>mfw STEM programs at university these days actually have

>>1049072

Good. Maybe the engineers I hire in the future won't graduate as social retards that wander in circles mumbling when asked to work in a group.

protip: if you graduate with an engineering degree, and can actually write a coherent and grammatically correct letter, you will be running a division of your company before age 30

>>1049072
>Not looking at performance in core classes

>>1049072
I was actually looking at the Stanford curriculum and saw that at least one ethics in engineering class was required.

Stanford obviously doesn't know what it's doing.

>>1049072
Those classes are stupid and won't make socially retarded engineers socially smart.

Biggest problem imo is people who just can't see the bigger picture

>>1049324
there is no bigger picture, why do you think working consists of an ultimate meaning when it should serve as a source of income and not a hobby

>>1049072
Im gonna tell you the truth. If you dont know anyone in the industry you will only get a shitty tier job.

>>1049072

In theory, such programs could prevent the Albert Speers of the world from enabling the Hitlers of the world.

>>1049072

>ended up with a sub 3.0 gpa
>not socially awkward and able to ace interviews
>kept in touch with industry contacts through 4 years
>starting 70k in fortune 500

made couple mistakes early on but didnt let it determine my future. i would suggest the exploitation would be to simply immerse yourself in extra curriculars if classes are so easy. build social skills so acing interviews is easy.

>>1049072
Except you just made that up.

File: image.jpg (307KB, 658x800px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 658x800px

>>1049072
>getting double major
>biology with a focus in neuroscience
>mechanical engineering

so far from what I've seen you're not totally wrong. most of the ethics courses are mind numbingly easy, and my bioethics course right now makes me want to fucking shoot myself.