[REVO] is on top, [THORA] is on bottom.
Which one fucked up the colors when they encoded it?
For easier comparison, here's the original frames.
>>135671843
This looks better.
Both have problems, but THORA shit is closer to how it suppose to look.
Here's another.
Yeah, I think there's more detail in the THORA release.
>>135671922
no shit sherlock
Make screenshoot with town or fuckton of details.
The whites in this shot must have had some bad color correction and oversharpening or something which was applied to the whole movie then, because this is a truer white and the edges are sharper.
This looks pink and fuzzy.
>>135671835
they are from different bluray masters that have different color temperatures dumbass
>>135672209
So then which one is "right"?
>>135672209
no shit sherlock
Big difference here.
>>135672095
THORA's losing a lot of detail in places, too. Compare the light shaft in the back-left in these two screenshots:
>>135671843
>>135671877
Call me dumb, but I don't really care. Both are high quality, and both don't really jump to the eye as distracting. It doesn't matter.
>>135672478
But if I have the option to choose, then it only makes sense to try to pick the best.
>>135672258
>>135672608
Dammit, I always forget about normalfag trackers.
>comparing jpgs
my digitally archived chinese cartoons cannot be remastered in so many nuances
As far as I know, THORA is pretty deluxe, so based on reputation alone, I'd assume REVO fucked up.