WATCH THREAD

File: watches.jpg (1MB, 2877x742px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2877x742px

mine

File: 1451836753970.png (4MB, 1600x4200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1600x4200px

>>10873138

File: resize.jpg (363KB, 2200x1466px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 2200x1466px

come at me /fa/ggots

>>10873152
W2c the digital citizen watch ??
I've been looking for that one (or the silver one) for a while

>>10873138
What's wrong with it? don't take it to a retailer, take it to a watchmaker.

>>10874821
that's what I did, I just didn't know the word for it. Don't know the specifics, but this watchmaker is legit and has a good reputation.

>>10873457
most of those watches are ugly as shit/hard to find/not versatile at all.

Just got a GMT-Master II from my dad. It's from the late 90's and the papers/box are in a different country.

What is the first thing I should do? He hasn't serviced it since he got it, and it was an everday watch of his for a couple of years until he got a Seamaster. It's in awesome condition still.

I really like the Orient Bambino v2, especially the blue-handed one, but they're hard to find. Are there any Seiko like it? I don't like divers because I have bitch wrists.

>>10873490
ebay

>>10873467
Ayy lmao

>He fell for the it

>>10875236
>What is the first thing I should do?
Hide it in your asshole until you found someone willing to buy it off from you.

Are there any /fa/ stopwatches?

>>10873152
what exact model is the casio? on the left?

>>10875236
post pics

File: picture.jpg (3MB, 3024x3384px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x3384px

mine

>>10873152
i like those russian ones, what are they?

File: image.jpg (786KB, 2448x2207px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 2448x2207px

Thoughts?

File: image.jpg (233KB, 1279x1570px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1279x1570px

Should I?

>>10876021
why not, nice looking piece

>>10875189
Could you define a truly versatile watch, then?
Personally I'm wearing steinhart ocean one on a daily basis and cant imagine I would need any other watch - matches me, my both work and personal outfits, lifestyle and it's robust, solid and it only costed my a little over £300 including shipping - if that's not versatile then i don't know what is. If you're looking for a maximum amount of features then go get one of them casio wrist calculators.

Did I buy into the meme or cop a solid, affordable piece?

File: IMG_20160124_094323.jpg (2MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3120x4160px

Forgot to post pic, did I fuck up on this meme watch or cop a affordable reliable piece?

>>10876349
I like it

File: seagull-dec-17.jpg (127KB, 800x800px)

127KB, 800x800px

About to buy this one. Can anybody tell me the differences between this one and the 21 ? Any experiences?

>>10875300
>fell for it
>not having a watch that's actually useful in your daily life

keep convincing yourself to spend thousands on shitty collections & repairs bud

>>10876349
meme watch. all of these minimalist "luxury" watchs cost like $10 to make but marketed so it feels like you got a good deal spending $100 - 500 for it vs a 5k rolex/real watch even though they don't compare at all.

if you're gonna cop a piece like this or any of those other minimalist watches you might as well go on aliexpress. you will literally get the same watch for $10.

post a preppy watch

>>10876944
rolex
ulysses nardin

>>10876349

You fucked up.

Those watches cost 15 bucks on Aliexpress

They are the exact same shit

http://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=SB_20160124131657&SearchText=minimal+watch

>>10876944
timex by j crew, buy strap from j press

File: dL0QwtQl.jpg (48KB, 640x462px)

48KB, 640x462px

copped this a few months ago
fit and finish is top tier for its price range
loving it so far

>>10877900
nice

>>10875977
would be sick if the day counter wasnt in an awkward place.

>>10877900
model and price?

>>10876021
looks good imo

File: a158w.jpg (40KB, 326x606px)

40KB, 326x606px

>>10873138
mine

>>10873138
Hey im looking to buy a Seiko watch with the following movement (7T12)

https://www.seikowatches.com/support/ib/pdf/SEIKO_7T12.pdf

How do can I tell whether this is a decent quality movement as far as quartz watches go?

>>10879679
>Seiko
There's your indication. No, really, Seiko watches are the best at every price point.

>>10876349
I can't believe people fall for this shit.

>>10876021
this is nice but a bit big. well, most chronographs are but there are a few good looking edifice pieces. the less sporty looking ones are great.

>>10879494
Most atheistically pleasing minimalist watch

File: 9b2f2a562863a0a9ee2d0d137c66107f.jpg (86KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 800x600px

Gonna post my two latest cops for my Russian collection.
This is a Soviet Raketa with 24h movement and world time rotating bezel.

File: Captura de pantalla 2016-01-23 a las 16.22.01.png (886KB, 1015x678px)

886KB, 1015x678px

>>10880216
And this is a Slava with day-date complication, also from the Soviet era.

>>10877900
I kinda prefer the inky black dial to this Sinn as opposed to their usual, more functional non-gloss/non-reflective matt black/charcoal color.

Deeper true black > greys imo.

>>10879994
They're spamming their ads everywhere and WUS is shilling them pretty hard at the moment.

File: WP_20160125_11_07_59_Pro (2).jpg (853KB, 2240x2240px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 2240x2240px

hi /fa/ what's up

>>10880733
absolute trash

embarrassing

>>10880764
Post your watch

File: 20160121_170318.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

>>10880928
Repost

Sort of in the market for a more casual watch. Maybe an omega.

Invicta is garbage. Any brand that pretends it's selling stuff for 90 pct off should be raising red flags.

>>10875863
amphibias

File: OmChronoStopBlacks.jpg (166KB, 430x494px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 430x494px

>>10875604
I've always wanted one of these omega chronostops, they're expensive and probably hard to find in good condition though.

File: JLC.jpg (45KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 540x960px

Been offered a good deal on a JLC Master Control by a colleague, thinking of taking it.

I like JLC as you don't see many around, and the master control looks kinda like a Calatrava, which is probably my ideal dress watch. Also can't have anything larger than a 37mm as I have babby wrists.

File: DSC_0319.jpg (410KB, 1125x1500px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1125x1500px

>>10881004
Those hands look familiar.

>>10881007
whats "a good deal" on a master control for you?

not a fan of the date indicator myself but its a nice watch, if you like it just go for it

File: china.jpg (105KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 800x600px

>>10881007
>Master Control
>Calatrava

I really don't get the appeal. You can buy a 2 benjamin China watch and probably get 90% of the functionality and design. At least with their tourbilons and moonphases you have something mechanically unique.

>>10881079
>buying watches for functionality

senpai...

So I need an automatic dive watch with a timing bezel. Nothing too large so I'd say 41mm is max size. Would like to avoid SKX007, Orient and the Sub ripoffs if I can. What can you get for $300?

File: Bizness doge.jpg (45KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x640px

>>10881024
2300€, in good condition, box and all.

>>10881079
Yeah, but you can't sell the China watch for ~3000€ when you get bored, or if you ever need some extra cash. It's good to have a little something as a security, in case things start to go south.

>>10881170
I'm not arguing in favor of fake watches but calling a watch an investment and expecting to sell it for even close to what you paid for it is absolutely fucking retarded. There are actual investments you could make instead, and if you're worried about having to pawn off your watches later maybe you shouldn't be spending thousands of dollars on a useless piece of jewelry to begin with.

>>10873152
>casio digital watches

hipster

>>10881184
as someone with a few four digit dollar cost watches, this is true

File: JLC Master Control.jpg (37KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 533x800px

>>10881184
If you don't even understand the difference between an investment and a security, why am I 'arguing' with you?

The watch is currently being sold for ~3000€ on Chrono24, in good condition. Retail price was ~4500-5000€ last time I checked. I don't think it's going to drop that much further in price, unless it gets really worn. And I'm very much aware that it won't gain value either, as one would expect if they'd view it as an investment.

Always fun getting financial advise from random people on 4chan.

>>10881288
>buy watch
>end up putting it in a safe so it doesn't devalue with wear
>don't get to enjoy it
>still have to sell it for 50-90% of the original cost because of pawn shops and store resellers

kek

>>10881301
You don't hang around watch forums, do you?

I don't blame you. Must be tough when you can't even afford a $300 watch kek

>>10881247
nice meme

>>10881314
>someone who apparently owns a Patek has to make his own posts on an autist forum to sell and ship it.

that's just sad and a sure sign of some poser who stretched his credit card. maybe that's why you're obsessed about "investment". also lol how would you know what I can afford? I have a couple four digit watches myself. they're beautiful, but I know they aren't good investments.

>>10881337
Are you on drugs?

I apparently own a Patek? Investment? You really need to work on your reading comprehension kek.

>>10881416
>replying to posts that isn't his and without reading up the reply chain

opinion discarded

>>10879494
people joke about this watch but it's very nice in a super minimalist way and is the only watch under 300 bucks that wont break in a month

File: IMG_2417.jpg (1MB, 2446x2430px)

1MB, 2446x2430px

I tried on this mondain the other day, I really like design but my wrists are very thin.

This is a 35mm model, do you a smaller one would look better?

>>10875713
jg2000-59f
they've gotten really expensive recently, i remember them being like $80-100 on ebay

>>10881482
hard to go smaller than 35mm. that's about where they bottom out unless you're going for some super vintage dress watch.

>>10881496
they also make 33mm and 30mm models.

>>10881651
you can pull off 35mm but if it feels wrong then go for the 33

>>10881482
no that looks right

>>10881651

Yea in that case I agree with what >>10881686 said

the 35mm seems fine and is already on the small end of things (watches have been trending bigger anyways)

>>10880938
not worf desu just get a rolex, swatch group killed omega and vintages are a bitch to take care of

>>10881924
yea idk omega has been on the down lately, but problem is i have tiny wrists and all the rolexes i've tried on feel too big. also not a huge fan of the dive style desu, doesn't really work with how i dress a good portion of the time. been trying to figure out what a good way to go for a not super dress watch but haven't found a good solution yet

might just end up with a rolex anyways cause whatever :|

>>10882076
You'd end up with a Rolex? You poor poor thing!

>>10882145
it's a respectable and recognizable watch that's extremely high quality, the design just doesn't grip me in the same way some other watches do.

>>10882156
I'm just shitting you, I know what you mean about Rolex. You like any of the GS designs?

w2c watch under £50

>>10882182
timex weekender

>>10882182
almost anywhere watches are sold

>>10880207
>>10881467
I agree.

This thread is disgusting.

If you cannot afford a watch please stop purchasing cheap asian shit and flooding the market with their atrocities.

>>10882163
Some of them are quite nice, similar to this for example http://www.grand-seiko.com/collection/detail.php?pid=SBGA003

But I'm generally not a big fan of the date indicator on the Grand Seikos.

>>10882371
Is that watch so expensive because its enterilly made in Japan?

It looks almost identical to those 300-400 dollar seikos you see in jewellery stores

Are those viral marketing "MVMT" watches any good?

Keep seeing ads for them and was interested, because the metal banded ones look nice for the pricepoint.

>>10882891
Complete shit, basically almost all viral marketing watches are poor quality (i.e Daniel Wellington)

>>10882896
Figured as much.

>>10881079
why would anyone buy a "refined" watched named after an ocean pigeon?

File: IMG_10381.jpg (92KB, 565x756px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 565x756px

>>10873138
Got this from my asshole dad for getting into uni. Don't know...im 22 and I dont think it works with my fits. I wish I had gotten an hublot big bang instead. What do you guys think?

>>10876408
the 19 just refers to how many jewels it has (Zuan means Jewel in chinese) more jewels = more accurate and more expensive

File: image.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x2448px

Picked up this Tag Heuer Aquaracer for a daily wearer. What do you think? This is the fort watch I've ever owned that has a pure white dial

>>10883140
first*

>>10873138
just buy an apple watch

it will never break down on you because you have to buy a new one every year since the previous model gets a forced update to make sure the planned obsolescence scheme pans out

>>10883123
>>>10876408
> more jewels = more accurate and more expensive
Maybe in like 1930. Synthetic jewels don't cost much and any modern movement should have more than enough jewels on all the bearings that require them. Actually the Seagull 1963s all have 21 jewels as far as I know. The original watch made for the air force in the 60s had 19 jewels but when Seagull updated the movement to re-release the modern version they upgraded it to have 21 jewels. For some reason they decided to print 19 anyway on some of the watches to be more true to the original and on other watches they print 21 jewels which is the actual number. There's also another variant of that movement Seagull makes with 23 jewels.

>>10882871
nah the movement and finishing and details are totally different. made in japan has nothing to do with it

>>10882891
You can get em' for $13 http://www.aliexpress.com/item/UK-Brand-Watches-No-Name-MVMT-Minimal-Design-Face-Japan-Movement-Leather-Strap/32441669842.html?spm=2114.01010208.3.31.zaHuDj&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_2,searchweb201644_4_10014_10001_10002_10005_10006_10003_10004_62,searchweb201560_5,searchweb1451318400_6151,searchweb1451318411_6449&btsid=caa6c3c5-18d6-4546-9c1c-7b8948d6b06e

>>10883019
>reposting this

Can get a secondhand Seiko SNDC49P for 75 Australian dollarydoos. Just needs new batteries. Worth it? Do I need to buy specific Seiko batteries that make the price redundant?

File: $_20.jpg (50KB, 800x600px)

50KB, 800x600px

>>10883178
Forgot image.

>>10875186
It sounded like you'd taken it to some sort of citizen rep or a department store who would fuck you over.

>gee it's broken that's a shame look here are more watches you can buy!

>>10883178
>just needs new batteries

that's a fancy way of saying the watch doesn't work anymore 9 times out of 10

File: Casio ref. A158WEA-1EF.jpg (132KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 800x600px

>>10880207

File: NeTSFkEC.jpg (97KB, 1024x1024px)

97KB, 1024x1024px

thoughts?

>>10883393
gold is trashy drug dealer tier unless you're a non-white in which case why even live

File: omega1601tc2led1.jpg (52KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x480px

>>10883393
>>10883393

Get this instead

>>10883398

I disagree. That's not my watch, either. I'm also white.

>>10883402
that shade and lustre of gold does not go well with light skin tones at all

silver is almost always the right choice unless you're getting an omega constellation or you're wealthy enough to get a platinum watch

File: IMG_20141110_002737.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px)

1MB, 2448x2448px

>>10883412
>>10883412

Like this kind of constellation

>>10883387
oooo, very good choice.

File: only omega worth owning tbqh fam.jpg (185KB, 1250x834px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1250x834px

>>10883419
no way son, this kind

>>10883393
>>10883398
i agree.
to me, gold is just tacky for a watch.

>>10883427
>>10883427

fuccccck, father I have failed you.

why are the lights in the A158 and F91s so shit?

>>10883393
just get an A158

File: DSC_0394.jpg (373KB, 1125x1500px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1125x1500px

>>10883427
w-what about this kind?

>>10883506
acceptable, I like the angularity of the one I posted but yours still has a lot of the nice little details while still being clean af

>tfw poor

File: 19331967915_af4fb4c6bd_h.jpg (293KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1600x1200px

>>10883512
You mean the pie-pan dial or the angled lugs? I like both of those things a lot and they're really distinctive Constellation features, but yeah the one I have is more rounded all over. Also of course mine was pretty clearly used a whole lot but I guess what it lacks in cosmetic condition it makes up for in sentimental value.

>>10883467
i thought the same thing, actually. thought it was just a problem with my watch, and I was just too lazy to go and replace it. But, I'm glad I know, I'm not the only one.

>>10883427
>the mesh even fills in the lugs

noice

>>10883019
Spoiled brat.

>>10883019
>>10884063
it looks fake tbqh fampai

File: woj music.jpg (44KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x375px

who else g-shock?

>>10883653
Yeah, it's an obvious flaw, but I guess it comes from the fact the watches are old, "vintage", technology. You won't be getting a full display backlight like on modern digitals.

File: IMG_20160126_135141.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

New aliexpress cop. I kinda like it. Feels sturdier than the absolute trash £3 watches they sell.

>>10884282
No one, they look like trash and are way too clunky

>>10881336
your watches are the only meme here

>>10884063
>jealous cause he has money

File: DSC_5684.jpg (289KB, 1408x1113px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1408x1113px

Sinn 104. I want to get this watch sometime in the unforeseeable future.

File: Vostok Amphibian.jpg (56KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x480px

Anyone know what the Amphibia that was actually military-issued looked like?

>>10884605
nice meme

>>10875751
>>10875977
ugh disgusting skins

>>10884342
huh, I never really took that into consideration. Thank you, for your insight.

File: ball_trainmaster_daynight_lg.jpg (199KB, 1450x825px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1450x825px

next dress watch? if I can get in stainless steel and not rose gold.

File: moto360.jpg (92KB, 525x620px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 525x620px

the motorola 360

>>10883019
Your hands look like they've only touched cashmere your whole life. Give me a handy.

>>10886871
I'm just speculating, but that's what I drew. No worries at all

File: 2016-01-26 21.49.05.jpg (428KB, 910x1090px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 910x1090px

>>10873152

Nice Casios, famberlamp.

>>10883355
an ugly watch for an ugly arm

File: 20160126_220443.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5312x2988px

Some of the Burberry watches are nice, or a Victorianox night vision watch.

Pic related, mine's never failed me

>>10883393

Casios are better and the gold looks shitty.

2/10

>When nobody comments on your new watch you posted with great excitement

File: 51z5PqYU1IL.jpg (40KB, 500x500px)

40KB, 500x500px

>>10873152
Nice casios my man. Pic related in silver is mine.

w2c the far right?

>>10887288
nice watch

>>10886947
I completely agree.

>>10886944
Cashmere, you say?

File: let me just double check the time.png (179KB, 308x506px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 308x506px

One is a relic that I wear when I'm not working, the knock off is when I'm at work. 100 mechanical so no batteries ever as long as I keep moving, * years and counting

File: Olive gold with red accents.jpg (305KB, 1125x975px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1125x975px

>>10887292
I was looking at pictures of this the other day from different angles. It's perfect. My wrists are ridiculously small though, it might just look clunky.

Pic on wrist?

File: ball.jpg (46KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x800px

>>10886898
almost perfect, ruined by the offset day window desu

but yeah get it

>>10887379
>40mm

RUINED

>>10887493
Ehw your watch is litteraly pushed into your fatty arm

>>10887493
>guaranteed neckbeard

>>10887309
fuck off, tripfaggot.

File: casio.png (476KB, 644x682px)

476KB, 644x682px

look better?

>>10875252
>>10875751
>>10877900
>>10881012
>>10880938
>>10881007 if you man up and get it, which you 100% fucking should
>>10883140
>>10884237
>>10887493 With new strap, also loosen it ffs
Only watches ITT worth having, not counting OP's citizen and the chink shit.

>>10875236
If he hasnt serviced it and wore it everyday, get it serviced. Then wear the shit out of it.

>>10876320
Divers are probably one of the most versatile, you can pull off a pilots watch in a few different ways too. Maybe even a dress watch with a metal band like a SARB033

>>10876349
kek, You fucked up bro, sell it for as much as you can and buy the aliexpress duplicate. Get a chink DW knockoff if you want to impress your friends

>>10876861
You dont need a watch to tell the time anymore, almost every other device does that for us. People either have $10 pretty looking chink watches because they like them as accessories, or they fork out big money for a piece of precision engineering and see the beauty in that. It's more about an appreciation of the build than anything for most people.

>>10880216
Dont mind that for a USSR piece, nice cop bro

>>10881162
Steinhart ocean-one if you dont call that a "sub ripoff", maybe some of their other stuff too. I hear Citizen does decent divers watches. I have the Orient Ray for a daily beater and its probably the best around its price point

>>10881482
I'd go smaller for that style, yes. How fucking small are your wrists?

>>10882299
I wouldnt regard watches respected for their engineering as in the same market as watches normies buy for case/strap design appeal

>>10883140
If the white face suits you then its a really decent score. Looks pretty sturdy, I like it.

>>10883393
I'll never understand the appeal of this style

>>10884282
>/g/shock

>>10885208
Just save for it and don't waste your money on any watch that isn't your grail.

>>10886898
I dig the design, dont know much about the brand though. What movement does it use?

>>10887936
Don't like bracelet but rest is dope. Reminds me of that James bond/metal gear Seiko w2c?
>>10887292
Thanks. I almost bought that one
>>10881483
The jg is a citizen, its about twice that price too
>>10887060
Thanks fampai

File: mwrist.png (857KB, 565x553px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 565x553px

>>10887377
>Pic on wrist?

the watch is actually fairly small, so I dont think it looks that clunky. Obviously that depends on just how skinny your wrists are. Should be fine though

File: IMG_20151201_135811.jpg (624KB, 718x1000px) Image search: [Google]

624KB, 718x1000px

Not nearly enough gook-watch in this thread.

>>10884282 See 10885581

>>10884552
We aren't talking about your ass we're talking about watches

>>10884282
>>1088109 #

>>10888647
what are these called?

>>10885581
Hey whip out that dick that's the sexiest watch I've ever seen

>>10889134
casio databank

File: IMG_20151114_165229_zpst7gnn50o.jpg (368KB, 1024x1024px)

368KB, 1024x1024px

who here /ripley/

>>10889162
I thought about buying one but I waited too long, too bad it's a limited edition. Does it look and feel nice in person? I saw that it's made in china shit which is disappointing for being a special edition and not all that cheap.

>>10889210
Not my photo, I thought about buying one as well. Maybe they'll go back in stock, seiya restocked them once after the first batch. I thought they were partially made in China?

>>10889223
Seems like Amazon has a few for like $330 right now if you really want one. The caseback says "movement Japan cased in China" which is odd, I don't think I've seen a Seiko made in China before or at least not any admitting to it, so I hope it's not a sign that it's poorly made.

I have $150 to spend on a watch because niggers stole my previous watch. Looking for analog, nice looking, not a sundial on my wrist, and perhaps something darker in appearance but that isn't necessary. I'm watch illiterate so please help

>>10889292
How does something strapped to your body get taken away from you
>sounds like you're gay

>>10889318
Sounds like I was foolish enough to trust the housekeeping

>>10889349
You left it because you didn't love it, and then jamal took it and u r mad. Well guess what I'm him and I wear it whenever I fuck your mom and I definitely tell her what time it is
>schlonged

>>10889365
You probably don't tell the time because you're a nigger and they can't read and it was a fossil watch so the mechanism probably broke

Do metal watches mostly go with less outfits than leather ones?

>>10888647
Woah, This looks great in silver.
King Of The Nerds

>>10888742
Damn Tissel looks so fucking expensive. Real goat diver under 300$...

>>10889493
it's ok but you still look really stupid buying what looks exactly like a rolex without the rolex name

>>10887670
What the fuck are you gonna do about it, loser?

>>10889417
Fossil? Get out of the dirt and buy a new watch from the Internet. I'm not a nigger I'm white and proud and I tell hella time with my casio g-shock
>you are gay

File: IMG_20160127_161925.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>10889417

File: Snapchat-3122866418013654010.jpg (486KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1080x1920px

Just picked this up last week. I wanted something in blue. Usually I'm not a fan of MK since they are bulky and I hate the hype but it looks good IMO.

Ignore the bloody pants just got in a motorcycle crash this morning. Off to the mall in just a bit for new ones.

>>10873138
Maybe you should stop spending money on overpriced things you /fa/ggots.

>>10887975
Believe the movement in the Ball Trainmaster is the ETA 2824.

gross

all these watches are all generic dadcore crap

do you think anyone else notices the watch you have but you?

>>10890490
your wealth can't obscure the fact that you have 3 types of the same watch

>>10889521
>it's ok but you still look really stupid buying what looks exactly like a rolex without the rolex name
If you're in the $300 range, you're not going to get a real Rolex.

It's better to have a nice homage than a fake.

>>10890829
I count Tisell as a fake because it doesn't do anything original but change the name

>>10890868
I'll accept this as soon as you recognise my right to identify as an apache helicopter

>>10890895
and your point is?

>>10889162
Probably going to get one when the Australian dollar is rubbish

>>10890490
jelly as fuck senpai

>>10890829
I would agree but I'm afraid >>10890868 is right. It's basically a carbonn copy with a different name.

File: watch.jpg (49KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1000x1000px

Posted this in one of the earlier threads, I do now understand that Citizen dont make particualry good watches but are alright for the price range.

What do you guys think of this style wise? I find myself more attracted to watches which arent as chunky or full of a large variety of dials and sub faces.

>>10890518
Idk if its worth it for the price then. But buy whatever makes you happy. Value is based on perception, not an absolute rule.

File: caswrist2framed.jpg (115KB, 800x603px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 800x603px

>23, just got a job as a digital customer service guy
>mom offers a pretty dinged-up rolex for getting my BA in music appreciation, sure thanks
>mfw I realize it's a Submariner

Am I too young to make this my 'everyday'? My supervisor wears a Casio, I feel like there's a good chance this wouldn't be smart in the workplace.

>>10891821
It's timeless, but if you have babby wrists it'll look tacky

>>10891821
I'm also thinking about getting a NATO strap to dress it down, but I live in Canada and most of the major suppliers only ship to the US.

>>10891821
just keep it in the little tacky green wood box it comes in and buy like an oreint or alpha or steinhart or some shit

>>10891853
I didn't even get a box or certificates or anything. The scratches are pretty deep, a few short ones on the bezel and some long ones on the bracelet. Every link shows wear, I'm guessing it's been worn for at least 5 years but the lumination is completely out, so it must be older than 15.

If people ask if it's real, I'm thinking of just saying 'no'.

File: Screenshot_2016-01-28-12-57-29.png (623KB, 2560x1440px)

623KB, 2560x1440px

420 NZD for this. What quality should I be expecting if i cop this?

>>10891868
whoops, lost my post

that watch is unabashedly shit quality, get
>>10891875
instead

>>10891868
Have you considered getting a Rolex instead? Like a Sea-Dweller?

>>10873467
>>10876861
Topkek
A decent watch don't has to cost thousands and it also wont break by itself. You can inherit it over to Generations. It is a masterpiece of Engineering, a prestige and fashion Object with a practical function. It is a understatement.
The imeme is a overpriced bullshit toy.
Impractical and trying to solve Problems no one has while looking like a cheap toy out of a gumball machine.
Plebs buy it because of Marketing.
It probably wont even last 3 years before something breaks or it gets obsolet. And also lose all it's value.
Stay pleb and enjoy your overpriced cringe toy.

>>10886905
Only decent looking smartwatch imho. Design of the 2nd is also an improvement.
But i personally see no sense in a smartwatch.

File: notracistjustalaughingguyplsnobully.gif (1MB, 255x191px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 255x191px

>>10891910

File: DSC_0178.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px)

3MB, 3840x2160px

Hublot, skagen, Rolex, ulysse. Also, wearing a grand seiko

>>10891827
nigga they probably sell NATO straps on every corner

>>10892090
Well I'm jelly, I've been wanting a 7A28 for a while now. Yours seems to be in really good shape too, did you buy it off ebay or what?

>>10892017
>skagen owner

willing to be they're all fake

yes they fake grand seiko

File: seiko.jpg (159KB, 390x358px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 390x358px

>>10892173
don't be seiko invented the quartz qatch (and the kinetic and spring drive) but they sure as hell didn't do it best

File: 5.jpg (221KB, 1067x1600px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1067x1600px

>>10892240
>seiko invented the quartz qatch (and the kinetic and spring drive) but they sure as hell didn't do it best
YOU TAKE THAT BACK

File: IMG_20160128_095050.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Bought this last week. What think?

File: hey.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

Rotated for your viewing pleasure.

>>10892412
>Generic "Suisse" KWARTZ
>Not even %50.0001 Swiss
You got skull fucked by a mall-borne jewellery saleswoman, didn't you?

Nah, it's a high-quality fake. (https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=720&q=rado&oq=rado&gs_l=img.3..0l10.575.1134.0.1391.6.4.0.0.0.0.186.536.1j3.4.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..2.4.532.fgmJNNYP3Oo#tbm=isch&q=rado+ceramic)

Bought it in Beijing for about 20 USD.

File: 1.1235797140.resting-on-my-xgoonx-pillow-xbag-of-winex.jpg (60KB, 550x412px)

60KB, 550x412px

>>10892444
>Buying a fake of a watch that's not even Swiss enough to be legally called "Swiss Made".
Made my fucking day anon.

>>10892490
...Have you never heard of Rado? They're Swiss. Part of the Swatch Group, which also owns Omega. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Swatch_Group).

Rado is garbage tier sold to people who think swiss watches are good but have no idea why.

>>10887292
I remember in grade school, having one of these made you a badass. teachers would never realize you had a calculator on you during a test.

File: 1453998809340.jpg (46KB, 480x204px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 480x204px

>>10892503
>Swatch
Every man and their dog is part of the Swatch group.
Of course I have heard of it.

The question is, have you heard of the SWISS MADE trademark?
It can only legally be applied to watches that are more than 50% Swiss.
Look at the face of the watch, notice how it doesn't say "SWISS MADE"; it says "SWISS 3317".

The movement is a $50 (at best) generic Swiss Ronda/ETA Quartz - the watch probably isn't even cased in Switzerland.

You got cucked hard.

>>10892412
>HE ACTUALLY BOUGHT A RADO

>>10892503
>owning a more expensive Swatch with some random brand name they happen to now own the rights to is worth bragging about
I hope you know that Rado and Tissot and Hamilton and Omega and Longines and whatever other brand all died in the 70s and 80s and anything you buy now with that name on it is shit.

>>10892578
Omega is on the down but it's not quite that bad yet. Hamilton is still OKish.

Whats some good fashion branded watches? Hilfi? Armani? etcetc

>>10892592
>Whats some good fashion branded watches? Hilfi? Armani? etcetc
None.

All fashion watch brands are unfashionable and overpriced.

File: DSC_0331.jpg (452KB, 1371x1065px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1371x1065px

>>10877900

Eyyyy Sinnbro. Nice 556i (if I'm not mistaken).

>>10892522
>>10892562
It's a fake. As such, don't care too much about "Swiss Made," but interesting; can you explain what the "Swiss" designation (like Swatches say "Swiss" on the dial) means?

>>10892578
Why so down on modern Rados? I like that they use ceramic; makes them look different.

I like Rado because they made the clock system for the HK subway, which is awesome.

>>10892597
>All fashion watch brands are unfashionable and overpriced.

lol this is an outdated meme. I can see Fossil, Michael Kors and Armani putting out better stuff than some watchmaking houses in the under $500 budget. Most mall brands are still shit though.

File: michael-kors-watches-5.jpg (81KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1000x1000px

>>10892611
"SWISS MADE" as a legal trademark was a measure adopted by Switzerland to ensure that "Swiss" watches were at least majority made in Switzerland (Prior to the 1968 ruling and 1971 codifying, there were hundreds of "Swiss" brands that had a single Swiss part in them or merely passed through Switzerland.

A "SWISS MADE" item must be at least 50% Swiss in origin, and the most important part must be made in Switzerland.
In the case of a watch, this means that at least 50% of the value of the watch must originate in Switzerland and the movement must be Swiss.

Most companies barely scrape by with their designs (cases made in China and finished in Switzerland etc, Movements produced in China and assembled in Switzerland), but there are a few high end who do manage a near 100% Swiss supply chain (Rolex, PP, etc.), whilst on the other end of the spectrum, there are watches that can't even meet the bare standard and mark themselves as something similar (ie. "SWISS" then model number, in the case of RADO).

>>10892612
>I can see Fossil, Michael Kors and Armani putting out better stuff than some watchmaking houses in the under $500 budget.
BULL
FUCKING
SHIT

I have not once seen a desirable watch from any of these brands, sure, they make some automatic watches, but that doesn't make the designs any more respectable than a DIESEL or Barbie play watch.
MK has some truly horrific designs.
My sister in law has this watch and wears it everywhere - I struggle not to laugh at her.

File: fossil.jpg (343KB, 1597x1600px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1597x1600px

>>10892634
Armani Mecanico has some nice ones
Fossil cases and dials are miles prettier than anything in the price range
MK Jetmaster and auto lines
http://www.ablogtowatch.com/michael-kors-jetmaster-automatic-watch-review/

>sister
well of course their women's line is going to be shit anon. even seiko and citizens are just stiletto dogshit.

>>10892669
you know fossil supplies armani and mk and almost every other designer watch brand right?

and they're all garbo

>>10892634
Yeah, but the "Swiss" designation is regulated too. As far as I can tell from here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Made) and here (https://www.admin.ch/cp/f/[email protected]), it means the same thing as "Swiss Made.

>>10892669
>MK Jetmaster
It honest to god, looks like a chink rip off of the ugliest Breitling I have ever seen.
>Armani Mecanico
Gaudy chink shit, again.
>Fossil in picture.
That's a nice design, but not an original one.
Whilst it'd be fine for $200-300, there are a lot of much nicer watches in this price range.
Plus, Fossil cases are probably the worst finished I've seen in a long time.

>>10892674
>Yeah, but the "Swiss" designation is regulated too. As far as I can tell from here
Yes and no; it's easy to skirt by not using "SWISS MADE" and it's never enforced.

Using "SWISS" as a prefix to an object is restricted (ie. "Swiss Watch", "Swiss Chocolate", "Swiss Clothing"), but there is no restriction on what you can use it in.
The movement inside (I assume a customized Ronda/ETA that is marked as a "Rado 3317 movement") is likely what is being marked as Swiss.

If a company can use SWISS MADE, they will (exceptions generally being reissues of older watches, that were marked as "SWISS" before "SWISS MADE" was restricted..

>>10892673
they also own shitnola

just saying for $200 bucks they're plenty attractive compared to some 70s looking shit from "legit" watch companies

>>10892707
>just saying for $200 bucks they're plenty attractive compared to some 70s looking shit from "legit" watch companies
And for $200, you can get a much nicer Japanese or Microbrand.

>>10892184
Implying that watches are fake because he owns a skagen.
Ayy Jellyfag.

File: armani.jpg (187KB, 580x580px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 580x580px

>>10892705
>>10892713
eh at least their designs aren't so dated

>And for $200, you can get a much nicer Japanese or Microbrand.
like what? an SKX007 or seiko 5? they're even more goofier lol

>>10892721
he also has a potato camera for someone who can afford a Rolex and Hublot

>>10892017
>chooses one of the ugliest, least original ulysse available

senpai what are you doing

File: regulator_R-01_i_.jpg (1MB, 1333x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1333x1000px

>>10892741
>like what? an SKX007 or seiko 5? they're even more goofier lol
>Choosing the two meme watches.

You really don't know anything about the brand, do you?
$300 gets you into the SARB/SARG territory.

If you prefer goofy shit like that Armani, you can get a Regulator from Perpetual for $170 (next batch is available in April).

>>10892705
Gotcha. 70s versions of the Jubile (this model) were marked in the same way ("Swiss," then serial number), so who knows.

In Chinese fake watch stores, there are the watches you see displayed on the counter, which are 20 USD (although they'll charge you as much as you'll pay), and then there are the "nice watches," which you have to ask for and are high quality fakes that go for around 100 USD. I always wondered where those fakes came from; maybe they come from Chinese factories that make "Swiss" luxury watches.

File: img_5054.jpg (92KB, 450x253px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 450x253px

Links for good minimal watches from Aliexpress? Thought about getting this Rodina, but fuck having 'china made' on the face. Also thought about getting the Orient Bambino, but after looking it is too busy, even though I love the domed glass.

File: seiko5.jpg (208KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 720x540px

>>10892764
>SARB

those are their mid-range lines but I'll bite. the designs are pretty much seiko 5s without the 5. SARG is not too bad I guess maybe a bit confused if they're dressy or casual.

>passing over italian chink shit for unavailable plain chink shit

>>10892803
>>those are their mid-range lines but I'll bite. the designs are pretty much seiko 5s without the 5.
And a shit load more finishing.
SARB/SARGs are also very available to anyone with an internet connection.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px)

1MB, 2448x2448px

Posting again for more opinins

File: chloe.jpg (49KB, 634x423px)

49KB, 634x423px

>>10892901
>Coach
return it. their spokesperson is a coalburner.

>>10891917
>But i personally see no sense in a smartwatch.
Its cool because everytime your phone does something you will see it on the watch so you dont have to take out your phone all the time
I also have a lot of data that I want to check often

>>10892932
pigs roll around with shit all the time.

Just got an old Rolex Submariner, so I'm thinking of getting a NATO strap before I make it my everyday, to dress it down. Only problem is, where should I get one?

Dollar stores don't seem appropriate, somehow. Canada has a shit dollar right now, so I'd prefer somewhere without a retarded shipping cost. Any help would be /g/.

>>10877153
>>10876924

Link to that or similar watches on Ali for €10?

>>10892938
Wow. Sounds pretty lame to me and like a first world Problem. But to everyone their own.

File: max-bill-automatic-chronoscope-watch-stainless-mesh-band_im_395.jpg (24KB, 395x395px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 395x395px

>>10893292
no, but i got one for 2000

File: 20160128_172637.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>10892634
>I have not once seen a desirable watch from any of these brands
I would have agreed in the past, but Fossil has been putting out some decent designs recently. Pic related is my daily beater for work and grocery shopping. It is thin, fairly elegant, and versatile. For the $100 I paid a year ago, I have certainly gotten my moneys' worth. No complaints.

1/2

File: 20160128_172811.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

2/2

>>10893585
The dial looks alright but the hands are not a good fit for it and the level of finishing overall is obviously not very good and the crown is awful. I bet it's really big, too. It's fine I guess, it works, but it certainly doesn't look particularly good or anything.

>>10893628
>I bet it's really big
Nah. It's only 44mm.
The fit and finish is much nicer in person. These photos don't really do any justice. I just wanted to show that not all fossil's are complete garbage.

>>10893670
literally every fossil is garbage. there's no reason to ever own a fossil vs something else

I'm looking for like a <20$ watch that looks nice, anyone have any recommendations?

>>10893788
casio

File: 1439083371003.jpg (220KB, 640x853px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 640x853px

>>10893073
>>10893073
help please

>>10893833
http://www.crownandbuckle.com/

>>10892634
Nice Mary kay watch homo

>>10893833
>>10893839
I bought mine at cheapestnatostraps.com
they also have perlon straps which are a bit classier imo.

File: 1a9a7ce75f8220e5aee78b33dbc76283.png (577KB, 1472x924px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 1472x924px

for a cheap watch, is this one good?

>>10894017
I don't think the numbers on the bezel look good imo. However something to think about is buying a Rolex or Omega that will actually hold it's value, you buy that the money you spend is basically flushed down the toilet.

>>10894202
>why spend $26 on this watch anon just spend $8000 instead it'll be more worth your money
>it's a better idea financially because your watch will hold its value perfectly except for the fact that it loses 30-50% of its value the second you purchase it and continues to lose value as you wear it and bang it up and it also requires ongoing maintenance costs unless you want the movement to deteriorate and further lose value
He could buy that watch and throw it away and buy a brand new one every time the battery runs out and he would still spend much less than a Submariner would cost him over that period and instead of "investing" his money in a luxury toy he could've actually invested that money to get some sort of return.

You can like luxury watches but you must be absolutely retarded if you think they're actually a smart use of your money.

>>10893585
2bqhwyf, I wouldn't have paid more than $40 for that, less if it's quartz.

>>10893670
>Nah. It's only 44mm.
>Only
>44mm
44mm is large dive watch zone.

>>10893840
>/fa/
>In charge on comprehension.
Sit and spin.

File: nomos.jpg (1MB, 1520x2688px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1520x2688px

Just got this today, I'm pretty happy.

What are some entry dive watches that has all these things?

>sapphire
>auto
>200m water resist & crown screwdown
>good lume
>41mm max size
>under 300 dollars

>>10894840
Orient mako usa

File: a066a9bb-b44d-4e14-8490-7c63c914385d_huge.jpg (164KB, 870x1262px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 870x1262px

Thoughts?

Don't hold back.

>>10894879
You should moisturize your skin, and loose some weight. And wear things that dont scream autism.

>>10894833
my nigga

>>10894901

That's a pic of the model's hand, not mine bub.

Thanks for the (You) though.

File: ga-110gd-9b2_4.jpg (3KB, 65x65px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 65x65px

Just copped this one yesterday. Reckon it looks pretty dope

File: ga-110gd-9b2_4-1.jpg (81KB, 600x600px)

81KB, 600x600px

>>10895074
A pic that isn't autistic

>>10895079
>Protection

does it protect you from getting laid

>>10894840
maratac sr-3

File: 1435180755520.jpg (77KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 600x450px

>>10894263
>it's a better idea financially because your watch will hold its value perfectly except for the fact that it loses 30-50% of its value the second you purchase it

How ironic that you list the Rolex Submariner as an example, when the Submariner is literally one of the few watches that retains its value extremely well over time.

>>10895261
>rolex submariner lose 50% of its retail Value the moment it is purchased.

$7000 is likely enough to wear a new apple watche or the beautiful huaweiwei stainless case smart watch at every release for a lifetime.

Also note that an apple watch will never need servicing since they tend to be obsolete in a year. Meaning yearly services on that Rolex = new Apple watch price>>10895261

File: TmXgYlL.jpg (77KB, 436x654px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 436x654px

>>10895271
The current Rolex Submariner costs $8,550 with date option, $7,500 without.

Resale prices for this latest ceramic model (with date) range from $8,000 to $9,500, based on the patina development on the dials and hands.

If you want to spend your money staying on latest smartwatch editions, that's fine. But only the ignorant would deny Rolex's greatest strengths - timelessness, consistency of design.

If you were talking about the highest-end products from Omega, Breitling, or Cartier, I would agree with you. But saying that a Patek-Philippe, Rolex, or Jaeger-Lecoultre loses half its value out of the box? That's not even absurd - it's factually wrong, as anybody even remotely familiar with the watch industry would readily know.

Anyone know anything about Atlantic watches? saw an Atlantic sealine the other day, 100€ seccond hand it left me wondering
its got the seiko SARG look to it

>>10893628
>but the hands are not a good fit

I think so too. roman numerals are more classic than anything. so elegant black hands would be more neat.

it's so typical for Fossil/Diesel/Police shit to be all about butt ugly weird ass industrial aesthetics.

>>10880938
>>10894833

stowa > nomos

>>10896318
>stowa
>buying china sourced crap with a $800 markup from its true value

>>10896318
>stowa > nomos

o i am laffin' lad. this is just embarrassing.

>>10896318
ETA movement with Chinese parts, why? Nomos makes everything but the balance themselves in the Tangente, and the balance too in all the newer models. Everything is made by them. There is zero justification for Stowa's prices, every part of their watch is outsourced besides the engraving.

What part of Stowa do you like better?

>>10896591
the answer is probably because he has a stowa

>>10895307
>grouping rolex with patek or jaeger le coultre

>>10896600
Laco > Stowa

File: 20160129_223535.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

Someone gave me this.
Is it legit?

>>1089670

lol no

>>10896722

meant for >>10896704

just look at how the numbers aren't even aligned. super low quality fake.

>>10896704
Did they even try to make it look remotely like an actual Patek model or did they just print the brand name on a random watch? Either way it's obviously garbage.

File: Patek-Philippe-5004-or-rose.jpg (337KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 600x600px

>>10896704
Looks like a fake of this model. Probably in the 20-40 USD range, depending on the quality of the movement.

Just consider this question: Would I expect this person to give me a 50,000 USD gift?

>>10896837
nah senpai but it was worth a question

File: fossil_watch_autisimo.jpg (84KB, 900x900px)

84KB, 900x900px

I bought this one years ago, does it look okay? I stopped liking it and simply didn't wear any watch anymore for some years.

>>10895322
Any watch worth less than 2000 US is a disposable watch

File: fukasawa_twelve.jpg (67KB, 465x424px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 465x424px

What do you think about this one? As a product designer, I am a big fan of Naoto Fukasawa, designer of this watch. Does it look a bit too gimmicky/cheap for the pricepoint?

Also, should I cop black or silver version?

>>10897226
btw they are both the same sice

>>10897226
I dig the concept but it'll probably look pretty gimmicky in person/being worn. Definitely, a million times over, not worth the price either.

>>10886898
name please?

Where the fuck do I find Orient and Timex in London? I've went to three different watch shops and they only have shitty mall tier brands such as Calvin Klein watches or alternatively really gaudy shit paki kids will buy like Rolex

File: fossil.jpg (342KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1500x1500px

what do you think?

>>10873467
the faggots will come in your behind any time

>>10897452
I laughed aloud at this comment. Thank you.

>>10897452
kek

>>10897404
it tries to look like a very expensive watch but obviously isn't

>>10897404
Its a bit feminine for my liking