Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random
>>565405031 over the years of browsing /b/ ive become desensitized to pretty much anything: gore, scat puke porn etc but animal abuse for some reason is the only thing that grinds my gears, I don't know.
>>565405031 Because we are desensitized to what is coming next. So that the elite can successfully rape, murder and mutilate people in their way for the natural resources, governments that do not agree with a one world government, etc.
>>565405031 this is bait or stupid. people who love dogs don't have true empathy... they are sociopaths who love to be a martyr. you know you are.
on the other hand, cats actually steal your soul and merge with your mind. they really do know what you're about to do and own you psychosexually/emotionally. just because a dog can feel you a bit or vice versa... dogs are essentially a glorified rodent. cats are something else entirely. they're 100 times as smooth and their instinct far surpasses that of a dog.
dog people are brash, phony and uncool and unclassy. cat people are mentally infused and are more perceptive, sensual and feeling of others.
>>565405345 Humans are monsters. I hate when humans or dogs die, but humans are the most barbaric. We have reason and don't use it. I'm a monster, so i'm not blaming others, and neither is the other guy I hope (but I can see a person doing that, projecting their own problems).
>>565405031 Humans have chosen to live in the current situation of convulsion, chaos and violence, nobody is innocent from this sin. Animals, on the other side, have nothing to do with this madness and thus should be left alone.
>>565405031 because dogs are almost always passive and essentially defenseless, where as humans attribute harm to humans as a form of the situation they were in, people have the option of doing almost anything, so people tend to pity people less and defenseless animals more
>>565405031 I don't see why people don't understand this. Dogs will serve you loyally unto their deaths. Humans will sell you out and betray you over a joint, blowjob or $2. Humans are living garbage. Their deaths are a net positive.
>>565405031 >Puppies can't really defend themselves and are innocent. >humans retarded, lying, greedy and cheating. >humans are bigger and smarter than dogs, so we should take care of them. Pretty sure most people think like this, so do I.
>>565409597 >3)They can`t think or don`t have toughs. 3)They can`t think or don`t have toughs. 3)They can`t think or don`t have toughs. 3)They can`t think or don`t have toughs. 3)They can`t think or don`t have toughs. "toughs" Apparently sir. you can't think OR don't have toughs.
You kill people because you have your own reasons whether they're good or not You kill dogs and cats because you're a pathetic cunt with the consciousness of a really small child But it's stupid to think anyone care less about humans being killed than animals. It's just that hurting animals on purpose is the weakest thing anyone can do. It deserves no mercy and no fun could be made about it because of that. It just concerns some fucker having fun. You can't say that for most murders.
>>565405031 I don't really care much about either, but yeah it is stupid. "Hurr durr humans are so shit, dogs rule!!!1!" Humans have invented everything that makes your life tolerable but because a dog licks your special area that makes them more good and valuable?, shut the fuck up.
>>565409997 >1) Animals are not moral agents. Humans are animals. And they're not special in the slightest except in being particularly shitty ones. Where do you think morals came from? You a fucking creationist? Cultural values aren't even close to unique to humans. You'd know this if you studied ANY biology and weren't 16. >2)They are just part of replaceable property This is just asinine. They're living organisms. I shouldn't even have to qualify this. It's basic golden rule shit. If you don't value other life, noone should value yours. And judging from your stance on these issues, you're exactly the sort of human nobody would miss. >3)They can`t think or don`t have toughs. Again, learn2basicfuckingbiology.
>>565410872 Well, no, but mostly everything else keeps shit in balance, like one may imagine humans in a few hundred years. These days all humans do is fuck shit up worse. And lets say you have a machine loaded up with 10,000 dogs and 10 humans. Kill one human, a dog gets set free. Kill one thousand dogs, a human gets set free. You have to press a button once per individual, and watch it suffer and die before pressing a button again. What do you do?
>>565411309 A military contractor with the goal of making killing more efficient for one party for the better of the rich. Heard of IPv6? Why don't you go look up why THAT was made. Fun stuff. Dogs ain't done shit, yet they have done more good then humans.
There is a lot of people who mourned a bunch of jerkass executives that became pancaked by some regular joes from Middle East. There is noone to become outraged at senseless murder of innocent puppies but us. Besides, most of us got wronged by humans, but most of us didn't get wronged by puppies. In fact, I don't think it's possible to be wronged by something that can't even break your skin.
>PETA-- PETA only cares about wild animals that see humans as snacks.
>>565411016 You grow up. If you think stabbing someone to death is the right thing to do if you get robbed, well you shouldn't be allowed to go outside. Typical american mentality "you're breaking the law so it's ok if I kill you" I don't know, hurt the guy, seriously injure him, don't go full retard.
>>565412871 Try half a million. Oh, new question. If the choice is between avoiding killing 400 thousand brown people in Indonesia, 3 thousand colorless businessmen and executives, and 6 puppies, what would you choose? Fact: Murricans don't care about non-american brown people and will pick saving WTC any time of day.
>>565413170 I'm not.Humans slaughter eachother by thousands each fucking day.Dogs don't.We are much worse then them.We're even ruining the world we fucking live in.Humans being are terrible, all those terrible things you read in history books, none of them were performed by a dog.We should all kill ourselves and spare evolution the trouble.
>>565410637 1. If we're just animals, it's my own choice to kill whatever, for nourishment (like all animals do) or sport (like many predators do), competition/establishing my place among my peers (like most male mammals do). The REASON we made up morality is exactly because we are superior. If that is not the case, I should be able to skin you alive just because I want to. Cats torture prey for fun, why can't I, if I'm "just an animal"? And if I am not just an animal, why should I be forced to include them in my own moral code by faggots like you? 2. Plants are living organisms too. do you feel regret for eating them? Oh, is that "different" because hurr durr I'm only sustaining myself? What about the grass you step on and the flowers you pick? If living things are by default exempt from being property, then we should all go back to caves and throw away our furniture, and never even cut off so much as a mushroom to eat it. 3. Having a nervous system does not mean they have complicated thoughts, self awareness, emotions, and most importantly, understanding of a moral code. If that were true, next time you're about to swat a fly or mosquito, stop and consider its feelings.
>>565413752 Dogs aren't responsible for their own actions.They are not capable of rational thought.Everything they do, they do because it is their instinct.So even if a big dog attacks a human, it's his own fault 99% percent of the time.
But all uyou retards are wrong, dogs actually DO shit for the human race, they always have. We have guard dogs, hunting dogs GUIDE dogs police dogs, and they make fantastic companions, best part is, they do this all for free, they do it because they love and trust their owner, and only want love back. Truly innocent creatures
>>565405031 humans are evil they have reason but still kill for pleasure,rage,profit or some other shit you don't see dogs running concentration camps or a cat ethnically cleansing a town only humans do shit like that animals kill for food or they flow instinct we should be better then them protecting the weak and innocent but despite all our knowledge and intelligence we act like savage beasts
i feel no sympathy for animals killed for food nor for animals that die in medical research but killing a being simply because I can that is disgusting
>cruelty is bad >HOW cruel something is can be decided by how much cruelty the victim is capable of/has caused >humans are capable of massive cruelty >humans are cruel >dogs are capable of some cruelty >dogs are not naturally cruel >cruelty to humans is, seen this way, more acceptable >if the worth of a being is decided on how much cruelty is can/has inflicted, then dogs>people
>>565418273 It'd be easier to kill, there'd be less chance of being found out, you could claim it was an accident if it was found out, and even if they didn't believe you, the punishment would be less severe. I'm not arguing about preference, simply that, if we judge morality on cruelty, killing a dog is worse than killing a human. >>565418397
Cats are an interesting one, this applies to both you and >>565418273
>it's like the moral dilemma of killing baby Hitler >he's innocent then, but he has the potential to be very cruel, and to pose a threat to humans. >you never have that issue with a cat or a dog, unless they were carrying some disease. >if a lion is running at you to eat you, it has the potential to kill you >killing is justified >a cat cannot wield this power >killing a cat is bad, because it does not, and can not, have the same amount of power as you >Yes, cats are cruel >However, cruelty does not warrant (nor justify) cruelty
>>565418504 >Alsatian IQ = c.60 >2.5% of human beings have an IQ in the 50-70 branch >try again
>humans are garbage, they should be eradicated, they don't do any good to planet Earf >doesn't kill him/herself but keeps on polluting with CO2 from lungs being unproductive or not doing any good to planet Earf (except liking eco-fascists pages)
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.