this is what rotten tomatoes' editors look like

File: 1350583241663.png (210KB, 600x857px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 600x857px

>99% white with a handful of nonwhites
it's like old /tv/
how do we go back

>this entire fucking article
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/business/media/rotten-tomatoes-box-office.html

Film execs deserve to be strapped to the front of a minivan and sent on their marry way

They look like rotten tomatoes.
Surprise surprise.

File: 1504974924272.jpg (291KB, 2048x1537px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 2048x1537px

What's Ice Cube doing there?

>>87522647
Totally not surprised

File: ghostbusters.jpg (122KB, 750x845px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 750x845px

>>87522647
Fuck Liberal Tomatos.

>b-but it's not reviewing films
They blacklist anyone that isn't a liberal.

>>87522888
Why the hell does that fuckhead Rex Reed's reviews show up so often then? You're talking out of your ass

>>87522647
>>87522888
t. butthurt movie execs

>>87522692
Woa, you know basing something on a race is still a racism, right? I mean, i don't know how today's protesters work, but they call hate speech against anyone racist, but when it comes to white people it's ok. Racism is literally differentiating one race from others.

>>87522647
Not enough niggers, they are raceist scum it seems.

>>87522888
I'll give you five seconds to think of a different, more plausible explanation

...

Done?
Here's the thing: all of those liberal film journalists had already gotten in on milking the "look how much the disgusting anti-feminists hate it" cow and would never in a million years end up admitting that the film was soulless

>>87522647
who do they make the black guy sit in the back of the office?

>white """"""""people""""""""

>>87523029
Embarrassing

>>87523029
WHEN