Archived threads in /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests - 1295. page

>>137452
Judging by the pic, I asume you have seen cinderella girls. If not, check that out. Prisma illya 3rei is airing in a few weeks, so be sure to catch that. GochiUsa's second season and YuruYuri's 3rd season aired a couple months ago. Shomin sample from a few season ago had an adorable Loli with alot of screen time. Kuma Miko this season has a loli MC that chills with a bear. Sansha Sanyou has a legal loli with alot of screentime, and a plethera of adorable high school girls, that aren't quite lolis.

>>137501
I actually haven't watched most of those.

>>137501
>GochiUsa and YuruYuri

Oh, I know why I avoided those. I dislike yuri. As soon as I looked them up I remembered.

I can't comment on netflix subs because I don't use them, but they probably use official subs from whatever the western distribuitor used. Most of the things that make subs good or bad is left to preference, but sometimes subgroups are just generally garbage at QC. A lot of the deciding factors is how much they localize, how reliant they are on memes, how they typeset, and a few other things.
FFF and commie are known to be pretty big memers unless they like what they're subbing.
I honestly can't remember any negatives Asenshi had, I think they're usually pretty ok.
Bunnyhat has really good encodes but the Toku void took him and he hasn't really touched anything since he encoded a DVD rip of Sailor Moon.
EG and OZC are both encoders and get their translations from somewhere else, If you have a choice between the two (they both do a ton of 70s/80s/90s mecha) and you have the space I'd go with EG, RX 78-2 doesn't encode anymore, but his encodes are straight up archive quality.
I'm pretty sure UTW was the go-to for 99% of the fate series, but they didn't completely finish it or they just didn't finish a BD rip/encode all the way.

Other than that I'm not sure who the best rip of the Meguca movies are, Although I think it might of been commie.
Also if you end up downloading from Nyaa stay away from fish anything (deadfish, bakedfish, etc). They're encoders who just turn horriblesubs rips into mp4s.
Also horriblesubs isn't a subgroup, it's some /a/non who owns a bot and some servers that rips from crunchy/netflix/amazon video/funi and then just uploads the video as a .mkv.
You should never download HS for a non-airing show if there's another group who's done a BD rip, or even TV rips might have nicer typesetting and a higherr bitrate.

>>137413
Thanks for the insight. Always thought deadfish was somewhat reliable

>>137413
Also, what's HS? I feel dumb for asking

> be me
> be 19, going to E3 for the first time
> Gaben is holding a presentation
> pretty basic stuff
> but in the end, a giant 3 slowly appears on the screen behind him
> hyped, because it could be hl3
> then he says: "I forgot to tell you, have a nice E3!"
> REEEEEEEEEEEEE.png
> pretty dissapointed
> but suddenly, hear a gunshot
> Gaben dead on the stage
> And that, is how my first E3 went

>>137409
kek

>>137400
>>137409
anyone have the video?

>>137374
You have to be 18 to post here.

>>137374
P2=5/32
P1=3/16
It's kind of sad you don't know how to do algebra.

>>137421
Thank you.

>>137352
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiGX0QHDzoQ

I dont think this is it but may as well share in the slight chance that it is

>>137359
It isn't, but thank you for trying. I forgot to mention in the post that it's a rock song.

>>137352
Give us more info anon. Is the singer Female/Male? Is it a band or does it sound like a single artist? What instruments do you hear? What style music?

I'm trying my best here.

>>137256
its a virus.

>>137274
post a screenshot

>I'm too afraid to download something because of a virus
>Can someone download it and risk getting a virus on my behalf?

File: gorod_l_en.jpg (4MB, 6374x2552px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 6374x2552px

>>137196

File: maria_l_en.jpg (696KB, 4510x2552px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 4510x2552px

>>137197

File: mnogogrannik_l_en.jpg (3MB, 5682x2362px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5682x2362px

>>137199

>>137138
sad romance? the one used in mlg videos and stuff? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFZ7bBaYpcw

>>137143
or maybe this since you mentioned looney tunes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnXOr8GvKcQ

>>137138
http://www.mademan.com/mm/5-sad-violin-songs.html

I want to pulverize your tight boypussy

>>137104
You have to be 18 to use 4chan.
That or this is some bait.
MOOOOODS

>>137104
Here come the summerfags.

Come on, guys. I only have two skele images left.

File: welcome.jpg (62KB, 430x430px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 430x430px

Do not worry my friend, I have heard your call and I'm here to grant you many boners.

exactly? they tell you the file size.

no, seriously. the bitrate tells you the rate of bits per second (usually annotated in kbps = kilo bits per second). given a song length in seconds it tells you the final file size.
if we have a song of 2min = 120s, at 320 kbps the file will be 38,400 kilobit, divide by 8 for kilobyte: 4,800 kB large (give or take with headers, etc).

what it means in terms of audio quality is far far more murky. one thing is clear: within a given codec (eg mp3) bigger numbers = better quality. the more bits per second are available for audio information, the more audio information can be stored and the better (ie more like the uncompressed original) it will sound.
the trouble is, you're literally trying to compare apples with oranges if you want to cross reference the bitrates of different codecs. the more advanced a codec is, the better its compression is and therefore the less bitrate it needs for a similar quality.

mp3 and aac are both relatively old codecs by now. aac compresses slightly better (beware: once you get to the audio quality part, the standard is a subjective one - this is just how i hear it!), so i would say 320 kbps mp3 is pretty much equal to 256 kbps aac.
more modern codecs are game changers. Vorbis, part of the second to last generation, sounds equally good with ~120 kbps. Opus, part of the latest generation, probably needs even less (i haven't really worked with Opus yet, but Google does on YouTube).

>>137078
thanks for the info anon. what is the future of mp3? it's pretty popular these days, i haven't even heard of opus or vorbis, i don't even know what their extensions look like. is flac considered old?

>>137098
well, mp3 will always exist (the same way ancient real media files from the dawn of the web will be playable). i have to assume it'll be replaced as a widespread medium one day, the same way xvid isn't used as a video codec anymore. for now it's far too popular to just shut it down (you are the best example, most people think mp3 is a synonym for music). maybe the difference is that with video codecs the visual and file size improvements are *massive*, while with audio you'd just save a few MB per song, which nobody cares about.

the other thing is, mp3 and aac are so old and popular, that most computers and smartphones have specialised *hardware* decoders. their CPUs are literally optimised to very efficiently decode mp3 and aac. so the codecs are probably not dying very soon, altough they have long passed their prime. battery life is an issue with rising mobile use, so chances are, whichever codec manages to get hardware support first will be the new mp3.

mp3 is from 1993, aac from 1997, vorbis from 2000 and opus from 2012. let's see when we manage to get rid of the dinosaurs :-) btw, vorbis is the audio codec in the webm specification, so if you ever clicked on a webm with sound on /gif/ or /wsg/ you've been using vorbis already.

flac is another beast entirely. so far we've been talking about lossy codecs. that means the files are smaller due to compression, but some audio data is lost along the way. codecs try to cut out the stuff that is less noticable to humans. flac on the other hand is a lossless codec. no information is lost. you can convert it back to the uncompressed original and it should be the same. it just compresses what it can to reduce file size a bit.
so far it seems to be hear to stay, no serious competitor has risen as far as i know. it's also free and open, so everyone can implement it (but since there is no industry group pushing it, it's very unlikely to receive hardware support).

>>136994
maybe if you also post the background you want.

>>137028
The 5th Wave ? Can u

>>136994
whats that

bumpetty bump

>>137029
so, you are asking on an anonymous board for people on fb/twitter to share whatever the fuck your page is about? shouldn't you at least post your page?

No I'm not, im asking for ideas for getting the pages to be more popular. I've tried a few things and boost ads tend to work with decent images and something somewhat interactive but when the page is fresh without any audience what do i do to get the ball rolling?

It is retarded

that's not an equation, so you can't solve for x. 1+x is just 1+x, unless you happen to know what x is.

1+x can never be x itself.
1+x can be 2x, if x=1.

>>136957
out has to equal to something, faggot

>>136942
fix what?

>>137513
monitor

cable is probably damaged, wiggle/move it slightly until the picture clears up, or replace cable if that doesn't work.

monitor could be fucked as well.