it saddens me that people will post, and then violently defend furry content.
>Like a catgirl
>catgirls are furry
Your argument is non sequitur. While it is true that a cat is an animal, and furries are anthropomorphic animals, it does not follow that any and all depictions of a human with any animal traits is classified as a "furry".
She has no tail, nor does she have any defining animal like qualities, save for her ears, of which she also has human ears. They might as well be a hairstyle or accessory.
I would object even to that. My tard rage toward things that fall into my arbitrary designation of furry is absolute. It kills any erection utterly and seeing decent art indulging it is a source of anger