There is literally no excuse for not owning Men of War now.
>>277437278
I just got Assault Squad 1, is there any reason I should get Men of War 1?
>>277437278
except that its garbage
what so great about this game
looks like coh ripoff
>>277437498
Assault Squad is mainly about the multiplayer, it doesn't have a proper campaign.
The original game has a fucking great campaign.
Also of note, Faces of War and Soldiers: Heroes of WW2 are a part of the Men of War series and are on sale too. Faces of War also has a fucking great campaign.
>>277438713
Causal shitter please leave.
>>277438729
It's nothing like COH, not even the same genre. You literally control each unit individually and they have inventory, limited ammo, vehicles have fuel, you have to put guys into a vehicle for it to drive and shoot etc.
It's not RTS it's RTT.
>>277438729
Except the series is older than CoH, you stupid fuck.
>>277437278
I was never any good at it, which is a shame since it looked like a lot of fun
It's overcomplicated shit for the sake of being complicated. Garbage ass game
>>277440494
Casual who couldn't defend the train detected.
I swear this game is the biggest casual repellent.
So is the base 0.99 game all I need or are any of the expansions must haves?
>>277440494
What's so complicated about it? You can even slow down time
>>277440884
Only MOW1 and Assault squad are good
>>277437278
If I wanted to play a good murder simulator, I'd buy something worthwhile.
does it play somewhat similar to Blitzkrieg?
>>277437278
is this the game with the cool destruct able environment?
>>277440856
I think you're confusing a casual repellent with a fag attractor.
>>277441124
Why so mad?
>play sevastapol defense mission
>failed 3 time on normal
>try easy because shameful display
>there's no airstrike option
>first line all fucked because of the german plane flying perpendicularly to the trench
>loop this music for the whole thing and suffer for over 2 hours because slowed down the game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-J5Vg0SxLc
this game is hardcore but i love it
Anyone got the gifs/webms?
>>277440970
>Only MOW1 and Assault squad are good
Faces of War is great too though.
I haven't played the rest so I don't know.
>>277441116
Yes, everything is completely destructible. Driving tanks through buildings and leaving huge holes in them while the rest keeps standing is really fun, and a good way to save ammo and kill cunts hiding in buildings.
Stealing enemy vehicles, fixing them up and using using them as a ram to smash into MG emplacements is also a great tactic.
Men of War games seriously encourage so much creativity.
>>277437278
What if I'm not a fan of military/war games?
>>277441323
He's a disgruntled Relic employee, just ignore him.
>>277442373
Get some taste and start being a fan of war games then.
Is the assault squad 2 multi still active? How is the campaign in the vietnam expansion?
>>277442251
neat I'll pick it up
>>277437278
Is this some dirty PC exclusive that only appeals to certain genre aficionados and the PCfriend conglomerate tries to pass it off as something anyone can enjoy?
>>277442668
AS2 is new, of course it's still active.
I haven't played Vietnam yet myself so I don't know but I heard it's the hardest in the entire series.
>>277442748
Yes it only appeals to those who aren't filthy casual console peasants.
Disregard the price, should I play Men of war 1 or 2 ?
>>277437498
You dun guufed, no point in getting AS1 as there is AS2.
>>277442748
casual confirmed, will never lead men in freeing the world from fascism
>>277437278
I hate RTS
Get Men of war if you want to play singleplayer
Get Assault squad 2 if you want to play multiplayer.
The rest is shit.
I fucking loved this game too bad the online community is full of polaks and slavs so i jumped over to AS 2. It's good but holy hell 3 vs 3 or 4 vs 4 is impossible to play because of lag and people dropping out.
>>277444302
Good thing Men of War is not an RTS game then faggot. It's Real Time Tactics and you can control your units with WASD, aim with the mouse and shoot manually with a mouse click.
You can also control it like a typical RTS if you want, but it's not forced, neither way is forced. MoW lets you play it how you want.
>>277444067
Do you mean AS1 and AS2? Get AS2.
If you mean original MoW, then original for the single player then play AS2 afterwards for online.
>>277437278
>All the new guys saving for a super heavy tank only for it to be blown up by a single infantry
I absolutely love how every unit can be a huge danger.
>>277437278
Why would I buy this westaboo filth?
>>277444864
So it's Valkyria Chronicles?
>>277444974
>Panzer II Luchs
Such a fucking rape machine, I love that little tank.
Seems like autistic company of heroes rip off.
Sorry but i rather have fun playing company of heroes.
Enjoy browsing your inventory and riding trains or w.e you autists do while im actually having a virtual war.
>>277445097
Isn't VC turn based?
Men of War is real time.
I was going to get VC this sale but then it only got a tiny percentage off. Will pick it up when it gets a 50% sale.
>all this shitposting
>>277444974
What MoW is this from?
>>277445414
If they weren't thinking about what shitposts they could make, they'd be forced to dwell on and realize they are simply not good enough to play Men of War.
This shitposting is a defense mechanism anon.
>>277445654
How much are they paying you?
>>277445239
>company of heroes rip off.
It came out before Company of Heroes you faggot.
And it's nothing like COH either.
I loved COH 1 as well, but I am not going to pretend it's on the same level as MoW.
If you have played Blitzkrieg mod, MoW is a more in depth and harder version of BKmod.
>>277445614
AS 2 most likely
>>277445895
A potato and a sip of vodka for each purchase.
>>277446023
>it came out before CoH
Since men of war is so hardcore and coh is just casual trash...
I challenge any of you autists to take me on coh2 1v1. I will be streaming it. Surely you hardcore guys can just wreck me since im filthy casual.
>>277444509
>not having friends
I'm sorry.
>>277437278
yes there is: i dont want to play it
go home marketer
>>277446308
>Company of Heroes release date
>September 12, 2006
>SHoWW2 release date
>June 30, 2004
>Faces of War, the first game in the Men of War sub series release date
>September 8, 2006
>>277446642
I do but none of them play this ;_;
>>277442748
To be perfectly honest, I could see this game not being for everyone. It occupies a sort of weird spot between action and RTS, but it can be fun in a very unique way as a result. Approach MoW with an open mind - don't treat it like a generic RTS.
>>277446321
>coh2
Lol
So Assault Squad is better for the multiplayer? Talking about the first one, the 2nd is too expensive.
>>277446834
If I recall, this thread is about the game in the OP which came out in 2009
>tfw when theres only 3 games you're really looking forward to and want to play
>everything else became mediocre, games stopped being fun long time ago and I only continue to play out of habit
>STALKER 2 is never gonna happen
>MOW 2 is unlikely
>Witcher 3 will rape my PC if I try to play it
>only 3 games I really want
>>277447174
But coh is sucha casual series.
Men of war is hardcore, requires more skill etc.
So surely any men of war player can beat me in simple casual game.
>>277447275
It's completely irrelevant. You are trying to say the Men of War series is a COH rip off, which despite Men of War itself being released after COH, it's the 4th game in the series, and the other previous 3 games, which play just like Men of War, were released before COH.
In Russia, all the games have the same series name, they only have different names in the west.
>>277447690
I never said Men of War ripped off CoH.
I'm just stating which came out first and CoH did indeed come out before Men of War.
>>277447413
What about Call to Arms which is shaping up to be similar to MoW?
>>277447874
>I never said Men of War ripped off CoH.
>Seems like autistic company of heroes rip off.
Which one is it?
>There is literally no excuse
I don't like RTS games.
This game looks BAF. No thanks.
>>277448024
And what makes you think I posted that you fool?
>>277448325
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Just stop posting, it's getting pathetic.
>>277446901
They should, MoW is fucking brilliant LAN material.
Why are MoW fans always so aggressive against CoH? It's like they can't enjoy more than one game like ASSFAGGOTS players.
http://youtu.be/7yS4ehgzWIM?t=6m24s
Wow, sit in a trench simulator
So hardcurr
>>277448489
Not only are you a filthy marketer but you're a gullible moron too
>>277448656
>That nerdy sperg voice
This is how I imagine the nerds on /v/ sound.
>>277448798
>Get called out
>I NEVER SAID THAT YOU'RE STUPID
>SHUT UP MARKETER!!
Keep digging retard, this is hilarious.
>>277448880
>All this damage control
Nobody wants to buy your shit game, now fuck off back to Reddit or something.
Rather high tier Starcraft BW/2 player here.
Will I enjoy this?
>>277448880
All I did was make a correction of a mistake in your post about which game came out first.
You sperging everywhere is making people lose interest in this game.
>>277449331
Sure, if you like MOBAs and the like.
>>277449331
Men of War is all about insane levels of micromanagement.
Not really about clicks per minute.
Also it's RTT not RTS. No base building, resource gathering or unit creation, though some levels you can call in reinforcements.
>>277437278
>There is literally no excuse for not owning Men of War now.
I don't want to pay $8.99 for a game that I don't want.
What now faggot?
>>277449331
no you won't, this game has no traditional RTS mechanics
you can play the faces of war campaign as a MoW mod
also MoW 1 train level is one of the bigger casual filters ever put into a game
>>277449671
It's 99 cents retard.
The series collection is $8.99, learn the fucking read.
>>277437278
>$0.99
Shit, better get to selling those trading cards.
I like the Vietnam one, there's more stealth involved which I like.