does anyone else here prefer physical media to streaming/having

>>66247
I personally believe that digital media can never replace, at the very least, print. I'm one of those people who far prefers holding a book in his hands to just looking at text on a screen.

>>66261
i have the opposite opinion. i think e-readers with natural displays (not backlit, see nook simpletouch) can easily be a decent substitute for bound paper books. it isn't like an ipad where the sun will be brighter than the screen and make it unreadable. and to me the aesthetic argument of "well i just like having a real paper book in my hands" is about as convincing as the arguments for polaroid photos or vinyl records. sure, the older tech feels more natural or "warmer," but at the end of the day, for me at least, utility wins over aesthetics.

>>66261
>>66312
i think books are separating from whats on ereaders. they have separate (but similar) purposes. books are going to become more of an art as printmaking continues to advance, ereaders are going to be where cheap but fun stories live, probably text books, maybe some other stuff.

>>66247
Why would you ever try to stream on you ps4 when you own a computer?
But I have to agree OP. I prefer physical copies to digital copies.

>>66322
because sometimes i want to watch a movie on my larger tv screen, while also browsing the internet on my computer.

>>66324
In my set up I've got two TVs for occasions like this where I want to shit post and watch anime full screen at the same time. My video card is full on outputs with two tvs and my HTC Vive. You may have a laptop without two video outputs though so that would explain using your PS4.