>>138412420 Implied past boyfriend for the main girl, who many otaku were waifuing at the time. This normally isn't a big deal if people already knew it was a romance story from the start, however it was out of left field for Kannagi so the fans felt totally betrayed.
>>138412823 That's just what you want and expect, it doesn't mean you'll get it. Throwing a tantrum and posting pictures of you being autistic online is just retarded. This whole purityfagging is really stupid anyway.
>>138413012 So you want the author to pander to his fans? That's even more retarded, he shouldn't have to worry about some stupid fans hating him if he writes the story as he planned it. The entire problem is with the fanbase thinking they somehow deserve to be pandered to.
>Purity It depends, in my opinion. I don't mind if my fav character is a used good in series like DxD or Valkyrie Drive. But, I will definitely mad if my fav character turns out is a used good in series like Kimi no Todoke or Ore Monogatari.
>>138413107 Yes of course. I care more about watching anime/manga that I would find fun to watch and character I would enjoy than author realizing his creativity/plans. Just like I don't like Anno for what he has done with 3.33. Of course if I were watching random anime that's main appeal are innocent girls, but the author suddenly decided to make them all used goods, I would simply drop it. But if my waifu who is my life-time partner, has become dirty because author suddenly decided she had previous romantic and sexual partners, I would get mad as fuck.
>>138412456 Stop bullshitting. The "Kannagi incident" was nothing more than Sankaku Complex misrepresenting joke threads on 2ch as genuine outrage. It's ridiculous that people still cling to the bullshit that site spun despite its existing reputation as a trashy tabloid.
>>138416292 >Then how do you explain OPs pic? One person tore up a bunch of Kannagi volumes. There's multiple possible explanations for that. It could be a joke, it could be they really were that angry about the Ozuma thing. Either way, they're just one person, they don't represent all Kannagi fans. The fact of the matter is that Sankaku Complex has a long history of being a shitty tabloid site that does whatever it can to get page views, regardless of whether that means fabricating or misrepresenting events. Trusting anything on that site without a more reputable source backing it up is just foolish. >And why did the author go to great lengths after the hiatus to refute Nagi's relationship with Ozuma here? I don't know, I'm not privy to Takenashi's thoughts.
>>138416745 >It could be a joke, it could be they really were that angry about the Ozuma thing. Either way, they're just one person, they don't represent all Kannagi fans. Stop projecting
Reality is that someone tore apart 5 volumes of that manga. And it is also a fact how the mangaka had to deny Nagi being used goods a dozen chs later, without leaving any room for misunderstanding. Anybody with a functional brain can see the reason of this change
>>138417085 Culturally speaking, they have those tendencies, but they do have a word (their equivalent of "purityfag") for those who take it too far, like the Kannagi incident. I've actually spoken to a Japanese guy who said that non-virgin women motivate him to try harder, in a "I'm gonna fuck her harder than her ex ever did, and make her forget about him" way.
>>138417090 Still ongoing. It was so obvious that the mangaka tried to fix the mistake with a flashback showing Ozuma being just good friends with Nagi, and of course, showing him getting married and having a child with a normalfag
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.