Alright i couldnt find the science forum on 4chan
What if the sun emitted cold?
OP is fucking retarded. Cold is a way of saying "lack of heat" thus cold just means less hoy then what you consider hot. fucking moron. go learn your nuclear thermo vocabulary before you come here. bitch
Well, there are stars/suns in the galaxy that emit cold. Due to coldfusion reaction. It would emit around -273 degrees celcius with 500.000km/hour.
All planets around them are frozen, only mammoth like creatures live there, and penguins and shit..
Then we'd be a fucking ice ball of no life. Nothing would be generating heat. Our core would of peramfrosted forever ago. No magnetic field. Atmosphere uninhabitable. Death. Cold dark death of nonexistence.
Igloos' would be "cool" and popular for a no existing population.
Cold fusion is a hypothetical type of nuclear reaction that would occur at, or near, room temperature, compared with temperatures in the millions of degrees that are required for "hot" fusion. There is currently no accepted theoretical model which would allow cold fusion to occur.
>if the sun emitted cold
>everything else would be reversed too
>you would need cold to survive
>you'd crawl out of your house shivering in the dead of summer to get a dose of refreshing cold rays from the sun
>you'd feel it exactly the same way you felt heat now
Jesus christ, are you fucking kidding me. Since when does the universe reverse things if some theory is explained?
So Albert Einstein tought us that the universe is continously expanding in 1915 or so, i don't fucking know, but you TELL ME, that since he has told that theory. IT REVERSES?
SO NOW THE UNIVERSE BECOMES SMALLER EVERY SECOND? you're a fucking retard
Do you know how a fan works?
That's called bouncing ball theory friend. The idea is that the universe produces anti-matter and matter at slightly different rates. Eventually the amount of matter in the universe will be much more than that of anti-matter causing the universe to compress to a singularity.
The unnatural receptive core would remain in infinite singularity outlasting any other star in the universe . After the last star dies out, the cold sun (given the fact that there's no negative energy too feed off of from any other sun) would be given the only option too for a little while lasting maybe just because of reasons
The opposite of a black hole is awhite hole, therefore it can not be the opposite of a star
>black holes were originally stars anyway
Cold stars are theoretically possible
>Possibly the fusion of anti-matter?
Ah I see. Well anyway, the light from the sun, (or photons, whatever) when there is enough of it together, it creates heat. Photon absorption creates heat, so a cold star would emit anti-photons or something.
okay say the fan on your cpu its hot the fan removes the heat energy from the cpu and dispaces it from the cpu to the surroundingthe more heat is dispaced the cooler the cpu will become. you can only displace heat energy as there no such thing as cold energy
I feel more autistic after reading the post in this thread.
OK, I'll try to explain one more time.
This here is a COLD FUSION SUN.
>> 1: Core of ice mixed with hydrogen.
>> 2: Protons in the hydrogen/ice mix will start flowing around very VERY fast. Produces enormous heat.
>> 3: The ice from the mix I called before starts to get very compact by all of the heat around it (step 2)
>> 4: It get's so hot, the ice will start exploding/emitting from the 'outer layer'. Thus it will emit cold, hundred of thousands kilometres away, making planets around it freeze.
holly shit i wonder how is a man with so little brain still alive. the cold is not emitted it is the LACK of heat. what you sense as heat is moleculs moving- the faster they move, the hotter the surface is. if they stop moving you reach the absolute zero(whic is impossible). my point - YOU CANNOT EMIT HEAT RETARDED FAGGOTS. the fan just moves the air it doesnt even cool it
OP is so stupid and gay he can't even find /sci/.
He belongs in /lgbt/
This is a baseless assumption.
Kelvin literally just said "okay, this is the max, this is the min, based on hypothetical states of matter. Now let's equate it to Fahrenheit, and poof, nothing can be colder than ?459.67.
I guarantee you, -460 is possible. Kelvin is tardtastic.
daytime is warm because the sun emits heat
night is cold because the moon emits cold
if this was not true then night would still be warm because the sun's heat would have no cold no cancel it out.
a freezer works by blowing cold air into a box full of water vapor to super cool the air.
The moon is not emitting cold, it is losing heat.
I know you're just trolling, but it's making me hurt anon, please stop
Let's put this in a more relatable setting.
You're ringing up some fries for the next nigger in line. As you heat them up in the deep fryer, the fries get warmer and reach a point where you will take them out. You place the fries in a neato bag and give the fries to said nigger.
The fries gradually cool down to a temperature where you can eat them. Do the fries therefore emit cold or does the nigger emit cold?
>tfw poster has less brain than this
I don't see how it would work. the whole concept of emitting stuff with less energy than your surroundings is just against every principal of physics. The sun emits heat because there is less energy around it. also heat = speed so if you were emitting stuff at 0,xxx kelvin it would hardly even move. or what is cold? define cold. cold compared to the vacuum in space or cold compared to the sun or cold compared to a hot summer day? if you wanna make these trollscience threads atleast put a little effort into them
you fucking morons. its called gas pressure builder.