Why are there so few characters in anime with Autism? And I don't

Well there's watamote.

>>135791696
I want to snif her grandma underwear.

>>135791696
Anime writers want you to self-insert but not THAT hard.

File: 1445959831768.gif (605KB, 512x588px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 512x588px

>>135791798

>>135791696
>chuuni-style autism
That's not autism.
>"Can barely speak up in public" autism
That's not autism either.

File: Shut the F up ni Naru.jpg (129KB, 1278x890px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1278x890px

>>135791696
>"Can barely speak up in public" autism

There is Kageyama and that guy with the piss yellow hair from Haikyuu. They seem pretty autistic.

>>135791961
Kageyama totally is. I don't know which blonde guy you're talking about though

>>135791961
The giraffe? I think he's just an asshole, Kageyama definitely is.

>>135791696
Think she was based on a real person?

http://myanimelist.net/anime/32255/Ashita_Kirarin

Subs never.

>>135792269
Somebody summon Daiz or Mori. Does Mori have a summoning ritual?

File: firework lover.jpg (432KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1280x720px

>>135791696
>"Can barely speak up in public" autism
That's not what autism is. A true autist doesn't even give a fuck.

>>135792343
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20PwaJYcnuk

>>135792343
Spout Reddit memes.

Kokou no Hito is a manga, but damn does it display autism in a fine way

Try and find any anime characters with legit disabilities. Literally an untapped market.

>>135792690
Guts.

>>135791696
But anon, that isn't autism, that's a clear case of dissociative identity disorder induced by the stress of being a production assistant.

>>135792784
>production assistant
>dissociative identity disorder
What are you implying?

>>135792784
She's a KA though.

>>135791696
>"Can barely speak up in public" autism
that's social anxiety, not autism

File: 1446091139129.jpg (62KB, 516x339px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 516x339px

>>135792784
>production assistant

>>135792690
http://myanimelist.net/anime/7877/Momoko_Kaeru_no_Uta_ga_Kikoeru_yo
http://myanimelist.net/anime/9931/Happy_Birthday:_Inochi_Kagayaku_Toki
http://myanimelist.net/anime/8120/Gotou_ni_Naritai.

>>135791696
>but "Can barely speak up in public" autism
That's not autism you autistic moron.

>>135792815
Tell me you weren't that stupid to not realize that.

>>135792815
>>135792860
>not seeing the obvious

Do I have to spell it to you?

>>135793044
I'm asking you to.

>>135793065
A O I I S A I A I I S A O I

File: Kenma.png (180KB, 656x369px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 656x369px

>>135792113
>>135792127
This guy. He may just be an introvert unlike Kageyama however.

>>135793301
Oh, pudding head. Yeah he's not autistic, he just doesn't like people.

>>135793354
I can get behind that. I wonder if Kageyama was autistic on purpose. I wonder if his parents are proud of him having friends now.

>>135793754
I don't even know if he has parents, he seems to live alone. That would explain a lot of things.

File: 9E6VzbT.jpg (72KB, 445x718px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 445x718px

Reminder that aspergers=! autistic

>>135793902
It does. Could be, there were only one pair of slippers in his house. But it is a house after all and it looked clean and different interior vise than Kageyama's bare room. No reason to be worried about him if he can take care of himself. Good guy.

>>135794040
>Asperger syndrome (AS), also known as Asperger's syndrome, Asperger disorder (AD) or simply Asperger's, is an autism spectrum disorder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome

>>135795748
>using wikipedia as a source

>>135795829
Are you denying entirely that Asperger's is an autism spectrum disorder?

>>135795829
http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is/asperger.aspx

It's true senpai, you have autism.

>>135794040
looks like europe will get demolished when shit happens.

>>135795890
No, I'm denying the use of wikipedia as a trustable source.

>>135796046
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

I got a 32 on the autism quotient exam. How do I bring up to my psychiatrist the question if I have autism?

File: blue-sonic-tshirt1-front.jpg (147KB, 1071x999px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1071x999px

>>135796217
wear this

>>135796217
There's specialists for autism. However whether you try them is up to you. There's a bias of specialists to give positive diagnoses for what they specialize in - in patients that non-specialized doctors would see not sufficient evidence for that diagnosis.

>>135796217
Unless you plan on going on meds it's a really moot question.

I got diagnosed with ass burgers and it's literally just a check mark on some old grade school files.

>>135796193
>believing wikipedia

>>135796367
Don't believe in wikipedia. Believe in the you that believes in wikipedia.

>>135796193
>trusting wikipedia

>>135796390
Why would you trust an article like that?

>>135791696
No one wants to watch you on TV, bro.

>>135796440
Because it's on wikipedia, of course.

>>135796411
Do you have any statistic that disagrees? Or personal experience of wikipedia being untrustworthy - other than the usual and obvious trolling attempts that don't stay up for very long anyway?

>>135796503
but why?

>>135796584
Why what?

>>135796564
Do you have non-wikipedia/non-wikipedia-funded statistics that show that I should trust wikipedia? Or just wikipedia ones and the obvious attempt of trolling?

>>135796661
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia#External_links

>>135796606
Just don't be such an obvious troll and answer the question.

>>135796699
>non-wikipedia-funded

>>135796756
>criticizes wikipedia
>must be wikipedia-funded

>>135796807
>trusts wikipedia
>isn't wikipedia funded

>>135796807
Do you have any proof that those articles weren't funded by wikipedia?

>>135796721
Why would I trust that article?
Because it's mostly written by random guys, who I figure delight in being able to report bad stuff. That's why the article isn't all-positive.

But it roughly reflects my own experience. Wikipedia is trustworthy. Half of all alternative sites that you'd come up with have wikipedia among their sources.

An autism thread filled with autism? What an unexpected turn of events.

>>135796954
>trusting sites that have wikipedia as a source

kids this days man.

>>135796910
Now you're rejecting the articles based on the possibility that they might have been funded by wikipedia?

>>135797004
>>trusting sites that have wikipedia as a source
How would you know? Linking your sources is not common practice outside wikipedia.

>>135797011
Do you have any proof or you don't?

>>135797011
So you don't have proof?

>>135797079
>>135797096
You win. Information loses.

>>135797043
Why would you trust an article that doesn't have a source and doesn't explain where did the information they're giving you came from?

>>135797131
How often do you actually look up the sources?

>>135797181
How often do you? Let me answer for you, never.

>>135797121
If you are still going to be a gullible retard, then nobody wins.

>>135797241
So what is the problem?

>>135797181
Are you telling me you just see that there's a source's name and belive it?

>>135797302
What if that source cites wikipedia?

>>135797263
Oh, you win the argument. You just lose the battle for information.

>>135797336
Why would wikiopedia cite itself as a source?

>>135797377
>thinking he's getting the right information

>>135797380
No, I'm talking about a non-wikipedia article citing wikipedia.
The article in >>135796699 has a segment on that about the problem with citing other sites.
What goes around, comes around.

>>135797377
>battle of information
There's no such a thing as information when you never check you sources anon.

>>135797460
>when you never check you sources anon.
>not reading the article
>counts as checking the sources

>>135797377
Again, if you're gonna keep being a gullible person that belives anything some site says, nobody wins.

>>135797527
Well, so long as you have no alternative at all, I have some information (with what you consider questionable reliability) and you have no information at all.

>>135797496
What you say doesnt ake any sense.

>>135797496
what are you talking about?

>>135797574
What information?

>>135797582
>>135797596
Rejecting the articles based on the fact that they might be biased.

>>135797496
How about you stop memeposting and stop being retarded while you're at it.

>>135797574
And you're also lazy, what a terrible human being.

>>135797637
Any article you reject based on it being from wikipedia.

>>135797650
So you're saying it's better to spread misinformation? You should just shut the fuck up if you don't even know what you're taking about.

>>135797716
An article I rejected based on having no trustable sources.

>>135797716
Why would you trust an article from wikipedia?

>>135797716
I seriously hope you're not this gullible offline kid. I can see you being an easy scam target.

>>135797756
>So you're saying it's better to spread misinformation?
No, I am saying you rejected the sources of the article on wikipedia's reliability without reading them and then decided that the article was misinformation.

>>135791696
I think anime is full of autists. Wejust can't tell because we're also autistic.

>>135797766
>no trustable sources
What made them untrustable?
The fact that they were linked to on wikipedia?

Autism levels skyrocketing

>>135797869
Kid, seriously, grow up, read the article and the sources and try to realize why they're not trustworthy, it's no use that somebody give you the answer.

>>135797959
You've got nothing better than that?

>>135797996
I'm telling you what's better for you, if you want to be a gullible lazy asshole and not reading and trust something just because, be my guest, you're not gonna have a good life that way.

>>135798089
>I'm telling you what's better for you,
No, you're reaching for lazy excuses why you have nothing other than empty accusations.

>>135798125
>lazy excuses
>empty accusations

So you not being able to read an article nor it's source makes me lazy?

>>135798259
And now you're down to deflections.

File: r0tsuritama11.jpg (220KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1920x1080px

>>135791696

>>135798125
>calls other people lazy
>doesn't even check sources

>>135798125
Still you haven't provided any source other than a shitty article on wikipedia.

>>135798285
Why are you being so dense about it? Are you really that lazy you need to have the answers? no matter they're truth or not?

>>135791696
Pretty sure autism is the opposite, bud.
Like someone walking around talking about train facts to people waiting for the transit and prattling on despite getting "the look" and other dismissive social cues from people who just want to go to work/school and haven't had their cuppa that morning.

True autism is the dumb genki characters.

>>135798604
You should read a book.

ITT: Autists trying to figure out the meaning of autism

>>135791696
Name an anime teenager MC without autism

>>135796217
You made me anxious about myself and I just scored 29. Now I'm worried.

>>135798655
About what?

>>135799782
I don't know, find a subject that interests you and you'll find something good to read.

Don't believe >>135800097's lies. He's being paid by the lobby of librarians to push their agenda.

>>135800097
Got any recommedations?

>>135800182
>implying you can't steal books through the internet.

File: 1430684205531.png (172KB, 357x422px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 357x422px

>>135800339
You wouldn't break the law just to read a book, would you?

>>135800374
>Breaking the law

Is not breaking the law if I borrow it and then give it back later, right?

>>135800519
>implying you can restore the file's virginity and innocence

>>135800594
You can when you're a super hacker.

>>135800636
Are you a super hacker by any chance?

>>135800655
maybe, depending on who's asking.

>>135800697
What if it's a cute file from 2005 doing cute processes?

File: pedobear-370903.jpg (45KB, 500x596px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x596px

>>135800735
>2005

>>135791696
Does she really have autism or is /a/ memeing again?

>>135799528
Shinji.