https://www facebook com/pages/NSA-Stop-Racial-Profiling/1445207855738109
Remember, keep all stats the same. We have 63% on the watch list as our current stat, don't have varying stats it makes the whole thing seem fake and will cause people to do more research.
that would be me. I don't think that's something you'd see in a NYT article. The picture on the left is from a similar article that I based this on.
Also, new graphic
Graph's here. If it's shit, just tell me and I'll change it.
>Ex-NSA worker Eduardo murkden told Fox News that while he worked at the NSA a higher percentage of African-American citizens were targeted during the Operation PRISM surveillance program.
>Eduardo also claimed that a series of high profile political leaders were also targeted, including Nelson Mandela before his untimely death.
What do you think anons? Can you make this into something completely believable?
Message to the White man: Put down the Meth pipe, stop molesting little boys, stop being serial killers, quit beating your wives, stop killing relatives to collect the insurance money, quit creating ponzi schemes, stop looking for prostitutes on Craigs List, stop committing incest, stop jacking off to pictures of OJ in handcuffs, stop getting sun tans and pen!s enlargements, put down the Prozac & Zoloft, stop committing suicide, stop shooting up movie theaters, stop being mass murderers and stop sodomizing the family dog.
This is pointless, starting a facebook page from scratch never works for shit like this. Don't bother, try to find a way to inject the story into already active anti-NSA groups and shit. Create fake nigger profiles and message them saying they need to share it and shit.
1. Your headline sucks ass. Headlines are short and to the point.
2. NYT has a very distinctive "Capitalize Every Word" style headline. You fucked that up.
3. NYT uses an AP-style base for their in-house stylebook. http://afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/29/the-latest-style/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
4. News article headline has to match link headline. Dumbass
no, we want to involve reddit 3 days from now or so. we need small news and radio talk shows to talk about this, then medium and some large news sites, then a wikipedia article. then AND ONLY THEN get reddit involved. post it on a small subreddit and let it get xposted
not bothering. Whoever is stupid enough to believe this won't care
>implying the dumasses who believe this are gonna point that out
"I may believe everything I see on the internet without fact-checking, but I sure as hell know how NYT formats their articales
Get your shit together. It doesn't read like a proper news article. It doesn't have the flow of something the Times would publish. You dense motherfucker. Read one line. Any line. None of it is NYT material. Any idiot can smell this bullshit from a mile away.
This is important.
Great fabricated information is worthless without proper introduction
>OMFG! BREAKING NEWS!
>WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THIS?!
>Use the word sheeple
>LOOK AT THESE SURPRISING STATISTICS!
>Hey, did anyone else see this?
>Any idea where I can read more about this?
>Anything to do with searching for more information.
If you post anything that shows excitement/shock it'll send a bit of a red flag.
If you ask question instead, it makes the person search for more information, which will lead them to our other posts.
With this, if you ask question, we can respond to those, giving off the sense that there is more information out there that no one is aware of. So, people will go off searching for more.
Try something like this:
>The National Security Agency has once again found themselves at the center of an Internet tracking scandal. Earlier this week, a now deleted blog post attributed to a member of the notorious online group "Anonymous" revealed several pieces of data that indicated that members of the African American community have had their online activity monitored heavily by the agency. Several charts were released, noting that African Americans were 63% more likely to be placed on an NSA watchlist than any other race, with Arab Americans holding the second-highest spot.
Obviously rushed through that one, but everyone's right. The original is a good attempt, but not too believable. It would be debunked almost immediately.
allright allright whiny faggots...
heres a correct one...ithink?
Fake article shit to be posted (in the sense of an interview with conspirator): Interviewer "You said you've been following the leaks closely ever since Snowden first revealed his initial leaks, and that you've been doing research on the subject. What else can you tell me that you've learned?" Conspirator "Well, at the moment there isn't a lot we're sure about. One of our bigger ideas that have been circling through those concerned with the issue is the NSA's targeting scheme. We have reason to believe that they're racially profiling certain races more so than other such as the black community" Fake article shit for you guys. Put some of it to use.
Remove the mugshots, use the stock images that match those used in other legit NSA stories. Adding a bullshit quote from a black IT company CEO might make it better. Try and make it a real person in case they google.
You know anons, I think 63 is a little too unbelievable... As it is we can't even represent Arabs on this, and this kind of DWARFED representation of whites, etc. is just not believable.
This. We first release 'stories' about suspicion that the NSA is being 'unfair' to minorities. Wait a while. At least a week. Then a new rumor that african americans have a statistically higher average. Then we wait a few days. Then the charts get released.
This page might actually post it, considering it's run by niggers
Again, if 63% of the negro population is being watched, then only 8.19% of the total US accounts for niggers being watched. They shouldn't take up more than 30-45% of NSA's total statistics. Have other numbers, but let the niggers be a little bit higher than others. Not more than half, that's crazy. It's unbelievable.
It makes sense if the percent is the total percent of niggers being tracked then it reads as 63% of niggers are tracked ect. It makes sense, it has shock with it and it cannot be a pie chart it has to be a bar graph or something for this reason
THAT ISNT THE FUCKING LOGO YOU DUMB SACK OF SHIT!!!
Now the whole thing is gonna be ruined because >>555356753
God fucking damnit man. Why the fuck would the NSA put ears on the fucking eagle?
listing that 63% of the entire watchlist is made up of niggers is just too unbelievable, since that leaves very little room for arabs, whites, etc.
make it the highest percentage, but if it has to be believable it has to be somewhere around 43% of americans on the watch list are niggers. that way, arabs can make up 29% or something and so on.
Wanna know the joke behind this?
/b/ sucks now-a-days. We used to be able to conduct the most beautiful raids. Now we can't go 5 minutes without some autistic dipshit posting the first shitty graphic he sees.
you mean the newfags won't maintain interest.
that's a good thing. /b/ vets will be able to take their time without add'ing out.
poorly executed and constructed plans end up being rushed and shitty and get debunked within an hour.
Haven't seen a /b/ thread thus productive in a long time. Even raid threads have trolls posting and the occasional bait pop up for off topic shit. But this thread 100% focused and on track. Good job /b/ keep it up!
one, stop trying to get people in that retarded fucking chat.
that chatroom is a piece of shit and has about 5 people in it and do you know how to read? 63% is not a believable percentage. where the fuck were you when they taught proportions in school?
Dont act like a total dumbshit who cant spell white. The tweet was good but we still need more fake shit before we try get it spreading. Try again tomorrow when Amerifags are awake
I'm just trying to say, we shouldn't be worried on the past. Let's just try and make this operation successful. I and everyone else in here wants a good lul. We won't get it by getting distracted.
NO ONE LAUNCH ANY NEWS OR NOTHING UNTIL WE HAVE COMPLETE AND UTTER COMPREHENSION OF WHAT THE FUCK WE ARE DOING!!!
Ffs guys, this should be common sense. Once we get shit rolling, it'll be good but not if were half assing the whole thing
somewhat disregard >>555358349
i was thinking of a different chat (the blockthenigs one or whatever), actually. but still, 63% isn't believable whatsoever since it barely leaves room for the sand niggers. we're trying to convince people, and nobody will believe it if the sand niggers are at a measly 10% (to make room for even other races)
No one gave me a picture so I used the one of the right from a lengthened google search. The left black guy is from an article about the NSA too.
Moved the logo to the middle since I cropped it lopsidedly earlier.
The top part doesn't always match the headline before someone says that.
Get your critiques in quick before I have to make two.
why would you make a claim that is so easily verifiable as fake like a cnn story? You fags are getting so worked up over something nobody will believe longer than a few minutes.
Guys, can we all friend each other if we're doing this? I don't want to look like an idiot by just friending people and posting this shit. I need backup
Should I post this? Tomorrow at what time? We all should post at the same time
>ITS REAL MY DAD WORKS ON NSA AND HE SAID THIS LEAKED LAST WEEK
I love you knuckleheads
have experience in web design might be able to help, nothing too crazy but I can make a decent looking site also have Photoshop cs5 with pretty decent skills at that. I'm certainly not the best but if I can help I would
Unless you're working on a photoshop/new article, stop working on this raid. It will be resumed tomorrow. There are some people in the irc and google docs if you need direction. Let the thread die now. Don't do anything stupid like try and spread this to reddit or twitter. Just wait.