Archived threads in /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests - 636. page

File: image.gif (1006KB, 260x187px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 260x187px

>on gimp -> layer -> stack -> reverse layer order -> file -> export to image.gif
here you go

File: AND THAT MAN IS... really, really wonderful.jpg (41KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x480px

>>299068
Thank you!

>>299068
Not everyone can afford those programs retard

File: keen observer.jpg (12KB, 417x144px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 417x144px

>>298991
>To the left you can see a photo which I've posted

>>298991
do your own shitty over involved project

wasnt this a board for normies?

>>298932

That's Sasamiya Saya from Asterisk War. You could've easily gotten this information from Google, Saucenao, or Whatanime.ga. Use those in the future, they're all very useful.


On to whether it's worth watching, most people seem to shit on it (haven't seen it myself), but watching an anime for one cute character or some other shallow reason is what it means to be human. So go for it, anon.

>>298940
I uses reverse image search and got 0 results.
But thanks anyways

>>298932
It's shit.

File: 1490356720274.png (466KB, 655x675px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 655x675px

2/?

File: 1490469319171.jpg (60KB, 1014x1024px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1014x1024px

3/5

File: 1491038800865.jpg (34KB, 370x699px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 370x699px

4/5

File: 1492444136313.gif (325KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 540x540px

>>298870
i need more input for what you need

File: 1488421984927.gif (430KB, 500x538px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 500x538px

>>298877
Something like this

>>298881
Text in brackets, [triggering intensifies], similar font and effect.

>>298745
Today I learned that you can initialise fields outside of the constructor in Java and the compiler will quietly hoist the initialisation into it.

OP, what you're doing is valid Java, but it's not idiomatic and that's why the question is confusing you.

What the question is expecting you to do is

class blah{
Object foo;
public blah() {foo = new Object();}
}

The specific problem you're getting in your second part is called "shadowing". Your declaration is getting hoisted into the constructor, but then because you're declaring the variable in the constructor instead of referencing it, you get a local variable with the same name and that name has priority, effectively "overwriting" it; if you write

class blah{
Object foo = new foo();
public blah() {/**/Object foo = new Object();/**/}}

You actually get

class blah{
Object foo;
public blah() {
self.foo = new foo(); // hoisted from declaration
Object foo = new foo(); // local variable, not the same as self.foo, will get GCed when leaving constructor's scope
}}

And you don't get an error about foo not being initialised because it is being initialised just not by the bit you think is doing it.

If you don't want shadowing (and you almost certainly don't), you need to use "foo = new foo();" in the constructor, not "Object foo=new foo();". Removing "Object" means you're not creating a new name in the namespace, so the compiler won't find foo in the local namespace, and the next place it will look is self.foo, which is what you want.

>>298768
Thank you for your reply, I understand what you're saying

Do you know anything about HashMaps? The next issue is I don't understand about implementing or having the key and values in HashMaps being able to be called on if there's more than one value within the value

For example now you have the list:
1. Apple, banana
2. Carrot, dill
3. Egg, frog

But the values are under a class called "alphabet" and the key are the integers? If alphabet is made up for 2 variables called "pairOne" and "pairTwo"?

If you specify within the HashMap to have the key as value integer but then the value as the class alphabet then.. how does this magic occur that pairOne and pairTwo are able to be within the HashMap?

Does that make sense...

>>298869
>how does this magic occur that pairOne and pairTwo are able to be within the HashMap?
The only way to access objects* in Java is through a pointer. So the actual objects are somewhere in the heap, and the only thing that's in the Map is pointers to them.

* everything in java that's not a boolean, char, byte/short/int/long or float/double is an object. This includes arrays.

>Does that make sense...
Not really. Could you post the assignment?

File: image.jpg (48KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 800x800px

>>298731
Dude, just get one of the dollar-store ones that are one-use versions of the reusable ones.

If it turns out that that's the thing for you, the batteries, chargers, coils, etc. etc. are all interchangeable. Plus the "disposable" batteries are actually rechargable, you just need hold the button down with something and put it in a charger.

>>298731
The "chunky square ones" are $100-$200; they're not really intended for someone who's going to use it for a short time as a cessation aid.

File: 15977158_1820541271304950_4536680519161587834_n.jpg (73KB, 720x719px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 720x719px

>>298733
Ah yeah, but no, see - the cheap Chinese explody thing? I'm thinking to splash out or not bother.

>>298734
Point taken, but I've been smoking more than a pack a day for some 15 years: I don't think I'll be using it as a cessation aid for a short time only. Plus I got cash saved up, I'm willing to go for a fancy one.

bump for op lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_5FkCs6n_A

>>298640
Can you post a picture of just the flag?

File: Chile Helicopter Flag.jpg (12KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 960x640px

>>298676
Sorry for the delay, my computer was being retarded then the captcha was doing some endless loading bullshit

any help is appreciated

self bump because of incompetence

>>298623
You really need to get a picture, otherwise all we can give you is the usual

"is the CPU power connector in?"
and
"you didn't forget the motherboard standoffs did you?"
and
"have you tried booting just the motherboard, CPU and RAM?"

questions that everyone gets.

File: pathetic.jpg (62KB, 1002x719px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1002x719px

>>298487
>brilliant
kek. Pathetic.
I'll help you in the hope that someday you screw up in a magnific way, appear on the news because of your fuck up, and give me some entertainment.
I'm counting on you.

>>298508
anon but the upper right joint has 2,5 kN force. You wrote 0,35 there.

and i will most likely do screw up. If i do please contact me and i will show you how to be a hero in skype.

File: picture.png (175KB, 1694x800px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1694x800px

>>298487

Can anyone help me?

>>298398
I'm working on one right now for you.
Should be done soon.

File: Template.png (316KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1000x1000px

>>298398
Here you go.
I couldn't salvage the original picture, so I tried to remake it.
I hope this helps, sorry to hear what happened.

>>298393
Leave it on a couple of hours. There's all kinds of search-indexing, update-checking, .NET manifest-building, and miscellaneous shit Vista-and-later needs to do, and if the computer is never on, none of it ever gets finished, so it just starts again every time you turn the computer on.

Failing that, there's the startup tab of task manager, which has a "startup impact" column (it's usually Dropbox's fault), and there's also Performance Monitor if you're a bit more technically-inclined.

>>298396
Sorry I should have said the laptops aren't like new, I think I have managed to fix the current one I am using my updating the page size, but when I tried this for hers it didn't work. Its frustrating me that it can't seem to fix it.

search indexer and/or windows update are probably the culprits
stop each of those services
>net stop wsearch
>net stop wuauserv
respectively, and see how disk utilization changes. if that bother you that much (at least the search indexer should not impact performance since it should only "do-its-thing" once the machine is idle for a while) you can disable them on
>services.msc
(windows + r)

gl

(float *managerTotal, float *hourlyTotal, float
*commissionTotal, float *pieceworkerTotal)

Are pointers , so:
totalOutput(&a,&b,&c,&d);

or remove * from totalOutput function declaration

>>298299
That absolutely worked on the stripped down code, thank you for that. Any ideas why it's not working here?

Long code:
https://pastebin.com/iKCDLDd1

>>298302
>https://pastebin.com/iKCDLDd1
Add float choiceInput(); below the includes,
The function was not defined in your case because it was below the function that used it so the compiler did not find its definition in the context of the code that was currently processed

>>298280
For graphics cards, look up performance/price ratio charts and buy something in your price range. Make sure it's compatible with your processor.
For motherboards, make sure it works with your processor. Outside of that it should be chill.
For RAM, get 8GB (or 16GB if you wanna have more shit open at once). Motherboards come with two slots for ram by default, so get 2x4GB or 2x8GB based on your choice.
For a PSU, calculate the combined wattage requirements of all these parts (there's tools online or something), then buy a PSU that provides at least that much power, if not more for security.

>>298282
and read product reviews, then you're good.

>a i7 core processor
which model? because its important to chose the proper socket. also, just because it says i7 in the name does not mean its a good one

>>298250
Probably best to ask over at >>>/a/155900239

>>298250
Make a thread on /a/ and dump your chapters. Someone will collect them and post them in the appropriate places.

Or up then to mega

>>298250
Make a blog famdawg!