fighting it
>>10883468 That article is aggravatingly preachy and wrong.
The whole argument hinges on the validity of the BRÅ data. Not only are such surveys notoriously unreliable - they are opt-in and ask questions relating to very sensitive topics - but they can easily be manipulated to produce desired results. Such numbers manipulation has happened by both U.S. political parties on a regular basis for years. Where there's increasing public evidence of a sexual assault issue growing in a country yet the numbers don't budge, it reasonably raises a huge question mark over the validity of the data. It is also particularly questionable given that numerous other studies show a marked correlation between foreigners and rape in Sweden - a rise in foreigners would predictably result in a rise in rape (absent research explaining the contrary).
It's also hilarious that he accounts a small bump in crime in the survey - a non-governmental collection of data - with expanding registration efforts and definitions of rape. Neither of those things should have an affect on poll responses: "Oh, I guess I was raped now that the definition includes..." is almost certainly not an actual thought in any Swedish woman's head. They will believe they were or were not raped. Whether or not it was counted individually or as a single charge has absolutely no bearing on survey responses unless proven otherwise (what do they do, ask for the number of men to be written into a little box for them to multiply against, like a tax form?)
The writer basically finds data he likes, finds a few reasons to justify it, and jumps to the pulpit without any form of deep thought on the subject. Like a goddamn college student in a political science course.
(Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that it doesn't have a lot to do with socioeconomic status, etc. I'm saying it's willfully blind to pretend that the foreign population of Sweden isn't committing a disproportionately huge percentage of the crime)
>>10884348 Don't be disingenuous. The propaganda that you have let inform your entire opinion bases it's entire stance about Islam not viewing "infidels" as worthy of not being raped, to put it succinctly.
I certainly know all immigrants aren't Muslims. I don't care for your pretenses about me stereotyping immigrants, we both know that you generally don't give a shit about any of them. I don't care about moral appeals from people who want to engineer those appeals to support their arguments and care not at all for the importance of the thing they are bringing up.
Oh yeah and straight jumping to saying that he's an islamophobe isn't. You could have even just criticized him for being straight xenophobic but you just wanted to be a faggot
>we both know that you generally don't give a shit about any of them >The propaganda that you have let inform your entire opinion bases it's entire stance about Islam not viewing "infidels" as worthy of not being raped, to put it succinctly. >I don't care about moral appeals from people who want to engineer those appeals to support their arguments and care not at all for the importance of the thing they are bringing up.
All of this is baseless conjecture and shitty opinions. In no way did you actually argue any of the points he brought up from the article
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.