And to add to what he said, this cunt was also contacted by outraged war vets with real PTSD.
They told her that she was full of shit so she responded by claiming she was being harassed again and tried to get these mean dishonorably discharged from the army by whining to their superiors.
(pic unrelated to your post just related to the thread.)
Oh. Gotcha now. You were talking about my post number.
Pic again unrelated to my response.
was it twitter? i thought it was 4chan
here's some gender equality justice for you
And that, is feminism in action. On next week's episode we cover fake so-called-rape claims and fake so-called-domestic violence claims. That wraps up this week's edition of Smack A Cunt Around, please join us next week.
Yes. It is a bit hard to look up online. I found that pic on /b/ like 5 months ago so I can't remember where I found the sauce for the quote.
Little note, I believe he said that back in 2010 to aid in your search if you want to verify it.
I really hate when they talk about male privileges like there are no down sides to being a male.
Lack of homeless shelters for men compared to women.
Less likely to get benefits if poor.
Royally screwed in alimony and custody rights during divorce.
Longer and harsher sentences.
Double standard regards physical, sexual and psychological abuse on male on male and female on male.
Being regarded as disposable.
Higher suicide and work related fatalities rates.
Just to name a few.
Care to elaborate your pointless insult?
^Here are some of the disadvantages.
Another disadvantage is that we are expected to be okay with criticism(for example if we are fat). But if you dare criticize a woman for being fat, you are a FAT BIGOT and a MISOGYNIST!!!
Not really, im fine with going to serve my country if the draft were to take place for a legit need of soldiers. I just think its unfair that half of the population is required to do this, while the other half is allowed the freedom of choice.
Is 3 times more likely to suicide a double standard though? If so, explain how?
As long as we are listing statistics instead of double standards why is there so little content on the women's side?
>male and female circumcision are literally the same thing
You COULD have a decent argument there but the retardation is so obvious. It's weird that there are people that read this and unironically go "yup this lines with my beliefs" without any sense of self-awareness.
Here's the (nearly) complete list.
When feminists scream "male privilege" and are called out on their bullshit, they claim that "those who have privilege cannot see their own privilege" (thats how the whole check-your-privilege shit came about).
But when you point out all of their privileges, they laugh at you as if said privileges don't exist. And when you remind them of their own aforementioned claim, it somehow doesn't apply to them because penis.
There are people in the world who will put their dicks into apple pies, jars of jelly, animals, wasps nests, all sorts of fucked up shit. It's not difficult to believe someone would rape her. If you want people to buy into the feminist hate, you need to do it with proper arguments, not "hur hur this bitch is so fat lol" edgy teenage shit.
Barbie was created by a woman(Ruth Handler) you ignorant fuck
What does double standard have to do with my post? I was replying to advantages/disadvantages.
And yes, being raised in a way that makes you 3 times more likely to kill yourself is in fact a disadvantage.
Why are you misusing the sage function faggot? Are you trying to have a discussion here? A debate of some kind?
Or are you trying to fuck over the thread?
The point of saging is to post without giving a bump. Not so you can have new ID in a thread after you were intellectually bitchslapped or proven wrong with your regular ID.
Because checkbooks open up for cunts, especially bootlicks like you under the control of a cunt who happily carries your hairless nuts in her purse.
But nobody gives a damn about a man until he bursts through the exit door of a theater and starts dispensing justice.
Well, there is a form of female circumcision where only the clitoral foreskin is removed, not the clitoris itself. This is equivalent to the male circumcision, yet there's no one who argues that this form of female circumcision should be allowed.
Feminism = need to date fat, unattractive losers? Who came up with that idea?
"Sexist double standards"
Nobody is here to debate lol. Check the thread you are in and the website you are on. Everyone is just here to parrot their own opinions and bask in the echo chamber to feel better.
I love this m8. So fucking true. I've been scolded for saying I didn't want to date a fat girl but those same girls wouldn't date a fat guy themselves.
So much hypocrisy within feminism.
what's that got to do with men drawing he-man like that? "feminists" don't like barbie. a woman created barbie. omg wow. the fact they don't like barbie has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the way he-man is drawn. blame feminism for he-man, why? or, what do you want feminism to do about it?
I didn't make that pic. I posted it because it is hilarious to me. There are plenty of statistics and facts on this thread.
A funny picture with no valid argument is okay every once and a while. I feel like you were just waiting to call someone an edgy teen.
What a terribly stupid and sexist thing to say.
So are you trying to say men can't have double standards?
Are you trying to say women can't draw?
Are you trying to say only men's opinion matters when it comes to what society thinks is popular?
Check your sjw privilege. Cunt.
Theyre saying that its a double standard to have women consider barbie an unfair depiction of women that makes girls stride to be something unattainable while those same women(or anyone as far as i know) dont give two shits that he man is the physical embodiement of every unattainable stndard held about men.
Are you brain damaged? Nobody dislikes He-Man. There's no organization asking for he-man to be redrawn in a more conservative and realistic fashion.
The point is there's nothing wrong with either one.
He looks so much like a pleb that I could walk outside and find 20 others that looks just like him
Are you in support of female circumcision or against male circumcision? If the latter, why not do something about it? The decision is made by the parents and not some mandated government body.
>I'm sure by now it's happened somewhere to someone
Haha. It doesn't even have to be real anymore for you...
"It must've happened therefore feminism" is enough to be in a feminism hate thread.
yes, yes we do. as the other anon you referenced asked, would you like to elaborate and actually make an argument, or are you just going to dodge ours by asking rhetorical questions and making blind insults?
Because fat, unattractive losers are making and posting the images.
Actual functioning men do not have "MRA problems" and "male disadvantages"-- things that fat and ugly women are also subject to.
How is He-man even relevant anymore? Do we need to bring out statistics comparing Barbie sales to He-man? Why not try picking a better example?
Nothing you said literally made any sense. Try to think through your arguments.
What is that image even trying to say? Women can't date attractive, hygienic and fit men because they support feminism? That's fucking retarded if you actually believe they think that way.
i didn't say you did make it, i said it's a stupid picture. if you find it hilarious then that's ok, but if you're going to post this crap in controversial topics then expect comments on it, either for or against. i don't care what you feel.
>It's not difficult to believe someone would rape her.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Holy fuck do you really believe what you're writing?
I'd rather rape a blender than come within sniffing distance of her clam chowder cunt.
Holy shit this isn't tumblr you faggot. Get your tears out of here.
Why do people think that is okay to be like that? You can tell how unhealthy fat is just by looking at it. I can't believe some women think that should be a source of pride. That they are proud of their "curvy" figure.
so it's a woman's job to fight for the depiction of men? instead of men getting upset about "double standards" and fighting feminism, why don't they say "hey, you're right, barbie IS ashitty representation of women. we have it too, in he-man"? again, the way he-man is drawn has nothing to do with women.
7/10, more subtle than most but i saw it.
Can't wait for October to come so that we won't have to deal with newfags like you anymore.
I didn't pick the example, you mongoloid. I didn't create the image nor did I post it. I am merely agreeing with the logic in using it. Both reached their peak in popularity around the same time, so they are decent examples to use.
Could there be better? Sure, but you play the cards you've been given. Or, if you prefer, you play in the mud pit you spawned from.
I am against it, I think parents shouldn't let others put sharp things near the genitals of their children unless there's a good medical reason.
But in my country (Germany) they actually made a law last year allowing male circumcision for religious reasons (because the jews were already crying about the Nazis again when a court of law said earlier that circumcision for religious reasons is in fact criminal assault). There was a debate, there were also comparisons with female circumcision, but none of the groups speaking out against female circumcision fought for a ban of male circumcision although the reasoning should be the same. Doing something against it? I'd like to, but I can't.
Le epic trole. i am the tru heaven u guise XD
>women are inferior
Where else are you going with that?
Sorry I don't believe that feminists need to date fat, unattractive losers in order to stay in line with their own beliefs. Somehow that makes sense to you.
Epic trole again broheim.
>Both reached their peak in popularity around the same time
Fucking lol. There is also the "I didn't m-make the image though but I completely agree with itso you are somehow wrong"
I thought i made it quite clear i wasnt claiming women needed to fight for the depiction of men when i said
>(or anyone for that matter)
regardless, what i was trying to say is that women have no reason to claim that women are being unfairly presented when there is the exact same standard for men.
>implying trolls lose their computer privileges in october
this is /b/. you always have to deal with newfags Heaven
Tried arguing with some male tumblr feminist. I honestly don't know what I expected. Aruged that modern feminism is plain whining and man-shaming, getting shit done doesn't happend, they present themselves as victims, period, they don't want to work it up with the other half of the world, just the logical stuff.
Although he wanted a 'discussion', he only kicked me out and deleted the comment. Came back again with a different account, told him why he was wrong and why his actions are literally what every femnazis are. Explained him why Israel nowadays has the very same problem, which we are all familiar with.
Got banned again and literally told that I'm mysoginic, anti-semitic and racist. Fuck this..
attempting to laugh at the argument and posting no rebuttal to it does little to help your cause, Heaven.
i agree that when you take it out of context, there's nothing wrong with either one. it's not "barbie" or "he-man" that are the problem, but the whole way the sexes are supposed to be. they are the material representations of child/teen pressure. and if there was a problem with how he-man is drawn, someone should say something about it. i don't really buy the "we don't have a problem with it, so you shouldn't either"
That's an anecdotal logical fallacy. "If i'd rather rape a blender than her, everyone would also rather rape a blender."
If you're going to argue our side, do it properly.
But I suspect you're just a troll trying to "kill the messenger" within our ranks.
The He-man and Barbie argument have more to do with power fantasies which would actually require a lot more time to explain than the attention spans of most people here.
You actually that it didn't matter if it was real because it must've happened somewhere and grrr it really makes me hates feminism somehow.
The hint is the quoted sentence. Barbie is more relevant and popular today than the other outdated and unrelated example. And like that other guy said the logic of "since men didn't complain about he-man women shouldn't complain about barbie" is hilarious.
Do you know the consequences?
You can lose financial aid for school, as well as opportunities for many jobs, and the right to vote.
Oh and the government has the right to fine or jail you.
Not saying it's a female priv. just here to point out that being annoyed with SS is a valid thing.
For example I cannot join the military due to a medical condition (they wouldn't event take me for a draft), but still could have been jailed for not signing up.
It's not so much 'we don't have a problem' it's more like "it's unrealistic and we just want you to understand that, but not by making a fuss and whining in the streets and flooding every social website with irrelevant garbage to make a point we forgot decades ago"
See the difference?
Feminist's attitudes to Barbie are confirmation that they're the weaker sex emotionally, imagine letting a fictional character doll shape define your self-worth in terms of appearance so much that you harm yourself or it hurts your feelings. I've never felt threatened or insecure by a fictional character being more beautiful than me or having a ridiculous body shape.
Just goes to show women can't handle a lot of things in life that men can.
"Almost all male U.S. citizens, and male aliens living in the U.S., who are 18 through 25, are required to register with Selective Service."
The point of Selective Service is to provide the Federal government a list of males within an acceptable age range to be put into a lottery to be pressed into the armed services and forced to be sent off to a war at such time as deemed necessary by the Federal government. See Vietnam War for an example, if you children even still cover that in your little golden books supplementing your severely dumbed down educations.
Please note the usage of "males" and not citizens or resident aliens. This is because cunts do not have to do this and thus do not face the distinct possibility of having their social security number pulled in a draft lottery to be forced into the military and fighting in a war. Where is the equality in that?
That is the so called "male privilege" that men must face along with the many other examples cited. Cunts want *special* treatment, not equal treatment. Another example, a cunt hits you in the face and you smash her face in just as you would another guy hitting you in the face...that is equality. But that is frowned upon in the feminazi culture taking over in many places.
When cunts will be held to the exact same standards and have the exact same risks and exact same punishments, they will have a weak foothold for their arguments. One that will not last long as they are inferior to men in the tasks that men have historically taken on. But till they set themselves up for that inevitable failure what they wage is a war on men; pure misandry.
Back to the kitchens cunts and get to making sandwiches and brining cold beers.
Just to let you know that you are getting trolled. The replies are false flags by an anon who got really mad that I haven't taken off heaven so they can "beat me in an intellectual battle" in a feminism hate thread.
I'd rather not bump this thread.
I guess you disagree that media has no effect on our perceptions whatsoever. Those people aren't complaining because it hurts their feelings. Hell, I don't buy into the argument either but I see why they might be saying it instead of generalizing that women are weak and I am strong.
How does it belong in this thread?
Because in this modern day and age, most girls and a good number of women think they can just physically attack a male and then be completely immune to retaliation.
They need to be taught that if they attack a man, that man is well within his rights to defend himself and his honor/pride.
If a man walks up to another man and decks him in the face, the other man wouldn't just walk away or brush it off as nothing.
That's the final goal of the feminists. It's not about 'equality' or some moral crap like that, it's about penis envy, and eliminating every man, nephew, son, and brother around, until there is nothing left but a bunch of women and eunuchs.
>would still fuck the shit out of that Sarkeesian bitch
Thing is I don't do feminist friends. I have lots of female friends and three sisters and feminists piss them all off.
They're really sick of being told when they should or should not be offended by other women who find any opportunity to blame men for why their lives haven't worked out like they planned or their eating disorders.
They see men as people with their own issues to resolve and that no one will ever live in a world where they're not uncomfortable from time to time or they never get unwanted attention.
Everyone, men included face unwanted attention, but we brush it off as meaning nothing. Most women I know do too, they just don't care.
Hot guy smiles at girl on a train = ego boost, what a nice guy.
Ugly guy does the same thing = ocular rape, sexual violence and street harassment.
Hot girl smiles at guy on a train = gets nervous, holy shit she couldn't have been or smiles back
Ugly girl does the same = I suppose she does have nice tits, still an ego boost.
>i'd rather not bump this thread
If that were true, you'd leave, because every reply you make generates at least 1 bump from people who respond, like me.
>how does it belong in this thread
It shows an example of gender equality, something feminism is not fighting toward. It also provides comic relief.
How do these belong in the thread?
I don't see you attacking them.
Heaven, I know your presence in this (and every) thread is merely to be antagonistic and confrontational, but to ignore the fact that there are women who want to see men dead is ignorant, even for you.
Unless of course, this particular incarnation of "Heaven" is actually a woman, which would explain the ignorance and refusal to acknowledge reason/logic.
Mostly because all feminists are "radical" meaning that none of them are. Just as if all christians shared the Westboro baptist beliefs, none of them would be radical, just average.
"good non-radical feminists" who genuinely want gender equality are not feminists. They are egalitarians who for some reason brand themselves with the title of a hateful group.
Saying you're a feminist because you believe in true gender equality and genuinely take into account mens' issues is like saying you're a Nazi because you believe in anti-smoking laws and genuinely take into account the need for animal conservation.
Joining a hate group and claiming you don't share their "radical" hate does not change that group's dogma or ideology. It just gives you a bad name.
Forgive my Godwin but in this case it's actually a relevant argument.
ok that's a pretty shitty fucking argument
do you expect her to pick out someone ugly? attractive people aren't attracted to ugly people, jesus christ get over it you pathetic cunt
Wow, it's almost like different authors working for different websites writing different articles have different opinions.
You know that 4chan is originally the internet hate machine right, holy shit lrn to /b/ faggot.
Does anyone have a picture that explains all of the male groups (alpha beta ect) in full detail?
Almost all of these are valid, except for the cancer research one. I don't get what it's trying to prove, if prostate cancer is the only male-specific cancer on the survey it still has equivocal funding to the female-only cancers.
Breast cancer is the exception but it's not even female-exclusive. One of my close friend's father's died of breast cancer, and the male form is usually deadlier because it's harder to detect and doctors aren't usually looking for it.
But the female-only cancers have less funding than prostate cancer. The fuck is that supposed to imply then? Feminism is bad because women get more types of cancer? Prostate cancer should have the same amount of funding as breast/ovarian/cervical cancer combined? I'm not trying to defend shitty feminism but that last graphic makes no fucking sense.
had to check my phone to see that it wasn't 2007
>but we're le sooper koolaid internet club who don't take poo from no one
that shit may have flown back then, but right now all I see is desperate cunts. All people are doing in this thread is fueling sjw feminism
So you're a radical feminist, and you're calling ME the idiot? Baka!