God, that is one hot image. Wish I could do that to my students.
7-9 years old.
Is it hard being that close yet so far?
This is now a get thread. You can check 'em.
That's fucked up, dude.
Not that I'm judging you or anything. I'm just saying.
Oh boy that I got :D
Yes and no.
Sometimes my mind wanders too much, but I would never risk doing anything.
Most of us know it is wrong that is why we go on 4chan to not cause trouble in reality
I had a job once where I get to know the parrents and they end up completly trusting me. But I never did anything
Why? I'd never do anything. And I like being around children so work is always fun,
I was a rec leader 4 years ago, best job ever. Just play with kids all day. Only it is a seasonal job.
I say no now but if it really happend, maybe.
They can't give consent though.
Is that a type of loli or a name of a girl?
Y'all sick fucks are telling me that it is morally okay to sexualize little children? I feel sad for you.
She is 18 isn't she?
Sorry I don't have any.
I don't really agree with the consent angle. It is not a black and white answer, well legaly speaking it is.
go back to your trap threads faggots
Legally speaking a girl of this age cannot give out consent
That is what I am saying. But if you disregard the law it is not so simple anymore.
It dosn't matter in the eyes of the law, regardless if their underdeveloped brain can or cannot comprehend giving their body away like that.
Girls fully develop their brain around 18 years of age. around like 10 it would be likely their brains cannot fully comprehend what they are giving up
hey faggot, dont you have a trap thread to be in? go whel your dick around thar
well other countries lower the age of concent, i do not know of any that rais the age. But none i think go as low of age as these pictures I am afraid
>>598134937 In anons question the law is of no relevance. Don't sidetrack the disscusion.
The liberals would likely legalize both pedophilia and zoophilia if they were allowed greater reign, save the feminist cults within their ranks. Then again most feminists want to have sex with little boys so it could still work out without having to remove them from power. Just saying, pedophiles should vote Democrat.
Oh i did say It would be hard to say no. but i wouldn't say I am a good person
A fully developed brain -- which comes at age 25, not 18 -- isn't necessary to understand what sex entails nor what the consequences are. It is religion that made us think that sex can corrupt young people's minds. Sure, 10 years is pushing it... but the countries that has 15 years as the legal age of consent has it right, because to think that anyone would wait til 18 when given the choice is just silly. Unless they are religious sheeple of course.
Probably, but doesn't help the psychological damage
I got fucked in ass several times by my dad and my grandfather and mounted by my babysitter a couple times when I was five. Didn't mess me up nearly as much as being beaten into a pulp by my brother on a regular basis, though maybe that's because at least the people who raped me when I was a kid were gentle.
25 is actually for male brains the females develop faster. Also In European history it was expected for a girl to be married by the age of 16, and to bare children at age 20. I am not saying lowering the age is a bad thing
It's not religion that tells us that sex with younger girls is wrong. That came with secular society. If you look at a lot of middle eastern countries they don't have age of consent past "married". If you drop your fedora for a bit you might actually know this.
Ah, I see. Well, that even strengthen the point that their brain being undeveloped has nothing to do with being ready for sexual encounters. I was ready when I was 15 and that's 10 years before my brain was fully developed.
Actually, that's bullshit. I just happened to see this posted scrolling through /b/. The human brain finally matures around 30. I know because I work in this field or expertise and have seen the brain scans to prove it. It has nothing to do with maturity, it just plasticity of the brain which hardens completing the developmental cycle, but that in no way should be used to determine the maturity in a subject. Maturity is subjective and doesn't mean anything.
I don't see how how that strengthens your point. Listen I agree with you thinking that you don't need full brain functionality to understand what sex will do to you, especially sense female bodies are ready for sexual activity at age 13, most likely we also evolved to take the abuse mentally as well.
These are things I have documented. I'm sure there is something online, but I'm not about to explain in full detail. Around age 30, most brains harden and it's harder for the process of plasticity to take effect which means it's harder to teach an old dog a new trick. You prefrontal cortex still develops and begins finalizing around 40 years of age. It's all downhill from there, but the damage is minimal and it's more of a plateau rather than a loss. Brain deterioration occurs naturally with aging, but at a miniscule rate when compared to other conditions suck as Alzheimers.
Not same anon, but why is sex considers so different and damaging? Why can a child conset to say a backrub but not a sexual rub?
You keep trying to convince yourself that you're smart and superior by building strawmen and winning debates that way. Have fun.
The gap between sexual maturity and brain development. The answer to your second question is "why not".
Sex releases a lot of of chemicals throught the body, if we are talking about girls around the age of these pictures, their bodies cannot revive the chemicals well or won't produce them in the first place. I am sure one can give consent to being beaten to a bloody pulp as well. doesn't mean we should allow it
Ahh I understand you. Although the brain might not be fully developed by younger ages like with you at age 15, but most likely sense your body has been able to support sex, likely the brain will of developed that too. But I do not know this
I don't even understande wtf is wrong witg people. Lo;i's aren't even real. They are just drawings. Why is it illegal? Why are we debating if sex is bad for an imaginary creature?
harmful at all ages or just young ages?
You're talking about neurotransmitters when you say chemicals? Those are diffused, reabsorbed or broken down by enzymes, but reused a lot by the body. I've never heard of that claim that someone would be unable to recycle endorphins or other neurotransmitters after being released in the body. I believe that statement isn't true or backed by anything.
I get that the law is set to offer maximum protection in a clear cut way. That does not change my question. Children are not asexual and engaging in sexual activity does not automatically harm them.
Hey guess what?
Legality doesn't matter in nature. As soon as a girl has her period, she's ready for sex. No matter what the age. Because nature doean't give a shit. Many of your ancestors were probably conceived through rape. This is just an extension of this primal desire for reproduction. Fuck psychology and morals, let alone legality.
Yes, but that is toddler.
Don't want to kill the discussion.
SEX IS MURDER. Having sex period is a sin against God. When the man ejaculates his semen, thousands upon thousands of potential lives die so one can live. This child must live with the burden of knowing he's responcible for thousands of deaths and he hasn't even learned to walk yet. Children are a necessary evil, but we must all beg forgivness because in the eyes of God, we are all murderous sinners from birth. I see nothing wrong with molesting children for their wickedness because they are sinners as well. Just as long as you both beg forgivness.
I would never fuck a child, not at all am I attracted to them in any sexual way. It makes me shudder to even think about, fucking gross.
But this loli shit, I just don't get it, it's so fucking hot to me. Someone explain that shit.
I was not talking about something that makes endogenous chemicals that transmit signals across a synapse from one neuron to another, no not quite sure how this is relevant?
Oh yeah sorry wasn't aware there were threads for toddlercon :P
It doesn't automatically harm them, but it does frequently harm them, and it seems to be unpredictable whether or not it will harm them. If you can guarantee that they they will be unharmed I have no problem with it, but if you are risking harm to them, it's definitely immoral. I have no problem fundamentally with sex with animals for instance (assuming they are treated with some consideration), because they do not seem to psychologically harmed by it in any way. Children, however, seem to be frequently psychologically harmed, which is bad!
I wasn't talking about the law and i was in fact auguring earlier about lowering the age of consent but i would say it dose harm bodies of the ones as young as these pictures
No it means she is ready to carry a baby. Sex is so many diffrent things and does not require penetration.
Just on the topic, to put things in perspective with real life, back in the day one of the female friends from college told me she had her first time at 13 with a dude in his mid-20s at some part/camping trip. She generally was a very smart girl, so i wouldnt have much doubt she knew what she was gettign into as she said.
She agreed to it, she wanted it and he was very gentle and painless, and i did ask.
Well there aren't, mods dislike toddler threads.
But many loli lover hate toddler. I don''t get what is so different but it tends to piss a lot of people off.
experiences are always different for different people.
you may be able to live with yourself, but most of the world can't abide by you if you're a real pedophile. and if it's all a ruse, it's not funny at all. either way, you're glorifying a sickness that ruins people's lives. like this world isn't already enough of a shithole. why don't you try cleaning up your act and maybe seeing a therapist? i can guarantee you that anything you ended up doing to a kid would catch up with sooner than you'd think. you obviously love yourself enough to want to avoid that. but this profile of yours is completely vile. i'm not sure why you'd want to be so stupidly evil toward others. in a way, i think even being a self-made troll is just as sick as any other passtime that demands the suffering of others. it's not even sane. it's not socially acceptable. people like you don't belong in this world.
Hmm Good point good point,
It is almost as if we should post more loli
How? Unless you are a sadistic asshole you care a great deal about what you are doing.
Psychological damage is indead possible and unpredicable but I am not arguing against that.
Definetly, thats what im hinting at, theres no clear yes or no, it varies for every person. Some endup fine, some endup poorly, with 7 billion people on the planet having a yes or no answer is impossible, age laws are there just because they cannot be accurate enough as we all are diffrent individuals.
Are you trying to tell me that a sexual experience, even gentle, will not harm a body of 10 or younger? Those are some big claims
true enough but as long as laws favor the majority it'll always be based on age instead of mental capability.
Because most loli is just a girl by herself
Sorry I didn't get in on th ebeginning of the thread to post some of this. My collection is on a 1.5 T external so I had to take off my other porn drive to plug in my loli drive. How about dominated lolis?
you can just ask I'm sure someone has some
Some guy was talking about loli rape earlier, and i have none of that. Maybe you could be so kind?
Because Sex would do a lot to a young 10 year old's mind and body.
I have everything. It is just a matter of finding it. One day I will organize my loli drive. But It may take weeks.
I am jealous of your collection annon
How bout some stuff from Enseki? He doe sscoolloli rape.
It would be so much cooler if it was organized. U have one file that contains everything, Everything from Gelbooru. 13 thousand images unsorted.
At least two loli pussy rubbing against your dick?
Streaming Loli Art now
Yes, post more happy lolis.
Can you tell me this loli name if it has one.
How many years did that take to acquire that amount?
I am so jealous and impressed!
1. "Shown" meaning studies correlating childhood sex to later negative outcomes? Can you show me any studies that controlled for other factors (household environment etc) AND examined the effects of coerced vs. non-coerced sex?
2. If sex in general were shown to have the same harm coefficient across all ages, would this imply adults should not have sex either?
3. Since other activities that children perform are also known to carry risks (sports being the main one), should those activities be banned and laws made against adults encouraging or participating in said activities with children?
>yfw you just got btfo