If space = time that means that if space stops expanding,

Space doesn't equal time you dumb fuck, they're totally different things

>>582493694
Time was created by humans

>>582493867
this.
Space is demention 3 time is 4

>>582493867

time is space in another dimension

File: 1410904068896.gif (3MB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 600x600px

curious

No.
Space is not time. They both exist in the same continuum, but they're separate.

ok then, explain why time can not be bound to the expansion of space

File: 1410904824249.gif (362KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 500x500px

>>582493867
>>582494069
if you change space you change time and the other way around

>>582494090
no.
Alright kids its time for the lesson
DEMENTION 0: A point, just data, not an actual dot
DEMENTION 1: A Line made up of infinite points. Again just data.
DEMENTION 2:A plane, made uip of infinite lines.
DEMENTION 3:A space, made up of infinite stacked planes
DEMENTION 4:A time of that plane. Lets say that plane changes every xenosecond, therefor the 4D cordinates change depending on time

>>582494036
Technically, all scientific constructs were created by man. They exist only as a rough approximation to help us predict reality reliably.

>>582493694
Is... is that a 4 dimensional ona hole?

I want to stick my dick in it and cum a new universe. My orgasm will be known there as the big bang.

>>582493694

Anon!

Maybe you discovered something really big here!

>>582493694
good luck op, you bringing some high level shit to a site that cant agree on the outcomes of (x-1)(x+1)

>>582494797
You forgot to quote that to Steven Hawking, asshole.

>>582493694
yes but, in the same aspect, there appears to be no end to space so therefore no end to time

>>582494396
The fuck? Do you even understand what a dimension is? It's an independent axis of change. A change in one axis has 0 effect any other axis, otherwise they're not independent dimensions. Why the fuck do you think you can move an object left and right while not having it move up and down or back and forth?

>>582494662
Exactly
I mean if time stops does the earth stops?
No

>>582493694
Actually according to Mr Nobody, time will go back.
the only way that it isn't supposed to go

is dumbfuck terms, just to help op udnderstand.
It's called time space becasue travelling through said space will take time

>>582494396

No, you don't?

>>582494973
>high level shit
>everyone hasn't thought about this already
Not sure if sarcasm.

>>582494220

nobody knows that

And to me, its more logically to think that dimesion are not separeted

4th seems to me like the unfold of the 3th dimension

>>582493867
>>582494069
>>582494090
>>582494220
>>582494638
>>582494973
>>582495175
>>582495272
interesting how many people get this point. anons are no fucktards i believe

>>582493694
there is no such thing as time, OP. its just a unit of measurement that we made up.

>>582494638
That's only true if you consider time to be a separate dimension. It's possible that time, like gravity, or electromagnetism, exists as a field.

I, personally, thin the theory you subscribe to is correct, but the field theory also has merit.

>>582493694

Space = time? The fuck you talking about, anon? Space isn't time, it just took time to the universe to gain space, it doesn't mean space and time are the same thing.

>>582494036

This guy is correct.

File: 4444.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x250px

ITT nothing is real and we are all a part of everything and consciousness is connected and time to go fap

>>582495626
But we can observe change so the concept of time does exist. Most likely it doesn't work how we think, or is caused by something that isn't time itself, but time does exist.

>>582493694
I don't care what it is, I want to stick my dick in it. It reminds me of how my girlfriends ass feels when I fuck it.

>>582494638
>combines multidimensional structure definitions with descriptions of a dimension
>thinks there's only 4 dimensions

Protip: there's at least 10 or 11 dimensions according to mathematical models of the universe

>>582495175

interesting...

but you agree that you cant conceive 4th without thinking the 3th dimension?

(like "a plane is a set of infinite side by side lines")

>>582494036

As much as the color blue or the speed of light was created by humans, yes.

>>582495979
Time doesn't objectively exist, though. It's only a concept. We can observe things change. They move. But that doesnt make time real. It's just a concept in our minds. It's hard to wrap your mind around all the way because our whole way of life is so deeply entrenched in time, but when you finally see that it's an illusion it'll blow your mind.

File: 1390646444292.jpg (87KB, 1010x758px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1010x758px

>>582496036
there are atleast 17 dimensions
read more than michio kaku
>op reporting in

>>582493694
wow, jaden smith goes on /b/

>>582496036
well yeah but i cant explain that very easily can i?

>>582496286
The way we percieve time may be false, but you can't claim that things don't change. Change means there has to be an axis for things to move forward on, hence time. You can't have something change and stay the same.

>>582496286

Shut up you fucking retard. Next you'll be telling me that gravity isn't real, it's just an illusion and as soon as you accept that you can shove a dragon dildo up your ass.

>>582493694
Space ≠ time; however they do correlate. Your theory is correct, but your facts are wrong. Faggot.

>>582496712
This. Anon is trying to be deep but he's an idiot. He has no fucking clue what he's talking about which is why he's being vague.

>>582493694
Time != space
Though, one is essentially the inverse of the other, as they are two halves of a single space-time.

Also, time does not expand per se, nor is the flow of time even consistent throughout the universe.

Look up gravitation time dilation for a better understanding of how space and time react.

Honestly, just actually read some Hawking or Einstein and stop going to the weird side of youtube for scientific knowledge.

File: 1185800_701935399822583_92008981_a.jpg (6KB, 180x147px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 180x147px

>>582493694
OP idk what drugs your on, space is never expanding, its the universe thats expanding, space is just empty area

>>582496036
by that you mean string theory, which doesn't have any supporting physical evidence. Classic Heaven, being a retard.

>>582496712
MVC of the day

>>582496083
I really can't comprehend a 3th dimension.
What would a 3th dimension be like? The human brain could probably never understand.

>>582493694
but in my opinion space>time

>>582496286
>>582495626
>>582494662

shit superficial philosophy

Hegel beats Kant saying that he cant say we dont know the "thing-in-itself" without previously knowing the "thing-in-itself"

>>582496917
You are the most reasonable person in this thread. Everyone else is being a speculative idiot with no actual knowledge of physics. Thank you

If time doesn't exist then explain time dilation faggots.

>>582496706
>>582496712

Ill try again. Just try and think about this for a second.

Think of everything that ever happens in the world as MOVEMENTS. Everything is constantly moving. The Earth is orbiting the sun and the moon is orbiting the Earth, and this causes night and day.

An old man can think back to when he was 20 as if it was a different TIME. But there is no other time than NOW. Everything always happening right NOW. Just because the man grew older does not make TIME real. Its just a concept. It only exists in our heads.

You keep saying that time has to exist because things change. But that's just not true. It doesn't have to exist anywhere other than in our minds, because it doesn't.

>>582497159
but what if the thing is actually itself?

think about that.

>>582495178
We use time only to calculate "deltas" or changes. If time stopped, all changes stop. Earth stops. Temperature never changes. Light freezes in place. Quantum fields stop popping particles in and out of existence... no changes. Ever.

There's a theory that once the universe runs it's course and all the sum energies in the universe go back to zero, then time will essentially stop until another big bang happens. Nifty shiz-nit

>>582497252
Wow, apparently I'm on a fucking roll today.

I got congratulated 3 times in a previous thread for explaining proper usage of "tits or gtfo".

This calls for more alcohol.

>>582496923

your mind stopped in newtonian physics

File: IMG_20141202_010840.jpg (179KB, 775x1159px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 775x1159px

>>582493694
I wanna tell you something OP, The universe will expand, then it will collapse back on itself, then will expand again. It will repeat this process forever. What you don't you know is that when the universe expands again, everything will be as it is now. Whatever mistakes you make this time around, you will live through on your next pass. Every mistake you make, you will live through again, & again, forever. So my advice to you is to get it right this time around. Because this time is all you have.

i get the fact that time is a made up constant.


but if its a constant why cant it be irellevant?

I'm not trying to be deep or anything. It's a really simple thing to grasp, but it can be hard to grasp at the same time and even harder to explain.

I'm not trying to say anything mystical or philosophical. Its plain and simple. There is no TIMELINE. It's just the way that we humans think of and perceive things. Kind of like an optical illusion only not entirely optical.

>>582497378

that is the point!

Thats way you cant say "they are just concepts of something else that we will never know"

to say that you must before know that thing you claim "you will never know" (which, by the way, is a paradox)

>>582497438
Go to a desert island
Being yourself enough food, medicine whatever to survive
Do not bring
A clock
Anything electrical
Forget about time
Time in that specific moment stops. It ends
You don't know what time is it or month or year or anything
Correct time does still exists around you but not in you

>>582497806
imho we underestimate time and its function itself

>>582497321
There's still change you retard. You can't have movement without time. Even if time is just another spatial dimension that we can only observe moments of, it exists. With only 3 dimensions you have an unchanging object, for it to move you need a fourth one where the object can change.

>>582497438
Balloon Theory?

>>582497656
The universe won't collapse back in on itself. That was the theory before we realized that universal expansion was speeding up. Now, it's believed, that it'll just keep expanding until the energies in the universe succumb to entropy and reach zero.

Can't you use trigonometry to surpass the conventional laws of time like superman? What's actually stopping people do that? Technology?

>>582497912
so you mean we have to admit we know nothing to know everything?

that's your paradox right here.

File: 6a00d8346cc95f53ef017ee85c2ab5970d-320wi.jpg (17KB, 320x318px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 320x318px

>>582497321

>mfw you just discovered Kant and Leibniz

>>582498380
Can't you follow the financial business laws to earn money? Your the waste of time....

i hope you get the irony

You guys are getting stuck on a timeline. You're thinking in terms of human lives and stories.

Anna found out she had cancer. A month later she started treatment. Several months later it failed and died.

The months that passed are our unit of measurement for the day/night cycles of the earth which are MOVEMENTS. There is no past where Anna found out she had cancer. It doesn't exist. Anna went through many movements or events or whatever you want to call them from the time she found out she had cancer until her death, but all those movements were happening NOW. UNLESS - you are referring to the concept we have of her movements on a timeline. And concepts don't exist!

File: wallhaven-75623.jpg (537KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 1920x1080px

>>582493694
1.) {___[_]}

1.a) The title is indicative of the dimensionality of space, minus the existential factor, where the original three underscores are the primary dimensions; Length, Height and Depth. The inner brackets, along with the additional underscore, indicate a fourth necessary, though paradoxical part of the original three dimensions, dimension-esque factor, time. For all three dimensions to exist, an overlay in universal dimensions must occur. This overlay is time. Time ties the original three dimensions together, along with the next two additional dimensions in the bracket of time's set of three (plus the fourth, bi-dimension), where time itself is the linear (length), by allowing depth to occur. Without time, only the illusion of depth could be achieved by a perceptive force. Though the dimensions occur in sets of three, there will always be a fourth, paradoxical, dimensional-esque aspect created by the sum of the three. This fourth aspect is a bridge and a glue, holding the three dimensions before it whole, and laying the foundation as the first aspect in the next set of three. Time, being this aspect, is the linear function, which being as it's also the first aspect in it's very own set of three, shows a correlation among dimensions in space since the first dimension in the perceptive set before time's set also is linear. Considering the idea that life is in fact time, since time must be rooted in the original three dimensions of space, is a truly wondrous notion... Then gliding into the idea that life, in turn, also gives birth to the next set of three dimensions within itself is only that much more awe inspiring.

>>582497806
Yeah there's no timeline, the universe is in a state of constant change. But there is a dimension for that change to take place in. Time exists, it's you who has a stuck up idea about what the term means.

>>582498191
You're getting stuck on not being able to distinguish between CONCEPTS and REALITY.

>>582498318
and then what? there will still be an outer boundary. will it remain static or collapse into itself?

>>582498967
Time isn't just a concept. Even gravity is a concept made up by humans, but the effects are observable. Same with time, we don't know how it works or what it even is, but there is a dimension that allows change.

>>582498952
Why does there being a dimension for change to take place in mean that time is a real thing?

And I'm not being stuck up.

>>582494069
Sorry, no but this simply is not true.
This implies that a 2 dimensional world could not have time, as it couldn't bypass the 3rd dimension to experience the 4th.

Also, dimensions are shit like X,Y,Z, or directions in space. Time can not be a direction in space. Time itself would actually theoretically have dimensions, since it is the counterpart of space.

>>582494090
No, just no.

>>582494220
Not even close to separate. One directly influences the other.

>>582494662
This is actually fairly astute.
For example, we have a working model of quantum physics; enough so to design technology around the model that works. Yet, we still no fuck all about quantum mechanics at the deeper levels.

>>582495178
>I mean if time stops does the earth stops?
wut

Stop what? rotating, revolving? No shit it does. Movement is change in space over time, so no time means no movement.

In fact, it also technically things wouldn't have force, weight, and a slew of over shit.


>>582495359
Wut.
No.
First of all it's space-time, not time-space.
time-space is theoretical. For instance, lets say you suddenly popped over into time-space, for every bit of "space" you moved, you'd have moved that much in time when you returned to space-time. The two are basically opposing counterparts.

>>582499043
>keep expanding
which part didnt you get?
oh, the universe will expand until the very moment the universe will collapse!

>>582494638
‘Can a cube that does not last for any time at all, have a real existence?’

I believe you have ordered your dimensions wrong.

>>582498014
No... just because you can't measure time, it doesn't mean it stops.

If I'm on the island, and observing, time continues. I suppose it's a bit like the tree-falling-in-the-woods parable.

However, just because nothing changes macroscopically, it doesn't mean that things in the subatomic world have stopped. Or, on the other end of the spectrum, it doesn't mean the universe and galaxies have ceased their motion.

>>582499317
That dimension is time. What the fuck did you think I meant by time?

>>582499293
>There is a dimension that allows change

That does not mean that there is time... It only means that there is change... Time is when you put those changes on a Timeline and think in terms of past and future and present...

File: 1417109536164s.jpg (4KB, 121x125px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 121x125px

>>582493867
>first post
>you dumb fuck

>>582499519
You're using your own terms to impose false implications on my words. I never said that time is what we mean by it in the common language, I meant time as the dimension. It's an undeniable fact that time as a dimension exists.

>>582499484
Dude, its just the universe. You're doin too much with all this dimension shit. It's all conceptual. All there is is what is.

Things happen. Even me saying that is a concept. Things change <-- another concept. Reality IS reality. That is what is real. Concepts are mental constructs.

>>582499857
why cant dimension be in correlations?

>>582499969
The human mind uses concepts to deal with information, doesn't make the information any less real dipshit.

>>582499043

Depends on how you define collapse. It's not gonna suck itself back into a singularity like how it initially existed. It's energy will reach zero and simply stop existing. It's collapse will be in relation to it's fields, not it's dimension.

>>582500214
you mean if the human doesnt understand it doesnt become more usless, eh?

>>582500214
Yea, it does. You're not able to differentiate between what goes on in your mind and what's real.

A concept that you come up with in your mind does not EXIST anywhere OTHER THAN YOUR MIND

>>582495626
>time is a unit of measurement.
Nigga, how high are you?
Time is not a measurement. There are measurements OF TIME, but time itself is the thing being measured.

Though, you are somewhat correct, but only accidentally.
Time doesn't exist how we perceive it. Our brains can internally slow or speed the perception of time, changing our own ability to gauge time passed. Clocks and whatnot don't experience perception, so are accurate.
Then there's also things that alter the actual flow of time and not the perceived flow. Gravity not only bends space around it, but time as well. Gravitational Time Dilation.

>>582496932
>string theory has no supporting evidence.
Lol okay, anon. Whatever makes you feel smart.

>>582497017
Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?

>>582497148
|space| = |time|

|| meaning absolute value.

>>582497321
>time does not exist
>uses the word NOW

>>582497656
You say to get it right THIS time, but that's assuming this is the first instance of the universe. Otherwise, we can't get it right if we hadn't already before based on your interpretation.

>>582497806
That's because time isn't a line. Time is a series of independent realities that form to conform to every possible outcome of all situations. Before the outcome becomes part of our world, it exists as a waveform of all probability. Each resulting universe only contains one outcome from the collapsed waveform.
Hugh Everett motherfucker.

>>582500540
Nothing is real by your retarded logic. The universe is a concept. We can still observe how it works, it doesn't make it any less real that it's a concept. We literally can't communicate a non-concept. Also, you can't prove that the world exists outside of your mind so your argument kinda falls flat there already, if you're trying to discredit the human mind as an instrument of observation.

>>582500117
>>582500383
I'm going to ignore you because your grammar is shit and I can't understand what you're saying.

>>582501168
This guy gets it. This guy fucking gets it.

>>582501168
Ok I find a lot wrong with your response so instead of addressing every issue let me ask you one question, which I know how you will answer and then I will be able to explain it to you further.

Give me an example of the flow of time being altered, and I will tell you how time does not exist.

>>582501168
>universe being the scale
thats correct

>string theory
also correct

i just said that space = time, which means if ywe have an expanding space we have expanding time. since we dont observe shrinking space we dont observe any other time

>>582501261
Im saying that the concept isnt real..............

And I never said you could prove anything is real...... Im not gonna get into other topics..... The one I'm discussing is time not being real

>>582501591
A.) If time was altered, we woudln't know so he can't point that out

B.) You can't alter time by means familiar to humans, if at all

>>582501261
be a faggot, i dont care

>>582501762
What do you mean by time? Because you already implied that there is a dimension that allows change. Sure the human mind's concept of time may be wrong, but the concept is based on a very real thing that exists. We can't observe the thing itself, but we can observe what it causes. Just like gravity, we can only observe it through it's interaction with matter.

>>582496249
studies have proven colors are a societal creations... in certain languages there is an absence of a word for blue and those civilizations have extreme difficulties differentiating blue and green

>>582498380
You're talking time travel, right?

The short answer is that it's impossible.

The long answer is that it might be possible with an incredible amount of opposing gravitational forces... But that is some complicated math...

>>582501591
>time being altered.
That's pretty vague, anon. Fuck you are altering time right now.

Do you mean in the physical sense as in being stretched by gravity?

Or like.. shit happening in time?

If time does not exist, then how can motion exist?

Yes, I know you can say
"well we just use the CONCEPT to mathematically understand motion, as we can only see it as distance over time"

but to that I say:

How ELSE can it be seen?
I'm open to crazy scientific ideas.
Fuck, I openly disagree with mainstream science about mass being responsible for gravity. It's quite obviously energy density, not mass that determines gravity.

So enlighten me anon, how can motion exist without time? How can force, or weight, or anything at all, exist without time?

Fuck mass couldn't even exist without time. E=mC^2

C = speed of light as a constant

Speed = distance over time

Explain this shit to me.

>>582502332
>But that is some complicated math...

So if you do all those hard sums then suddenly some.... gate opens somewhere? Into the past? How can simply doing math make time warp?

>>582502360
"Force" is an 3D force, applied in an 3D World

>>582502682
doing the math allows you to figure out the mechanism by which time could be altered.

Phsyics is math
Time travel is physics.

Science isn't that hard, anon.

>>582501261
I like you, but your efforts are wasted debating with people who just took philosophy 100, and likely no hard sciences beyond first year.

>>582496378

According to string theory, there are 12 dimensions. I have never read anything suggesting that there must be "at least 17 dimensions"

>>582502798
>force is a 3d force
Force has nothing to do with the 3rd dimension.
Hell, there's theoretical calculations of force on 4th dimensional objects out there, so lets take that 3d nonsene out, and we are left with

>force is a force

No shit, anon.

>>582502936
mathS has an s at the end you fucking ameritard

Time is definitely a real observable thing. You sit around orbiting a super massive black hole for about a week, compared to normal fags on earth you're going to experience less time. Time dilation has been proven making time more than something mankind just made up to measure the passing days.

>>582502360
How else can it be seen? WITHOUT THE CONCEPT.

If I walk through a fuckin forest for 6 hours without thinking a god damn thought, THERE ARE NO CONCEPTS OF TIME - ITS JUST ME MOVING!

That is my whole point ^ there is no need to complicate it any further than that

>>582502958
Not all forms of string theory agree on 12, I believe M-theory is 11 or something.

But yeah, never heard 17 before.

>>582503150
You're still stuck on thoughts, anon....

It's entirely subjective

>>582503138
wut.
Wtf is maths?
Since when do I need to pluralize a fucking shortened word?

That's like be saying I'm doing sciences.
I don't give a shit what nation you hail from, that shit sounds fucking retarded.

>>582502941
Thanks but I haven't studied any science either. I think these people just have some fundamental flaw in their thinking that prevents them from grasping logical concepts.

>>582502958
>>582502958
stop being this. you know why there are atleast "17".

dont be this guy

>>582497656
Woah, that actually sounds pretty awesome. Wouldn't mind even with my 6/10 life

File: image.jpg (85KB, 650x520px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 650x520px

>>582493694
Yep! Even more, when space starts to collapse again, time will run backwards and OP will be drawn back into the vagina of its mother. Pic related

>>582503192
That doesn't make sense. Those are just words...

>It's just me moving
>for 6 hours

So you moved over a certain distance for a certain time?
Cool story, bro.
Whoa.. trippy. My captcha has "pluralized" in it, and I just posted this a second ago
>>582503530

>>582503192
But the change of moving from point a to b is still there, and it's obsevable from the consequence of you being somewhere else when you turn your brain on again
>implying
Also the universe isn't dependent on human observation. Things keep changing without us having to document the change. Your brain is fucking broken.

>>582494090
Time has a different metric than space.
e.g. the length of a 4-vector is sqrt(x²+y²+z² - t²)

File: 200px-World_line.svg.png (23KB, 200x204px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 200x204px

minkowski's space explain the independency between space and time.

>>582503997
Youre using concepts again. And Im not saying theres anything wrong with that. Im saying there is no reality to a concept of measuring time!

I moved over a certain distance for a certain time. Yeah. 6 hours. 6 Earth hours. That is a unit of measurement made up by humans based on the movements of our planet.

>>582504118
>Also the universe isn't dependent on human observation

Weeeelllll.... kinda.
Look up the observer effect.
Let me be clear though.
The observer effect in no way makes any of this nonsense valid at all
>>582503192

>>582504118
YES. THINGS CHANGE. BUT THE CONCEPT OF TIME ONLY COMES INTO PLAY WHEN WE THINK OF IT. BELIEVE IT OR NOT, EVEN AN ENTIRE PLANET OF HUMANS THINKING OF THE SAME CONCEPT DOES NOT GIVE IT AN OBJECTIVE REALITY!

File: 1361163353780.png (49KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 200x200px

>>582493694
dude
woah

>>582504421
Schrödinger.

It is real TO US but it is not real WITHOUT US

File: image.jpg (186KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 640x1136px

Time is merely a concept created by our minds to better understand the universe. One second is based on the vibrations of the cesium atom.
There are, however, states of being. If that can be altered I do not know. Also time travel is impossible. For one, if you generate enough energy to do so you would create a black hole. Second, you would create a paradox just by being in the past.

>>582504348
Okay, but you are measuring something that exists, you dipshit.
I don't care if you measure them in hours, seconds, or some made up unit called cockgarglingtiddlywinks.

You are still measuring something that exists. Stop with this "earth hours" bullshit.

For instance, if I measure space in inches, meters, or fuck even fathoms, I'm still measuring the same amount of space.

Are you going to tell me space doesn't exist?

HUR DUR HOOMANS MADE UP SPACE
ITS JUST A UNIT OF MEASUREMENT

>>582502682
not quite. We use mathematics to try and predict the outcome of a given event. We can show how time travel is possible mathematically. If we warp space into a shape that would allow us to end a journey before the point we started, we've essentially time traveled.

To actually do it would require technology that could bend space in a massive way... like how a black hole does it.

Then again, if we ever discover that time is a field and has particles (chronotons), there's a chance we could send information or material in any direction in time... but that theory is not widely accepted. I don't think we're gonna find gravitons either. :)

>>582504421
Yeah I know that propability and shit is decided when you observe the result but on this level it doesn't matter.
>>582504530
So you're saying that the human mind isn't real. That thoughts aren't real. Sure, we don't make things with our minds, but we do observe, and in this case the concept that we created reflects something very real. If this really is what you were saying, you were using an extremely vague and idiotic way of explaining. Also that's some elementary level shit.

>>582493694
the answer to your question is no.

>>582504835
Youre applying measurements to movements............ not time...............

>>582504729
Heisenberg actually.

Schrodinger is related, as well as the guy I mentioned earlier, Hugh Everett.

The true nature of the quantum world and it's interaction with observers is still very unclear.

>>582493694
Space is subjective
/thread

>>582504805
paradoxes are only local. get your facts straight.

>>582504919
Look just stick with this specific topic and dont branch out because we can get into all kinds of shit that I dont wanna get into, Time doesnt exist. This is really easy to understand. You're just not grasping it.

>>582494364
time=/=space
time=entropy
entropy=decay

time will cease when all molecules become so cold (having lost any energy they might have had) that they cannot be considered anything but "burnt out".
which will happen in about 10 to the power of 100 to the power of 100 years from now.
it's called the heat death theory.

time ends when matter no longer turns to energy, and energy no longer turns to matter. but you won't be able to comprehend that, so just give up now and focus on more important questions.

like why is OP such a colossal faggot?

>>582505008
>very unclear

>>582505182
Explain what you mean by time. I mean the dimension. Time as a dimension exists.

File: stephen-hawking-simpsons.jpg (34KB, 680x445px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 680x445px

>>582493694

HOMER, I FIND YOUR CONCEPT OF A DOUGHNUT SHAPED UNIVERSE INTRIGUING.

>>582504982
What?

What the fuck are you saying?

You don't measure a movement.
You measure the space moved, or the time it took to move.

Hours, seconds, minutes, etc = measurements of time

inches, feet, meters, etc = measurements of space.

This is grade school shit, anon.

Either you are a bad troll, or I feel really sorry for you.
Either way, your IQ is likely lower than room temperature.

>>582505182
It does exist man. Just accept it.

File: ahhhhggg.gif (2MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x200px

If there is one thing that watching interstellar taught me it is that if you eject from a spaceship into a worm hole you will go into a weird dimension where you are surrounded by bookshelves. So that should answer your question.

>>582505456
Any concept of time. Even your dimension of time doesnt exist. Past, future. Do not exist. There are all mental human constructs.

Even from your dimensional standpoint. Why complicate it and say there has to be a dimension for time? Why not say there is a dimension for change?

>>582505128
Bullshit. If it effects time it is not limited to just the person that created it. It is linked to all the timelines between that persons present and the past that they traveled to.

>>582505223
No.. no.. no

Time is the vector through with entropy can express itself.

You can only observe entropy over time.

That's like saying speed=time.

time is the counterpart of space

entropy the counterpart to synergy

gravity is the counterpart of levity


Everything has a counterpart in physics.

define 'time'.
what is its function?

>>582494036

To me, if everything remains inanimate, time isn't flowing. Time flows precisely because there is movement that allows us to distinguish "past" from "present".

>>582505539
Dude

Like, what the fuck is wrong with you that you keep reiterating the same shit over and over?

Ive fucking said a million times that time is a measurement. ITS A FUCKING MEASUREMENT ANON. AND WE MADE UP HOURS SECONDS AND MINUTES YOU DUMB ASPARTAME SATURATED FUCK.

WE MADE UP THESE MEASUREMENTS WHICH ARE BASED ON MOVEMENTS

>>582505796
i've never said it's linked to a person
its bond to an qantum event which occurs within an event, which is an event in the timeline and which traveled in a timeline

>>582505740
I'm not talking about past and future, I'm talking about change. Do you claim that change does not exist? TIME IS WHAT WE USE AS A WORD TO DESCRIBE THE DIMENSION OF CHANGE. Your dimension of change is time, don't make up new terms for things that have been named already.
In fact, just kill yourself, I think it's the only way. Or at least don't breed, do us that solid.

>>582505880
time has no function.
Things can be functions OF time.

>>582505880
define 'horizontal'
what is its function?