why sylveon so lewd?
That art style is fucking ugly.
>>32546792
Is this all gayshit?
All Doggos welcome. I'll start off with Growlithe. I always liked the stripe pattern on it's back and legs, especially how it gets expanded on with Arcanine. Also, fire dogs are just cool.
I like Houndour too, as he's another fire doggo. I remember playing through Pokemon Gold for like, forever trying to figure out where to catch one, until finding out I had to get to Kanto, which was all the way near the end of the game.
I like eevee because they can become anything they want potentially.
Zygarde 10%, I think, is one of the newer dogs and also one of the coolest. While not a fire dog, it's got earth powers, as Earth is the second coolest classical element, so it's all good. I think I like Zygarde better as a snek, but it works great as a doggo as well.
Pokemon you like that just aren't very good in competitive.
I've always had a soft spot for Tropius.
>>32546468
This thing has such weird fucking stats. I love gen 3 but why do most of the things there have wonky stats?
>>32546483
None of its stats really reflect the Pokemon itself. I'm not saying give it great stats across the board, but at least put its defensive stats at somewhere over 100
>>32546468
I like it from the chest up. But the legs and feet are so blobby and stubby it puts me off.
What was his name again?
DooPliss
Ronald
>>32546264
Botch
This is the bug-type Lurantis, please say something nice to this bug, who is indeed a bug-type and not a grass-type pretending to be a bug-type, no sir this is 100% bona fide bug right here with Lurantis.
Something nice.
>>32546185
You have cute arms
you're cute but not as cute as this mantis
>who choose
>>32546147
Both
>>32546147
If the twin was an interesting character, maybe I'd choose her. Never Lillie though.
okay but au where gladion was born with a twin brother.
>>32545885
>>32545885
Aqua (f)
Dog (f)
Morgana (f)
Nebby(f)
Diamond (f)
Forza (f)
>>32545840
Casual, get out
>>32545840
you get an F
>waifu team
You havefinetaste
What's your Gen 2 waifu?
>>32545785
>>32545785
Alright, me and some friends are looking to play an online pokemon game. Hoping to have everyone start out at the same time and try to nuzlocke it. What are some of the best games out there for this? Anything goes. Old games reworked with online, fan made games, anything as long as you and your friends can run around together.
>>32545117
>as long as you and your friends can run around together
Literally what is the point
You could all separately play the same game at the same time and it would be exactly the same
Google PokeMMO. IDK if it's still up and requires a gba emulator, a fire red rom, and the actual PokeMMO download, but it was really well made.
>>32545137
>PokeMMO
>really well made
It's literally Fire Red with a chat feature and microtransactions. >>32545135
This is a Rokon.
>>32545115
This is Muma.
>>32545200
Mummer is CUTE!
>>32545115
So is this.
What determines the waifuability of a Pokemon? Why are some Pokemon more 'waifued' than others?
Fugability. Some pokes are just more fuggable than others.
>>32544870
First, one must determine the general volume and width of "dat ass".
Cover legends are Necrozma Red and Necrozma Blue. Necrozma Green is a Venosaur, Necrozma Yellow is a Pikachu, And there is also a Mewtwo Necrozma
>>32544758
This is stupid enough to actually be true....
>>32544783
yeah this is dumb as shit and probably fake but if this were to be revealed as true in a few months I would not be terribly surprised.
My issue is mainly the models look like total shit but so does necrozma so
I wanna 100% my next HeartGold run.
So far the ToDo list I got is:
-Beat E4/Red (no shit)
-Fill Pokedex
-All Frontier badges
-All Pokeathalon Trophies
-Get shiny crown on at least 1 mon (starter prob)
Am I missing anything?
The Wi-Fi Tower is literally impossible to do these days.
You can rematch all the gym leaders after the Elite 4 and they have much stronger teams
>>32544559
I don't need wifi for a gold tower print, do i?
I tried this once before but stupidly on a day i couldn't check up on it regularly after the fact, so let me try this again. Also last time I did this people seemed to whine about not getting the point so I'll be clearer. The stat distribution we have along the current scale is fraught with irrelevancies: minuscule differences in base stats that make next to no functional difference when compared to like stats. So, instead of trying to parse 120 from 130 from 140 in stats a pokemon doesn't even get any particular use or advantage out of, I decided to simplify things by cutting it all down into 5 points. And average(3), a high(4) and a low(2) to denote those with distinct abilities, and then exceptionally high(5) and low(1) for those that need to stand out from those with only moderate stat focus. In this way redundancies in stat distributions are a little more apparent and it can give more focus on who could use restating or distinct move pools to better differentiate themselves from like pokemon.
Find your favorites, look at their neighbors. Do they have stat equivalent pokemon of other types; does that type better or worse utilize their stat distribution? Do they have a stat equivalent of the same type? Does one have a move set that better suits the stat distribution? Do they have a stat the just doesn't seem to make any sense? (like Slaking not actually being particularly slow)
I just copy pasted these from bulbapedia and ran it thru a formula, so it's not like i checked over each and everyone one of these. So, let me know if anything got fudged.
Looking over a lot of these I'm kinda surprised Smeargle isn't more in line with Ditto and Castform and Spinda as an even balanced normal type. it would make more sense to give it a more versatile stat distribution considering its gimmick, more so than given such even stats to some of the others at least.
>>32544380
Also in the face of some of the stat and type redundancies, which pokemon are just obsolete?
bumping this because effort was put into it