Should I spare him?
Is there anything worse than wobbling?
>>380915781
that reaction still hurts me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-Xm7s9eGxU
Official thread theme
>>380915781
>>380916368
I want to give M2K a hug
How do we go from this....
to that
....to this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igb0nuEVH58
What the fuck happened this looks terrible. TERRIBLE!
Making a video game with a similar style to Darkest Dungeon and I need your guys thoughts:
> Image Darkest Dungeon
> 1 member in a party, not 4
> Set in a crusade, knights going from the left of the map to the right, killing anything wielding magic
> The player can 'give in' to magic, not going to reveal this too much as I'm writing a story
Here's where I need some thoughts: I am making this moddable from the very beginning, however I'm at a bit of a crossroads.
I can allow players to script and animate custom 'abilities', but with this being a 2D game, the character will have to be set in stone so that artists can use my characterlist and animate abilities.
OR I can allow the creating and implementing of custom items and characters, that have their own sprites etc. This means that only a handful of base characters are made, but modders can make cool equipment and new player chars all together (NPCs will always be customisable, already implemented)
The thing is, if people can create new abilities and animate them, they cannot animate characters created by someone else without knowing it. I'm no artist, so I have no idea if there's a way around this with software, but for now I'm just using spritesheets etc and planning on overlaying armour over the top.
Is custom spellmaking (as mods, spellmaking is already in the game, as in, you mod in 'components' and join them together to make abilities and spells, modding just creates new components to add to the pallette) more important than customisation? From a gameplay perspective, I think this is appropriate, but I'm trying to step away from classes, which creates the problem of just having base characters and items set in stone from the get go.
Sorry for the long post. Pic unrelated, not showing the game off yet, hope you understand
If the objective or concept is vague to you, then I'm sorry, but I don't want to reveal too many mechanics I have in the game until I have gameplay to show!
>>380915753
Just a little tip, always write everything out, the more you actually have to show someone the more likely someone would be interested in the game. Don't worry about people stealing your ideas or whatever, ideas are cheap, the work you put into detailing how the game works is what shows people your potential.
>>380916232
Thanks for the tip. I'm a student gamesdev, and I'm going to be working on this until I graduate in another 3 years. There isn't much gameplay yet as the game itself as its all prototypes etc. I will definitely come back when I have something I'm happy with!
Its only that this is quite important, I can't finish the combat system without knowing whether or not its moddable, likewse I can''t finalise rendering the entire player without knowing whether to show equipment. I figured that at this stage, it'd be better to be a little secretive than show shit
But I agree, I probably should prepare something next time I post to /v/
Is there game you want the experience to play the first time again, if so what game?
World of Warcraft
Just found out this exists. Is it any good? I've always heard the original was one of the OG Xbox's hidden gems, but I never got around to playing it.
It's a decent platformer, just don't expect a "brilliant game" but more of a playful and competent one with some unique boss fights.
Will this ever be topped?
Will Sucker Punch next game be their magnum opus?
>still haven't changed your steam currency to
rubles to get cheaper games
Why?
john mccain is going to put you on a blackbag list
>>380915425
Do you not get banned for that?
>I'll be your 1-up girl
>game doesn't have 1-up's
It's been 4 almost 5 months since the Switch launched and now there is a literal shortage this isn't Nintendo limiting supply. It guaranties success because basically every Switch will get sold but almost half a year after launch and it's still in short supply. What does it mean and ow are you dealing with it? I caved in and got a bundle through FUCKING Gamestop but it was a alright deal even better now that this happened.
>>380915357
It's just scalpers fucking people over. Same shit happened with the wii and people snagging them and reselling on ebay or the like. It'll blow over like it did with the wii but it'll take time before the scalpers want to move the product from their house vs making a profit if the turn around is bad.
>>380915357
Nintendo really should step up the production and if they are still holding off they need to fuck off. I got extremely lucky and found mine at a random ass target I called late at night but otherwise have not seen one
>>380915524
Your probably right It took a year to get my Wii. Still everyone thought the Wii was a one time event. It didn't happen with any of the other consoles in the 7th and 8th gen
Is this the best indie game of the year?
The answer is yes.
Is this the best mystery game of the year?
The answer again is yes.
I enjoyed it, but it was too easy and simple. It could have gotten way crazier.
Has there been a worse launch in recent memory?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eky8JmYl1EQ
Warlords of dreanor, stormblood is quite literally the warlords of ffxiv in every single way
Things looked grim for us after Carteneau, didn't they?
>>380927272
GWAHAHAHAHA
Knowing you are an expert in the field, an associate of yours asks what systems and games they should buy with $1,000 (or the equivalent in your currency) to get back into gaming.
>This person has not played a single game or system since the 6th gen.
>They enjoy any exceptionally well made game regardless of genre.
>They have a PC but it is borderline toaster tier and will need to be upgraded to play most modern games well.
>They have a decent amount of free time and skill, meaning they won't mind long or challenging games.
>They are willing to spend more money down the line if they feel its worth it.
What do you recommended to them?
>>380915126
My peanus weanus of course :D
>>380915373
Buy anon, you must know that no one would want such a tiny, pathetic thing, surely?
>>380915126
$1000 USD can get you a completely competent gaming PC. It is the only choice.
Consoles are for literal destitute poverty-lifestyle 'people' who can only afford $200 down payment on a retail store lease and are too stupid/ignorant to save for the better long-term value, petite-sociopath 'people' who don't particularly care for anything but just follow trends, and idorts for whom the cost is no factor.