You think comics could get away with covers like this if the writers just said that they were transgender men? How would SJW's react to it then? What if it was just men that looked like women. What would be their response?
Its my body is my choice! Women should have the right to dress sexy
WHAT? That woman on tv is WILLING AND PAID to dress sexy?! Shame on her! Thats objectifying!
Just call them out for not being fans and just being people forcing their agendas.
Spider-woman is getting zero discussion anywhere.
Get a "news site" to bitch about it.
People will undoubtedly argue for and against what it's saying.
It snowballs into a stupid thing.
A book noone cared about has tons of press, even if it's bad.
Or a "news site" had a slow day and just decided to bitch about nothing.
Well it's not necessarily the same.
One has to do with agency and all that good stuff, if a chick wants to dress hot it's her right as a womyn.
Whereas the others a drawing, so no real female agency unless it's drawn by a chick. It's just some dude drawing what he thinks is sexy. However it's dumb to try to take that right away or deem it sexist. Guy likes hot chicks being hot.
>Some SWJ's confuse me. They don't want women to be sexualized, but then get mad when women aren't sexualized and then when women are sexualized they get mad.
Where were you when comics were killed?
>It's my body, it's my choice!
>and their body? Well, I guess that's my choice too!
>double standards aren't even a thing
>if I don't like it, it's bad
they're literally the worst. You want to know how they would respond to what you're talking about OP? Just think about how good of an image it can give them. They don't care about anyone. They see people like statistics for them to use as some sort of weapon and if they don't get immediately approval for their "activism", they don't do it, because that would require hard work and to make a difference.
Long story short, yes, they probably would get upset because they can make themselves look like nice people to anyone that reads their blog.
>When a women is drawn sexy, it's a man's choice.
But its a fake fictional woman. You shoot up and kill millions of men in video games, thousands are portrayed as villains, and some just for sex in the media. Why do they even give a shit? Is this just an American thing?
>One has to do with agency and all that good stuff, if a chick wants to dress hot it's her right as a womyn.
But those women in the media have just as much right to dress sexy as anyone else. Its still THEIR CHOICE. Same goes for men.
I also noticed that is only objectification, sexist and degrading when its a skinny model, but then when its a plus size model, even when she's BUTT NAKED its okay.
Don't set standarads for women! (5 minutes later)...........REAL WOMEN HAVE CURVES
Wondering why we didn't do anything about it.
We could've stopped this. But we didn't.
People sometimes act like the problem with SJWs is that they're too sensitive, but when you really get to talking to them, you quickly realize it's that they don't care about anyone. They care about imaginary people that can benefit themselves and once that statistic becomes a person with a mind and voice, they hate them. If they exploited the point you mentioned, it wouldn't immediately sound nice and get them praise, so they just won't do it.
Here then. I still don't find it fair though.
>Lets be progressive by attacking everything we don't like and shaming other women!
>>if it's written as a blog and you want to read that, read a blog.
But then you'd complain that people are writing on their own blogs. That's what you do every time you complain about a Tumblr post.
Admit it, you just want to censor people whose viewpoints disagree with your own. You're turning into the very people you hate.