For the past 10 days
I have seen or heard the numbers 6 and 16
Almost everywhere
to the point coincidence is gone
I really want to know what it means if it's /x/
Is it a warning about 2016?
Is 6 and 16 haunting me?
Or on the off chance it could mean good luck or good fortune will happen?
It has gotten to the point where I hate these numbers and have constant suspicion about them
Would really like some answers please
>>17117480
enjoy i guess.
>>17117480
Okay I shall answer your question, no it's not supernatural, the thing is, you are only focusing on those numbers, there for that's what you keep seeing, your mind is tricking you I a way. Trust me you're just focusing on the numbers to much. Ignore it and believe what I said and get your mind back to the right state of mind, and it will go away eventually. You are being to paranoid, let it go, and eventually you'll understand what I mean. ;) someone's a lil traumatized.
>>17117480
None pf these post numbers have a 6 or 16 in them, must be nothing
have any of you listened to swerdlow? so much information on all metaphysical
anyone there
Autism is caused by a dolphin stuck in a human body
>>17117654
that shit is great haha
I can't agree with everything he might be saying, but a lot of it is fascinating and besides how would we know it truly isnt
Is there an ultimate list of book recommendations for /x?
We had this thread some time back.
>>17087863
SECOND CHANCE
LAST CHANCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUZNqNL68lc
>>17117362
This is too early to publish footage. You're making yourself and your project look lame. Keep working on it and have some content.
>>17117362
So the masks/faces are the goasts? Is there a pasta to this game?
>if youre the one coding it, make sure the lighting source is right since it seems like the texture for the noses glitches out
>>17117362
i saw this like a year ago
its like a virtual reconstruction of a real building and shit
but i think it's only a lame unity beta game
This mistery is already solved ?
>im afraid
> i cant sleep
>>17117323
People on here get pissed when you post and ask about this. Dont expect any real responses bro.
>>17117409
Why tho, what is it?
>>17117418
They say people post it all the time, but honestly I rarely see threads about this subject. Maybe 3 times a month? Im just as curious as you, but it seems no where on the internet cares anymore. Or they arent willing to talk about it.
A few years ago I was laying on my bed watching the stars through my window when I saw a bright yellow/orange light doing pick related.
It moved so bloody fast it left a residual lighrt behind it.
To this day I cannot find an explanation to what I saw, it looked much like a shooting star, except for the colour and the fact it made those bizzarre "curves" at extremely bizzarre angles, it did not look like it made a curve at all, more like instantly changing direction.
Anyone else have had similar sightings?
>>17117221
Ok, english is not my native language, sorry if that is a big deal for you.
Have you actually seen an ufo or are you just posting to mock my bad grammar?
Guess no one is interested in ufos in this board, guess I should go post on a more serious site, a forum about ufology or something.
>>59079310
In 2007 I saw two parallel lines move across the face of the moon over the course of 30 seconds. I emailed several astronomy professors at my school and none could explain it. I was overlooking a field at the time. No sound, no lights. My gf was standing next to me watching and was equally baffled.
Had anybody else seen something similar?
is your name Crow777?
>>17117109
Papa Franku?
http://www.youareinaforest.com/
>>17117084
Not /x/ related.
>>17117084
Is the joke that it just keeps repeating the same thing over and over or is there a real game behind it? Anything spoopy happen?
>>17117222
No.
Hey /x/, I never browse this board, but today I saw something very strange in one of the pictures I took with my friends while hiking. Please help me to yell wether its just a picture glitch or something else.
Looks like mirage or glitch to me.
This is the original picture
>>17117036
Sorry its this one
Twice the number of man is the sum of the former. The sum of the former is half of the latter. These numbers share an intimate relation with each part of it's whole.
Experiment with it mathematically. Meditate upon it. Test it's Gematria and utilize this number in your workings once you have realized it's power.
When Eve ate of the fruit, she did not tell Adam in words what she had learned, but implored him to eat of it himself.
I implore you to do as described above.
>>17116831
Interesting.
its*
Welcome to Divination General!
Come here for readings and discussion of theory/practice.
If you're new, please read the STICKY first!
http://pastebin.com/2Wp1Q074 (embed)
Thoth's finished his new guide for /div/.
Thoth's tarot and rune guide! For beginners looking for new spreads and info regarding taking up tarot/runes.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ciFuMOVDIkA18d9Rw-Zkklgigx-Y4XzJkGVeMTYWcic/edit?pref=2&pli=1
Remember, each reader requires different information to read you. Look for their posts in the thread to determine what's needed.
Some readers will refuse to do certain readings-- respect that choice.
>Querents: Bantz your readers and your fellow querents
>Readers: Bantz your querents and your fellow readers
IRC channel for discussion:
https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.sorcery.net/#/div/ination
Previous thread: >>17107154
I just wanted to make a few quick public service announcements regarding divinations and the like.
>How do I get a reading?
Lurk the thread. When a reader announces that they are doing readings, query the reader according to his or her guidelines. If a reader is telling you that he or she will do x amount of readings and requires a given set of information, provide the requested information if you would like a reading, and try to link the reader's announcement post to make sure you're noticed. You should preferably try to see if said reader is still doing readings before querying; it only takes you an extra 30 seconds or so.
>What if nobody is doing readings right now?
Well, you're unlikely to have your query answered if you post it. Just posting in the thread without querying a reader directly is what I like to call “air-querying,” as you are querying the wind. Some readers actually like taking these, but most do not; most readers only take private queues. If you air-query, it's a crapshoot, and you shouldn't count on getting a reading.
>In other words, pic related.
That said, I'll be doing some (mental scry) readings for a bit.
>What is seen or revealed is not divine providence.
"Most people assume that the purpose of predictions is to tell you what is going to happen. This is completely false. The purpose of a divination is to give you information to create your own future."
“Divination is not a "right answer" kind of practice. If you ask the cards: should I marry this person?, you will not get advice about whether to marry or not. You will get insight into the strengths and weaknesses of that union. You will get an exploration of the issues which that potential marriage raises for you. It can be like a good therapy session -- through dialogue and exploration of these issues you can arrive at your own truest desire and choices.
“When someone else is interpreting the cards for you, they should be a facilitator for this process. If they say: "yes you should marry", or "no you should not marry this person, because..." they are not using the tool the way it should be used. They are interjecting their own choices, preferences and decisions. No card (or rune, or astrological sign, or cowrie position) is "bad" or "negative" in and of itself. It tells you something about energy, about the relations of one theme to another in your life, and it is always up to you to determine the value of this information for yourself."
>>17116651
What are your requirements for a reading?
Hello /x/. I come here in the hopes someone has an image I'm looking for.
It is a picture of this rake creature but where it's REALLY low to the ground and was apparently taken by accident and seen later in the photo by (I think) a British photographer.
Also, RAKE THREAD!!!!!
Durr durrr durr
This thing is so freakin scary...
Had the picture and lost it.
Dr. Wolfgang Eisenbeiss asked a medium, Robert Rollans, to contact a dead chess grandmaster to play a game with a living grandmaster. A living grandmaster agreed, Victor Korchnoi, a former contender for the chess world championship and ranked as high as #3 in the world. A dead grandmaster was contacted and agreed, claiming to be Geza Maroczy who contended for the world championship in 1906, and died in 1951. The game between the living and the dead began in 1985. Maroczy gave Rollins his moves through automatic writing. Moves took around 10 days, and with added delays from Korchnoi's travels, the game took over 7 years to complete. Korchnoi won in 47 moves, and commented that his opponent's play was old-fashioned but he was not sure he would win. Playing a competitive game with a player of Korchnoi's level would be on par with playing a competitive game of tennis with the world's #3 player. It is a physical impossibility for all but a few dozen people on the planet. For this to be a hoax would require one of a few dozen people on earth to be conspiring with the doctor and Rollins. Maroczy also provided details about his life which required a chess historian to research in order to confirm, and also required interviewing Maroczy's two surviving children.
>>17116442
Rollins died 3 months after the game finished.
If someone could get a psychic to play the optimal moves, they could defeat chess computers. Currently chess computers will destroy any human. If a person was able to beat a chess computer consistently, it would be proof of psychic functioning.
How come we've got two cryptid threads
>>17116440
we actually only have one legit one. the other turned outto be swamp gas
>>17116440
>making a third thread just to ask this question
Get your shit together, son.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cnFlwwjJMw
Am I only dreaming?
Remember that Alan Watts, even though i respect him and his work immensely, was a popular psychology entertainer. That's how he made money. That's why there's so many recordings of him. What i'm saying is, he's an excellent Spirituality 101 guru, but don't hold on to his interpretations for too long.
He himself repeated this very point often.
He's still GOAT though, but i'm just sayan, you know
>>17116197
Few of his ideas are worth keeping with yourself.
The great majority of his ideas are inspired from Hinduism and he believed too much into it... he then took it, removed all the gods and the practice and the entry levels for Hinduism and offered it to the general public, cashing out from it.