The Holy Bible

File: Koran.jpg.cf.jpg (36KB, 250x368px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 250x368px

This one

File: 91fA95LUp7L.jpg (789KB, 1959x2560px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 1959x2560px

This one has better characters.

KJV has more literary value if you're into that but NIV is more accessible/readable.

No real difference

Try Da Jesus Book.

>>16647728
The only difference between those two is that the New international words are more modern. Not reading it in Hebrew or Greek loses some translation anyways.

>>16647761
This really
I was given a kjv as a kid, a lot of the literacy is way to hard for me to understand. NIV is great because it uses a level of English that is more easier to read for first and second languages alike

>>16647728
Of you want to be a true christian read the KJV one

Landoverbaptist anyone?

>>16647728
Try neither?

>>16647728
read both as well as dozens upon dozens of other versions at http://biblehub.com/genesis/

i hope im not advertising here. its free anyway so i guess not.

Depends on what branch of the christian faith are you.

>>16647728
I find that the KJV is more acccurate.

>>16647728
KJV
Most baptists, Methodists, and Presbyterians use this version.

Idk what the other version is tbqh...

The king James is the worst one. It was written to make it sound older than it actually is and so this guy could have more political influence in his kingdom. NIV is most popular in modern churches. NLT is my favourite, really easy to understand. Or like another anon said use bible gateway or some other website and have a bunch of translations at the same time.