So now that the It remake has gotten so much praise which means we may be getting more R Rated horror, is there hope we get a movie adaption of the F.E.A.R. game?
F.E.A.R. 1 and 2 are absolutely fucking terrifying and if done right this would be a masterpiece in the cinema!
>>87502189
No, not really. I love the first F.E.A.R. plus the expansion packs but it's really fucking stupid.
>>87502189
It's basically The Ring with guns.
I mean, if you changed the story to be a whole lot more disempowering, then it could be cool:
>Team of 3 soldiers investigating offices of Armacham.
>Face some resistance
>Power cut
>Get separated
>There's something else here.
>Bullet-time as a metaphor for heightening insanity
>Continue w/ mission to find documentation on what's really going on.
>Elevator music
>90s style offices interior decoration
i don't know it could work.
>>87503775
I was replaying FEAR and thinking of how it could ever be adapted and came to the same conclusion.
The original story couldnt work as a movie unless they changed it up and added a lot of flashbacks for exposition, but thatd sacrifice the atmosphere and spirit of FEAR for the sake of a mediocre story.
>>87502189
Bit too late for that. The scary-japanese-girl era has come and gone.
>>87505422
Instead of a movie, perhaps a series with hour long episodes? then again that'd be fucking ridiculous budget and the rating could drop
>>87502189
mfw HE WIPED OUT THE WHOLE SQUAD
>>87503775
Every idea is uwe boll tier
>>87502189
1. They are not "terrifying".
2. Video game films will never be good. Ever.
I love the games but no.
>terrifying
90% of the game is shooting the same fucking 3 soldiers over and over again