Should i stop having the desire of a significant legacy, bruhs ?
>be me
>never got to exceed in class and, until some time ago, used to be mediocre to bad in math's and other exact subjects, though
>Even with that, i always dreamt of building some contribution/legacy so i could at least get my name given to a concept in the footnotes of textbooks and all
>look up to guys in the history of sciences i admire
>all exceled from the very start and the rest of their lifes were like a rising rocket
>realize i don't quite got their profile
Should i just give up on leaving something meaningful and just keep with my life focused on dragging my carcass around, consuming and producing like the other simple-minded folk with no ambitions ?
>>18576746
I don't know but I'm in the same boat anon
just do something you find meaningful
if you find nothing meaningful, let me know if you figure out the solution to that one
legacy is a meme
literally
>get to a middling political position
>wait for the right moment
>do something silly
>get anal'd into the feet of history
>on the bavarian communist republic
>His government members were not always well-chosen. For instance, the Foreign Affairs Deputy Dr. Franz Lipp (who had been admitted several times to psychiatric hospitals), declared war on Switzerland over the Swiss refusal to lend 60 locomotives to the Republic.[11] He also claimed to be well acquainted with Pope Benedict XV[12] and he informed Vladimir Lenin via cable that the ousted former Minister-President Hoffmann had fled to Bamberg and taken the key to the ministry toilet with him.[13]
Just be a good person and live your life to the fullest. Those people are the ones people genuinely look up to. You don't have to be the best, just the best person you can be.
>>18576746
most of the people who leave legacies were once losers I think. Look at all the communist dictators who failed out of school.