These are all people who draw non-fujo doujins/ero-manga every comiket
How does that make you feel?
I wonder why they do it. Maybe knowing fat neckbeards masturbate to the things they imagine and put to paper gets them off or something. Maybe it's just what they ended up doing. Maybe they hate it.
Anyway, I feel like masturbating now.
>I bet she says ara ara all the time
>cute girls cutely drawing porn
>just like in muh japanese animes
I think you're the one who's wrong, anon.
Ok, so I don't get it. Maybe they had money issues and ended up drawing hentai. That's the only plausible reason that sounds reasonable to me. Either that or they are wannabe mangaka and are hoping to get a non-h serialization?
Even with all that I don't know why on earth they would be out showing themselves on some time of show/stage? Don't they feel shame? My penis is ready but damn I don't get them.
Careful not to hurt yourself on that edge
Fujoshi harassed her because she was making too much dosh out of them trap doujins. She had been receiving death threats for years, but the prunus girl doujin sparked some serious shit.
Don't ask me though, /jaypee/ are the ones who know what happened.
>all women liberation did was to turn them into sluts. More than before.
This is correct. There were sluts before, but they were regarded as fucking garbage. Being a dumb whore is something to be celebrated now.
I took the time to google that
What the literal fuck?
>Maybe they had money issues and ended up drawing hentai. That's the only plausible reason that sounds reasonable to me.
It's a job you retard, why would people not do what they love?
You people fail to understand that girls like cute 2D girls as much as their fellow men.
And sexuality/lewd, well, that's a part in all of us.
But really, its hardly rare when it comes to Japanese Otaku girls.
A lot of them are really into stuff that one would think would only appeal to moebuta.
>"I like young-girl sexual creations, Lolicon is just one hobby of my many hobbies," he says.
>I ask what his wife, standing nearby, thinks of his "hobby".
>"She probably thinks no problem," he replies. "Because she loves young boys sexually interacting with each other."
Yeah. Not saying they should all wear some microskirt. Sometimes a classy dress is nice too. Jeans are ugly
I hate jeans, can't even go commando in them without fear of chafing
>possibly illegal in Australia, Canada, and the UK
US once again confirmed best anglo country
That body looks like 3DCG to me.
Based on appearance, they seem to be organized left-to-right in a purity gradient, where left indicates untouched pure, and right indicates cock-gobbling slut.
I don't really like her porn though.
Well, many women in Japan wear skirts/dresses and many men wear suits. They just like being more traditional when it comes to clothes, especially if it's for a special occasion or work.
Didn't know people weren't aware of that, especially on /a/.
we all know who is responsible for feminism.
>yfw female h-mangaka are the ones drawing all the loli/guro/ntr/scat stuff while all the male h-mangaka are the ones drawing cute yuri girls mainly
>Ootsuka reika is a girl name
>Still thought was a dude until anon told me
I did reverse search and I believe the picture's a troll. I got some random blog about a festival and these girls are all kouhai for this Miss Contest thing. The middle girl won and that's about it.
Hana can also mean nose, and it's just nose hook that's so commonly featured in those doujins (if not all of them).
I forgot that white middle class yellow fever japanophiles who believe that Japanese women regardless of whether they are ugly and have creepy habits or not can do absolutely no wrong still fucking exist.
I've seen enough pictures of fujos at fujoshit events to know they're cute, like that pic of them lining up at the Kyo-Ani store for some Free! event. Only western ones are fat and ugly.
I would bang them all.
Yes, even the dopey horse face second from the left and even the short stupid looking one in the middle, as well as the uptight looking bitch on the far left.
We are trying to discuss porn
>mfw learning my favorite trap artists are women
Fei/Maidoll also female, she plays pso2 and draws the adventures of her character from time to time.
She also fucking loves this type of characters.
God bless them, but chings have some pretty weird anatomy going on. Their skulls, at the back, are flat and go upwards. Their torsos tend to be squat and rectangular. Their faces are maximum qt, until you see them from the side or 3/4 angle. It's like what the fuck is that.
I mean, it's nothing to hate them for but jesus christ.
I'm not exactly a fan of loli art, but I really don't want to see it become illegal because some people find it appalling.
Who the fuck is going to decide to persecute a piece of pornographic artwork on the suspicion that it depicts a minor? Who the fuck are they going to hire to stare at ero manga all day long and judge whether that schoolgirl they're looking at is 16 or 18?
It's not about whether or not certain things should be censored. It's about who's controlling the censoring, and how, and why.
Right now, yes, we can assume that the gubmit (especially and particularly the USA) is going to use any and all possible censoring measures to control and corral the minds of the population and generations to come.
But if we had people in charge who could be really trusted to do what they think is best for most people (and not just the super rich), then some limited speech control is okay, I think.
>It's not about whether or not certain things should be censored. It's about who's controlling the censoring, and how, and why.
I'm not fond of the idea of condoning censorship depending on who's doing the censoring. People who want to censor shit for "wrong" reasons would obviously argue that they're censoring for the "right" reasons. If you think certain types of censorship are acceptable based on the circumstances, you're not necessarily wrong, but your attitudes aren't all that different from somebody who pushes for a more extreme form of censorship.
Perhaps it is. I would include all forms of sadistic porn in that category. It just needs to be assured that the things being censored are ONLY things that people who are dangerous to society would be interested in.
And even then, maybe have such material accessible, but only with some kind of registration system.
>People who want to censor shit for "wrong" reasons would obviously argue that they're censoring for the "right" reasons.
This is the crux of the issue, yes. And this is also why democracy is an inferior system to authoritarianism, like Aristotle and Plato said. Because your average person (and keep in mind that might include you and me) isn't intelligent or responsible enough to be a sufficient democratic citizen.
If we were, we definitely wouldn't let the powers that be get away with some of the shit they do in this world. People would ask questions and shit would change.
But bearing in mind that if Hitler couldn't make that system work (the bad guys won), then it is extremely unlikely that authoritarianism is going to help us in reality. Democracy is the only remaining answer. The change that needs to happen needs to happen at the grassroots level; it's the only way left.
If that doesn't happen, TPTB are going to eventually have their hyper-elitist, orwellian, high-tech mind control world, or they will destroy the planet while fighting with one another to have that control (which in my opinion is the more likely scenario).
>What leads you to the assumption that only "people dangerous to society" would watch sadistic porn.
It is highly unlikely that people will want to watch guro (or whatever you call it) for benign reasons. Most of that is going to have psychological roots that would be better sorted out with a (free and state provided) therapist. I know, for example, that my days of browsing gore on /b/ was due to other shit I had in me, and that it was pretty much a waste of my time, and I wouldn't have been missing out on anything if the gubmit had censored gore from the interwebs.
In the off-chance that somebody insists on seeing obviously questionable material (the definition of which can only be as legitimate as the legitimacy of the masses' LCD as individuals), like I said, I would have it be available, but only with some form of supervision, to prevent the people who do have problems that are real and dangerous from pulling a shiggidy shag later on.
stop sexualizing dahootch guys, he's already mindbroken by japanese highschool prostitutes
>Do you have an actual source for this claim?
I don't, but I'm confident that society's infallible and omnipotent scientists could prove it if they wanted. (But I'm sure they could "prove" anything if they set their minds to it.)
Do you have a source to prove that a significant portion of society will be psychologically impaired from being restricted to only viewing graphic sadism under supervisory measures?
People assume that if you like that shit in pornography then you're liable to actually pursue and engage in that shit in the real world.
I don't think that people who like rape themed pornography are actual rapists. On the contrary, they might be engaging in a guilty pleasure because they know exactly why it's wrong in real life.
That said, there are always those consumers of extreme forms of pornography who actually do engage in serious sexual crimes. I think they're a minority, but they none the less provide ammunition to the people who want to censor the material outright.
>People assume that if you like that shit in pornography then you're liable to actually pursue and engage in that shit in the real world.
Private fetishes don't always equal irl action, no. But it seems pretty much inarguable that the people who like that shit are exponentially more likely, than people who don't, to take it to the next level and engage in 3D.
If you can masturbate to depictions of somebody getting raped, you need to change, get help, or be locked up. That's the opinion of someone who likes loli and incest.
>they might be engaging in a guilty pleasure because they know exactly why it's wrong in real life.
Delusional psychobabble. If you get turned on from watching somebody get hurt: that's a problem, man.
List of female hentai artists:
>Yuzuki N Dash
>tenkla aka Doi Sakazaki
>Sayori (Neko Works
>Satsuki-doh (Juri Miyabi)
>Uran (Uran factory)
In your words, people who enjoy violent video games are extremely likely to engage in violence. It sounds fucked up to be turned on by the idea of somebody being abused sexually. What does that say of somebody who enjoys shooting people in video games? Is there something really fun and exciting about a person bleeding out with their brains are spilling out of the hole in their skull?
It all sounds so fucking ugly, but when it comes down to it, most people who play violent video games are not violent. Not only most, but nearly all.
And guess what? There are a lot of fucking people who enjoy playing violent video games, particularly those depicting war. Are they all so mentally deranged as you believe?