>2h 43m kino incoming

This definitely seems like it'll be a better movie to see in IMAX

>capeshit
no thanks
imagine thinking this ISNT capeshit btw

I'm not holding my breath.

File: ridley-scott.jpg?x42694.jpg (452KB, 2048x1343px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 2048x1343px

How will he have sabotaged it?

So Gosling is a bad guy? Why is he with Leto?

>>87551158

I can already tell this movie is gonna be shitty by the blue/orangey red color scheme and harrison ford wearing a 5 dollar tshirt on the poster.

>>87551643
Fuck off Redditlettermedia

>four of the most overused hollywood actors ever
>blue and orange
>unnecessary sequel / reboot to an 80's movie
>original blade runner was shit anyways

only people excited for this shit were born after 9/11

>le french faggot director meme
Yeah, no thanks.

>>87551158
Really, all they have to do is have interesting, competently-written characters and story and it'll be better than the original.

>people memeing about the movie being bad when literally /ourguy/ Dennis is directing it

>>87551398
everything about this capeshit sequel is a meme

File: i hav question 4 u.png (729KB, 1361x574px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 1361x574px

DID U FUCC MY BLADE RUNNER???

>>87551800
It's part of an Internet smear campaign. This film has literally everything going for it. It will rival Dunkirk as film of the year.

>>87551792
That's not ScarJo.

File: 1403873024443.gif (1MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x400px

>>87551844

>>87552113
Deep

i am literally going to see it in imax just for ana :3

File: ana-.jpg (57KB, 736x1104px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 736x1104px

>>87552180
Me and you both brotha!

>>87551158
Awful thread so far but I'll post anyway: I'm pretty hyped for this. Gosling and Leto have both shown they can do roles like this pretty well (gosling moreso but I think Leto can act well if he's given a decent script). It looks really nice from the trailer, and it's being directed by someone who's already made some good shit. The guy who wrote the original blade runner and the guy who made american gods are the screenwriters on it, so it's probably not gonna be lacking in that department either. I honestly thing it'll be really good.

File: roger-deakins.jpg (100KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1000x667px

>>87552327
Don't forget, they have the god of cinematography on board aswell.

Honestly, this film simply can't be bad. It would be such an immense anomaly for that to occur. There are too many talented people attached.

>>87552383
>13 nominations
>0 wins

And people went on about Leo (even though he was mediocre)

>>87552327
>>87552383
I too agre good friends. Vilenue can never go wrong, and honestly, it's damn Blade Runner coming back, there's a very low chance of the movie being bad.

File: +.png (293KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 640x480px

I was cautiously sceptical until I saw the prequel movie. Now i'm cautiously hyped.

>>87552383
deakins is a meme, dion beebe is the only good guy working today

>>87551158
>2049
dude that is way too long to wait for a movie

>>87551793
He's Canadian

>>87552562
That's a weird fucking opinion. Beebe is average at best, the king of bland and forgettable.

File: sicario.webm (3MB, 1300x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1300x540px

>>87552473
Sicario was robbed that year.

>>87552586
hahahahaha lollll I saw a YouTube comments that said the same thing and it was soooooo funnyyyy!!! uppvote!!

>>87551158
>they didn't make it 2 hours and 49 minutes
:^/

I have stayed away from all trailers and media regarding this movie. How are the trailers? Does it look good?

>>87551158
there's literally no excuse for any film to be over 95 minutes.

>>87551158
>10.6
but that was three months ago, it already came out?

>>87551643
David created the replicants

>>87551158
They just lost a sale. I'm not spending that long in a shitty theatre.

>>87551398
Sci-Fi /= capeshit

>>87551158
All of Villeneuve's films are mediocre so I don't expect much from this

>>87552795
The visuals look beautiful, but the trailers are portraying it as an explosion filled action movie. I'm hoping that won't be the case, and that there'll only be a couple of short action sequences.

File: image.jpg (76KB, 594x396px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 594x396px

>>87552383
That's not Christopher Doyle

File: 1504574043100.png (139KB, 394x360px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 394x360px

>>87553360
>but the trailers are portraying it as an explosion filled action movie.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

File: Avatar-this-is-great-001.jpg (19KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 460x276px

>implying it won't have 1 hour of shitty "Blade Runner lore" padding in the middle of it

dropped as fuck

>>87553360
remember the VVitch trailers?

I wonder how many will see this without watching the original. My friend's girl says the original "looks boring" but she's going to watch this.

>>87553360

What about the music?

>>87553434

Well, she isn't wrong.

>>87553435
hype composer, but it isnt
V A N G E L I S

>>87553434
Is her name Susan?

You guys remember Harrison Ford appears in the last third of the movie, right?
And the trailers practically show him for 80% of their length
So for at least 2 hours I dont expect action stuff

Why is Deckard old if he's a replicant like Scott has been saying all these years?

>>87552680
>silhouettes against the sunrise at dawn
incredible

>>87551158
Just checked that run time, its true. Damn!

>>87552695
how'd you get this upset over that

>>87553536
Because he's a fucking idiot who doesn't understand his own creation.

>>87551398
>he thinks sci-fi is the same thing as capeshit
I didn't think this level of stupid was possible

File: 1488157797404.gif (2MB, 250x158px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x158px

>>87553371

File: 1502293402671.jpg (287KB, 1576x1576px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1576x1576px

>>87552113

P O T T E R Y

>>87553522
>So for at least 2 hours I dont expect action stuff
Good. I was worried it would be too much of an action movie based on the trailers.

>>87551398
I hope you're wrong anon but everything we've seen from the promotional material makes it look that way, and makes it look like it appeals to capeshit audiences more than high brow sci-fi fans

File: image.png (394KB, 590x590px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 590x590px

FROM THE VISIONARY DIRECTOR OF KONG:SKULL ISLAND COMES BLADE RUNNER 2049

>>87551792
bait

go back to your game of thrones containment thread you faggot cunt

>>87553360
>The visuals look beautiful

Do they? It doesn't capture the blade runner aesthetic at all

>>87553827
>It doesn't capture the blade runner aesthetic at all
I don't want it to. It has its own aesthetic and I like it.

>film has no niggers ham-fisted into it

nu-/tv/ will hate this no matter what

>>87553863
then why make it a blade runner movie? why have harrison ford in it?

it's a movie set in the blade runner universe, it NEEDS to capture the aesthetic of the first

>>87553975
>it NEEDS to capture the aesthetic of the first
No it doesn't. It can be it's own thing. It captures the world just fine. It's set 30 years later. It doesn't have to look exactly the same.

>>87553737
1. Skull Island was decent

2. You're a faggot

3. It's not the same director

nu-/tv/:

hates dunkino
hates blade runner
loves capeshit
loves game of thrones
loves star wars
loves e-celebs

Why is this board so fucking shit now? Every other board on the site has some element of disdain for entry level garbage, but /tv/ actively embraces it

File: IMG_6370.jpg (62KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x427px

>>87553943
>no niggers ham fished into it
Except it literally has a nigger "scientist" hamfisted into it

No doubt the work of Denis "Justin Trudeau" Villenivue

>>87554102
>now

>>87554108
It literally never used to be like this though

Jared Leto


why

>>87554159
to appeal to young adults/teenagers

The first blade runner was boring as fuck, why would this be any different?

>>87554159
>why
He's a good actor.

>>87554182
t. brainlet

>>87554182
>>>/gameofthrones/

fuck off you underage faggot

>>87554159
He's been acting in films for longer than you've drawn breath on Earth.

File: 1473937422867.jpg (23KB, 367x330px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 367x330px

>>87554182

>>87554097
No
Yes
Fair enough

>>87554182
I want RLM parrot plebs to leave.

>>87554033
>it can be its own thing
Except it isn't, is it? It's Blade Runner. If they wanted to make something new, they can just make an original film.
That's how you know it's going to be shit. If it wouldn't be successful as an original film, slapping Blade Runner on to the title isn't going to make it any better.

>>87554140
u mean its never b een this bad

>>87554261
It can still have a plot connection to the first film without sharing an exact visual style.

>>87553536
Because Scott is crazy

>>87554102
its the /v/ influence

>>87551643
literally everyone is a replicant

>>87551800
This is only movies I'm going to watch in theatres this year tbqhwyf

>>87553360
They did the same thing to arrival.

File: 15145005731.jpg (85KB, 598x651px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 598x651px

>>87554159
>tfw /tv/ only hates on Jared Leto because of Suicide Squad
>he's been good in almost every other film beforehand

>>87554159
Hating on Jared Leto is 100% reddit.
Leto is a good actor if he has a good script and a good director above him. Also his weird too perfect homo not aging face fits the Blade Runner world quite perfectly.

File: br2049_statue.jpg (957KB, 1768x742px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 1768x742px

The film will be pure visual storytelling with the classic Villeneuve slow tension building narrative and /tv/ will immediately call it "boring" and "nothing happens".
Screencap if you want.

>>87554695
/tv/eddit loved sicario desu

>>87554695
Is this some BLACKED statue?

>>87554695
>caring what pleb Marvel dickriding board thinks
I'm just here to piss off those niggers

>>87554695
i agree this will be ~90% slow-burning with an action climax towards the end
I am certain most of /nutv/ will hate it, those fucking plebs probably are /v/tards who suffer from ADHD

>orange/blue contrast
What is this? Late 2000s/early 2010s?

Aside from Alien Covenant this is the only film I'm seeing at the cinema this year, hope it doesnt suck like Covenant did

>>87552473
>he thinks wins matters
Only thing that matters at that jew-hack infested rathole they call the Oscars is how much hype and money a movie generated

>>87554159
>it's a normies now hate leto because of Suicide Squad

He's been doing films for fucking ages and is usually good in them

Fuck off back to R.eddit

>>87552586
xd

>>87554104
>black scientist
>police chief woman
>Leto trailer line "muh slaves"
yes, no

File: dunkirk224.jpg (1MB, 1400x1021px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1400x1021px

>>87555037
Just be aware that you are currently missing out on one of the best cinema experience of recent times that is Dunkirk.

>>87553737
wow,great post

>>87551398
>not coatshit

>>87553975
When you have these big names known for their skill within cinematography, you don't really want to restrict their creative freedom.
I feel like Blade Runner isn't as much about its visuals as it is about its atmosphere.
I am more than confident Villeneuve and the talented people he is working with are perfectly capable of capturing that emotional neo-noir feeling the original had without completely recreating previous elements.

File: 1492271668882.png (596KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1600x1200px

Reminder that this film will be nothing but a warm up for Villeneuve before he directs the Kinos of all kinos

>>87554695
Siciario and Prisoners were pleb as fuck. Enemy was Kino, arrival was okay

>>87555272
What does "pleb as fuck" mean? How can a film be "pleb"? Are you by any chance a mentally challenged autist?

>>87555387
t. Pleb

>>87556152
reddit

>>87555387
Not him, but the usage of "pleb" is pretty commonly known to refer as something of lesser value that is widely enjoyed by the average viewer

i.e "death note was a good adaptation", "only plebs enjoy capeshit"

>>87556205
You can refer to individual people as "pleb", not films themselves.

>>87552113
woah..

>>87552562
Lubezki and Deakins are among the best living cinematographers. Only a retarded contrarian would disagree with that.

>>87553737
Are you retarded?

>>87554102
I agree with everything but Dunkirk was a 7 at best desu

File: 998399.jpg (94KB, 600x917px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 600x917px

I wish they'd make a normal adaptation of the book not a shity pointless sequel
Fuck Scott he ruined such a good story

What did Leto do to prepare for his role?

>>87553975
> it NEEDS to capture the aesthetic of the first
30 years have passed, the world is different
Would a sequel to a 1987 film based in the present real world need the aesthetics of 1987 or 2017?

Johan Johansson was fired and replaced with Hans Zimmer its gonna be shit

>>87556697
Isnt Flying Lotus involved in the soundtrack aswell?

>>87556687
blinded himself

>>87556747
Holy shit picked up

>>87556419
It doesn't hold the same meaning as it did during the Roman age

Refering to something as pleb points to it being part of pleb culture, much of the same of saying that living in the streets of Rome meant you probably belonged in that caste

>>87551158
It'll be better than the first


Blade runner is great but it's also pretty fucking boring, and its one of my fave films

File: nice.webm (2MB, 1980x825px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1980x825px

>>87556697
>Hans Zimmer

>>87556844
He was at Moogfest dropping not so subtle hints on a project he was working on that he wasnt allowed to talk about (it was fucking obvious it was bladerunner though he wasnt even trying to hide it)

>>87556697
He wasn't fired you dumbfuck, Zimmer came in way late in the post production process and not just him but Wallfisch also, probably because a few scenes didn't work out as they wanted in the editing room so they came in to rearrange a few already made tracks or so. They mainly worked arrangement and composition in the tracks for it to compliment the original Vangelis score because Johannsson is more of an ambient "one note" composer.

>>87555258
I'm relatively excited for this, but I think after BR he's going to make another movie before this.

>>87552383
>digital camera
DROPPED

>>87554323
>le /v/ boogeymen

>>87554865
>le /v/ boogeymen

>>87554310
>without sharing an exact visual style
>implying they're even close to being similar in any way
>plot connection to the first film
We both know that probably is also untrue. Ford will likely die in the first 10 minutes and the only thing similar to the first film will be use of the words 'replicant' and 'Blade Runner'.
We already know the film is about the Goose, Ford is just going to be exposition for a scene before dying.

>>87557245
>Ford will likely die in the first 10 minutes and the only thing similar to the first film will be use of the words 'replicant' and 'Blade Runner'. We already know the film is about the Goose, Ford is just going to be exposition for a scene before dying.
All of this sounds great, I hope Ford dies as soon as possible in the film.

>>87557064
Why? Digital is superior to celluloid film in every way.

>>87557308
Nah. You can upscale film to higher resolutions. Thank God the shot older films on film. Means we can upscale them to high resolutions. I don't know if modern digital can be as well upscaled.

>>87551158
>2h 43m
wow. it's going to be shit then, huh?

>>87557897
Don't worry Thor will be playing the next month for you!

>>87557172
>>87557229
Fuck off /v/ermin.

>>87554102
>now
this is the first time i've been on here in a couple years and nothing much has changed desu

>>87551158
>there were seriously people who doubted in Villeneuve
for shame
>>87551800
this

>Ford aged
Looks like he's human.

>>87557283
>>87557245
Ford is coming in in the 3rd act of the movie.

>>87552680
what won that year? it better not have been that furious pete movie where he drives around in a go kart

>>87558000
nah he's a replicant. Ridley says so! and I believe him over literally everyone else involved in the book and screenwriting and production. Ridley is right! Has been for decades!

File: 1499667850026.png (291KB, 430x430px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 430x430px

>>87551158
>overlong trash like any capeshit these days or the annual Transporters
>orange and blue gud vs ebil it's like poddery :D

it will be hot garbage but because it's MUH VILLENEUVE MUH DEAKINS fedora redditors will call it kino and whatnot.

>>87558130
The "orange and blue" is just a complimentary colorway in color grading that's been used from the start of the use of color in any art form, but autists on the Internet like you caught up to that only a year or two ago and now just screech ORAMGE AN BLU just because they heard of the term somewhere and thinking that that some kind of argument.
Yeah it's a terrible poster but that is not an argument.

>>87558130
DUDE CONTRARIANISM LMAO

File: vlcsnap-2016-11-20-21h38m09s025.jpg (332KB, 1920x834px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1920x834px

>>87558034
The Revenant.

>>87551158
>Jared Letho
>Ryan Memeling
No, it'll be garbage.

>>87552562
Well that's a unique opinion.

File: Can't think of a hot new filename.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>87554695
Now you know my pain in Better Call Saul threads.

File: 1502561951001.jpg (77KB, 563x467px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 563x467px

>>87551158
>>87552113
those colors tho

File: sicario.jpg (2MB, 5400x3035px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5400x3035px

>>87558547
While the framing and composition in The Revenant is undoubtedly beautiful, I would still give it to Deakins that year because the visuals in Sicario actually tell a story, while in The Revenant most of it is empty pretty visuals and long take gimmicks which Lubezki has done a million times already.
Not to mention that half of The Revenant visuals are ripped straight from Tarkovsky, especially the dream sequences.

>>87552728
You mean they didn't make it 20 hours and 49 minutes

>>87551158

>kino incoming

Always distrustful of movies where the trailers tell the entire story including revealing plot twists, typically a surefire sign of shite.

Seeing as nobody answered me in my thread, should i watch the Final cut or the Director's cut of the first one?

>>87559286

Final cut, without a doubt

>>87559286
Watch the Final Cut.

>>87559336
>>87559342

The final cut looks like someone vomited blue on it

>>87551158
>firmament

Flat earth confirmed

>>87551792
>original blade runner was shit anyways
wew lad

File: bladerunner-old-vs-new.jpg (912KB, 2500x2100px) Image search: [Google]

912KB, 2500x2100px

Yeah, this is just going to be an absolute visual masterpiece.

Pic definitely related.

>>87559463
Im surprised they even did something that bold did they not think flat earthers were gonna clock onto if?

>>87559625
They were never going to be able to replicate the original's aesthetics.
There's a grim and grittiness to the original that is fantastic.

>ywn put your arms around Ana de Armas

why live

>>87559625
>nitpicking
i know it's bait but damn you are a spineless faggot

>>87559625
everything is just too clean

>>87559729
They could try.

>>87559914
That would require them giving a shit.

>>87559625
Is this the power of film?????????? How can digital even compete.

>>87558413
>a year or two

Try 10 years. I remember this was a meme when I was in high school 10 years ago.

>>87559885

>everything is just too clean

Not only clean, but also that shitty lighting, maybe everthing looking sterile was part of the director's vision, but it sure doesn't help make it interesting to watch.

>>87558413
Orange and blue is overused in movie posters and it started to show up on movie posters a decade ago. Shut the fuck up.

>>87558130
t. rebbit

>>87559625
>4 different locations on the left
>2 on the right
so fair and unbiased

>>87558012
Proving my point even further that it has nothing to do with the original film except the title

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7BF1nK9Jek

This new Mad Max movie looks great.

>>87559625
>Blade Runner
>Wright designed Deckard's home
>Blade Runner 2
>Unpleasantly lit cheap generic apartment
Why?

>>87560351
>cheap generic
It reflects the quality of this new movie

File: obvious bait.jpg (55KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 625x626px

>>87551398
>Blade Runner
>capeshit

>>87557823
>You can upscale film to higher resolutions.
>Being this retarded
Celluloid is in higher quality than what home video currently offers, they aren't being 'upscaled'.

>>87559625
I hope you just baiting

>>87559625
>film vs digital

File: ennis-house.jpg (98KB, 520x337px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 520x337px

>>87560351
>Just looked up Ennis House
Holy shit it's real! I can't believe a building like that exists, in the middle of LA no less. It looks like an ancient aztec temple re-purposed into a mansion.

>>87551187

>IMAX

gonna drive a couple hours to see this in a dolby cinema senpai

i hope i made the right decision, its going to have dolby vision and dolby atmos mix, first movie i will hear with dolby atmos

>>87559625
This picture says all you need to know about the current state of Hollywood

>>87560780
I'm pretty sure you can pick a few visually non extravagant frames from the original Blade Runner and compare it with some of the more "DENSE" visually pleasing frames from the new one and make the same argument. Nitpicking.

>>87560948
Try it, you really can't. Even Tyrell's place didn't look that dull.
The original had way too much personality in every shot.

>>87560948
It really isn't. The new movie looks too clean, too neat.

Even the scene that takes place in a junkyard >>87560110 looks wrong.

>>87560948
The original is perfect in literally every frame.

>>87560395
you havent even watched it yet

>>87559625
did you really just use the same scene for 3 pictures you retard

>>87559625
fucking hell
I don't know what's more depressing:
-that you actually posted this thinking that cherry-picking counts as an argument since there are several easily-available trailers showing how biased this is
-that people are actually being persuaded by this crap

Just nuke /tv/, it's beyond saving

>>87561323
I haven't, but the warning signs that his movie will suck are all there famalam.

File: screen-shot-2017-05-08-at-1-09-13-pm.jpg (25KB, 676x282px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 676x282px

>>87561036
>The new movie looks too clean, too neat.
You're all acting like they wanted to make it gritty and dense like the original and made it "clean" by mistake.
It clearly doesn't try to look like exactly like the original, you think Deakins wouldn't shoot on film on the same camera with the same exact setup if he wanted for it to look exactly the same? And you can't argue about visuals until you see the film and if the visuals fit the narrative, making it look quite empty and clean is clearly a strong stylistic choice most probably because of the narrative which should support it.

>>87561572
Why bother making a sequel if you are not even trying to emulate the original's aesthetics though?

The world that this movie takes place in doesn't look like the world of the original movie. Might as well make a new movie and not a Blade Runner sequel.

File: br.jpg (187KB, 1740x1729px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1740x1729px

>omg why does the original film look so dull and uninteresting?

>>87554104

fuck ana de armas is so beauitful
are we going to see her tits in this movie?

File: confused memester.png (102KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 300x256px

>>87561842
>there are people who would unironically take the troglodyte on the left over Ana De Armas

File: kinographié.jpg (2MB, 5760x3615px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5760x3615px

>>87551158
Kino

File: goose.jpg (41KB, 630x250px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 630x250px

>>87561842
>yfw contrarians will actually claim the new film looks bad

>>87561842
where are these screencaps coming from. Is the movie out?

>>87561842
>>87561914
b-but I thought digital looked poopy?

>>87561914
Prometheus looks exactly like this

>>87561842
>Original has better lighting
>Original has better sets
>Original has better atmosphere
>Original has better costume design

I think you failed to make a point there broseph.

>>87561784
>The world that this movie takes place in doesn't look like the world of the original movie.
Maybe, just maybe that's the whole point of it???

>>87561968
Yes, Prometheus looks great anon.

>>87561977
o you've seen it already?

>>87561977
>Original has better lighting
Low-key lighting! omg so original and cool!
>Original has better sets
Yeah bland rooms with nothing going on is certainly better than crowded cities and dusty ruins
>Original has better atmosphere
This is totally something you can tell from still images
>Original has better costume design
Case dull outfits that you'd see in everyday life are so much better than original realistic costumes which pop right?

Fuck off idiot

>>87561992
The whole point is that this movie has nothing to do with the first one?

Really activates those almonds.

>>87561936
Trailers lad

>>87561964
I'm the second guy you quoted, I'm not being a dour contrarian arsewipe like the others, I genuinely want to see this movie, it looks awesome

>>87561968
Prometheus was very grey, a very different sort of colour palette and visual aesthetic. It was a good movie though.

>>87552680
>that one soldier struggling to get his NV on

>>87562077
The point is that 30 years passed and the world is a different place now.
The film is still heavily stylized just like the original and clearly going for the same level of visual storytelling and focus on atmosphere with exploring the grey are inbetween right and wrong (like with most Villeneuve films), just a different execution most probably because of the different narrative.

Why would you want it to be exactly like the original? What's the point of making a new one if it's exactly the same thing?
Imagine if Fury Road was exactly the same as Road Warrior.

File: 1498177690990.jpg (48KB, 750x440px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 750x440px

I don't know why, but the shot of Dave Bautista in the trailer looks most "Blade Runner" to me out of all of them.

>>87562760
He looks like a otherworldly mongoloid, which helps with the whole eerie "unfamiliarity in the familiar" feel.

>>87562367
>What's the point of making a new one if it's exactly the same thing?

I wish you worked on the new star wars

File: 144881944297.jpg (154KB, 489x535px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 489x535px

>>87561889
I prefer left
She reminds me of Dorothy

>>87560035
Except there's no location in the original that looks anything like that brightly lit, monocolor room in the sequel. Deckard's apartment is cluttered and dingy.

>>87563433
wait, let me get this straight
are you saying, right, are you saying that interior decorating has changed in 30 years? seriously?
woah

>>87563433
>Except there's no location in the original that looks anything like that brightly lit, monocolor room in the sequel.
And that's bad why?

>>87563433
>Except there's no location in the original that looks anything like that brightly lit, monocolor room in the sequel.
How the fuck do you know, have you seen the whole movie? And in any case that means it's okay to reuse the same scene? You fucking moron.

>>87551158
shit