Lets start with this one
>>4251326
who the fuck knows. it's not a very good game
>>4251327
This thread has potential, fucker
Mars Matrix will be worth ONE MILLION DOLLARS someday.
>>4251330
So Mega Man X3 will be worth 2 million?
>>4251326
It will be worth less than X3 but more than X1.
>>4251338
In 30 years? Duck Tales 2 is also disney merc. So I'm going to go big. A complete, good condition duck tales 2 will be close to 10k.
>>4251338
This is one of those games that questions "Why the fuck is it so rare?"
Anyways, I bet some sucker would buy it for $5000
>>4251340
Nigga what?..
Won't all retro physical media be degraded in 30 years?
>>4251345
I thought OP posted X2 for some reason. My bad.
>>4251346
That'll be true for the vast majority. But some of them will be stored in protective environments. Another 30 years and the ones still playable will have premiums.
>>4251346
There is always gonna be people who go ape shit over it. And by then, it will reach antique status.
>>4251352
Anyone who game a shit about them will probably have either lost interest or died by then.
>>4251358
30 sometimes will be in their 60's. They'll be retired and have all the time in the world to rediscover their youth. They are going to pay just about anything to relive classic games in the original format.
What do you think, boys?
I'm rich or no??
>>4251326
Any "valuable" snes game is worth $50 and no more -- adjust that for inflation 30 years from now
wouldn't be surprised if they were literally worth exactly the same, because it's not like demand would ever actually increase or revive again
the market will only dwindle
>>4251496
The games will break or get lost. If the demand keeps being the same the prices will rise up.
it will be worth 200 dollars, that will be enough for a meal in a restaurant (with 30 years inflation).
this new generation does not care about physical media, the generation that cares about physical media will be 60 to 70 in 30 years. they will start dying and huge collections will flood the market. I mean, I'm 36 and I have all the expensive snes games. in 30 years people will care as much about snes as people care about baseball cards today.
>>4251514
So why get all the expensive games?
>>4251576
I don't plan on living 30 more years. Also, I have disposible income. Like the top half of my generation, that's why because the prices are going up.
>>4251581
How old are you? And I'm not going to snap on you, when you answer.
>>4251595
I said there, I'm 36.
>>4251346
I don't think this is true. Atari games have not degraded, nor pong and old TVs, even though more than 30 or 40 years have passed.
>>4251606
What's wrong with being 66?
>>4251514
regenerative medicine implies in 30 years our reflexes will be good enough to play shmups again.
>>4251326
Do you think that we will be overfilled with flashcarts/repros of games because it would be near impossible to find the actual hardware anymore? I also think there might be a time where people grow out of this and the generation that grew up with it is long gone.
Quick, make more YouTube videos about it to drive up the price. I want to cash out at the right time.
>>4252483
Impossible, considering the amount of hardware produced compared to games. Also consider that clone hardware is becoming better and more common, such as the Analogue NT, retroUSB AVS, or my personal guilty pleasure, the Cyber Gadget Retro Freak.
If the Atari is anything to go by, all this shit will be worth half of what it is right now. Atari prices used to be high in the 90s, now it's worthless.
Relevant
>>4255646
So basically any discussion whatsoever?
I laughed hard when I read Nintendo is going to re-release the NES classic next year. Scalpers got owned.
>>4255671
>Scalpers got owned.
Pretty sure I still made a couple hundred off being online at the right times. Retards who overpay for shitty emulator boxes got owned.
>>4255487
>Atari prices used to be high in the 90s
source?