Fuck I forgot a space sorry.
the definition is fairly arbitrary, but I wouldn't risk for now , the mods are awake.
Oh shit, it's a roundeye! Won't someone save me from the horror of it all?
Crossposting this from the other muscle girl thread.
>Liking muscles makes you gay
Just how sexually insecure ARE you, exactly?
If she had a dick that'd literally just be a dude with tits and long hair. Not even a feminine dude with tits and long hair, a manly man who happens to have a few female features. But, sure, I'm the one who's insecure about my sexuality.
You kind of are dude, you're the only one bitching about them and comparing them to real shit while everyone else accepts them for the unrealistic fantasy they are.
Nice to see people posting western art in here too. No sarcasm.
Not really. If they were based on the real thing then futanari wouldn't exist as a loanword in the west. It's there because it represented a specific idea that didn't have a term, that's how loanwords work. The west already had an actual shemale genre. There's some overlap on the fringes, but actual transsexuals and futanari are not the same thing.
As for misguided... Anon, look at your argument. You're implying gay men would take one part they do like and attach it to a body they have absolutely no interest in. Would attaching a pussy to a dude work for you?
>I don't give a shit whether or not you're gay, but I'm going to keep arguing that you are anyway, despite the fact that I know literally nothing about you aside from two fetishes.
Can we just agree that trying to convince anonymous strangers on the internet to "Admit" that they're gay is a pretty ridiculous pursuit, and stop shitting up the board with it in general? This argument is as old as futanari itself, and it's never persuaded anyone who actually has the fetish. It's a waste of everyone's time that accomplishes nothing, and it's aggravating to re-tread the same old discussion constantly. Nobody should have to defend their sexual orientation on a fetish porn board.
Maybe a muclefan can help me. I one read a hentai that has pregnant mucle women, maybe more that one. Thing is, while pregnant, their abs were still visible, maybe restraining the bulge of pregnancy? Any ideas?
Honestly, I haven't seen very many artists depict pregnant muscle girls correctly. The abs remain visible, and later when the belly grows bigger, actually split in the middle and get pushed off to the sides of the belly. Every work with pregnant muscle girls I've seen just makes it look like their abs disappear completely.
yeah, it would take a lot of balls to accomplish
Hey, /d/ I need you to help me settle something. Are muscles just a body type preference or do they qualify as a fetish? I need to know to settle an argument I'm having with a friend.
A disease for which a girl, and even some boys, get turned into bulging muscle futas.
Every September there's a telethon to raise money and awareness of this disease.
A disease for which there is no cure.
A 'fetish' is anything you can latch onto that gives you arousal.
You can have fetish for a particular hair style. For feet. With the dick, without the dick, without the balls dick, ass, anus, legs, panties, leggings, shoulders, eyes, what have you.
Hell, best fetish I saw came from /b. Guy has a fetish for symmetrical tile work.
Even those on /d were like "well, that's one for OUR books even."
any doujins/cg sets with a toned bbw girl? Can be futa, just no futa on male. futa on female, futa on futa is fine too.