>Dude, let's take a normal human woman and draw some

>freckles on her face so
They go all the way down.

>>87568870
I do give them credit that they addressed this lazy shit in I think TNG? The episode with the "creators" or whatever seeding planets with their DNA or some shit I don't know, hence why all alien species are bipedal humanoids.

it's so they have a low enough budget to do weird scripts. if every alien had extremely good prosthetics or were cg there would be less episodes and they would take less risks.

A star trek with good effects is the JJ abrams movie. Do you want that? I dont

>>87568904
Hnngg

File: xypj82qz8zjz.jpg (56KB, 618x429px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 618x429px

>>87568957
>all alien species are bipedal humanoids.

>>87569115
Based Tholians should inherit the Galaxy.

File: Ro_Laren14.jpg (106KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1440x1080px

Is it like when they made Bajorans only slightly weird looking because they didn't want to hide how pretty Michelle Forbes was?

>>87569190
Or the little T-shaped bit was superfluous and hard to notice anyway?

>>87568870
I think they were trying to work towards adding furries slowly with cheetah spots in the series but sort of gave up.

>>87568870
It's hit and miss with Star Trek alien designs.
A lot of the aliens they designed for women to play as were light on the prosthetics.

>>87568870
budgetary reasons. they had some weirder aliens in ENT like whales, ants, sponges or >>87569115