INTO PIECES this is what happens when you pander to sjws

>>1083552
Github is next.

What happened? Did they restrict free speech?

>>1083596
timelines and algorithm shenanigans
it should be even lower tbqh

>>1083560
I wish they were public so I can short them. They're feeling the effects of the tech bubble crash as well, however, as VCs see the lack of potential in their service, and the ridiculous cuckery going on in management.

>>1083552
OP the real question is why instead of beating the market you post on a NEET financial advice board

why would someone pay this much for a stock that cant even generate earnings much less grow them

First it was linkedin now its Twitter. It looks like the dot com bubble 2.0. What's next faceshit?

>>1083673
Facebook has solid growth and earnings. Twitter and all the IPOs of 2013-2015 are stillborn and were doomed to fail. The delusions of VCs and silicon valley investors is purely what made these companies' valuations.

>>1083560

Gawker failing when? I'd love to buy Jalopnik and its associated blogs just to disassociate it from the rest of the site.

"Hi, my name is anon, and I bought Jalopnik because I love the potential, but as long as the site was related to Jezebel and Kotaku, it could never be more than that car blog on the femnazi and SJW site. Now you won't have any headlines from them shitting up the sidebar, and I'm also putting a stop to click-baity titles. P.S. The Micra is a chick's car, deal with it".

>>1083692
>facebook has solid growth and earnings
I'm pretty sure the market meltdowns of 2015 raped their growth and earnings. Also Zuckerberg moving his wealth and stock to his new LLC wasn't a good sign for the investors. Some believe he isn't confident in facebook to survive in the future.

File: FQJm22K.gif (2MB, 330x166px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 330x166px

>>1083552
This is actually what happens when you spend your market cap on infrastructure for future dividends
buy now while cheap
screen cap this post
>when an actual person who actually doesn't own actual shares of twitter actually breathes near me

>>1083699
Its all boomers and idiots who fall for this meme stock.

File: arstechnica.jpg (248KB, 1001x652px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1001x652px

>>1083552
what could be the cause of this?

>>1083699
Why would Zuckerborg doing the ol' personal tax dodge not be a good sign for investors?

THIS IS MY LAST RESORT.

DIVORCE, NO PRENUP

>>1083699
Facebook owns Oculus Rift, the next gen console, in my opinion.
even if fb doesnt survive as a social media thing, it could always dominate the gaming industry in like 10-15

>>1085491

>oculus rift

dude that's the most meme thing in the history of memes

>>1083699
>Zuckerberg moving his wealth and stock to his new LLC wasn't a good sign
Kinda like when Nick Woodman gave all those GPRO shares to charity - when they were trading near $100. Way to inspire confidence, guys.

>>1083560

ramzpaul pls go

>>1085541
What? Lol

File: twit.png (62KB, 982x1080px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 982x1080px

Can someone explain to me why they'd invest in a company that doesn't make money?

I can understand buying Tesla because they have a long-term plan. But Twitter doesn't.

>>1085573

I'm telling you. Virtual reality is a fucking meme bubble. It's not an industry that's going to grow. You'll find that when it goes full speed people just don't bother with it. It's a gimmick and an utter meme.

Is anyone else just feeling too old and getting too busy to respond in any meaningful way to nonsense like >>1085491 ?

What am I coming back here for?

>>1085574
because of operating expenses
they spent 700m on research in 2014
they also a lot lot lot on short term investments like 3.5b
thought, they do have 4.25b in assets with only 1.6b in debt

honestly, averaging out a little bit of money on twitter right now doesn't seem like a bad idea

File: 1408308700965.jpg (22KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x375px

>>1085580
Do you think that since the required specs are so high , we will see a boost in video card sales in the next few months?

>>1083552
Buy ethereum

>>1085610

Meh. I don't foresee people dropping even more money on hardware to get into virtual reality. I'm not sure what these companies are looking at that they're doubling down on VR. Tech speculation is out of control.

Look at smartwatches. It's not going anywhere despite favorable forecasts.

>>1085592
So, what I'm hearing is "you're long barber memes" despite falling user numbers, falling advertising revenue, and division by zero price/earnings.

>>1085610
No

Nobody is going to shell out $1600 just to play the Rift.

>>1085616
they've been reducing their operating expenses and their revenue has been growing...

>>1085619
Maybe an Obama Rift program for NEETS if everyone over the age of 45 dies tomorrow, and Sanders edges out 'none of the above' for the democrat nom?

>>1085625
>What type of roi you want f a m?

>I'm strong buy on TWTR

>>1085634
i would at least recommend hedging the bet
seems like twtr long/fb short would be a good combo

WHY DIDN'T YOU BUY

>>1083698
Haha I played a big role for a short time in the shekel shoah. I was working for one of the tech/merchandising divisions of Home Depot and had access to a lot of the Merchandising GMs and a few VPs. Home Depot is adamantly anti-drug and clearly anti-pedophilia. Showed the screen shots of Gawker pro-drug and pro-pedophile articles with Home Depot ads on the same page and the contract was dropped a few weeks after that.

Got me a lot of high fives on /pol/ and was great for a chuckle but /pol/ is pretty stupid desu senpai

File: newzoo-data.jpg (67KB, 655x485px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 655x485px

say The global game market is about is about 100B in revenue. VR could disrupt things and lets say they grow the market an astounding 50% and literally everyone is wearing these shits all fucking day and google has a lock on all software development and sales.
FB' market cap is 290B
So they add 50B to that
340/290 = 1.172
if 17% return is literally the miracle scenario its probably a bad investment.
buy some junk bonds or something shit.

>>1087155
I am here to inquire about just how Chinese you are.

>>1087155
bro
im looking at a %6000000 return on twtr

>>1087087
No way man, Good job!!

How you want your earnings pham?

>>1087429
JUST

Apparently VR porn is going to be pretty legit

>>1083552
FUCK it dropped down today? I was gonna short.

>>1083698
>Gawker failing when?
when hulk's lawyers run all over them

>>1085592
>they spent 700m on research in 2014

On what? They arent a science lab.

>4.25b in assets

Can you tell me what warehouse holds their assets? Does any part of that not exist in a database somewhere?

>>1089561
you can most likely read what they spent it on in their quarterly reports

they have a corporate office which counts as an asset, and im guessing servers? you can read about it in their reports (though i would be surprised if this even made 1% of their assets, a lot is cash and invesments)

>>1089561
>700m
hiring their buddies research groups

>>1085619
This, VR is a sinking ship short term, if you are looking long term then you should go for it though, since it will eventually become a thing once Video cards get better over time, won't happen for the next 2-3 year maybe even 4 years though.

maybe then they'll see a sales spike

>up 10% today

What did I tell you guys?

>>1090747
>when you're up on EVERY position

>>1085612
FUCK OFF FAGGOT CUNT